User talk:Mareklug

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

I rarely check my discussion page here. Please contact me on the English Wikipedia: [1] or the Polish one: [2], or send email. Thanks.

Contents

Prace-prawa autorskie[edit]

Witam Wszystkie prace są mojego autorstwa ,oprócz tej wrzuconej Anne Sexton. Mapa jest całkowicie mojego autorstwa -pracowałam dla wydawnictwa kartograficznego - mam wiele robionych map przez siebie [mam umowę spisaną na te prace .Tworzyłam to w Ocad 7].Mapa nie była z niczego skanowana. Bezpośrednio wyszła z programu Ocad7.Poprawię jakość tego fragmentu,bo główne pliki są w skrótach .ocd i muszę jekonwertować na .jpg Akwarela była sfotografowana aparatem fotograficznym - nie uzywam skanera. Co mam w takim wypadku uwzględnić? "Stawa" jest mojego autorstwa. Jestem plastyczką i zajmuję się fotografią od lat. Nie mam zwyczaju podawać się pod cudze prace.Moje galerie znajdują się na różnych serwisach,m.in na stronie prywatnej:

O plik ze zdjęciem Anne Sexton przepraszam i nie wiem,jak go usunąć. Mam nadzieję,że to wszystko wyjaśniłam.Jestem osobą uczciwą i zapoznałam się z informacjami na temat praw autorskich. W innym wypadku nie wrzucałabym ich do Wikipedii.

Z poważaniem,pozdrawiam :)

Monika K. - --Bastet78 22:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)bastet78

Flaga[edit]

Ponieważ o czym pisałem w tamtej dyskusji: flaga Polski zgodnie z treścią ustawy to pas biały i czerwony!

Pozdrawiam --WarX 22:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Flags of Poland[edit]

Unprotected. But please add a full explanation about the changes in the image page at the Commons. See also my reply at the Village pump. Lugusto҉ 15:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

screeny z kolorkami[edit]

Aaaaa cośty nawrzucał!

Jeżeli stronka ma na dole all rights reserved, a ta najwyraźniej ma, to takie screeny to NPA!

Weź to sobie powrzucaj na pl.wiki z info, że to tymczasówka, bo tutaj, to niestety muszę skasować!

Pozdrawiam --WarX 10:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Coat of arms of Poland-official.png[edit]

Sprawdź proszę, czy dobrze opisałem. Pozdrawiam, Nux (talk··dyskusja) 14:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

jeszcze flagi[edit]

Witaj. Są jeszcze dwa opuszczone głosowania:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Flag_of_Poland_-_dimensions.svg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Polska_vlajka_rozmery.png

Bez głosu za skasowaniem będą tkwić i tkwić... Julo 13:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Armenia[edit]

Thank you for yelling at me and insulting me. Helps me understand what am I dealing with. But I ask you respect the official policy of Wikipedia which says No original research. Now if you consider Armenian minister of foreign affaris (we colour many other countries based on decisions by MFA) to be some bloody chap who has no idea what is he talking about then it's your choice but he is the highly positioned official of Armenia and should be respected as such. Twisting "Foreign Minister of Armenia Vartan Oskanian, stated that Armenia has no intention to recognize independence of Kosovo and that "Granting independence to Kosovo, the international community violated the legal norms but forgot Karabakh"." to your likings will not change the fact that Armenia will not recognize Kosovo and that it considers such move illegal. --Avala 16:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Unlike recognition, countries that don't recognise do not make an official document about this as they legally consider the situation unchanged. Only countries which have made some kind of official document that they do not recognise are Serbia and Romania. All other countries have made their positions clear through statements of their ministers or leaders. Now about your threats - as an admin on one of Wikipedia projects I am obliged to remind you of No personal attacks official policy. Also removal of sourced content is called vandalism. If my understanding of the matter wasn't supported by few other users I would have doubted I was right but considering you are the only person who disagrees and you are defending your position not on facts but on aggressive and rude comments I believe my position is right. --Avala 17:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

misunderstanding[edit]

I really hope you have just misunderstood the section "States that support further negotiations under UN auspices or disagree with unilateral moves." when you removed countries which are advocating further talks. I really believe you had no bad intentions and that it was just a misunderstanding on your behalf. --Avala 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you understand the fact that removing material that is sourced is called vandalism? There is nothing to resolve here, it can only be reverted. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a forum. So if you dislike the position of some country you can go to a political discussion forum and express your opinion there or even campaign for a president and then make your own politics but removing sourced information on positions of countries on some issue just for the sole reason you dislike these positions is not what we are looking for here. If you blank the information we have added with sources it doesn't change reality and will be soon reverted. And it seems you are into this blanking as you did it with other countries as well but when other users warned you, you did stop blanking those but you have also moved to blanking others. --Avala 19:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Final warning[edit]

Please stop your upload war or you will be blocked from editing. I have protected both Kosovo-related maps; please discuss changes before further uploading. Thanks, Boricuæddie 19:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I am not here to decide who is right; let the community do that, at the Village Pump. I am not here to solve the dispute, I'm here to make sure that our rules are not broken and our website is not disrupted. You were both defending your POVs, and, if you continue to do this, you will both be blocked. I cannot take sides here. I'm sorry. Good day. --Boricuæddie 23:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but there should be consensus on a change before I unprotect the images. Alternatively, you can wait for the protection to expire. Cheers, Boricuæddie 23:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Russia[edit]

Russia could only recognize Kosovo's independence within the framework of international law, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Saturday. "If such a compromise is found, we will agree," Putin was quoted by Russian news agencies as telling the press after meeting with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the first foreign leader to visit Russia since the country's March 2 presidential election. - [3] - does this justify painting Russia in khaki? I mean they might recognize it one day so it's khaki, no? --Avala 14:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

No, it wouldn't justify painting Russia khaki, because of other evidence: They took a formal position against, in principle, in the UN Security Council. They are officially on record as refuting the declaration. Please don't do "reductio ad absurdum". Slovakia, on the other hand, is genuinely undecided, and Bosnia in the words of its own president "won't recognize soon" and otherwise has not made any representations as a state. Cuba neither. Indonesia, Sudan, Egypt - neither. Your point? --Mareklug talk 14:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
And Slovakian PM said (who has the power not the President because Slovakia is not a presidential system but parliamentary) that Slovakia is not going to recognize Kosovo while the President said he thinks it might happen in few years. On the other hand we have Czech R. where the government said that Czech R. is going to recognize while the President said he is against. How come you didn't paint Czech R. in khaki then? Mój punkt? Wy dajecie źródła albo wy przerywacie wasze czyny. Wasze czyny spowodowały tylko krzywda dotychczas - 3 były zamykane i jedzicie mapa była przesuwana. Dziękuję --Avala 14:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Forget the honorable Slovakian president. Concentrate on what the Foreign Minister said on the 21st, as sourced by SKToday.com on en wiki talk page of the international reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence article. Your only reaction to that was, "Selective quoting", and giving a day older Chinese source that paraphrases the Prime Minister -- as you allude to him here. So. Prime Minister one day paraphrased by PRC source (hardly impartial). And his Foreign Minister, quoted in a Slovakian source a day later. You choose. --Mareklug talk 14:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

So you want SKtoday? Fico: Slovakia Won't Recognise Kosovo's Unilaterally-Declared Independence and Fico: Kosovo's Independence Resembles Munich Agreement Fico also said that Slovakia has the right to its own stance, and shares the same view on Kosovo with several other EU-member states, including Spain. So are you still saying Slovakia is neutral? --Avala 14:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, let us consider your evidence presented here for the first time:
  • The first source is from 10 December 2007. I dismiss it as outdated, and of no consequnce to determining Slovakia's position TODAY.
  • The second source contains this sentence: "Referring to the four-month period that Slovak Foreign Minister Jan Kubis said is necessary for Slovakia to consider recognising Kosovo, Fico stressed that this doesn't mean that the country will automatically acknowledge Kosovo's independence when the given period expires."
Dear Avala. That means that for the next 4 months they are by definition khaki as in delaying decision by evaluating it. Please come to your senses. --Mareklug talk 14:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
So it comes to choice between your interpretation and Robert Fico's words. With all due respect I think PM of Slovakia, Robert Fico, knows the position of Slovakia better. --Avala 16:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
What "your interpretation"? Did I interpret? Read the words from the source you gave: "Referring to the four-month period that Slovak Foreign Minister Jan Kubis said is necessary for Slovakia to consider recognising Kosovo, Fico stressed that this doesn't mean that the country will automatically acknowledge Kosovo's independence when the given period expires.". Come back 4 months from now, cuz that's when Slovakia will recognize or not. Until then, "delaying recognition" = khaki. --Mareklug talk

Image:Kosovo stub.svg[edit]

I see.Thank you for pointing it out.Eale 02:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days[edit]

Octagon-warning.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Upload-war. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 20:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I am very, very unhappy, to have been blocked, and that, after I already gave up fixing vandalism by User:Avala. In all my Commons/Wikipedia activity since 2005, I have never been blocked on Commons, and I was once blocked for 1 hour on the Polish Wikipedia, also recently, and also in the context of reverting vandalism. Be that as it may, I regret having come to this outcome.

However, I take issue with Mr. Avala's edits, the whole cloth, both the Kosovo_relations maps on Commons and on English Wikipedia, sum total edits in the article about the international reaction to 2008 Kosovo independence declaration.

User:Avala, w:User:Tocino, and w:User:Top Gun are engaged in a tag-team wrestling-like effort of skewing reality in the service of a Serbia government POV. This is particularly distressing, as User:Avala represents himself as an administrator on the Serb Wikipedia. I am appalled to see that an administrator can exhibit such bad judgment and lack of objectivity, as well as engage in unmittigated edit-warring on two projects at once.

For evidence, I point you to the talk page and the revision history. In the context of the two Commons maps, for which defense I have been blocked (along with User:Avala), countries such as Brazil, Algeria, Cuba have been marked by User:Avala as officially rejecting Kosovo's independence, while they have officially not acted at all. Furthermore, I have demonstrated on the talk page of the article on the Wikipedia, that User:Avala synthesized a quote for the Brazilian Foreign Minister, and together with the other 2 named editors above, kept restoring this bogus content to the article. Such behavior speaks for itself, and if anything, demands administrative scrutiny as demonstrably damaging WIkipedia through persitent introduction and maintenance of fabrications. I'm sorry to have discovered myself blocked on Commons, and feel at least partly vindicated, seeikng that a person took a look at the actual content of these maps, and reverted them to my last version. I would like to add Monaco, a white-bordered dark blue circle, since otherwise Monaco is invisible against the identically Kosovo-recognizing background of France. I believe that as of 21 March 2008, that is the only missing content from an otherwise conservatively sourced and true map state. Is it possible for me to convey this fixed map for you to upload? Thank you, and best wishes, Saddened, --Mareklug talk 02:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

P.s. The aforementioned map with Monaco (dark-blue in a white flattened circle) is available here: pl:Grafika:Kosovo relations2.svg. Thank you, and once again, very sorry. --Mareklug talk 06:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Portugal[edit]

Actually, yeah - the Prime Minister issued a request to recognize Kosovo and brought it to the parliament twice - since the President opposes it. However the parliament twice discussed and with a majority decided not to recognize Kosovo, on the grounds that there is not an international view to the solution of the Kosovo status. --PaxEquilibrium 12:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Kosovo_relations2.svg


Image:Betancourt, 2007.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Betancourt, 2007.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 15:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

A copy of my reply posted on User talk:Mattbuck: Hi there. You acted too swiftly for me to be able to react. Could you tell me how this image constitutes copyvio? I obtained it from he Wiki, where it was uploaded and licenced with cc-by-2.5 by its author and original Flickr uploader. I transferred conscientiously all the history and info to Commons at the time. What is wrong with the image or its documentation? Furthermore, it is the original image from which an excerpt is installed on the Commons (just the daughter, with the rest of the image cropped). Thank you for explaining. --Mareklug talk 17:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for not explaining. The image may have been transwikied from he.wp, but the original image was from flickr, and was licenced as all rights reserved, which is not suitable for commons. Could you please give me a link to the excerpt, as that should also be deleted for the same reasons. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
It's Image:Melanie Betancourt 2007 x.JPG. Compare against: http://www.flickr.com/photos/francois_lafite/512675895/ --Mareklug talk 17:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC) P.s. I just wrote to the author appraising him of the situation and asking for a freely licensed image donation/upload to Commons, as we don't have a likeness of Ingrid Betancourt at all. --Mareklug talk 18:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:CountriesRecognizingKosovo.png[edit]

Hi. Back to semi for now. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Note[edit]

Good day, I thought you could take a look on this & following my suggestion & discuss on the talk page. Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 14:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:EU on kosovo independence.png[edit]

Hi,

I have protected this image because of a editwar. Since you worked on this image i would like to hear you opinion about what version should be used. The discussion can be found at Image talk:EU on kosovo independence.png

Thanks, Sterkebaktalk 17:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Mareklug!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 48a80e53c0349689b8385353974f8530[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 48a80e53c0349689b8385353974f8530


File:Chihuly_blue_chandelier_in_daylight_at_the_Phoenix_Botanical_Garden.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chihuly_blue_chandelier_in_daylight_at_the_Phoenix_Botanical_Garden.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Chihuly_glass_in_milwaukee.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chihuly_glass_in_milwaukee.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Chihuly_glass_in_the_Phoenix_Botanical_Garden.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chihuly_glass_in_the_Phoenix_Botanical_Garden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Portgdansk.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Portgdansk.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 53867ad20b87e2408c65e8429aac28cd[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Mareklug talk 09:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


File:MIA - Miami International Airport FAA diagram.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MIA - Miami International Airport FAA diagram.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--DieBuche (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Keflavík Airport south building interior.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Keflavík Airport south building interior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Fingalo (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:NKU-lake-1.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NKU-lake-1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   11:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Melanie Fronckowiak.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses File:Melanie Fronckowiak.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.

Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.


Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk bokmål | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | +/−

Denniss (talk) 19:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Blinking red - yanıp sönen kırmızı.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blinking red - yanıp sönen kırmızı.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mahir256 (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

File:Tea Who You Yeah Bunny greeting card by Mareklug, reverse.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tea Who You Yeah Bunny greeting card by Mareklug, reverse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

odder (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Katarzyna Rogowiec.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Katarzyna Rogowiec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.2.55.100 16:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Radiografia-Carmona-Close.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Radiografia-Carmona-Close.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jaranda wat's sup 02:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:SquareheadMarek-avatar-size (14267196781).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SquareheadMarek-avatar-size (14267196781).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LGA talkedits 07:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Marek greybeard sideways (14083956897).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marek greybeard sideways (14083956897).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pibwl (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Utah (back) Poems by Marek Lugowski, back cover, original 1st edition and printing (14083866428).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Utah (back) Poems by Marek Lugowski, back cover, original 1st edition and printing (14083866428).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pibwl (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Utah (front) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1995, original 1st edition and printing (14268431982).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Utah (front) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1995, original 1st edition and printing (14268431982).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pibwl (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Utah (overleaf front) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1995, original first edition and printing (14083866058).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Utah (overleaf front) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1995, original first edition and printing (14083866058).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pibwl (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Utah (title page) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1996, original first edition and printing (14267194231).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Utah (title page) Poems by Marek Lugowski, 1996, original first edition and printing (14267194231).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pibwl (talk) 16:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar of railway traffic direction[edit]

For the unashamed display of trenum inspiciens tremens in identifying an obviously north-american but quite blurred train as Canadian Pacific Railway locomotives run train, making it obvious even to a blind... I hereby award you this barnstar. Be it inspiration and pride of this unparalleled community of multimedia curators! Nemo 21:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
A magnificent barnstar and a magnificent barnstar legend, dear Nemo. I live to find out. Thank you kindly. --22:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)