User talk:Materialscientist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

For the Diane Minshall page- not only do I have Permission- I was given these photos from Diane herself. It's called asking. I have proof too. Not like you asked, you just like to bully people.

File:Georges Loustaunau-Lacau 1945cr.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Georges Loustaunau-Lacau 1945cr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 12:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC[edit]

Hello Materialscientist,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Muhammed Ayub Khan 1972.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Muhammed Ayub Khan 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Humancommons (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:George Hare Philipson 1917.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:George Hare Philipson 1917.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 21:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

File:The Soviet Union 1970 CPA 3885 stamp (Lenin, 1918 (Photo by P.A.Otsup) with 16 labels 'Head of the Soviet socialist state').png[edit]

Both JPEG and PNG formats can be loaded together. See: Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in Russian. Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in English.

Hello! Please return this file. This file and file File:The Soviet Union 1970 CPA 3885 stamp (Lenin, 1918 (Photo by P.A.Otsup) with 16 labels 'Head of the Soviet socialist state').jpg have different extension JPG and PNG. --Matsievsky (talk) 21:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Восстановил, успехов. Materialscientist (talk) 08:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

File copyright[edit]

Hi, sorry to bother you. I stumbled across your userpage and saw you tag images for possible copyright infringements and I happened to come across a photograph that I found dubious, but am uncertain. This file states that it was uploaded by the original creator, but I somewhat doubt this. Here is a page that holds the same, higher resolution photograph with differing contrast that states it is from the UO Libraries. I suppose it is possible that the person who took the photograph independently submitted it here, but it's not passing the sniff test. I had wanted to use the photograph for a WP article, but I wanted to run this by you to get your opinion on whether this should be deleted. Thanks! Cluskillz (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

I've asked the uploader to provide evidence of own work. Materialscientist (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Redox Halves.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Redox Halves.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WIKImaniac 14:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Battaglin.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Battaglin.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battaglin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Tour da Taça da Copa do Mundo (14231974005).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tour da Taça da Copa do Mundo (14231974005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Clinton Lewinsky 1998 Abkhazia stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Clinton Lewinsky 1998 Abkhazia stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Librero2109 (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Clinton Lewinsky 1998 Abkhazia stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Clinton Lewinsky 1998 Abkhazia stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Librero2109 (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Assign rollback rights[edit]

Hi, I am an experienced Wikimedian. I have Rollbacker and Reviewer rights in enwp with 1000+ reverts. Please assign me the Rollback right in Commons. Thank you —Vis M (talk) 07:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much! :) —Vis M (talk) 07:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Carpet sweeper.png[edit]

This image has been used for about 2 years on Dutch Wiktionary. Why did you suddenly remove it without a preceding request for deletion? This procedure is causing unnecessary harm to our project. --MarcoSwart (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Blatant copyright violation (recent patent drawing that is not covered by the cited license or by any of our licenses). We simply don't have enough admins to check for that. Please have a look through Category:Carpet sweepers and find a replacement. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Bob Beamon 1968.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bob Beamon 1968.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:1974 Se-tenant Stamps (Mathura Museum).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1974 Se-tenant Stamps (Mathura Museum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IndrajitDas 10:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:JosefCyrillSychra.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JosefCyrillSychra.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 20:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Does Commons have a user right equivalent to "Autopatrolled" on en.wiki? I thought that I had such a right, and that my uploads were automatically marked as patrolled but someone edited one of my images today and marked it as "Patrolled", implying that it hadn't been marked as patrolled before their edit.

If there is such a right, I would like to know how to apply for it. With 14 years here (considering my original screen name, "Before My Ken"), close to 100K edits, and over 9,700 uploads, I think I can be trusted with it. I am autopatrolled on en.wiki, and have other rights there as well (ECP, file mover, etc)

Thanks for any information or help you can provide. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, that's a Wikipedia page I'm already Wikipedia autopatrolled, I was asking about Commons. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
OK, I see at Commons:Autopatrolled that the Patroller user right I already have includes the Autopatrolled right. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Alberto Alberani 1968.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alberto Alberani 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 08:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Царскосельская железная дорога.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Царскосельская железная дорога.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beland (talk) 00:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Pedro Calungsod 2012 stamp of the Philippines.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pedro Calungsod 2012 stamp of the Philippines.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AntakyaSporSalonu.jpeg[edit]

Hello. You closed the above DR "keep". I'm not asking you to change your decision, but could you please explain it a bit more? As far as I can see, the ban on GFDL-only photos at Commons:Licensing#GNU Free Documentation License squarely applies to this file, but there's presumably something I'm missing. If you can explain what it is then I can avoid making mistaken nominations like this in future. --bjh21 (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

In my experience, there are two major types of GFDL problems on Commons: 1) The author understands CC BY issues, but he/she does not agree with some details and wants to make a custom license; this license may not fully agree with CC BY, and this is a nuisance. 2) The author doesn't really care about all these subtleties, and is just clumsy with choosing templates.
I feel that this case belongs to 2); that there are no copyright issues, just misunderstanding by the author. If not, then this case can be brought up again from this angle. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I think I understand the distinction. Would you say that a case like File:Expo Gens de l'alpe.jpg, where the author has removed CC BY-SA 4.0 and replaced it with GFDL (Special:Diff/433399317), is clear enough to fall into (1)? --bjh21 (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes and no: they placed "GFDL-self", i.e., they possibly understand the differences and want GFDL to be present, but that template is Ok for Commons licensing. Materialscientist (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

FoP of the Netherlands[edit]

Hi Materialscientist, yesterday you decided to keep a lot of images I nominated for deletion with the note: Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. These were all images of the interior of a gallery, containing copyrighted artwork on temporary display. Imho this does not fall within the FOP of the Netherlands, which is only applicable for permanent display in public places. Where public space is not a museum (or in analogy a artgallery as in this case). Please note https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Netherlands#Freedom_of_panorama Can you please explain? Thanks, Elly (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

In case it is not clear which images I am referring to: 
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 02.jpg‎ 17:39  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 03.jpg‎ 17:39  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 04.jpg‎ 17:39  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 05.jpg‎ 17:39  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 06.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 07.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 08.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 09.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 10.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 11.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 12.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 13.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 14.jpg‎ 17:38  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 15.jpg‎ 17:37  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 16.jpg‎ 17:37  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 17.jpg‎ 17:37  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
wijzgesch  Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interieur Galerie d' Eendt, Spuistraat 272, Amsterdam 1968 01.jpg‎ 17:34  +230‎  ‎Materialscientist (A) overleg bijdragen‎ Kept: see COM:FOP Netherlands. terugdraaien
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Netherlands#Freedom_of_panorama: Public place in article 18 of the Dutch copyright law not only includes open-air spaces such as public roads and squares, but also the interior of public buildings. (same in valid in most other countries).
Galerie d'Eendt is "permanent", but that exhibition was not, so I have reconsidered, and deleted those images; thanks. Those exhibits might be in some other public place now, but it is hard to confirm that. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Elly (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Toscanini 8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Toscanini 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FMSky (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

File:EL Turner.jpg[edit]

Nice restoration! I was planning to take a run at the same thing when this one came unlocked. But there it is. You just can't outrun an administrator. ;-) -- WikiPedant (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Sophie Scholl 1942 in Blumberg.jpg[edit]

Sorry for being inconsistant with your opinion: of course, there is a valid reason for its delition:

By the way: the name of the file and it's description are still wrong and you did not correct them: "Dieses Foto entstand bei einem Besuch von Sophies Bruder Hans Scholl in Blumberg. Der Fotograf war Hans Scholl selbst." - that's not true: neither it has been taken in Blumberg (according to Zoske - most probably 1938 at the river Iller) nor the photographer has been Hans Scholl (this only would give an argument for keeping, 75 years after his death in 1943 and this was the (wrong) argument in 2018).

What we can say: The photographer is unknown, so far, okay; but now the licence mentions a "copyright term of 70 years after the a work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity" . Do you know, when this work "was made available to the public". i.e. published? I do not. But 1938 is definitely not the beginning of the "70 year"-term after publication; its the year, when the photo was made.--Markus Wolter (talk) 16:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

p.s.: Other photos of this "River-Iller-Series" of Sophie Scholl, which are published by Barbara Beuys (2010), Thomas Hartnagel (2005) claim Susanne Zeller-Hirtzel and Manuel Aicher, Dietikon, Schweiz, a member of the Aicher-Scholl-Family, as copyright-owners; Zoske himself claims Dr. Johannes Kuhn (he got access to the dated Ernst Reden-copies of this series) as the copy-right owner.--Markus Wolter (talk) 04:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Keiko Fujimori votando no primeiro turno da eleição presidencial de 2011.png[edit]

Hi! Can you review this please? it's a very used image, but with wrong copyright... Thanks! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted file not deleted?[edit]

Hi Materialscientist - according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Restless Flycatcher (10625071903).jpg you deleted the linked file 2 weeks ago due to incorrect copyright . . . yet the file is still there? Nothing in the file history to suggest a re-upload, either. Just for information! - MPF (talk) 23:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted now, thanks. 06:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (talk) 19:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Alex Croak 2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alex Croak 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tour da Taça da Copa do Mundo (14231974005).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tour da Taça da Copa do Mundo (14231974005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Darwin Ahoy! 21:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ludwig Guttmann.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  မြန်မာဘာသာ  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ludwig Guttmann.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 07:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  04:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Yukio Endo 1962.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Yukio Endo 1962.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : A1Cafel.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

ECM 2000.gif[edit]

As far as I can see, the file File:ECM 2000.gif has already been deleted twice (last time by you) and has now been uploaded again (i think an identical file). Can you look into that file? --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Shweta_Menon_1.jpg[edit]

[1]

Kindly restore the original image.- Managerarc talk 22:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

"No permission since" templates on files with OTRS information[edit]

Did you add the "No permission since" template to these two files (File:Towdie Screenshot.png and File:Towdie Title Screen.png) with a bugged automated tool or is this just a mistake on your part? Because both files clearly have licensing and OTRS information. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 20:49, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

My bad, reverted, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:53, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Mahmoud Namjoo 4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mahmoud Namjoo 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Iosif Sîrbu 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Iosif Sîrbu 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gikü (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Finnish markka coins[edit]

Hi, back in May there was a deletion request which resulted in removing some Markka images from Commons. Could you please elaborate on why the cited copyright council opinion was not enough to keep them? - Xbspiro (talk) 09:45, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

The cited opinion was unclear and apparently referred to a particular coin and not to all coins. Also, the Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Finland#Currency still states that Finnish currency images are not in public domain, so if you wish to rectify the issue, that could be a right place to start. Best regards. Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Vava Brodsky and Marc Chagall 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vava Brodsky and Marc Chagall 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours, — Berrely • TC 17:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Mira Stupica 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mira Stupica 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Mira Stupica 1966.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mira Stupica 1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Alexandra Patskevich 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Alexandra Patskevich 2021.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alexandra Patskevich 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Putin and Albert Batyrgaziev 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Putin and Albert Batyrgaziev 2021.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Putin and Albert Batyrgaziev 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)