User talk:Martsniez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

I invite everyone that wants to discuss or ask me something to just add a topic.

Cheers,

Maarten

Institution:Europeana[edit]

Martsniez, The {{Institution}} template are for "brick and Mortar" institutions to mention where physically artifacts reside. Your Institution:Europeana template seem to be more of a source template to mention where the image come from. I think something similar to {{WGA link}} would work better for you. If you agree, I would like to delete Institution:Europeana. --Jarekt (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, we are in a pilot/explorative process with Europeana. Europeana holds millions of images that could potentially be added to the commons. As of now the template only applies to 25 images. I will discuss your remark with Multichill. Who will do the ingestion of Europeana content in a few months. Is this okay? Cheers --Martsniez (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Sure no problem. Good luck with Europeana project. --Jarekt (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Singapore PD tool?[edit]

Would you like to try and make one for Singapore? See "Commons:Licensing#Singapore". — Cheers, JackLee talk 09:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

It is not a simple as just making one. Check out the media page on http://www.outofcopyright.eu/media.html where you can see the documentation we've made on our 13 available jurisdictions. You can download one of our flowcharts there. If you create a flowchart in the same format (using yEd) using only the objects that are used those files we already made and have this flowchart checked by an expert on your jurisdiction we can use that for our calculators. Mind you, we have been working close to two years on making 30 jurisdictions available.
Oh, looks like I misunderstood your message at "Commons talk:Licensing" which said "A new calculator is relatively simple to build and add. I will require some authoritative source in your jurisdictions to verify a new calculator before I can add it to our site." I therefore thought it was quite a straightforward process. What is yEd? — Cheers, JackLee talk 10:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Once you have an authoritative source (e.g. copyright law professor/scholar) that is willing to put some effort into this than it is not that difficult. Please read our research pages to see how we developed these calculators.

Category:Pictures and images[edit]

Why are you putting images in a very non-specific category Category:Pictures and images? Following the name, you could put almost all files in that category. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jan,
I believe I made a mistake. I used cat-a-lot in the wrong way I realize. I tried to update the cat by categorising all images created by him into that category. Sorry, How can I correct this?
Thanks for noticing! --Martsniez (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't know of an easy way, I never use cat-a-lot. But maybe it offers the same easy way to undo what you did? Else, you will have to do it by hand. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Fixed it, thanks again for noticing my nobery! --Martsniez (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:BP191 Vrouw en man vechten met krokodillen - Open Beelden - 105576.ogv[edit]

Beste Maarten,

Bedankt voor het destijds aanbrengen van deze video op Commons, onder licentie {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-nl|1=[http://www.openbeelden.nl/media/105576 eye film instituut nederland]}}. Later haalde ik als Wikipedian in Residence de andere Bits & Pieces van eye.openbeelden.nl over, met licentie {{PD-old-70}}{{Anonymous-EU}}.

  • Vind je het goed als ik jouw licentie vervang door die andere, omdat EYE geen auteursrechten heeft? (Vergelijk een boek uit een bibliotheek, bibliotheek heeft geen rechten. Pd-old-70 slaat hier op publicatie van een ondanks naspeuring anoniem werk tenminste 70 jaar geleden.)

Groeten en bedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hans,
De licentie is overgenomen van Open Beelden. Hoewel ik geen bezwaar heb tegen je verandering kan ik je niet zeggen dat ik enige juridische toestemming verleen, ik ben immers ook niet de rechthebbende. Ook is PD-old misschien niet geschikt. Gezien de clip ongescript is is er alleen sprake van naburige rechten en niet van auteursrecht op teksten, scripts of bladmuziek. De rechten zijn in (in Nederland) dan ook na 50 jaar verlopen, of 50 jaar na publicatie als deze binnen 50 jaar zijn verschenen.
Groet, --Martsniez (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Legislation in Spain[edit]

Hello Martsniez.

Please, see: File talk:World copyright terms.svg#Legislation in Spain.

Thank you. Regards. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)