User talk:Materialscientist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Help with block![edit]

Hi @Materialscientist: You recently blocked this shared IP address in the English Wikipedia. I have nothing against it but I have an account using this IP address sometimes called TheQ Editor and I can't log in due to vandalism in this IP address. Please help me. Thanks, 216.126.81.248 15:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

This is odd, and you should be able to edit from that IP when logged in. Any other hints like what does wikisoftware tell you when you can't edit? Materialscientist (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Я не в тему, но кажется, он говорит что не может войти в учётную запись, так как ип адрес, с которого он пытается войти - заблокирован.--Spillik (talk) 22:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

File:PaF5geometry.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PaF5geometry.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mabschaaf (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Leon Cooper with wife in 1972.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leon Cooper with wife in 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 06:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wikipedia-karlbarth01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wikipedia-karlbarth01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wikipedia-karlbarth01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jfhutson (talk) 02:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Rick Wayne photo[edit]

Hi. The image accompanying the entry of former bodybuilder Rick Wayne is not of him. I don't know who is the athlete in the picture but it is certainly not the 'Rick Wayne' associated with the corresponding information.

No need to reply.

Publishing of photos[edit]

Hi.

Are you able to help me with something? I uploaded several WWII photos using Template:PD-Yugoslavia which says that photographs or a work of applied art is in PD if published before January 1, 1966. One user marked them for deletion because I presented "No evidence of authorship or publishing within timeframes specified in the PD licence". I have to admit that I don't quite understand how are photographs published. I.e. every WWII era book is published during WWII. Isn't that automatically the case with WWII era photographs? If not, how are photographs published? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Lack of information is the most common problem with licensing old photos. If I were you I would look for authoritative sources, which state the author of the photo (anon. or someone) and when it was taken/published. "Publication" could be any distribution (in print, on a postcard) or presentation to the public (like photo exhibition). Materialscientist (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I will try to do as you advised. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Melanie Klein[edit]

And Carl Gustav Jung? --Viejo sabio (talk) 11:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

?? Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Me refiero a si es posible subir a Commons imágenes de calidad de Carl Gustav Jung, del mismo modo que lo ha hecho con Melanie Klein. De Jung no tenemos lamentablente ni una sola imagen de perfil que sea decente. De todos modos, muchas gracias por su labor con Klein. Un cordial saludo. --Viejo sabio (talk) 13:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I refer if it is possible to raise to Commons Carl Gustav Jung's qualit images, in the same way that has done it with Melanie Klein. Of Jung we have lamentablente not even an alone image of profile that is decent. Anyhow, thank you very much for his labor with Klein. A cordial greeting.--Viejo sabio (talk) 16:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Please use the correct license[edit]

You recently uploaded a file, File:Friction stir processing.png, with the license template {{cc-by}}. Please be aware that cc-by no longer redirects to Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 because of the high number of cases where that was the wrong license. In the case of File:Friction stir processing.png, the correct license was Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, which is not the same as 1.0 (otherwise why would they spend time and money updating the license). I have fixed the file for you this time. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I've noticed the license change only later and didn't bother to change. Thanks for fixing and explaining. Materialscientist (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Luigina Bissoli.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Luigina Bissoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Anahit Mekhitarian as Anoush[edit]

Regarding your edits to File:Anahit Mekhitarian.jpg (here) and File:Anahit Mekhitarian as Anoush.jpg (here): Why should pictures of the title role in an opera by Armen Tigranian (or Tigranyan) not belong in Category:Armen Tigranyan? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

They belong in a subcategory (which I haven't figured out because I've got carried away). Main category should directly reflect the subject, I believe. That actress is not even a relative of his, and, given the meager graphical information on him on Commons, her presence there is misleading :). Materialscientist (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kurt gödel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kurt gödel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Betty Robinson.jpg[edit]

I humbly deliver it to you; a new file for you to clean-up, noise reduction etc. Thanks in advance! Trijnsteltalk 00:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

I've done what I could. Rare image, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Nude by Iosif Iser 1971 Romanian card.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nude by Iosif Iser 1971 Romanian card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrei S. Talk 08:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ștefan Popescu 1972 Romanian stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ștefan Popescu 1972 Romanian stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrei S. Talk 08:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, —Andrei S. Talk 08:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Yugoslav stamps[edit]

Hi, Materialscientist. I can't find anything about the Yugoslav stamps being copyright-free in the Yugoslav copyright act,[1] and these stamps are not free in at least some, probably all, of the successor countries. I'm thinking of nominating them for deletion. In addition, like {{PD-YugoslaviaGov}}, also {{PD-Yugoslavia}} can't stand on its own, as the dates of copyright expiration differ among the successor countries. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Have a look here. Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
See e.g. File:Anton Janša 1973 Yugoslavia stamp.jpg (depicting a beehiver from Slovenia). Presuming that all these stamps were published in Belgrade (a source for this presumption would be welcome), at the very least, the licensing is incomplete: besides the PD-Yugoslavia tag there should also be the {{PD-because|stamps in Serbia-Montenegro are in the public domain. See: [[Commons:{{PD-because|commons:Template:PD-SCGGov]]}} tag/explanation. In addition, it is unclear whether a usage of a drawing by B. Jakac (see the lower left corner) on a stamp makes this drawing free / I mean, one can't crop the stamp to solely the drawing and reuse the drawing as they like without violating the copyrights of Jakac. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
You are right about templates. I use double templates in my later uploads and will retag earlier ones. Yes, printed in Belgrade, nowadays Serbia, a source for that is coming. Drawing and stamp of that drawing are not the same images for several reasons - stamps are always of lower quality and contain intrinsic texture. Stamps are designed, i.e., the image is typically modified (redrawn, color-adjusted, blurred, cropped, etc.) and some content is added. Designer's name can be found in proper stamp catalogs (sometimes printed on the stamp). Thus even if the painting is in PD, its stamp is not necessarily so. Yes, cropping a stamp is legal, and the stamp authorities settle copyrights with the authors, because governments (supposedly) don't cheat. Have a look here and note the copyright sign on Disney's stamps of 1986 - those are not PD. Materialscientist (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't agree. It is irrelevant here if "lower quality and contain intrinsic texture", because the original artist still keeps the copyright and such minor changes do not make this a new work. I concur that the copyrights have been settled with the author, but only to publish the drawing on the stamp, not to then also make it PD (after Serbia published a new act). What's the legal basis for the claim that all stamps are in the public domain in Serbia anyway? The Template:PD-SerbiaGov states that "official materials of state bodies and bodies performing public functions" are in the public domain, but the drawing does not qualify as such. An analogous case would probably be third-party materials used by the US government in their official publications. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Your latest comment basically says that stamps reproducing copyrighted work are derivative works that are not allowed on Commons, no matter if stamps in general are in PD. I'll think about a good answer to that. Anyway, if you believe you are right on that then the issue would affect a large percentage of all recent stamps on Commons; it would be irrelevant to Yugoslavia and stamp copyright templates; it would require a Commons-wide RFC. Materialscientist (talk) 07:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Imagine that someone placed an artwork in a public place in a country with FOP for artworks. We don't know details how did it get there, same as we don't know how an artwork got on a stamp, coin, or a banknote - such details (agreements between the author and authorities) are normally not available to public, and we don't need to know them. All we need to know is that an artwork got into a permanent display in public, or became part of a government work in a form of stamp, coin, banknote, etc., and we may copy it. We may learn (through press, for example) that the artwork was placed there illegally, and we'd take down our images. Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
We have at least one source (the paragraph about Section 105) stating that not all stamps are in the public domain, though they have been created by an official body. It's therefore not true that we're not interested in the contract. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, those book pages are not available for viewing in my country. Materialscientist (talk) 21:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
The text states: "Section 105 simply says works of the U.S. government are not copyrightable. However, government works created by an independent contractor may indeed be copyrightable by that contractor depending on the wording of the contract. Postage stamps, although created by the U.S. Postal Service, are indeed copyrightable". Similar is stated here. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
This is well known on Commons. Copyright laws in US are unique in terms of Federal/Non-Federal Government works. Materialscientist (talk) 21:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
According to de:Amtliches Werk, the predominating view in Germany is that if private copyrighted images are used in official publications, they can't be cropped out of such official context. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Germany is known for not accepting some copyright regulations of other countries (US for example), i.e. an image which is in PD in its country of origin (say, in US) is not necessarily in PD in Germany. For this reason not every image with a valid Commons license may be added to de.wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The problem is that if stamps reproducing copyrighted work are not free for Commons in the US and Germany, why should we assume that they're free in Serbia? All our files must be free in the source country. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't see why they are not free in the US (we are not talking about US stamps anyway). Being free in Germany is irrelevant, though cropping is a weak argument - we host a large library of Carl Van Vechten (from the Library of Congress), who forbade cropping of his photos. Materialscientist (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The US law and the German law exclude private copyrighted images used in official publications from the public domain. Why should we assume that they're free in Serbia? --Eleassar (t/p) 07:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I do not see any clear support for this statement, either in the US or in the German copyright law. Besides, we can't apply US or German law to other countries. If an image originated outside US, and is in PD there, it will normally be in PD in US. Materialscientist (talk) 07:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
On the contrary, I don't see any clear support of the statement that private copyrighted images used in official publications are in the public domain in these two countries or in Serbia, rather vice versa. In the case of unclear copyright status we delete images, and the burden of proof is on the uploader. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
As I mentioned, your doubt is irrelevant to Yugoslavia; it concerns nearly all Commons:Stamps/Public domain templates (maybe with a few exceptions). You can always start a request for comment on this. Materialscientist (talk) 08:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Of course it's relevant to Yugoslavia too. Anyway, I also think a wider discussion would be in place here. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

File:ErjavecFran-foto Pogorelc.jpg[edit]

Hi again. I've reverted File:ErjavecFran-foto Pogorelc.jpg to the original version as these are not exact duplicates or scaled-down versions (see Commons:Overwriting existing files). Feel welcome to reupload them under different filenames. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Please post something here in the future when you revert my uploads - would be appreciated. Materialscientist (talk) 07:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Marco Marulo 1903 Ljetopis društva hrvatskih književnika za 1900-1903.png[edit]

Hi, I don't understand why you deleted this file. No request was made... Regards, Yann (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Edmund Oscar von Lippmann.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edmund Oscar von Lippmann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Juan Leon Mera.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Juan Leon Mera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Mihovil Logar 2009 Serbian stamp.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mihovil Logar 2009 Serbian stamp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Milićević (talk) 19:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Chromolithograph duplicates[edit]

Hi, I noticed your merge of two images at File:William Broadbent Vanity Fair 30 October 1902.jpg. Lithograph prints can vary quite significantly in terms of colour and reproduction techniques. The version from the Wellcome is likely to be an extremely good scan of an archive deposit of an original print, while the previous version might have been taken from a different copy of the magazine. Both have value, especially as the colouring is quite different between the versions. I think it would be good practice to keep different (historic) reproductions of a lithograph on Commons as prints taken at different times may well be added together in some way in the future, giving us potentially better quality outputs than one version could.

I do have a full set of original hi-res images from the Wellcome (pulled from their archive rather than the website) and checking my hard-disk copy shows V0000775 is available with the border at 2100x3400 pixels. The plan is that WMF Ops are due to upload all 100,000 images from a hard-disk copy in the next few weeks, avoiding doing these over the internet.

Anyway, would you please consider un-merging these versions? I'll look at manually uploading the version I have over the specific Wellcome scan as the colour of the version I have appears slightly different and I think it probably would be better with the original border and legend.

Update I have pushed the file out to my Flickr account at https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5568/15143015056_042ae7ed05_o.jpg. Looking between the images appears to show that it is not colouring that has changed but lighting, possibly when the image was cropped. -- (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Great, but consider this - you're basically copying the Wellcome database to Commons without identifying images - I often found that your uploads should be added to imageless articles right away, but nobody did that. Part of my activity is to add images to articles (not just to Commons) from the Wellcome database. This work would be easier if those images were already hosted on Commons, but not if only a small part of them was here (I have to look up in both sources, and often fix the robotic data on date/author/etc. Also, nearly all images do need cropping before adding to articles). Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Photograph of Chandrika Kumaratunga[edit]

Please Delete the New Version of this page as it is Copyvio,Thanks.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chandrika_Kumaratunga.jpg --MediaJet talk 06:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for you quick response Face-smile.svg--MediaJet talk 06:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Restored image of Whitlock[edit]

Materialscientist, thanks for your upload of a new version of the image of Elizabeth Whitlock at File:Harvard Theatre Collection - Elizabeth Whitlock TCS 45.jpg. Because the file name and data regarding sourcing, etc. is very specific to a certain collection, it would make sense to keep the correct version connected with that file name. The version you uploaded would make a great independent upload reflecting its origins from the National Portrait Gallery. I hope you agree. And thank you! --Rob at Houghton (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Olga Tudorache 2014 Romania stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Olga Tudorache 2014 Romania stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrei S. Talk 05:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

FoP-Russia undeletions[edit]

Hi. I think it is wrong approach to leave the file version with DR template deleted. Instead, I would restore all versions and then remove the DR template from the file and put {{FoP-Russia}} therein. See also: User:A.Savin/How to undelete Russian FoP cases. Thanks anyway, --A.Savin 08:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quite possibly. I don't have any experience with FoP undeletion. Uspehov. Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Colin Gregory 1932.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Colin Gregory 1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wolbo (talk) 09:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

File:William Faulkner 1949.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:William Faulkner 1949.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 00:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Deadly hands of Kung Fu[edit]

Hi, I noticed your upload of File:Deadly hands of kung fu 1975.jpg as I have just uploaded File:Deadly hands of kung fu. (vol. 1), no. 17 Wellcome L0071807.jpg. However I think this must be a copyright error. Can you think of a rationale as to why there would not be copyright on this comic? -- (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

An agreement with Neal Adams? Materialscientist (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Faulkner[edit]

I think, once the levels and contrast are properly adjusted, the slightly-coloured version will look better, but I'm putting it into my restoration queue, so when I'm done, it should be as good as I can get it, and (hopefully) featured, which'll get Faulkner a much-needed day on Wikipedia's mainpage. I think the key is getting as good of distinction between head and wall as possible.Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Plus enhancing the hand, and flattening contrast on the wall. Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Edited to add: I'll start by cleaning up the dust, but once the basic stuff is done I'll probably start by playing with curves, and dodge/burn as necessary after that. Don't like overdoing tweaks, but we do need a good, usable image at the end of it, so I think a little bit is justified, if needed.
By the way, the Library of Congress actually have a LOT of Faulkner images. All the free ones are from the same shoot, but if you search William Faulkner, and find something better, let me know. This one's the highest-resolution, but there's a few good 12-meg greyscale files, which should be enough to get us quite a good image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:ShineeChile.jpg[edit]

Can you close this DR as a keep or delete by determining if this image is the flickr account owner's own work? Someone stated that there are many such images like this in the flickr account owner's photostream but other images are also derivatives so I don't know what is the situation here. Please keep or delete this image...if you can. Thank You and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • PS: I find it strange that the uploader suddenly appears and uploads an image from a potentially problematic flickr account--if Admin Zelenko is correct--after 2 years but he remembers to remove a previous copyvio notice. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Please decide to keep or delete this image...as a Commons Admin if you can. If you can't, please place this discussion at COM:AN so that someone else can deal with it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    Upon a brief look this is a matter of faith, not knowledge of policies; I have no time for a detailed analysis of that flickr account at the moment, sorry. Materialscientist (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. Thank You, Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:권민아 직캠.jpg[edit]

FYI.  revimsg 12:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Margrethe II of Denmark 1966.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Margrethe II of Denmark 1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Princess Benedikte of Denmark with prince Richard.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Princess Benedikte of Denmark with prince Richard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi Materialscientist, I would like to delete some versions of this file. Indeed, the two first versions (the ones before the 6th November) do not respect the licenses. I used incompatible licenses to create this picture. The two last versions should be ok regarding to the license. So, as you are admin here, you could probably the copyvio versions. Thank you in advance. Pamputt (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't see a copyright violation - if you mean those little icons inside the image, I don't think they can be copyrighted. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I mean the little icons. For example I used that one that is licensed under GPL. And the GPL license seems to be not compatible with the CC by-sa one. Same thing for this file which is published under Apache license which seems to be not compatible with the CC by-sa one... Pamputt (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ali Akhtar Gandro 2013-12-04 23-11.jpg[edit]

Hi, please review your closure of that DR. "In use anywhere" is not a valid reason for keeping such files.    FDMS  4    12:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

The account is abandoned, thus deleted, but disagree otherwise. Materialscientist (talk) 22:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
I wouldn't have nominated the file for deletion if the uploader made, say, at least two mainspace contributions on Wikipedia. It was a self-promotion SPA, which is why I have nominated the file for deletion.    FDMS  4    22:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

File:5th-April-News-Borstal.jpg[edit]

Thank you for checking on File:5th-April-News-Borstal.jpg and the other files uploaded by 519Clarke. I am wondering if this user and 519Clarke are one and the same. The subject matter and licensing is pretty much the same. - Marchjuly (talk) 02:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

From en.wiki CU scan I'd say they are very closely related, perhaps editing from same office. Can't tell if they are same person. Materialscientist (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for checking. Do you think the files uploaded by BiertonCorrespondent qualify as "own work"? - Marchjuly (talk) 04:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I'd prefer to have an OTRS permission email to clear suspicions. Materialscientist (talk) 05:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
OK. Should the files be tagged with {{OTRS needed}} or just left as is? - Marchjuly (talk) 08:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Not sure if 519Clarke reads his talk page, but File:Mr-Clarke-and-Maisie.jpg was uploaded today as own work. Part of this one appears be a screen capture taken from File:Borstal Boy Opera News Pt 1.webm uploaded by BiertonCorrespondent. If it's better for me to post this at the Village Pump, please let me know. Thanks again. - Marchjuly (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kerameikos, Ancient Graveyard, Athens, Greece (4452214630).jpg[edit]

Your deletion is not acceptable. You delete, because Texts in museums are copyrighted by the museum itself - interesting, that here is no text that could be copyrighted. This image shows a permanent part of the exhebition. There is no valid cause for a deletion. If you don't know about rights and things - you shuld no do this job. Resore the image please imedeatly. A speedy deletion never ever was correct here. Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kopi Luwak-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kopi Luwak-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Self portrait of Paulus Moreelse with additional artwork.jpg[edit]

This was used in one of the humourous description pages we use to explain policy, further, no actual valid copyright issues exist with it; it was nominated purely out of a lack of humour. Please undelete. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

As I recall the image was unused (do you have a permanent use for this image?). We shouldn't flood Commons with graffiti. Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Galadriel Stineman[edit]

Hi,
Can you review this pic to see is it okay to upload it into commons.? The Herald 14:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Not Ok, the license says "All rights reserved". Materialscientist (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Deletion glitch?[edit]

Hi there. I may have missed something, or it's just something weird in bot edit texts, but I don't get it: you deleted File:Ernest Rutherford (Nobel).png because it was an unused low-res version of itself (?), and so unused that it has to be removed from the galleries where it is used [2]? I don't know the pic, I'm not saying you didn't have a good reason for deleting the picture (I guess it was a dupe anyway), I'm just saying something in the process makes it a bit difficult to understand for the reader :-) Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 07:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. It was a low-res copy of File:Ernest Rutherford (Nobel).jpg (same filename, different extension). I've replaced it globally, but forgot about local use. Fixed now. Materialscientist (talk) 07:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks then. See you around, --Eusebius (talk) 11:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

File:George VI of UK 1947.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:George VI of UK 1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DrKiernan (talk) 08:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

András Hegedüs[edit]

Hello! I've realized that you uploaded some photographs from Dutch National Archives, including Hungarian politicians János Kádár and Ernő Gerő. Do you think you could upload photo of András Hegedüs (middle) to Commons? He was Prime Minister of Hungary from 1955 to 1956. I am blocked from editing English Wiki, so I cannot put the photo to th appropriate article. Thanks in advance, --Norden1990 (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This photo is not from Anefo, but from Spaarnestad, their license is not compatible with Commons. Materialscientist (talk) 04:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I'm sorry, I provided wrong link (I dont know how). That's what I meant: Hegedüs --Norden1990 (talk) 12:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Done in File:András Hegedüs 1956.jpg. Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. --Norden1990 (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@User:Materialscientist - I'd like to inform you that User:Norden1990 (despite shamelessly pretending to be a correct guy who doesn't want to evade his indefinite block and requests your assistance for adding a picture of András Hegedüs to en.wp) is constantly making illegal edits on English Wikipedia.

A blatant IP sock is 178.164.220.190, who edited András Hegedüs just a few hours after you. He removed the file HegedusAndras.jpg, which (what a coincidence!) had been uploaded by Norden1990 himself.

On List of Prime Ministers of Hungary, the same IP replaced the coat of arms of Hungary with the file File:András_Hegedüs_1956_(crop).jpg (which had been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by Norden1990 in the same day). In this case he had no reservation to "put the photo to th appropriate article" because of his block. Interestingly, the very same replacement (File:András_Hegedüs_1956_(crop).jpg instead of the coat of arms) was done by Norden1990 himself to the Belarusian and the Russian versions of the article List of Prime Ministers of Hungary.

178.164.220.190 also edited the article Mihály Károlyi where Norden1990 had contributed in the past with his main account.

Last but not least, 178.164.220.190 belongs to the typical range 178.164.128.0/17, which was twice blocked in the past by Tiptoety as a result of Norden1990's persistent sockpuppetry.

Below there is a list of recent socks (it is far from being complete, because he is editing on a daily basis and it would be a hard work to add all of them here); a part of them were blocked by admin User:Tiptoety, who has even instated some IP range blocks against him:

62.165.251.0/25 (now range blocked: Tiptoety (talk | contribs) blocked 62.165.251.0/25 (talk) (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 month (Block evasion: Norden1990))

  • 62.165.233.113
  • 62.165.251.34
  • 62.165.251.81
  • 63.153.129.194

178.164.128.0/17

  • 178.164.163.103
  • 178.164.163.208
  • 178.164.178.186
  • 178.164.178.190
  • 178.164.178.250
  • 178.164.179.114
  • 178.164.179.75
  • 178.164.179.72
  • 178.164.179.81
  • 178.164.206.136
  • 178.164.210.101
  • 178.164.220.140
  • 178.164.233.141
  • 178.164.233.23

188.143.0.0/17

  • 188.143.0.182
  • 188.143.22.99
  • 188.143.26.214
  • 188.143.26.234
  • 188.143.59.131
  • 188.143.70.185
  • 188.143.70.140
  • 188.143.79.102
  • 188.143.83.165
  • 188.143.83.252

195.38.96.0/20 (now range blocked: 01:10, 2 December 2014 Tiptoety (talk | contribs) blocked 195.38.96.0/20 (talk) (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 month (Block evasion: Norden1990))

  • 195.38.100.106
  • 195.38.103.123
  • 195.38.108.208
  • 195.38.110.92
  • 195.38.110.107

92.249.130.128/26

  • 92.249.130.146
  • 92.249.130.175

92.249.155.128/25

  • 92.249.155.155
  • 92.249.155.204

92.249.223.0/25

  • 92.249.223.53
  • 92.249.223.89

94.21.0.0/16

  • 94.21.44.60
  • 94.21.62.131
  • 94.21.62.131
  • 94.21.92.243
  • 94.21.148.165
  • 94.21.211.90

77.234.64.0/20

  • 77.234.71.96
  • 77.234.71.144
  • 77.234.75.64

84.236.7.128/27

  • 84.236.7.128
  • 84.236.7.157

84.236.42.0/25

  • 84.236.42.0
  • 84.236.42.94

Other IP socks:

  • 84.236.16.49
  • 84.236.24.16
  • 84.236.101.230

You are a firm administratior, so I am expecting prompt measures against this sockmaster. Since he is socking for 6 months now, maybe a ban from en.wp would could be considered. Iaaasi (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Iaaasi always push his blatant, silly misconceptions without evidence. I'd like to inform you, Materialscientist that this guy, who has 133 confirmed sockpuppets is the dedicated protector of WP rules. How ironic. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Without evidece? The proofs are indisputable. Your sockuppetry is confirmed by admin User:Tiptoety. It is amazing that you keep lying, In defiance of the evidence that support my accusations. You made identical edits on the Belarusian and the Russian and the English Wikipedias (the last one using an IP sock) and you still insist that you are innocent? Iaaasi (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Boooring. Instead you should stop pitiable harassment of innocent editors, administrators and destructive, chauvinist, unsourced edits in Wikipedia. A banned sockmaster refers to the WP rules and accused editors without evidences for years, very interesting :). I can edit French, Russian etc. WPs, so I don't understand what is your problem. Uploaded images myself are visible and avaliable for everyone. --Norden1990 (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I've already seen your problem; someone upload image of András Hegedüs to the English Wikipedia, at different times. Every IPs, wo edit Hungarian-related articles are supposed to be me? Nonsense, I'm not a superhero to edit in every time dimensions... --Norden1990 (talk) 15:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't charge you for editing French, Russian or Belarusian Wikipedia. My concern is that the same edit that you made on the Russian or Belarusian Wikipedias was also miraculously done in the same day by an IP on the English Wikipedia, where you are indef. blocked. Moreover, that IP belongs to a range that was blocked in the past by admin Tiptoety as a result of your persistent socking
As a matter of fact, I am not the only one who noticed your socks. Look what User:Psychonaut was saying about you: "I'm familiar with Norden1990's editing and am aware that he's been socking via unregistered dynamic IPs since his block (though I haven't had time to file any SPIs about this myself). At this time all I can say is that the IPs presented above are from the same ISP as the ones I'm aware of."
Materialscientist knows very well my past so it makes no sense to refer to my ban. Unlike you, I assume my former sockpuppets. I admit my wrong behaviour. Even if the contributions of my last accounts were exclusively constructive, I was told that socking is socking regardless of the intrinsic value of the edits. I decided to stay "outside the court" for 6 months in order to receive the standard unban offer (Wikipedia:Standard offer), but I am expecting administrators to have the same firmness with all sockmasters. I haven't been socking for more than 2 months, and I am going to appeal my ban in April 2015. Iaaasi (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
"I haven't been socking for more than 2 months", of course not, indeed.... :) If your appeal will be accepted, then rules do not make much sense as you presently destroy WP since 2009 (harassment of well-intentioned editors, pushing POV-materials, destroying consensual agreement, vandalism, utilization of other editors, nationalist insults and promotion of Nazi ideas). Yes it is a very bad behaviour. If you want to banish me from Commons, Belorussian, Russian, French etc. Wikis, just go ahead. :) --Norden1990 (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
You are just trying to change the topic under discussion because you feel cornered after I disclosed your socks. I am not the subject of this conversation, so I am not going to start defending myself against your accusations. The only remark that I want to make is that the referred infamous comment was ostensibly posted on several admins' talk pages because I wanted that account to be blocked as soon as possible, hoping that, once blocked, no one will check if it was my sockpuppet or not. Pretending to be simultaneously Nazi, anti-Semitic and homohpbic (3 in 1) was something that ensured an instant block. It was just a strategic move, it is funny that you accuse me of being a neo-Nazi. Iaaasi (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
What an explanation :) "Unlike you, I assume my former sockpuppets", like a murderer, who admits his crimes and apologizes. Do you assume your current sockpuppets too? We, Hungarians (you know, the Bozgors as you once said) have a proverb to your behaviour: "Mindenki a saját háza táján söprögessen." --Norden1990 (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I know another proverb: "A mistake already admitted is half forgiven". Not admitting your obvious socks is twice worse than socking. I don't understand why you disown them, because the edits themselves were, like in the case of my recent socks, constructive. The only violation is the evading of your block.
I have no sockpuppet at the moment. But if you have any suspicions, you are free to ask again your friend T. to raise a sockpuppet investigations for you. Iaaasi (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I do not affect the editing in en.wiki, unlike you. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I have no connection with Eurocentral. It was an unfortunate misidentification of "even if" with "even though" in that comment, which altered the meaning of my phrase. A SPI investigation confirmed that we are independent users.
But enough about me. Fine, I am the most despicable editor from en.wikipedia. But that does not change the fact that you are a lying sockmaster.Iaaasi (talk) 16:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
There are no facts, only baseless accusations from you. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
It is stunning how much you underestimate administrators' capacity to catch your socks. Do you think that they are so credulous to simply believe your perjury, in the face of all proofs? Iaaasi (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

please unblock panderichthys4144[edit]

{{unblock|i get it that you dont allow use of several accounts to get unblocked,i had no clue about that! just give me another chance! i promise i will make useful contributions! and how can separating bog body pages from the list be what you call "disruptive editing" or "damage"? and i promise i wont use any more sockpuppets!}}

File:Robert Loggia 1966.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Robert Loggia 1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.221.80.17 12:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Mass Deletion[edit]

Hi @Materialscientist: You removed all picture about Mahdi Zein-addin and Chamran and Kaveh and Abshenasan. This pictures are freom Shahidblog and Sajed website that their content are available under GFDL. These images restore now with other user that removed them incorrectly. please restore them because i want use them in my article. I talk about the follow images:

File:Mahdi Zein-addin 2.jpg File:Mahdi Zein-addin 3.jpg File:Mahdi Zein-addin 4.jpg File:Mahdi Zein-addin 5.jpg . . .

ZELZAL (talk) 07:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Mass deletions[edit]

Hey, there must be a reason for such a mass deletion! May I know it? Mhhossein (talk) 07:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your deletions[edit]

I restored files per User_talk:-revi&oldid=141986008#Picture_license but you redeleted (without a valid reason). Please explain :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Please reply to my question. You reverted my admin action without a valid reason. I like to hear what is wrong with that files, COM:LL? You deleted only a few files, what is with the rest? --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Pinging: @-revi: --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. If the site is for license laundrying, then your deletion can be justified, but if not, then it must be a wheel war. I don't have much to say here... :p — Revi 09:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Guys, would you please stop stalking my talk? I'm losing my detailed reply because of edit conflicts. Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok, here it comes. @Steinsplitter: In short, I did not revert your action, because I had no idea that you acted at all. I mass deleted uploads by AliAkar and blocked ZELZAL per block evasion by AliAkar. Mass deletion was partial because of a bug in the mass delete gadget. Whether the original block was valid is not a question to me, AliAkar should follow the unblocking procedures. As to deletion, first, there was no link to the source and license. Second, I saw evidence on en.wiki that those blog sites don't own the copyrights. The evidence came from availability of higher-resolution versions of same images elsewhere. I believe the GDFL note on those sites is not sufficient and COM:OTRS must be followed before those images may be hosted on Commons. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Ok. I deleted the remaining uploads. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Cheers. Frankly I have no slightest interest in this whole story and got to the "mass delete" button upon a link from en.wiki. This is one of those marginal cases of "believing to the uploader". I often do, but in this case I think someone scanned someones photos and should provide an email evidence that those photos are "his/her". I strongly doubt we are dealing with the original image provider at any step of this chain (from the hosting website up to Commons). Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Mass Deletion[edit]

@Materialscientist: Please explain about your mass deletion? you removed all my pictures without reasons ZELZAL (talk) 08:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Sharon Tate 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sharon Tate 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.221.81.114 23:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Jacqueline Bisset 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jacqueline Bisset 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.221.81.136 15:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Gina Lollobrigida 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gina Lollobrigida 2001 Somalia stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

94.221.81.136 15:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Unofficial stamps of Ingushetia[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Please unblock panderichthys4144[edit]

{{unblock|Please unblock panderichthys4144,i promise i will make useful contribs,not do what you call "damage" or "disruption",and i understand the reason why i have been banned}}

Images from Anefo[edit]

Hi, I noticed you sometimes overwrite files I uploaded. I make a lot of effort to reduced noise, scratches and overdone contrast. Could you please not overwrite my uploads just like that. There is always the option to upload them as a different file. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

I overwrite only files with obvious problems, in the recent cases contrast (curves) was significantly worsened from the originals (flattened). I know about efforts and appreciate that, but I do the same, reduce noise, scratches, also rotate, crop and restore. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Actually, the contrast is flattened, not worsened. Worse or better is a very subjective thing. The contrast is flattened to reduce harsh light effects. For instance the Goolagong image as it is stored on the Archief database has to dark eyes because of direct sunlight. It is not, as you write, an obvious problem, it is a fix for the shadow in her eyes. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I understood that right when I saw the image, but you flatten contrast in many images that don't have sunlight problems (I thought it is your screen problem, I had such on one laptop, which showed light "saturation"). In such images with exposure problems I tend to sacrifice eyes for the sake of the whole image. For Goolagong, I also found it was worth rotating the image and not crop it so tight, to keep her V-showing fingers at the bottom. Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

admin help[edit]

Hello, you seem online. can you have a look at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#John_Malfoy? that user is vandalising images for some hours, also see Special:Contributions/John_Malfoy. Holger1959 (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Koumanakos[edit]

Hello! I am under the impression, based on the photo caption, that Koumanakos is the second from left, and that the person currently labelled as him is Nino Pasti. Cheers, Constantine 07:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

No, the caption lists three people from the front row, and then two from the back row (I read Dutch without dictionary), but, Anefo contains a lot of mistakes in their captions, thus it would be nice to find another photo of Koumananos. Presence/absence of glasses may be a decisive factor. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Ah, my mistake, I didn't see the "daarachter". I've been looking for a pic of Koumanakos myself for some time, but no luck. THanks for finding this! Cheers, Constantine 20:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Metadata[edit]

When you delete an image (like File:George Busk Signature.png) for being a lower-resolution copy of another image (like File:George Busk Signature.svg), please make sure you copy over all the metadata from the one to the other (like, for instance, when the original image was created, and in what source it was originally published). Provenance is crucial. DS (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Do not overwrite files, please[edit]

Hi,

Please do not overoverwrite existing files. If you feel a different crop is useful, just upload a different version with a different name. Thank you. --Coyau (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Alfred Graf von Schlieffen.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alfred Graf von Schlieffen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

rubin16 (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sanjeeda Shaikh at Women's Day Special on Star Plus.jpg[edit]

I have got the right information of the source and author of the image. Please do check. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sanjeeda_Shaikh_at_Women%27s_Day_Special_on_Star_Plus.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D

File source is not properly indicated: File:04-titus-hermon.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:04-titus-hermon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Pierre Trudeau in 1968.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pierre Trudeau in 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Please give advice on Caesium Auride photo deletion[edit]

Dear Materialscientist, I know you are an expert on this subject. The photo File:Caesium Auride.gif is nominated to be deleted. Since this photo is very unique (it is the only photo of a compound between two metals on wikipedia) I am asking you to give advice on the deletion. Please respond on the nomination page. Thank you --LL221W (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caesium Auride.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--LL221W (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Michael Gross 1989 Paraguay stamp 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michael Gross 1989 Paraguay stamp 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grebenkov (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of useless file revisions[edit]

Hello! While uploading a few files, I've uploaded images with some errors, which I've corrected immediately and re-uploaded their fixed versions. That had left a few useless file revisions around that just keep clogging up the histories, and I've contacted one of the Wikimedia Commons administrators, resulting in having some of those useless file revisions deleted. However, there's more stuff to be deleted (and restored), while that administrator seems to be no longer responding to further questions.

I'm wondering whether you could, please, have a look at User talk:Dsimic § Deletion of useless file revisions, which describes everything in detail? In particular, this list is what's left to be deleted and restored. Any help would be appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 07:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

The file revisions are fine now. Thank you very much, your work is highly appreciated! :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 23:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Charles Michel (politician).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Charles Michel (politician).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Nina Kukharchuk / Nina Petrovna Khrushcheva (Nikita Khrushchev's spouse)[edit]

In researching Nikita Khrushchev, found that you deleted a listing for his wife Nina. There is a page with her name that exists -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Petrovna_Khrushcheva -- but I am too new at this to know how to fix these links. Thanks

File:Charles Michel (politician) 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Charles Michel (politician) 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JNélis 21:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Madurai landmarks.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Madurai landmarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File[edit]

hi, I am writing to ask if you could convert this file into a file of commons: http://www.adacta.fi.it/digitalib/teresiana3/sfoglia_stampe_dzi.php?b=t&op=esplora_ric&cata=stampe&gruppo=AlbumA&id=ALA031&cass=&offset=0 and an image that can not be loaded on commons, I would ask her if she could do it if we can :) --82.50.34.107 13:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Gligor Sokolović.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gligor Sokolović.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

File:KathieLeeGiffordintheNBCDitgitalCafe.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KathieLeeGiffordintheNBCDitgitalCafe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 13:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Richard Harman Luce 1928.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Richard Harman Luce 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Graemp (talk) 17:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

File:1st Baron Hutchison of Montrose 1923.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1st Baron Hutchison of Montrose 1923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Graemp (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Hilda Runciman 1927.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hilda Runciman 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Graemp (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Hilda Runciman 1920s.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hilda Runciman 1920s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Graemp (talk) 15:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Image usage[edit]

Iker Casillas Euro 2012 vs France.jpg Just to notify you that I have used this image on Quora for an answer.
aGastya  ✉ Message Me! (: 12:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

1964 Olympics photos in the public domain?[edit]

I just noticed, that you are currently bulk uploading photographs of the 1964 Olympics under {{PD-Japan}}. Since this copyrighttemplate explicedly states it "cannot be used for photographs or film" and all the photographs are just 50 years old, it is more than likely that they are still protected in Japan as well as in the US and therefore can not be used here on commons.

Please abstain from further uploads and investigate the copyright status of the images allready uploaded. If they are still in copyright they may have to be deleted. // Martin K. (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

This is what the English version of template says, I don't know why - I could not find this either in the Japanese version or in the original law or here. The law sets 50 years for anon works including photographs. Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
I am not quite sure if this photographs can be categorised as anon. They maybe available under the newspaper companies name but that does not automatically imply that they have never been published under the name of their original photographer. Imho claiming anon for works like this is always a risk not really compatible with our Precautionary principle. Especially since the use of this works are marginal, since they can not be used in most wikipedia-projects due to the Lex loci protectionis. // Martin K. (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
It is impossible to prove that the author is unknown, but, I've never seen a photographer name in Japanese newspapers, especially old ones, only when the photographer is famous and is part of the story. Getty is one of the few reliable and meticulous photography databases. If they don't know the author then I don't think anyone does. Another thing is that none of these photographs are available in other web sources. Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

GlobalReplace[edit]

Please update your version of GR: Commons:Village_pump#GlobalReplace_-_Please_update_your_version. --McZusatz (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. 21:53, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Peter MacNicol.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peter MacNicol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Davindaire (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

File:László Almásy 1995 Hungarian stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:László Almásy 1995 Hungarian stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 22:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Stalin lg zlx1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stalin lg zlx1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trust Is All You Need (talk) 06:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

MS[edit]

Who is David Christy and Dmitri Goldberg?? You have way too many blocks (88k) why don't you focus on content. Is there anyway you can unblock all of my jaredgk2008 sockpuppets (i will pay you money to do so)

Do you still work at the NIMS?? I love Wikipediocracy,great site why don't you post there??

File tagging File:Apostol Arsache1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Apostol Arsache1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Smooth_O (talk) 13:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

File:YanniPressPhoto.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:YanniPressPhoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Marx/Lennon graphic[edit]

Just a thought on the Marx/Lennon stamp on the Groucho Marx page. This humorous concept originated as a Firesign Theatre album cover in 1969, decades earlier, and perhaps that deserves citation? See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Can_You_Be_in_Two_Places_at_Once_When_You're_Not_Anywhere_at_All

File:Oscar Niemeyer 1968.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Oscar Niemeyer 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Oscar Niemeyer 1968b.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Oscar Niemeyer 1968b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Rachel de Queiroz 2011 Serbian stamp.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rachel de Queiroz 2011 Serbian stamp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yanguas (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Я восхищён вашей деятельностью. Higimo (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi from Caselle landi, Italy[edit]

Hi, dear Materialscientist, how are you?

I saw you charged in Commons the piture of the great Pino Calvi, very good! I would loke to charge also the picture of Susanna Huckstep, but I'm not able, I'm able to charge only pitures from my camera.

Is it possible to charge it? Thanks a lot for your help!

Rei Momo (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Difficult. If I upload photographs by Italian photographers on Commons, I have to use images from 1975 or older. Susanna Huckstep is too young for that. If I upload on it.wikipedia then I can use images from 1994 and older, but, I don't see good candidates for Huckstep right away. it:File:Susanna Huckstep Miss Italia 1984.jpg is not too bad. Materialscientist (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.53.243.67 13:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.53.243.67 13:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sohn Kee-chung 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.53.243.67 14:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Karan A Chanana, Chairman of the Amira Group, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.png[edit]

I noticed you changed the license on File:Karan A Chanana, Chairman of the Amira Group, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.png to {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} indicating that it is part of the Flickr's The Commons. However, the source image at Flickr does not use Flickr's "no known copyright restrictions" license, is not a member of the The Commons, and was not uploaded by one of the institutions participating in Flickr's The Commons. The original on Flickr uses the "Public Domain Mark" which indicates that the Flickr user believes the photo is public domain for an unspecified reason. I've changed the license to {{Flickr-public domain mark}}, which requires the Commons uploader to choose a more specific license. —RP88 (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Astrid S (photo by Stian Andersen).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Astrid S (photo by Stian Andersen).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

110.141.131.28 09:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

File[edit]

Mr. prejudice Materialscientist,, I write because I have noticed that failed to load some wonderful image of GETTYIMAGINES,, and I would ask if I could upload this picture of gettyimagines I found,, http://www.gettyimages.ie/detail/news-photo/the-state-coach-passing-under-the-doorway-of-buckingham-news-photo/3347769 It could upload it Commons? --95.245.76.133 18:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Flickr reviewing {{cc-pd}}[edit]

Thanks for your work in Flickr reviewing. As far as I know, Public Domain Mark is not {{cc-pd}}. Please take special care when reviewing images tagged as that. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Mangiare.ogg[edit]

You cannot decline renaming this file. Rules of Category:Pronunciation are clear: this file does not match category it is contained in. Names of files need to be machine-readable. Even incorrect capitalization ruins this. --Derbeth talk 19:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

The Queen Victoria[edit]

hi,, Mr. Materialscientist, I am writing to ask if you could upload this picture of gettyimagines, depicting a time of Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee in 1897, could load it,, because the copyright has expired for nearly 100 years? --82.55.135.8 19:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Cropping[edit]

Hi Materialscientist, I saw that you are uploading cropped versions of photographs by famous photographers over the original full uploads. Please don't do that, but upload a fully new pic instead (that actually also goes for sepia photographs, which you replaced with pure b/w photographs). The photographers like Nicola Perscheid were artists as well, so it is like cropping a portrait by Dürer or Picasso - you wouldn't do that or at least you would upload a new file instead of putting a cropped version over the original. The originals have to be kept intact, they are not only a mere portrait of an acto etc.r but also a work of the photographer. I would be happy if you could revert the heaviest crops you uploaded yourself (I startet reverting some of the heaviers ones already). --Paulae (talk) 19:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but the more I see what you have done the more shocked I am: What have you done to Nicola Perscheids work on Wikimedia Commons? This is absolutely horrible. Commons is also a place to preserve the works of famous photographers - what you do is the exact opposite. --Paulae (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
We do preserve those works, in the old versions of the images. Yet many uncropped photos are hardly suitable for infobox images. Materialscientist (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Wow, what an understanding of art - making it fit into our infoboxes. No further questions. --Paulae (talk) 08:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Garegin-nzhdeh-portrait.jpg‎[edit]

Здраствуйте уважаемый Materialscientis. Здесь Нжде написано с маленькой буквой. Это унизительно для армян, прошу переименовать. В других запросах, которые Вы отклонили - написано неправильно Njdeh, на английском пишется Nzhdeh, тоже прошу переименовать. Заранее спасибо--6AND5 (talk) 10:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Некоторые страны (например Болгария) узаконили транслитерацию; насколько мне известно, Армения этого пока не сделала, т.е. фисксированной транслитерации нет. To есть веских причин к переименованию этих файлов тоже net. Я бы переименовал если бы они не были использованы. Materialscientist (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Извините, но что менает, что они использованы? Ведь бот менает во всех проектах измененые имена...--6AND5 (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Замена происходит с запозданием, и ранее иногда приводила к физической и безвозвратной потере изображений (не знаю как сейчас). В любом случае замены не желательны по нескольким причинам - например, покрывание предыдущих правок в статьях. Materialscientist (talk) 10:36, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Королева Виктория[edit]

привет,, Г-н Materialscientist, я пишу, чтобы спросить, если вы можете загрузить эту картинку в gettyimagines, изображающие времяБриллиантовый юбилей королевы Виктории в 1897 году, может загрузить его,, потому что авторское право истекло в течение почти 100 лет? --82.50.35.29 11:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Зачем? Качество плохое. У нас полно лучших изображений этой королевы. Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Спасибо за информацию, но,, так как я не считаю, что я не все, что большой,, я бы, по крайней мере, если это chiderle "другое изображение видит,, Я всегда хотел, чтобы увидеть его на обыкновенные,, по крайней мере, один из двух,

[3] —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.50.35.29 (talk) 12:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand your message. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Я мог бы спросить вас, по крайней мере, чтобы загрузить этот файл, который я положил,, я хотел бы один из этих двух файлов, загружается из нее,, лично я всегда хотел, чтобы увидеть их на обыкновенные (о лице королевы Виктории) --82.50.35.29 12:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Date for George Marshall Photo[edit]

Saw the picture you included on the article on George C. Marshall. It's actually a striking photo which I like a lot. Interestingly it doesn't show anywhere else when googling images of Marshall. However, I note that it says it is Marshall, vintage 1947, and that is problematic. First, he is photographed as a General (i.e., 4 stars). Marshall was promoted to General of the Army (5 stars) on 16 Dec 1944. He would be out of uniform if the photo was taken in 1947. Marshall was punctilious about such details and propriety. Similarly, in Jan 1947, Marshall began his service as Secretary of State, a civilian post. Marshall would not have made the mistake of wearning his uniform while serving as a civilian cabinet secretary.

Most convincing however, he is wearing Army General Staff branch insignia. This is worn only while assigned to the Army General Staff. Otherwise, general officers do not wear branch insignia (unless serving as a branch chief e.g., infantry, armor, or are in a specialty branch, e.g., JAG or Medical Corps). This narrows the period down to his tenure as Army Chief of Staff.

If you examine his features, his face lacks the worry lines that years of war and age placed on him by 1945, as shown in other dated photos. His ribbons do not appear to contain any that are World War II era. The foreign awards are hard to distinguish but the latest one I could nail down (Brazilian Order of Military Merit) was awarded in 1939. At a guess (I know you can't use that in a Wikipedia article), I would estimate the photo as vintage 1941 or 1942, soon after his promotion to the 4-star rank. Given that he was promoted to 4 stars the day the Germans invaded Poland (1 Sep 1939), and that he was promoted to 5 stars the day the Battle of the Bulge started (16 Dec 1944), can we re-write the caption to say "Marshall during World War II" or "Marshall while serving as Army Chief of Staff"? Regards, Greg Bilhartz (talk) 07:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Feel free to rewrite the caption - I have much experience with the source (Dutch archives). They are accurate on dates only when the original image is taken by their photographers. This is a photograph of their photograph, and thus there is no trust in the date at all - I guess it is the date of rephotographing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Kobrin Mikhail 2.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте!

Вы изменили лицензию для файла File:Kobrin Mikhail 2.jpg. Дело в том, что эта фотография была изготовлена и опубликована как раз на территории Царства Польского. Поэтому лицензия не совсем подходит. С 2007 года фотография находилась в русской Википедии под PD-лицензией. Но недавно администратору Sealle что-то не понравилось в лицензировании. Поэтому я перенёс это фото на Склад и дал другой источник – Flickr. UploadWizard не дал возможности загрузить это фото под PD-лицензией. Поэтому я поставил CC-BY. Пожалуйста, исправьте лицензию, если это необходимо. И. Максим (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

А откуда известно про Польшу? Materialscientist (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
А на Фликре источник, на котором написано Холм (Chelm). 41.140.221.143 11:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
И что это значит? Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Холмский уезд Люблинской губернии Царства Польского в составе Российской империи. Лицензия, которую Вы установили, – PD-Rus-Empire – не распространяется на Царство Польское. И. Максим (talk) 11:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

[4]. Materialscientist (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Спасибо —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.140.221.143 (talk) 11:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Простите, вы не могли бы поучаствовать в дискуссии по запросам Sealle на удаление файлов File:Kobrin Mikhail 1.jpg и File:Kobrin Mikhail 3.jpg? Во второй раз пытаясь удалить из Википедии загруженные 8 лет назад файлы, автор запросов не связывался со мной и ведёт себя неконструктивно. И. Максим (talk) 22:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
    Тот же вопрос: А откуда (нам) известно про Польшу? Materialscientist (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
    Прямых доказательств нет. На данных фотографиях не осталось штампов фотографов. Но по времени и сопутствующим фотографиям, которых у нас несколько, можно сделать вывод о времени и месте съёмок. К примеру, эта фотография сделана 27 сентября 1929 года в Польше, незадолго до выхода Кобрина на пенсию (1931). Отсюда с лёгкостью можно догадаться, что опубликованные на складе фотографии относятся к тому же времени и месту. Честно говоря, я и сам это понял только в результате возникшей дискуссии. И. Максим (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
    Предполагаю, что вы не заметили моего ответа. И. Максим (talk) 10:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
    Заметил, но покa не вижу убедительных аргументов. Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
    Спасибо за ответ. Раз мои аргументы неубедительны, то должны быть убедительны аргументы инициатора удаления. А там пока тоже не вполне убедительные аргументы, если я не ошибаюсь. Изначально Sealle предлагал пройти процедуру OTRS. Наша семья не единственная наследница Михаила Петровича. Может ли моя супруга, его праправнучка, выслать разрешение на OTRS или нет? И. Максим (talk) 11:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
    Не знаю, поскольку я OTRS не занимаюсь. Если других аргументов нет (да и если есть тоже) то конечно надо пробовать OTRS. Materialscientist (talk) 12:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
    Хорошо, попробую. Раньше не пробовал. И. Максим (talk) 13:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

photos supprimés par abus[edit]

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé, SANS AUCUNE jusitification, plusieurs photos que j'avais postées. Certaines m'ont été confiées par la personne elle-même (Pierre Le coz, écrivain), d'autres sont de ma propre réalisation (page Bissorte utilisateur)... Ces photos ne sont grevées d'AUCUN droit d'auteur. Je vous demande instamment d'en rétablir le libre accès, s'il vous plaît.

Bissorte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bissorte (talk • contribs) 12:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Please provide a more detailed explanation for each individual image, and I will gladly restore it. Whenever you have personal permissions from the author or copyright holder, please send them to COM:OTRS, and the OTRS people will restore the images. Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Royal Visit[edit]

сальве, сиг Materialscientist,Я прошу, если я могу скачать этот файл, найденный на месте Getyimagines на фото на «встрече Вильгельма II и Альберта I Бельгии :),, что вы думаете?? :) --82.54.92.132 20:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Janet Landgard 1968.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Janet Landgard 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Largoplazo (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bohemian018[edit]

Two files were not deleted. Please take a look. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Some glitch on my PC or the Java script that I use for closing DRs. Deleted, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:V1B0131.jpg[edit]

I sent the permission of the photographer but I have had no response, and the file can be deleted in 7 days. What can I do? Please help me Samu.lc78 (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vista parcial noturna B. dos Professores, Morro do Carmo e Todos os Santos, Coronel Fabriciano MG.JPG[edit]

Hi, would you please consider undeleting this file? I would have closed it exactly the same way if I didn't know about this DR. It seems that the file was used in a collage that has a lot of external use. Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

This close[edit]

Hiya! While I totally agree with this close [5], I was wondering if they should be left as own work of uploader which they don't seem to be? Thanks for letting me know. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

File:RR5111-0028R.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RR5111-0028R.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Miwa Fukuhara 1960.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Miwa Fukuhara 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikijunkie (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:"Saint Gregory Armenian" by Francesco De Maria (Naples 1623-Naples 1690) - San Gregorio Armeno Church in Naples (21513030443).jpg[edit]

You reviewed this license, and approved it as "PD-Art". This photo isn't even remotely close. A photo of the painting itself, and only the painting? Yes. This? No. This photo is clearly, and obviously, not a 'faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work of art', especially since there is a 3D work of art sitting in front of a third of the painting. Please fix this. Revent (talk) 07:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Right, this was before the recent "flickr public domain" saga, which resulted in non-acceptance of the "Public domain" license on Commons. I undid my review and leave it to others. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. It's not part of what I'm trying to clear up right now (and I do, indeed, get what you were 'approving', since it's a copyrightable PD-Marked image of PD Art), it's just that seeing the PD-Art tag on it like that made me do a bit of a double take... it'll really need some kind of a somewhat complex tagging if it gets sorted. I just really didn't want to revert you... I'm trying to only mess with the wrong CC-0 tags right now. Revent (talk) 09:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Agnès Laurent Epoca 1957.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agnès Laurent Epoca 1957.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Yeah you are probably right about that, the whole magazine's cover art is simple enough to fall under PD-Text, PD-textlogo and PD-shape (and maybe others). But should not these licenses (or part of them) be added to the image description once they are part of its PD-status?? It is a side note anyway and I am probably going to strike/rewrite that comment, I voted to keep the image and liked your reasoning. My best, Cavarrone (talk) 10:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg You and me moving files together...kinda reminds me of how it was back in 2010/2011. I first became an admin not long after that, so maybe it's a good omen? Face-wink.svg In any event, it's good to see you over here on Commons. You're easily one of the best volunteers the WMF has, and one of the people I know I can go to who'll know what needs to be done..and that's really not so Common... INeverCry 05:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Links to NotesTyper in Algorithmic composition article[edit]

Hello! I found out that you removed link to my new algorithmic composition system NotesTyper. I already created several algorithmic composition systems. This new one also analyzes information from keyboard to act not just randomly but with some starting information. Can you please tell me what is wrong with my link? Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rualark (talk • contribs) 10:53, 03 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Rutile@quartz.jpg[edit]

Original (1600 x 1200) Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Queen_Máxima_of_the_Netherlands_in_2002[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Queen_Máxima_of_the_Netherlands_in_2002 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Vera (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Becky G perform at LA Pride.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Becky G perform at LA Pride.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Becky G perform at LA Pride.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ytoyoda (talk) 02:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

could you change the name of all my recent uploaded images[edit]

Dear materialscientist! I have recently uploaded some photos, which are mistakenly instead of District written Destrect. so if you are able to change all from destrect to district, I will be thankful to you. regards--عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 08:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AlfredNobel2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AlfredNobel2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 03:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Arthur B. McDonald-small.jpg[edit]

Is this file going through OTRS review or not? I think there is no way around it, as Boardhead says he is the webmaster of www.sno.phy.queensu.ca where the image was previously published with another license (copyright), and still is. See: User talk:Boardhead#File:Art McDonald 2008 .28cropped.29.jpg_2 Finnusertop (talk) 06:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Probably. I didn't bother with this question when uploading this crop to Commons (and I don't have OTRS access, by the way). My purpose was to unite both files (original and crop) here and handle them both here. Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I took this image myself and used it previously on the Queen's Particle Astrophysics web site without providing an explicit copyright (btw, that's me here). I would now like to also use this image on Wikipedia, and frankly don't care what copyright it has. I'm happy to release this into the public domain. I have done a bit of reading as to what must be done for me to prove I have rights to this file, but the hoops I need to jump through seem daunting. What is the simplest way to achieve this? Boardhead (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mattbuck's temporary category[edit]

Please don't just "revert all" changes when closing a DR - use the DRhelper [keep] links. You managed to remove all those photos from my temporary category... -mattbuck (Talk) 22:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

DR helper fails on multistep DRs, i.e. when a new DR is attached to a previous DR page with the same name. I have to handle those manually and would be glad to know a tool that works with them. Materialscientist (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miwa Fukuhara 1960.jpg[edit]

Hello Materialscientist. Maybe we have to correct Template:PD-Japan/de, because there is written "Note: This template cannot be used for photographs or film." Why is there a different text in Template:PD-Japan/en and Template:PD-Japan/de? The Text of the German version of the template was my reason to make the DR on that Image.... --Wikijunkie (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Some time ago I've looked into the template history and found that the English version was initially a robot-like translation (from Japanese I presume). Then, while brushing up the grammar, someone changed the text as if the law does not apply to photographs. I have consulted the original law and related pages on Commons, like Commons:Copyright rules by territory and the Japanese version, and corrected the English version. I could correct /nl and /ru versions, but they don't exist :-), I don't feel confident to edit in German (and most other languages), so please help if you can. Materialscientist (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I translate the note from English to German Template. So now it should be correct. --Wikijunkie (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Yuya Matsushita[edit]

Can this photo of Yuya Matsushita be uploaded with it saying "some rights reserved"? Vivexdino (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

No, it does no allow commercial distribution, and thus can not be uploaded on Commons (or local wikis). Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wifidel[edit]

Hello, you did not delete 3 files in this DR, is it wanted or have you forgotten? regards, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, deleted. Wikimedia servers (and our local servers) had problems around that time. Materialscientist (talk) 12:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Leonora Carrington[edit]

Can we do something with these three images?:

File:Leonora Carrington. How doth the little crocodile... (6877971863).jpg
File:Leonora Carrington. Quería ser pájaro. (6877971921).jpg
File:Leonora Carrington. Sisters of the moon, fantasia. (6877971971).jpg

Thanks.--Xabier (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Magic Mansion[edit]

Materialscientist, could I ask you to re-create a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Magic_Mansion_Title_Card.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 on English Wikipedia, for use in the "In the media" section of the upcoming Signpost issue? I understand the image was on Commons under a free licence. Best, Andreas JN466 09:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure it was freely licensed. The license was {{PD-USGov}} with the source "Armed Forces Radio & Television Services (now AFN) (obtained from cast member - Jerry Jacobson)" and no weblinks. Given the circumstances, this whole description might be unreliable. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, and agreed. (I didn't know it was USGov.) Andreas JN466 10:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Reuploads[edit]

You may want to re-review this editors uploaded some of which you already deleted. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Pyro wiki.JPG Fireworks from the Philippines to celebrate 2016
Happy New Year Materialscientist! I hope you still do your great work in 2016! Face-smile.svg Poké95 05:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Uploading images[edit]

Materialscientist i have a request. Can you promise me you will never wear sneakers ever again for charity?? Please (I am serious) . Also ,if i take photos and upload them to commons,can i upload them to Wikipedia without being autoconfirmed?? I want to add images to some Video game articles that need them (I took the photos of the video games myself) Video game wikipedia articles really need more images. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:880:4000:993:4D0:BE26:DFF5:4F9A (talk) 22:04, 04 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Princip arrest.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Princip arrest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Please delete this file uploaded by mistake (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Padurea_spanzuratilor_1922.jpg). I chose a wrong destination. It s a file under fair use. Thanks. --Haptokar (talk) 08:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Review[edit]

I understand that your job is to block, and I understand that I may have made a mistake in the other file, but the File: Ive Seixas.jpg is mine. Why do you blocked too? --Leangra Ros (talk) 02:28, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please email to WP:OTRS and we'll restore it. Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Alicegloucester2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alicegloucester2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

January (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Alter Botanischer Garten Göttingen[edit]

Hello Materialscientist!
I fear you overlooked my request to move all pages in Special:PrefixIndex/File:Alte_Botanische_Garten_der_Universität_Göttingen in the same fashion you now moved picture 001. I'd be happy if you could fix the remaining titles for the same reason as well.
Thanks in advance, --Vogone (talk) 18:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I overlooked. Fixed now, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Be honest[edit]

My friend you deleted a file that was my own, please restore my file because you made a mistake. I have sent an email where you asked for but to no avail. My file that you deleted is: Ive_Seixas.jpg --Leangra Ros (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Congrats[edit]

Congrats on hitting the 100,000 block mark, quite an accomplishment. I hope you're aiming for 1 million blocks (maybe you'll get a statue made of you outside of Wikipedia Headquarters for 1 million blocks) You've blocked so many people on Wikipedia i am sure you've even blocked your own grandmother!!


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)