User talk:Mattes

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-4 This user has near native speaker knowledge of English.
es-1 Este usuario tiene un conocimiento básico del español.
fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language
Jenseits aller Vorstellungen - Rumi.png

Daylight Map, nonscientific (0400 UTC).jpg

New section

Contents

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Mattes,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 22:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Basel 2012-10-13 Batch part 2 (45).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Basel 2012-10-13 Batch part 2 (45).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Taivo (talk) 09:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Gaertner Eduard Königsgraben in Berlin.tiff[edit]

Hallo Mattes, meinst Du location…missing ist bei Auktionen sinnvoll? Gruß--Oursana (talk) 20:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Du
Naja vielleicht wurde es an ein Museum verkauft oder an einen bedeutenden Sammler. Das mache ich schon seit vielen Jahren so. Ist ja nur ein Hinweis, dass die Lokalität noch nicht genannt wurde. LG, --Mattes (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

RM_Category:Media_with_erroneous_locations[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Mattes. You have new messages at Jarekt#RM_Category:Media_with_erroneous_locations's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Krd 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie[edit]

WLM-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Mattes,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

  • Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

File:Pierre Corneille, Jean-Jacques Caffieri, Paris 1723 1792.JPG[edit]

Hello. You moved this file from Category:Collections of the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rouen to Category:Paintings in the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rouen, but it's a statue, not a painting. Sincerely yours.Palamède (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Mary Magdalene[edit]

Hallo Mattes, was hältst Du davon, wenn Du den redirect rückgängig machst, weil es doch der eng. gebräuchliche Name und in Übereinstimmung mit der cat. ist. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo auch, ja wäre besser. Kümmere mich in Kürze d'rum. Der Galeriename (dt.) ist aber nicht von mir https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Magdalene&action=history MfG, --Mattes (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Danke ich dachte das käme von Dir. Offen gesagt, konnte ich weil ein redirect war das nicht so o weiteres bewegen. weißt Du noch wie Du das gemacht hast? Vielleicht habe ich es aber falsch in Erinnerung. Schöne Feiertage für Dich --Oursana (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Simon Magus[edit]

Bourdon, Sébastien - La Chute de Simon le Magicien - 1657.jpg

Hallo Gibt es noch eine größere Auflösung von dem Bild? Wo ist das Orginal? Vielen Dank K. D. Schmidt kadeschmidt@web.de

Grüß Gott,
Das Original befindet sich in der Kathedrale Saint-Pierre in Montpellier, Frankreich. Leider gibt es im Internet keine größere Auflösung außer vielleicht hier oder Cathedrale de montpellier-WEB.pdf hier (S. 49, PDF).
MfG, --Mattes (talk) 06:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hechtsee (Tirol) — Grenzstein 1787.jpg[edit]

Hechtsee (Tirol) — Grenzstein 1787.jpg

Hallo Mattes, habe den "Grenzstein" vom Egelsee zum Hechtsee umgezogen, jetzt stimmt natürlich der Dateiname nicht mehr. Er befindet sich direkt am Abfluss des Hechtsees Richtung Kieferbach. Der Egelsee liegt ein paar 100 m weiter östlich. Zu deiner Frage unter Wikipedia:Auskunft: Es sind ganz eindeutig zwei stark verwitterte Wappen (Tirol und Bayern). "Egelsee (Tirol) — Gedenkstein Felix Battisti.JPG" findet man übrigens ganz in der Nähe, also auch am Hechtsee. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Rufus! Danke für den Hinweis und die Umbenennung. VG, --Mattes (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Religious Symbols-ani.gif[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Religious Symbols-ani.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Religious Symbols-ani.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Glückskäfer (Schokolade).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Glückskäfer (Schokolade).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Smial (talk) 08:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Depopulation of Category:Data entry workers[edit]

Hello, I notice you have almost completely depopulated Category:Data entry workers, moving files to the less specific, and in general differently focused, Category:People with machines. I am curious what your motivation was for doing so, and why you don't think both categories are relevant for most of these images.

If your goal is to delete Category:Data entry workers, you should not first remove images from the category, as that makes it difficult or impossible to fully assess a category and its fitness; you should just nominate it for deletion, along with a suggestion of what to do with the content. djr13 (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for notifying. Guess, it was not such a good idea after all. Proposal: I revert the changes and Category:Data entry workers get Category:People with machines. Happy holidays, --Mattes (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Knoppers.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Knoppers.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Josve05a (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Dampfer vs Segler[edit]

Hallo Mattes, bezüglich z.B. File:Édouard Adam - The auxiliary steamer Rishanglys calling for a pilot off a headland (1877).jpg: Dampfer sind keine Segelschiffe. Die Besegelung, die sie früher führten, sind nur Hilfssegel. Sie müßten in eine Kategorie wie evt. Category:19th-century steamships in paintings. Grüße und guten Rutsch. --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Globales Benutzerkonto[edit]

Hallo Mattes! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass dein globales Benutzerkonto nicht mit deinem dewiki-Konto verbunden ist. Hat dies einen besonderen Grund? In den nächsten Wochen werden alle Benutzerkonten in irgendeiner Weise eindeutige globale Konten werden. Da fänd ich es sinnvoller, dies über Special:MergeAccount lieber direkt selbst zu steuern, bevor lokale Konten noch irgendwie umbenannt werden. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Double_portraits[edit]

Oursana (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Greek monastery[edit]

Hello Mattes,

I would like to know where is this monastery in the old city. It seems to be near the Greek Catholic Patriarchate in St George street... You took some pictures there Thank you for your help

Djampa (talk) 08:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, umm honestly, I just strolled around and don't remember. Unfortunately, my GPS locator was not working. Maybe I return to ISR some day... Thanks for your hard work with the Jerusalem photos! Shalom, --Mattes (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:PBair inflight meal 2009.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:PBair inflight meal 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
🎂CAKE🎂 13:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Map data sourcing: File:Wpdms nasa topo missoula floods.jpg[edit]

Hello: There are questions about the source data for one of your maps File:Wpdms nasa topo missoula floods.jpg. Can you please clarify on the map where the map came from and where the data presented came from? We want to use it for a Featured Article illustration on en:WP, but it is under review. Thank you. Gaff (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

I transferred it from en. There was no original source. The original uploader was en:User:Decumanus but he is inactive since 2012. (User:Decumanus inactive since 2006). Probable source: NASA with an overlay of a United States Geological Survey topographic map. I'll leave him a message anyway. --06:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thanks! --Gaff (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Boeing firetruck 01.jpg[edit]

Why [[:Category::Boeing Everett Factory]]? Photo is nowhere near there, it is photographed in Seattle (on the grounds of Garfield High School in Seattle, for what it's worth). - Jmabel ! talk 01:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, could be stationed anywhere → http://www.boeing.com/boeing/companyoffices/aboutus/fire/stations.page? Seattle is not too far from Everett, I would say. Now, it's just a guess. --Mattes (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Boeing has at least three major plants within 30 miles of Seattle: besides the one at Everett, there is one in Renton and another around King County Airport, more commonly known by its old name Boeing Field. So I'm going to revert. There is no reason to think Everett is more likely than the other two plants. - Jmabel ! talk 04:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Police_of_Thailand[edit]

Komei Koō (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Schweinehund.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schweinehund.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Vikiçizer (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues[edit]

Hello Mattes. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Meister der Heiligen Sippe der Ältere in der Alten Pinakothek[edit]

Hallo, liest du bitte mal de:Diskussion:Meister der Heiligen Sippe der Ältere. Ich bin der Meinung, dass beide Bilder in Category:Meister der Heiligen Sippe der Ältere zu Meister der Heiligen Sippe der Jüngere gehören. Herzliche Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Alan Liefting (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

File:International Narcotic Control Board (UN) logo.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:International Narcotic Control Board (UN) logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
JuTa 20:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Office for Outer Space Affairs United Nations Office at Vienna.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Office for Outer Space Affairs United Nations Office at Vienna.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
JuTa 06:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Kennst Du[edit]

it:Catalogo dell'Alte Pinakothek --Oursana (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

PN LG, --Mattes (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Jochbezeichnungen Sixtinische Kapelle[edit]

Hallo Mattes, kannst Du noch mal an die Zählung gehen. es muß umgekehrt sein, zB. Schöpfung Licht =1, Trunkenheit Noahs 9. Das ist die Leserichtung, die hier IMHO maßgeblich ist, auch wenn Michelangelo in umgekehrter Reihenfolge gemalt hat. Auch stimmen wohl die Deckenbezugsbilder nicht, vielleicht auch wegen der umgekehrten Nummerierung. Ich helfe sonst gerne mit.--Oursana (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, die Benummerung beruht auf Web Gallery of Art (Bsp. 1). Kann sehr gut sein, dass die Angaben nicht korrekt sind (Sistine Chapel ceiling#Overviews/Grafische Überblicke wäre demnach auch falsch). Meine Frage ist: Gibt es eine Art tradierte Zählung für die Joche? . --Mattes (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
IMHO sind dann auch die Übersichten falsch. Weitere Infos habe ich nicht. Aber ist doch klar, dass man die Geschichte der Reihe nach erzählt, s. de:Sixtinische Kapelle--Oursana (talk) 18:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
OK ja, macht Sinn. --Mattes (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Mattes,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

TÜpedia[edit]

Vielen Dank für das schöne Foto auf der Startseite von TÜpedia. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Training zum polizeilichen Einsatzverhalten[edit]

Hallo Mattes, gibt es das hier https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Training_zum_polizeilichen_Einsatzverhalten-Verbringen_aus_PKW.JPG oder vergleichbares irgendwo als Video(s)? --Rava77 (talk) 06:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, für die Öffentlichkeit habe ich nur das hier gefunden:

Es dürfte noch mehr Videos im Internet geben, z.B. aus anderen Ländern. Möglicherweise gibt es noch Lehrfilme oder Dokus auf DVD oder online in Fachkreisen, z.B. www.polizeitrainer.de. --Mattes (talk) 09:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Flags with angels[edit]

Why did you place this file in the Flags with angels gallery? there is no angel here or am I missing something? Ankry (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

There's a small angel above the green star in the lower center. Greetings, --Mattes (talk) 14:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Jarekt (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Finavon (talk)

Copyright status: File:Execution of Hebrews by Pagans.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Execution of Hebrews by Pagans.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 22:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Admin?[edit]

Hi, What do you think about becoming admin? You have the experience and you are active. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Yann, yes I would like to do it -- thanks for the suggestion! Have a great day.
Yours, --Mattes (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Personalausweis (2002), Vorderseite, Ausschnitt “Staatsangehörigkeit Deutsch”.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Personalausweis (2002), Vorderseite, Ausschnitt “Staatsangehörigkeit Deutsch”.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
78.164.196.25 21:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Notarztwagen DLRG WRZ Oberbayern - Toyota Land Cruiser.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notarztwagen DLRG WRZ Oberbayern - Toyota Land Cruiser.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
197.78.172.142 11:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

File:DPAG-Briefmarke "2000 Jahre Varusschlacht" (55 c).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DPAG-Briefmarke "2000 Jahre Varusschlacht" (55 c).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Correlatio (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Filippo_Teodoro_di_Liagno[edit]

Achim (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Religious paintings with more subjects[edit]

Hi, sorry for my elementaru english... I read your great work on religious (and not?) paintings in Commons and Iwant a your opinion. Various (or more) paintings haven't a only subject, for example an Madonna and Child with donors, or others Christian saints, or angles (with or without objects as well as musical instruments), or monks, nuns, various clergy, filling more and more the "mother category". I think you should start doing subcategories, started from Madonna and Child with Christian saints (Madonna and Child with saint Anne, with Saint John the Baptist alredy exist), what do you think about it? Regards :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An exemple: File:Madonna dell'Incendio- Pescocostanzo.jpg.--Threecharlie (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello! You're right, there is a lot to do. I'm busy for the next decades to sort paintings and create categories... [1] Ciao, --Mattes (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, Category:Paintings of monks in Italy vs Category:Italian paintings of monks. I wont understand... the first is relate to paintings of various monks in this moment in italian territory, the second...? ...of paintings by italian painters not necessary in Italy in this moment? If exist a painting of a monk of an italian painter in Louvre Museum I must upload in the second?--Threecharlie (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Vehicles_with_flags[edit]

Themightyquill (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Engelberg Tourismuswerbung Schmetterling 1928 .jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Engelberg Tourismuswerbung Schmetterling 1928 .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Tourismuswerbung Engelberg (Schweiz), Skifahrerin 1925.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tourismuswerbung Engelberg (Schweiz), Skifahrerin 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Bread_in_paintings[edit]

Oursana (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aero view of Hammonton, New Jersey 1926.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aero view of Hammonton, New Jersey 1926.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:William Faden. Composite Mediterranean. 1785.jpg[edit]

Hello Mattes,

Pleases see the file above after your edit - her. -- Geagea (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


File:Nds. Landesmuseum (42).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nds. Landesmuseum (42).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
JuTa 18:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:British Virgin Islands — Jost van Dyke — police automobile (rear.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:British Virgin Islands — Jost van Dyke — police automobile (rear.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
JuTa 04:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Staatliche Archive Bayerns - neue Logografie.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Staatliche Archive Bayerns - neue Logografie.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
HerrAdams (talk) 14:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Counter-terrorism[edit]

Sanandros (talk) 21:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Mattes!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Mattes!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Frage zu Bildern in der Kategorie Nürnberg[edit]

Warum hast Du die Bilder

Nürnberg — 2013-09-06 und 07 —Mattes (6).JPG
Nürnberg — 2013-09-06 und 07 —Mattes (48).JPG
Nürnberg — 2013-09-06 und 07 —Mattes (8).JPG

unter Category:Nuremberg kategorisiert.--Hfst (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Weil ich sie dort fotografisch aufgenommen habe; genauerere Standorte habe ich nicht in Erinnerung. Es handelte sich um Batches, vielleicht ist das erste irgendwie dort reingerutscht (DB Museum?) --Mattes (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

File:DBP 1982 1130 Hambacher Fest.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DBP 1982 1130 Hambacher Fest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Schlosser67 (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete narration, why?[edit]

What is the problem with the narration? Why additional indications of the country or province? All information can be found in the specified categories and listed in Wikipedia articles. Commons is not Wikipedia, but a database for images. Detailed information can be found in Wikipedia articles. --Jos1950 (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, it is not useful to put the narration file (like you guys on nl.WP) in a commons category description page. Commons lists media files, Commons is not the encyclopedian branch of Wikimedia. Some REALLY basic information is ok for categories and gallery pages. The basic information is limited to the extend that the reader gets an exact description of the topic and maybe some notes about the usage. Commons is a collection of files. For more information, see Commons:Project scope. I have put the ogg file into the category and deleted it from the category page as it was inserted via source code. That does not meet the standards (out of scope) of category pages. In the end, there could hundreds of narration files in the category description text before displaying the elements (file assignments). I would accept it in a Commons gallery page like Sosúa for the original language (not all other languages). How do we end the edit war? --Mattes (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
I understand your explanation. I now think like you that it is now obsolete and does not fit here on this way, and I will also remove the other spoken texts from the Dominican Republic.
There is no other city Sosua so it was not necessary to changed it for me. You have now created category Sosúa but have not moved the content. Is it your intention to disclose the location in Sosua "like Sosúa (Puerto Plata)" as with other cities?
The message "Sosúa> Puerto Plata Province> Flag.svg Dominican Republic" is not necessary, because the information is already present on the page and it also is not mentioned in the Commons on other pages of sites.
Is it acceptable for you to change the page name in "Sosúa (Puerto Plata)" without the additional indication and without the narration? If so, I will set it so and move the content. --Jos1950 (talk) 18:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
(1) Category assignments -- ✓  Done .
(2) Category name -- Sosúa is an exclusive name. No other place with this name exists. As far as I know, the addition ("Puerto Plata") is not needed, at least all the other exclusive human settlements outside of the USA and Canada don't have descriptions in brackets.
(3) Category description -- "Sosúa> Puerto Plata Province> Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg Dominican Republic" < well, that's exact the basic information I was talking about. Actually, I love this short information (so simple. so powerful.TM) without the blah blah blah. Actually, you only get the information from the category entries without my intro. Please leave it like that.

Greetings from Flag of Germany.svg Germany --Mattes (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

I leave it. I also look for the easiest way to find an image. Groeten van een Flag of the Netherlands.svg Netherlandser de la Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg Dominican Republic

Removal La Romana Aeropuerto from category[edit]

La Romana Aeropuerto RD.jpg

Dear Mattes,

Is there a reason for the removal of La Romana Aeropuerto from Category:Airports in the Dominican Republic. A picture of each airport should be possible, I think. --Jos1950 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello and happy 2017! The Category:Airports in the Dominican Republic in the pic is redundant to Category:La Romana International Airport. Anotherwords, nothing to worry about. Seems like you're new here?! plezier hebben in de Dominicaanse Republiek! --Mattes (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
For you there is also a good 2017, grab it. ;)
I do not quite understand what you mean by "the pic is redundant to Category: La Romama". If I have understood correctly, it is unnecessary to place the image in "Category: Airports in the Dominican Republic". However, all images in Category: Airports in the Dominican Republic (and other parent categories) coming from a different category, except File: KingAirCBR.jpg here, and would all be unnecessary.
I know this is Commons, not Wikipedia. I think it should be clear what kind of pictures can be found in a category, so I put one or two images for reference and link the category. If that is a good idea, then I place the file back in Airports in the Dominican Republic, otherwise I leave it as it is.
New here on Commons? Yes. Fun in the RD? Yes, and live there now for several years. By interest in the history of this country, I came on Wikipedia, and now at Commons to supplement and to clean up this category as much as possible. --Jos1950 (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Airports in the Dominican Republic is the so called parent for all other catgories dealing with airports in the D.R.:

File:La Romana Aeropuerto RD.jpg already belongs to one of these childs (in this case: Category:La Romana International Airport). OK maybe read Help:Gebruik van categorieën and Wikipedia:Categorieënschema to get the priciples of the category system (very similar to the category scheme at Commons)... --Mattes (talk)

I had read that, but obviously I do not understand it properly, or it is not applied consequent. That might be the problem and what I mean.
I see no difference with:
File: Cessna 172 gate guardian at Gregorio Luperon International Airport Puerto Plata.jpg,
File: Flughafen El Catey.jpg,
File: MDSD-TerminalA.JPG,
File: MDST-2003.JPG
This would then also have to go. Or am I wrong?
... now you understand. Yes it is useless, I have removed parent cat., because a more specific cat below this hierarchy is assigned to the files. --Mattes (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I will try to apply it consistently, but I find it bare hahaha ;). --Jos1950 (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Benedikt von Nursia.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Benedikt von Nursia.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Benedikt von Nursia.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Gamaliel (talk) 02:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Landratsamt Sömmmerda - KFZ-Zulassungssiegel neu.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Landratsamt Sömmmerda - KFZ-Zulassungssiegel neu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


Category:Pink clothing (queer)[edit]

--Andros 1337 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:FRA LH Lounge First seating.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FRA LH Lounge First seating.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Rodrigolopes, 朝彦 | asahiko passed review of File:FRA LH Lounge First.jpg. He succeed to find the original source page where those photos were. The source page had a CC banner that lead to CC BY-SA 2.5 page. See File talk:FRA LH Lounge First.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 13:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Geagea, license review passed. thanks. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Washington apron shrunk.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Washington apron shrunk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Ghirlandajo (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Straubing 001 (116).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Straubing 001 (116).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
188.99.119.221 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mattes, hope this finds you well. Just FYI regarding this rude deletion request: User talk:188.99.119.221. Nuff said. Regards, Kmw2700 (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-03 Bologna Mattes Pana (178).JPG[edit]

hi, nice upload. i would recommend that you use template:artwork, which you can upload using either one at a time with old uploader [2] or commons:pattypan. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, thanks! Well, template:artwork is soooo unimportant and is too much work for me. In the case named above I had a batch containing artwork and non-artwork. It is simply too much sorting work for me just to get files template:artwork. In my opinion, Commons has much more important tasks right now such as attaining files (fill the inventory), usability (find what you looking for -- maybe via search box, maybe via gallery pages, maybe via categories) and so on. Sincerely, --Mattes (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Mattes, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

I have just prepared it, but I dont use JS. --Mattes (talk) 19:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

permission to use photo[edit]

Hello,

Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, "File:Michelangelo-minos2.jpg” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.

With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Dear writer, the image is not my photograph, it is an extract of a photograph by User:GianniG46. He should get the credit. Sincerely, --Mattes (talk) 19:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Image use for cover[edit]

Dear Mattes,

I hope you are well. I was hoping if you will allow us to use your photograph of 'Jan Brueghel the Elder-Christus und die Ehebrecherin' as a cover image for the next themed issue of the Dutch Journal Of General Philosophy (Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte). I am the person responsible for the journal at Amsterdam University Press, we are part of the University of Amsterdam.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Brueghel_the_Elder-Christus_und_die_Ehebrecherin-AP.JPG

You shared the image with a CC-BY-SA license; we would like to use the image for the cover of the printed edition (I'd be happy to send you a copy!) which makes the Share-Alike part difficult to fulfill. The journal articles are published as delayed Open Access but the covers are usually not published online.

With thanks and kind regards,

Max Haring —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.255.213.226 (talk) 07:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


Dear Mr. Haring,

I'm glad you like my photograph.

I herewith declare that the image file named above may be used by the Amsterdam University press for the named publication, but not limited to, as a title page and elsewhere in that publication for an unlimited time. There is no fee for the permission and for its reproduction. For this purpose and this kind of usage, Cc-by-sa-3.0 is revoked for the use by Amsterdam University press except the attribution chapter. The name of the photographer has to be attributed with "Mattes (Wikimedia Commons)" in every online and printed products, clearly referenced to that image (annex or elsewhere is fine). If you wish to have no attribution obligation, a fee of 250,00 EUR is to be paid in advance. This permission may not be transferred to a third party.

I only need a copy if the text content is art related (just send me an E-Mail so I will be able to write you my address).

Sincerely, --Mattes (talk) 12:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Tiksi aerodrome (Air Force Base of Russia) NASA World Wind 2005.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tiksi aerodrome (Air Force Base of Russia) NASA World Wind 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Farchering (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Basel[edit]

Hallo Mattes, du hast File:Basel 2012-10-05 Batch (23).JPG mit "Basel – Eisengasse 5 – Gebäude – Gesamtansicht" beschrieben. Das wäre für mich sehr schön, weil ich für einen geplanten Wikipedia-Artikel ein Foto vom Haus Eisengasse 5 gut gebrauchen könnte. Nur leider stimmt das nicht. Die GPS-Daten sind offenbar falsch (ist es dir möglich, sie aus den Exif-Daten rauszuwerfen?), denn das abgebildete Haus steht auf der anderen Seite der Mittleren Brücke, im Kleinbasel. Du hast das Haus Greifengasse 1 fotografiert (eigene Ortskenntnis, aber man kann es z.B. auch mit Google Street View bestätigen), rechts zweigt die Untere Rheingasse ab. Ich werde die Beschreibung korrigieren. Ebenfalls korrigiert habe ich schon die Beschreibung von File:Basel 2012-10-06 Batch Part 1 (8).JPG - da sieht man sogar am blauen Strassenschild am Gebäude ganz rechts, dass es sich um die Marktgasse handelt. Solltest du zufälligerweise auch ein Foto von der "wirklichen" Eisengasse 5 in deinem Fotobestand haben, wäre es mir willkommen - du siehst es z.B. hier, es ist das Haus der Buchhandlung Wepf und der Zunft zu Spinnwettern. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo und Grüß Gott! Ja, die Kamera war sehr unzuverlässig im Hinblick auf die GPS-Daten. Die meisten der Fotografien, die ich in Basel-Stadt mit der Kamera gefertigt haben, sind mit unzutreffenden EXIF-Daten attributiert worden. Ich habe da nicht viel Ortskenntnis, daher vertraue ich auf die Deinigen. Die Geodaten braucht man nur aus dem Quelltext herauswerfen und wieder abspeichern. Dann muß man händisch weitermachen. Wie ich gesehen habe, sind die Geoddaten für die Datei schon rausgeflogen. Bezüglich der zweiten Datei bedanke ich mich für die Korrektur. Es ist wirklich eine aufwendige Arbeit... MfG, --Mattes (talk) 21:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Naja, die falschen Geodaten sind halt noch in den Metadaten (Exif) der Fotos selbst drin, d.h. solange sie dort drin sind, besteht immer die Gefahr, dass Bots sie extrahieren und übernehmen, denke ich... Gestumblindi (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Jetzt verstehe ich, was du meinst. Man muss dann {{Invalid Exif date}} eintragen → Category:Incorrect Exif date. Du hast recht, sonst immer wieder die Geodaten von den EXIF-Daten ausgelesen. LG --Mattes (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Und das Template hindert Bots auch daran, die (falschen) Geodaten auszulesen? Gemäss Beschreibung des Templates ist es ja nur für ein falsches Kalenderdatum/Uhrzeit gedacht... ein eigenes Template à la "Invalid Exif coordinates" scheint es allerdings nicht zu geben... Gestumblindi (talk) 21:33, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
PS: Mein gewünschtes Foto von der Eisengasse 5 habe ich inzwischen selbst gemacht, da ich heute bzw. gestern (Mitternacht ist ja schon vorbei) Gelegenheit zu einem Abstecher nach Basel hatte: File:Basel Eisengasse 5.jpg :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
OK super. Ich hatte das ungenau gelesen, statt data stand da date. Um das Datum geht es hier aber gar nicht. Ich denke mal schon, dass die Botprogramme den Hinweis "invalid EXIF data" berücksichtigen. Bis zum nächsten Mal. Ciao, --Mattes (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Wpdms nasa topo gulf of maine.jpg[edit]

What is the source you used for File:Wpdms nasa topo gulf of maine.jpg? This isn't really a problem for copyright, more so for reliability (to make sure the map is accurate) Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 00:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I guess, I have imported it from en.wiki. It's been a while ...and nowadays, I would be more responsible regarding sources and stuff. Sorry --Mattes (talk) 10:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project[edit]

Hello Matthes,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg-2017.jpg








Hallo Mattes!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))

Insert non-formatted text here

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Mattes!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Ainring[edit]

Hi, please don't create cross namespace redirects. Jcb (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

It has been discussed in the Village Pump around 6 or 7 years ago. The majority of the users was contented with my temporary solution. Reason: The user wants to have good solutions. If there would be no redirect from Ainring to the Ainring category, he will get an empty page. Thats not so great, is it? CU --Mattes (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Currently there are just two options: create a gallery at Ainring or leave it red. Being a 'cross namespace redirect' is an official reason for speedy deletion. Jcb (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Parts[edit]

--ghouston (talk) 22:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

File:München — Bahnhofplatz 1 (Luftbild).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:München — Bahnhofplatz 1 (Luftbild).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Ww2censor (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Jan Van Scorel - Mary Magdalene (Porczyński Gallery version).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jan Van Scorel - Mary Magdalene (Porczyński Gallery version).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Taivo (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Bundesstraße 11 Landkreis Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen (Kesselbergstraße) — Luftbild mit folgenden Layer Topographische Karte + Verkehrswege.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bundesstraße 11 Landkreis Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen (Kesselbergstraße) — Luftbild mit folgenden Layer Topographische Karte + Verkehrswege.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
тнояsтеn 20:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

review image.[edit]

Hello. Please review this image. This have "Tasnim" Permission and a link to. JomaIranگفتگو 14:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Headwear_by_color[edit]

Themightyquill (talk) 13:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Austria is not Germany[edit]

Hi Mattes, please be a little bit more carful. Not all, what ist written in german language ist germany. I found few photographies, which you have categorized in germany or in a german country. The austrian categories would be true. --regards from Austria - there are not cangaroos in :-) --K@rl (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

PS: sorry habe erst jetzt gesehen, dass du ja eh deutsch-Muttersprachle bist ;-) - aber ich hoffe du hast mein Englisch auch verstanden ;-) --lg K@rl (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hallo nach Österreich. Danke für den Hinweis. Grüße aus München, --19:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Empty or single image galleries[edit]

Hi, gallery pages are for image galleries. Could you stop creating those pages for different purposes? Jcb (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jcb. Great to hear from you. I have you in bad memory regarding deleting several gallery pages (mostly German geography stuff I guess). Well, first of all it is good, that we go into debating. For starters, I dont unterstand your reason "Empty or single image galleries". They are not empty and they have not a single image as a content (except someone messed around). I find gallery pages extremely useful (for starters: these are the objects for Wikidata linking all other stuff e.g. Wikipedia articles). The next problem is, there is not DR (just SD). Just mass deleting so much work with that unclear reason is not very friendly (where's the team spirit?). It is also not so nice trashing my time and effort. I have been creating gallery pages on Commons for several years (yes, mostly stubs) and now since you came along it is suddenly not suitable anymore to create those pages? I am not amused. Please let me know
(#1) "Empty or single image galleries"
(#1a) What content do you define as such?
(#1b) Do you mean something else, actually?
(#1c) What is your problem? Please give me a gallery which you would speedy delete and tell me whats wrong with it.
(#1d) Are you referring to categorytree only content? This is a stub for building the gallery and to very easyily navigate through all the sub-categories.
(#2) Why no DRs?
(#3) Would you mind settling this case with a guidiance of a third party (please)? Sincerely, --Mattes (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
The main space serves mostly to show images (except {{disambig}}s). Commons mostly relies on categories and File description pages themselves for navigation. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
(EC) I have spent too much time in cleaning up after you over the past few months. When I came accross your page creations, I have checked them one by one, and I found out that at least as early as 2009, admins have told you not to create cross namespace redirects (gallery pages redirecting to categories). Nevertheless, you have chosen to ignore those instructions and actively recreated such redirects after deletion (by several different admins), thus actively undoing maintenance work, until I spent several weeks to sort them out and clean them up. Since then you have created (and recreated after deletion) a number of empty or single image galleries, that is, gallery pages without image gallery. The gallery namespace is reserved of gallery pages. Anything else is eligible for speedy deletion. Category tree dumps do not belong to gallery pages. Do I need to spell out what an 'image gallery' is? This is a series of image thumbnails, with or without a description, belonging to a certain category. I hope it's clear to you that you must stop polluting the gallery namespace at this point. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

links from commons to wikipedia[edit]

Hi Mattes, die Verlinkung mit [[ ]] funktioniert nicht. Wie ich dir mit Dominican Republic — Punta Cana — international airport — inside.JPG zeige kannst du die Vorlage W (oder zur de.wikipedia die Vorlage Wd) verwenden. Gruss, -- sarang사랑 08:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Diplomatic_license_plates[edit]

E4024 (talk) 08:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Sort[edit]

Ha, only today I noticed this :-) Thanks but my name is sorted by "D'Afflitto, Sergio", not "Afflitto, Sergio D'". I have some relatives that have kept the lower case in their family name thus they're sorted by "Afflitto, d'", but since my father dropped the lowercase we have the capital "D" -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

ok sorry. Now I know. Best wishes --Mattes (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

واو —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.160.45.154 (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 14:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:DBP 1992 1617-1619-R extremley sharpened.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DBP 1992 1617-1619-R extremley sharpened.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)