User talk:Martin H.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Martin H)
Jump to: navigation, search

English | Español | Magyar | +/−


Mr 450 current photo[edit]

That photo i take by myself whit my samsung cell phone camera so its my own work NoelCruz (talk)NoelCruz User Talk:NoelCruz

Megatv Championship & Others[edit]

That photo was send me to my inbox on FB cause i have a Wrestling page so i dont violate ANY COPYRIGHT the other was FREE FOR USE the WWC Junior Heavyweight Championship is from Corner Tv authority cause the current champion take the photo and send us whit a message but if you got problems whit that i will dont upload Any File ANYMORE, BTW the Current photo of Current WWC Puerto Rico Champion are in public domain by Corner Tv my FB Wrestling fanpage any info

<script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script>

#WWC Ayer Mike Mendoza se corono Nuevo Campeon de PR ***Gracias a Michael Calvo Miranda por la foto-NC

Posted by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CornerTV">Corner TV</a> on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CornerTV/posts/499039143580741:0">Monday, May 18, 2015</a>

NoelCruz (talk)NoelCruz User Talk:NoelCruz

Archive Note[edit]

Page archived on January 10 2015, see the archive. --Martin H. (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File[edit]

Why was deleted de file Lega-Hospi2014.JPG in WikiCommons? The source is this web http://www.dleganes.net/2014/06/el-leganes-protagonizara-el-domingo-el.html It was allowed under commons 3.0, as you can see in the web. The other derivated from this image and, if I don't understand, a derivated work can't be hosted in WikiCommons.--Miguelazo84 (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Please see your talkpage. The license of that website is Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España which is not a free license because it disallows commercial reuse and modification. Wikimedia Commons can only host free content. Restrictions on where or how a file can be used are not acceptable here. See Commons:Project_scope/es#Debe estar bajo licencia libre o en dominio público. --Martin H. (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
which is the conmercial use?--Miguelazo84 (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Only "by-sa" (Attribution-ShareAlike), "by" (Attribution), and "sa" (ShareAlike) licenses are permitted. All "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) licenses are not acceptable. Why commercial reuse must be allowed for inclusion in our free content projects is outlined in Commons:Licensing. Freedom as defined in http://freedomdefined.org/Definition is the core principle of our projects. --Martin H. (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Danke --Miguelazo84 (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Alfred Krauth[edit]

Hallo Martin H.,

du hattest vor ein paar Jahren zwei Fotos von diesem Fotografen hochgeladen und die Category:Alfred Krauth sowie die Creator-Vorlage angelegt. Als Todesjahr gabst du 1939 an. Jetzt gibt es den Artikel de:Alfred Krauth mit Todesjahr 1956, das auf der angegebenen Literatur von 2005 beruht. Die Landesbibliographie Baden-Württemberg sowie darauf basierend die Dt. Nationalbibliothek und VIAF übernehmen dieses Todesjahr. Wie kamst du auf 1939? Ich konnte keine entsprechende Angabe finden, bei der Bayer. Staatsbibliothek habe ich die Bilder gefunden, aber da steht nur der Name des Fotografen ohne Lebensdaten. Liegt ein Versehen vor? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Creator-Vorlage mit Angabe des PND-Link erstellt, deshalb gehe ich davon aus dass die Information von dort stammt und der Datensatz mittlweile eine Korrektur erfahren hat. Wenn ich Creator angelegt habe, die keinen Wikipediaartikel haben, und ich andere Quellen für Lebensdaten als PND habe, schreibe ich die normalerweise in die Zusammenfassung (z.B. Creator:Franz Langhammer) oder ins Referenzfeld (z.B. Creator:Catharina Escherich). Ich mache nicht so viel im Creator-Namensraum, daher sind die Beispiele aus der Zeit in der ich Alfred Krauth angelegt habe.
Besser nachvollziehen kann ich es leider nicht, ich stimme aber zu dass die Lebensdaten vermutlich nicht stimmen. --Martin H. (talk) 23:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
... da auch eine Suche als petitio principii, das Todesdatum vorraussetzend, keine Ergebnisse liefert die auf die Existenz eines gleichnamigen Fotografen - oder auf einen Fehler bei der gängigen Beschreibung des in Wikipedia aufgenommen Fotografen hinweisen. --Martin H. (talk) 23:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

OK, danke. Dateien, Kategorie und Vorlage dann bis Wiederherstellung 2027 löschen? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 16:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Dateien stimme ich zu. Kategorie und Creator-Vorlage können nach Korrektur bestehen bleiben. --Martin H. (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Sind gelöscht. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Response to message[edit]

Thank you for your message, Martin. This is a question I've had for awhile: when I take a photo of a piece of art, do I own the rights to the photograph and/or can I use it on Wikipedia without worry of copyright infringement?

In the U.S. case law denies copyright for faithful reproductions of 2D artworks created by photography or similar processes, see COM:ART. In case there is a copyright on the photo You do own the copyright on the photograph, but the photograph is a derivative work of the painting. The copyright holder of the painting has to agree to any publication. --Martin H. (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


Robin Windsor image from Flicker[edit]

Hello Can you explain why the image for Robin has been deleted, it is from Flickr, it has a common licence 2.0 which was referenced and the URL was linked as well? Thanks

The license is unfree, commercial reuse and modification isnt allowed. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain. -Martin H. (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

. Hello! It is the Hungarian name of the book (Felvidékünk - Honvédségünk / Trianontól-Kassáig), publishers (Vitézi rend Zrinyi csoportjuának kiadása, Budapest, 1939). Free is because it has more than 70 years. I do not know English so please give thee there a source, if not as a reset I will not deal with it. I do not care, more pictures do not photograph well. Thank you!--Luppus (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:President Joko Widodo in Official Portrait 2014.jpg[edit]

Martin, could you briefly explain why did you tag that file? It seems to comply with the Indonesia.gov license. Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

The publication contains a copyright notice. The copyright tag not applies if "the Copyright is declared to be protected by law or regulation or by statement on the work itself or at the time the work is published". --Martin H. (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Flickr copyright[edit]

hi, I am writing to ask if I go to the site Flickr, and I find a 'image d' era where I know the 'author and I know that has been dead for 70 years, however, the picture belongs to an' other person l 'has loaded, but you could upload that same image, knowing that the 'author died and then the copyright has expired? :) --80.116.32.245 10:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Olusegun Obasanjo and Jimmy Carter-03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Olusegun Obasanjo and Jimmy Carter-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Monopoly31121993 (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Discussion of image description formatting[edit]

Hello, Martin. There is a proposal for a style guideline for image descriptions at the Village Pump. Previously, you have expressed an opinion about such formatting. Please feel free to join in the discussion! — hike395 (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Pictures deleted[edit]

I have seen you have deleted ALL the pictures. I must think now that I have to re upload those that you mentioned (cat, ribbons?). Those with the AEAColl in their back were also mine. I can reupload them then?

Morover, I would like you to tell me about the Coats of Arms? I am the Representant of the Bourbons of Bhopal in Andorra and I was asked to create the coat of arms. It is my own work. Give me an email and I will show you evidence of that. Same with the Andorran arms.

You erased all the ribbon pictures, even if you said I could keep them as own work, because they ARE! Now I have to go page per page replacing the ribbons!!

Alexeinikolayevichromanov (talk) 13:15, 21 February 2015

File: Amelia Valcarcel.jpg[edit]

Greetings, relative to the image: Amelia Valcarcel.jpg I am the author of this photograph. If has been used on occasion I have rights and it is ok the licensed in Flickr Mujeres en Red referenced in the photography. Not applicable deletion at all. We can talk in Spanish? Thaks!

See answer on your talkpage: I started a deletion discussion, discussion can take place there. --Martin H. (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Morning stretch.jpg[edit]

I was granted written permission from the copyright holder for the use of this photo after i explained the terms of the commons licence. This is the conversation:

[conversation removed]

I always seek permission from the copyright holder before I upload any image to wikipedia (the same is true for all the images I have uploaded and I can provide written authorization for all). Please let me know if you need anything further. --Geneticcuckoo (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Forwarding the copyright holders written permission to COM:OTRS is always required. There is an email template at Commons:Email templates#Declaration of consent for all inquiries. --Martin H. (talk) 10:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Files by Mboix[edit]

Please close the deletion request and explain in detail what Mboix needs to do to prove they took the pics. You should have engaged before opening the deletion request. Those pics are legit, we are going to be doing events in Spain to upload similar high quality pics, and the last thing we need is someone like Mboix who is friendly to free licenses and wishes to upload to Commons to be utterly discouraged by random deletions and silence. I kindly ask you to take responsibility, and lead this new user through this. Thanks --Raystorm (¿Sí?) 00:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The deletion discussion is the perfect place. It is open for comments in any language. Im not able to explain copyrights to a spanish user, particularily here where the user already got a wrong understanding of licensing. For example uploading various photographers works to flickr and using flickr for license laundering. --Martin H. (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
It's a horrible way for a new user to figure out how commons works. I am aware of your opinion on the matter, but that is not relevant: what has been asked of you is to please explain how Mboix can prove authorship in a satisfactory manner. If you are unable to do so, please point me to someone who does know so we can all stop wasting our time and energy like this. Raystorm (¿Sí?) 19:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Simple. For self created photos upload the original files. Using flickr for licensing instead of uploading to Commons direclty is worst practice but ok, its an acceptable method. The question here is if the flickr account is a fake account or a photographers account, finding copies of facebook images on flickr doesnt make it look like a photographers account.
For not self-created photos provide written permission to COM:OTRS. Uploading not self-created files to flickr first is not helpful here, it will never make things easier and it is not a way to bypass our processes.
Remember that the user (account) on Commons always is one person. An employee who operates an account for a company always uploads not self-created works. --Martin H. (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for this. I think photographers find easier uploading pics to flickr than commons. How could mboix prove the flickr account is legit? I will explain in Spanish about uploading the originals here, but perhaps it is far easier to prove that the flickr account it is a photographers account. How do we do so? Raystorm (¿Sí?) 17:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Mboix has uploaded the original, does this serve? --Raystorm (¿Sí?) 22:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
For the photo File:Amelia Valcarcel.jpg sure, for the photos with different author information see Commons:OTRS. --Martin H. (talk) 15:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I read otrs has a backlog of 45 days. Will the pics be deleted in the meantime? Any chance of closing the deletion request while the bureaucracy is happening? Raystorm (¿Sí?) 11:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Images_from_LIFE_Photo_Archive,_location_Indian_Territory[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Images_from_LIFE_Photo_Archive,_location_Indian_Territory has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Lamiced[edit]

please speedy delete my account commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Lamiced

Lamiced

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Von mir eben gesperrt worden, Benutzerdiskussionsseite geleert. --Didym (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

My images[edit]

Regarding File:MAB with Nehru.jpg, the picture was taken in 1954 when Bangladesh was part of Pakistan. Under Pakistani copyright laws, the image is in the public domain because it was published before 1962. It has been 61 years, so it should also be in the public domain in Bangladesh. The persons in the picture are also deceased. So it can kept right?

And regarding the dozen or more archaeological images I've uploaded, they are from Banglapedia, which is a public domain internet space of the Government of Bangladesh. FoP applies here. I can still work to bring a permission from the Bangladeshi Asiatic Society, which first published these images.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Banglapedia is not public domain. The page is copyrighted and gives a clear copyright statement http://www.banglapedia.org/english/copyright.html. The photos are not free to reuse, you need written permission.
You confuse FoP with a free license. FoP (Commons:Freedom of Panorama) is a concept that allows to reuse photos of architectural or artistic works without the written permission from the architect or for example sculptor. FoP is a limitation of the architects or artists copyright. Its not a limitation of the photographers copyright. A permission from the photographer for reuse of the photo under a free license is required in any case. --Martin H. (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
But MAB with Nehru.jpg is licensed under Pakistani copyright law, since it was taken before 1962. That one should not be deleted.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The requirement is that at least 50 years have passed since the end of the year of its publication. So a reference to a publication is required. --Martin H. (talk) 03:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

File:VOA Heinlein - Somali refugees September 2011 - 09.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:VOA Heinlein - Somali refugees September 2011 - 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JMWt (talk) 09:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent artistic portraits of historic people by Irena Bierwiaczonek[edit]

There is any way of keeping that images? The ones from the Polish artist or the portraits of the monarchs of Bohemia? --Mhmrodrigues (talk) 23:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyviol?[edit]

hi, prejudice, the marked a user who uploads images to overwriting other, here is the 'user Caarl 95 I would like to ask you if can control his contributions --82.50.39.138 20:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Тете Новоа.jpg[edit]

I did personaly asked the autor for the permition to use this photo. And he kindly gave me his permition to use it with his copyright. About the source of this picture, I left the link, but I'll left it here https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=271641189620101&set=a.260376470746573.59755.100003226656789&type=3&theater What information else I have to give to improve the status of this photo? May be I missunderstud about how to make everything right

See Commons:Permission. --Martin H. (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

More fish[edit]

Pi-gimjiRu is at it again, uploading dozens of fish images without copyright permission. I have nominated a few for deletion consideration but almost everything he has uploaded needs to be marked the same way. You appear to have done this successfully in the past— care to give it another shot?? KDS4444 (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Tagged as missing permission. --Martin H. (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Martin H./CatScan[edit]

Hallo, dieses durchaus nützliche Tool tut es nicht mehr seit dem Umzug des Toolservers. Magst Du es reparieren oder soll ich meinen Link dorthin löschen? Grüße, --Emha (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Ich nutze es selber nicht mehr und werds im moment nicht aktualisieren. --Martin H. (talk) 14:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyrights infringement?[edit]

Hi Martin. Could you check the latest images uploaded by Bato920203? He's already have copyright problems and I'm specially suspicious about this, this, this, this and this pictures. Many feel like scanned old pictures. Others are just models or renders. Slaudos,--Pedro Felipe (talk) 13:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Raju[edit]

Okey sir , now i am understand --Thank you--

राजु सुथार (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Franco Spain pictures[edit]

I admit I misinterpreted the words of PD-Spain and am completely fine if you delete these pictures:

File:El Generalísimo Franco.jpg
File:Generalissimo Francisco Franco.jpg
File:Francisco Franco 1923.jpg
File:Francisco Franco 1944.jpg
File:General Francisco Franco victory parade Spanish Civil War 1939.jpg
File:General Francisco Franco General Emilio Mola.jpg
File:Emilio Mola.jpg
File:Gonzalo Queipo de Llano.jpg
File:Francisco Franco Caudillo of Spain.jpg

Unless the 1923 picture is public domain because of the year or there is a government-published material PD for Spain rule that I don't know about and you do, then I hope you'll mention it, but otherwise it's fine. --Steverci (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Martin H.. You have new messages at Svetys's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

The media (files) have permission of the author[edit]

This files have the permission of Roberto Stuckert Filho/PR. The files has all rights reserved and Copyright with permission of the author (CC-BY-3.0).

Ana Paula Valadão no Palácio do Planalto.jpg (CC-BY-3.0)

Dilma Rousseff e líderes evangélicas 1.jpg (CC-BY-3.0)

File:Dilma Rousseff e líderes evangélicas.jpg (CC-BY-3.0)

File:Ana Paula Valadão e Dilma Rousseff.jpg (CC-BY-3.0)

File:Ana Paula Valadão e Dilma Rousseff 1.png (CC-BY-3.0)

Please do not delete the files. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 19:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The source website does not confirm this, a license statement is missing. The license is not automatically given just because photographies from the same photographer are published under a free license in other publications. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Mr 450 current photo[edit]

that photo its from my OWN work i take it whit my samsung cell phone at April 2015 in Aguada...and i can prove that so no need for report that photo of MY OWN WORK like "copyright infrigment" like the mega tv championship NoelCruz (talk)NoelCruz User Talk:NoelCruz

Just a heads up[edit]

Just wanted to give you a heads up that the following accounts are those of Wustefuchs (talk · contribs) and Wustenfuchs (talk · contribs) that you had blocked for "unfree files after warnings" and abuse of multiple accounts [1]:

text removed, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wustefuchs--Martin H. (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

--Potočnik (talk) 04:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Will have a look into this the next days. --Martin H. (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Just giving you an update. Initially AnulBanul claimed he had "no connection whatsoever" to the Wüstenfuchs account and that it wasn't his, [2] then admitted the Wüstenfuchs account is his and that rest aren't, [3] and then when pressed further he admitted that Wüstenfuchs and K. Solin accounts were his but claims the rest aren't. [4] If you have any queries just let me know. --Potočnik (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Blocked the above listed, not yet blocked accounts. You may have a look at Momčilo_Elezović (talk · contribs) wich I identified with the Checkuser rights and think is confirmed because of intersecting edits in Wikipedia and reuploads of previously deleted copyvios by Herr Ziffer. I otherwise dont care much about the content of his editing in hr.wp, because of the language and lack of knowledge i cant judge if his edits are political extreme or vandalism. However, from my Wiki Commons perspective there still is the copyright violations and identity theft (File:Ich und Ich.jpg). --Martin H. (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Removed your above text and commented at the Checkuser case Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wustefuchs. --Martin H. (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

How about[edit]

How about my uploads of [5] . photos of al-Akhbar is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. is that ok for here?--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

No, the license is not {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} but {{cc-by-nc-nd-3.0}}. --Martin H. (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
what you mean?can not upload them?>how about Category:Al Akhbar ? --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
see [ http://english.al-akhbar.com/]
That website is not free, the license shown at the bottom of the page is a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Thats different from a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported with two differences: Commercial reuse is not allowed, modifications are not allowed. That files are not free and not ok for our project, see Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain and Definition of Free Cultural Works. --Martin H. (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
so , clean Category:Files from Al Akhbar . there is another same , Category:Files from Quds Online , is that like al Akhbar,(i hope not).--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Why reporters do not publish in public domain? is files like their children?--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Acceder is part of GCBA[edit]

Hi, I saw you reverted my edit on this image, explaining "this is not from http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar". Well, this is incorrect because "Acceder" is the digital content website of Ministry of Culture of Buenos Aires, belonging to the Buenos Aires City Government (right above the site the GCBA logo links to the main website). Therefore its contents are licenced under the {{CC-AR-GCBA}} template (as I put).

{{PD-AR-Photo}} are only for photographs published +25 years ago, and there is no proof that this photo was once published. Moreover, it was taken by photographer Annemarie Heinrich (died 2005) so it is still copyrighted in case it was not published before. - Fma12 (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

{{CC-AR-GCBA}} is for photos of a particular website because that website is published under a free license, as noted at the template. The license on one publication does not apply to other publications published by the same entity. --Martin H. (talk) 18:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
See http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/terminos-y-condiciones, the terms do not apply to acceder.gov.ar --Martin H. (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted files[edit]

hi, I am writing to alert you that thish File where you can clearly see the painting of Victor Emmanuel II, who visited Rome. and the painting was created by

Ettore Roesler Franz (1845–1907) Link back to Creator infobox template wikidata:Q2640679
Description

Italian painter

Date of birth/death 26 February 1907
Location of birth/death Rome Rome
Authority control

,, then the copyright has expired for at least 70 or even 100 years,, I just wonder why she is so determined to clear it as strangely copyviol if copyrght expired by the fact that the 'author of the painting is dead long ago ATTENDO SUA RISPOSTA.--82.54.102.25 09:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Karachi montage 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karachi montage 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)