User talk:Maximilian Schönherr

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Maximilian Schönherr!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Arthur H. Smith The City of San Francisco 1936.ogv[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Auschwitz Zopf.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Edelpelztierzüchtung[edit]

Edelpelztiere sind, wie der Name andeutet, Tiere, die nur wegen ihres Fells gezüchtet werden, und zusätzlich auch ein besonders wertvolles Fell haben (z. B. Nerz, Zobel, Fuchs, Chinchilla), zur Zeit der Anzeige vor allem auch der Silberfuchs. Gemeint ist wohl, dass man sich schlicht finanziell an der Farm finanziell beteiligt. Gibt es ja heute auch wieder, dass man sich beim Bauer ein Ökohuhn least, in dem Fall kann man, wenn man will, auch die Eier selber verwerten, und bekommt nachher vielleicht etwas vom Gewinn des Verkaufs des Suppenhuhn ab. Silberfüchse z. B. haben eine ganz kurze Zeit lang wahnsinnig hohe Preise erzielt. Trotzdem dürfte eine solche Anzeige ziemlicher Nepp sein, sowie mehr Felle produziert werden, kippt der Preis. Die Gehege waren damals übrigens noch sehr komfortabel, da man wenig Ahnung hatte, versuchte man die natürlichen Bedingungen möglichst nachzustellen (das hat gerade jemand hochgeladen: Silberfuchsfarm in Holland). Falls Du mal mehr zu Pelztieren wissen willst, dann guck hier nach: Pelzarten. Gruß vom --Kürschner (talk) 16:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Hanomag_Werbung_1931.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hanomag_Werbung_1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 11:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikilinks in Bildbeschreibungen[edit]

Hallo Maximilian,

hab grade mal Deine neuesten hochgeladenen Bilder angeschaut und finde die ausführlichen Beschreibungen prima. Allerdings stellte ich fest, dass Du in den Beschreibungen auf Commons-Galerien verlinkst. Ist das Absicht? Ich verlinke üblicherweise auf die entsprechenden Wikipedia-Artikel. Beispielsweise in der englischen Beschreibung [[:en:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]] bzw. in der deutschen Beschreibung [[:de:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]].

Grüße, --Schwäbin (talk) 21:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Jo, ich sehe grade, die (falschen) Wikilinks sind nicht von Dir... Am besten gleich selbst richtig auf die Wikipedien verlinken, dann passiert sowas nicht ;-) --Schwäbin (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
sorry, schwäbin, ich gucke nicht jeden tag hier bei den commons rein. ja, mit der verlinkung hab ich nichts zu tun, aber ich habe einen en.wiki-bekannten, der meine historischen fotos gern anguckt und dann ggfs verlinkt. gerade entdeckte ich übrigens die rename-funktion. erleichertung, denn ich hatte in der vergangenheit paar fotos falsch benannt - tippfehler im titel, falsche jahreszahl. vg, M@aximili@n (talk) 10:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Nicht schlimm, wenn's ein bisschen dauert - es brennt ja nichts an :-) Ich hab übrigens in den Einstellungen hinterlegt, dass ich eine E-Mail geschickt bekomme, wenn jemand auf meine Diskussionsseite schreibt. Dann krieg ich das zeitnah mit. Muss aber natürlich nicht sein.
Jaja, man lernt hier jeden Tag was dazu! (Ich auch) --Schwäbin (talk) 20:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
wie machst Du das -- emailbenachrichtigung einrichten? ich lade gerade eine computergrafik (klassenzimmer mit frontalunterricht aus augäpfeln) und eine wiese, gestern aufgenommen, noch. wenn Du magst (ich hab gerade keine lust dazu), setz paar kategorien rein. M@aximili@n (talk) 21:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
In Deinen Einstellungen - ist gleich auf der ersten Seite. Muss jetzt aber Schluss machen und ins Bett - morgen wartet eine Menge Arbeit. --Schwäbin (talk) 22:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
erl., erl.. Übrigens: Wenn Bilder in Artikel eingebunden sind fügt der Kategoriebot beim zweiten Durchlauf (geschätzt in ein paar Wochen/Monaten) auch automatisch Kategorien ein - wirklich gut passen tun sie selten; daher wohl auch erst beim zweiten Durchlauf. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Schwäbin und Saibo, wenn's Euch nichts ausmacht, könnt Ihr mal kurz was zu sinn und unsinn von handschriftlichen unterschriften in den lemmata großer politiker sagen? auf meiner diskussionsseite bei de.wiki, ganz unten. danke! M@aximili@n (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Automobiler Wagen Brockhaus 1896.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Hallo Maximilian Schönherr, bitte beachte, dass die Lizenzvorlage {{PD-old-100}} trotz der Namensähnlichkeit zu {{ Bild-PD-alt-100}} etwas ganz anders aussagt. Wenn du wirklich meinst, dass der Autor schon mehr als 100 Jahre tot ist, was die von dir verwendete Vorlage angibt, dann fehlt noch sein Name und Todesjahr/Wikilink. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Saibo, schön, Dich zu sehen! mir gibt das modifizeren der lizenz rätsel auf. wenn ich die seite des bild bearbeite, bekomme ich die bekannte liste mit Information, Description, Source etc. wenn ich den eintrag unter "Permission" in geschweiften klammern auf Bild-PD-Schöpfungshöhe und/oder Bild-PD-alt-1923 setze, kommt mist heraus, nämlich sowas:

|Permission=Template:Bild-PD-Schöpfungshöhe Template:Bild-PD-alt-1923

Maximilian (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Wenn ich kurz dazwischenfunken darf: Die Lizenz gehört nicht ins Feld Permission, sondern in einen separaten Abschnitt darunter:
== {{int:license}} ==
{{Cc-by-sa-3.0-de|1=}} beispielsweise.
Zwei Templates gleichzeitig geht auch nicht.
Bild-PD-alt-1923 ist meines Wissens nach eine nicht-commonsfähige Lizenz, ebenso wie Bild-PD-alt-100 (= das Werk ist älter als 100 Jahre). (Kannst Du hier nachlesen)
Wenn Du Dir nicht sicher bist, wie man im Quelltext wo was ergänzt, schau einfach mal in eines meiner Bilder rein.
Welches Template nun das richtige für Dein Brockhaus-Bild ist und ob es auf Commons bleiben darf oder nach de.WP muss, das kann Dir Saibo besser sagen als ich. :-) --Schwäbin (talk) 15:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Maximilian und Schwäbin! Schwäbin, du darfst mir so oft und viel dazwischenfunken, wie du willst - ich freue mich über jede abgenommene Arbeit. :-)
Ob die Lizenzvorlagen hier in Commons in das Feld permission gehören oder nicht, ist umstritten - aber soll für dich einfach egal sein. Zwei "Templates" (aka Lizenzvorlagen) gehen schon, sind manchmal auch nötig.
Die Lizenzbausteine von Commons und von de.Wikipedia heißen unterschiedlich. Das siehst du auch recht leicht an der Sprache: die ist für Commons meist Englisch. Hier in Commons funktionieren nur diese Vorlagen, die es hier auch gibt. Eine (unvöllständige) Liste ist Commons:Lizenzvorlagen oder auch die englische Version davon (Link dort auf der Seite oben).
{{Bild-PD-Schöpfungshöhe}} und {{Bild-PD-alt-1923}} sind beides Vorlagen aus de.Wikipedia und hier nicht verwendbar, wie du merktest. Die grobe(!) Entsprechung wäre für die Schöpfungshöhenvorlage {{PD-ineligible}} bzw. spezieller {{PD-text}}.
Ich würde eher nicht sagen, dass das Bild hier okay ist - oder findest du einen passenden Baustein und damit Grund, wieso es (wegen Alters) gemeinfrei ist? Ob der Text hier wirklich keine Schöpfungshöhe hat, wäre ich mir nicht so sicher. Wenn du es noch etwas mehr zuschneiden würdest - schadet ja auch inhaltlich nicht - hätte ich damit weniger Problem. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
<seufz> Zweieinhalb Fehler in drei Aussagen. Ich sollte mich wirklich auf Dinge beschränken, von denen ich was verstehe... Ich häng noch eine Hilfeseite an: de:Wikipedia:Nicht commonsfähig --Schwäbin (talk) 08:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
So, wie das Bild und Lizenzbausteine nun sind, halte ich es für okay. Danke Maximilian! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011[edit]

File:CGI Fluid Clouds.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:CGI Fluid Clouds.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Bidgee (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

User_talk:Bidgee#User_talk:Maximilian_Sch.C3.B6nherr.23File:CGI_Fluid_Clouds.jpg Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Maximilian, war das ein Originalbeispiel/Originaltexturen? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 13:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Frontalunterricht mit Augen.jpg
Wet Fur - CGI.jpg

hallo Saibo! oh, die diskussion zwischen Dir und Bidgee hab ich offenbar verschlafen. war zu stark in der de.wiki aktiv. dummerweise finde ich die datei gerade nicht (vielleicht sitzt sie auf einer festplatte in meinem büro), und hier kann ich sie nicht mehr ansehen. mich würde es wundern, wenn ich einen Maya-menüeintrag oder ein von Maya benutztes icon in dem bild verwendet hätte. weil ich beruflich unmengen an CGI-bildern mit maya gemacht habe und die urheberrechtsfragen hier weitgehend kenne, habe ich sicher nur ein eigenes werk hochgeladen. wie z.b. die 3D-augen oder das künstlich generierte fell hier rechts. diese bilder unterliegen natürlich auch nicht fremdem copyright, denn sie sind mit meinem eigenen hirn und skill entstanden, wenn auch mit hilfe eines digitalen hammers und meißels, nämlich von software. vielleicht hatte ich die wolken falsch ge-taggt? kannst Du sie mir mal zeigen? Maximilian (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Maximilian, macht doch nichts. :-) Tu ich doch gern. Ich habe erneut bei Bidgee geantwortet und dort siehst du auch die Wolken. Ich bin hier (noch) kein Admin und konnte sie (bis ich auf die Idee kam bei google zu suchen) auch selbst nicht sehen - daher meine ersten unwissenden Kommentare bei Bidgee.
Ja, wenn ein Bild komplett deine Arbeit ist, dann dürfte das kein Problem sein. Die Rechenalgorithmen zählen wohl nicht.
Übrigens: File:Wet Fur - CGI.jpg sieht echt nett aus. Kannst du das Fell auch in viel höher Auflösung rendern? Wäre interessant. Übrigens: es könnte sein, dass png bei manchen CGI kleinere Dateien bei besserer Qualität (immer verlustfrei) erzeugt - aber darin kennst du dich ja wahrscheinlich auch bestens aus. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
"It must have been ages ago..." - not really: log → 2011-04-28T21:54:16 :-) Schönen Sonntag wünsche ich dir noch! --Saibo (Δ) 11:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

File:DDR-Fernsehen, RAF Terroristin gefasst.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:DDR-Fernsehen, RAF Terroristin gefasst.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tabercil (talk) 23:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Hmm Maximilian, wieso dachtest du, dass du ein Fernsehfoto hochladen kannst? Auch Fernsehbilder sind doch geschützt. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

hmm, ich dachte, mit dem timecode oben sind diese bilder rechtemäßig unproblematisch. ich habe beim deutschen rundfunkarchiv vor paar jahren zu dem thema DDR-fernsehen geforscht und dabei von einem normalen röhrenbildschirm paar sachen für meine eigene dokumentation abfotografiert. weil das ganze in einem archivarischen kontext steht, dachte ich, es hier in die public domain heben zu können. wenn das problematisch ist, raus damit. tut mir nicht weh. und danke für Deine arbeit! ps. sehen wir uns in nürnberg? ich bin dort als berichterstatter für den DLF. Maximilian (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Bisher konnte ich Saibo noch nicht hinlocken. Sollte er sich wirklich anmelden, dann muss ich meine anderen Termine doch noch wegschmeißen und mich anmelden. :-)) --Schwäbin (talk) 09:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Der archivarische Kontext ändert nichts an dem für uns relevanten Urheberrecht (des Kameramanns). Auch der Timecode ändert daran nichts (ich denke du meinst, dass das Bild dadurch eh unbrauchbar wird, aber wie du weißt, lässt sich der ja mit etwas Aufwand wegstempeln. ;)
Archivarisch oder sonstwie privat kann man das sicher nutzen - da "kräht kein Hahn danach". Aber diese Überlegung ist bzgl. der freien Inhalte nicht möglich: Commons:Projektrahmen/Vorbeugendes Prinzip.
Schwäbin, du kannst beruhigt deine Termine wahrnehmen: Nein ich werde wohl nicht in Nürnberg (WikiCon meinst du wohl) sein. Wenn es dann Berichte von dir online/live gibt, kannst du gern (z.B. hier) eine Notiz hinterlassen - interessiert mich. Beste Grüße an euch beide! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 23:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Otto Heubner - Abschiedsvorlesung Charite Berlin 1913.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Maximilian, ich habe es korrigiert. Bei deiner Version siehst du, dass die Lizenzvorlage rot ist - es gibt sie hier nicht. Bild-PD-alt-100 gibt es nur in der dewp, nicht aber in Commons. Aber selbst wenn du das Bild in die dewp geladen hättest: wirklich 100 Jahre alt ist das noch nicht, das weißt du, oder? ;-) Solche Bilder mit unbekanntem Autor siehe ich eigentlich lieber in der dewp, weil die dortige Lizenzvorlage die Unsicherheit klarer ausdrückt, als jene Vorlage, die ich jetzt eingesetzt habe. So, schau mal bitte den Text der Vorlage an und gebe in der Dateibeschreibung noch alles an, was du über das Bild finden kannst - insbesondere ob in der Zeitschrift ein Urheber angegeben ist und ob in der Zeitschrift bei anderen Bildern ein Urheber angegeben ist. Wie du in de:Anonymes Werk und de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Bilder.2C_deren_Urheber_nicht_bekannt_ist nachlesen kannst, ist die Lage bei Werken mit unbekanntem Urheber alles andere als einfach. Solche Bilder, wie deines hier schlage ich hier in Commons regelmäßig zum Löschen vor, weil eben nicht klar ist, dass der Urheber sich nie öffentlich zu seinem Werk bekannt hat und bei der Datei, so wie hier, nichts außer "unbekannt" angegeben ist. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 15:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
sorry, saibo, für meine semi-kompetenz in sachen bildrechten und einpflegeprozeduren.

neues thema: BStU[edit]

Du wirst sehen, dass ich vorhin zwei fotos aus dem BStU-archiv eingepflegt habe - elli barczatis und karl laurenz, personalausweisfotos. es folgen noch paar scans aus dem prozess gegen die beiden, auch das hinrichtungsprotokoll. wollte nur sagen, die rechte hier sind wasserdicht, denn ich habe das bei der BStU für die wikipedia beantragt und soeben bewilligt bekommen. bei bedarf kann ich eine kopie des schreibens der BStU vorlegen. dort wird die recherche unter Tgb.-Nr. 7736/11Z geführt. der vorgang hat mich ca. 10 € gekostet. der okay-bescheid ist vom 23.8.2011. vielleicht fällt jemand anderem, der/die das liest, noch ein, die bilder besser zu kategorisieren. grüße! Maximilian (talk) 12:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Maximilian, ich find' Deinen Einsatz prima! Und will ihn auch gar nicht schmälern; Dich allerdings, da ich die Aussage „für die wikipedia“ las, kurz hierauf hinweisen. --Schwäbin (talk) 13:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Maximilian, wie die Schwäbin schon richtig sagte, bringt uns eine Erlaubnis "für die Wikipedia" gar nichts. Das widerspricht dem Grundgedanken von Commons:Lizenzierung - nämlich, dass die Dateien für jedermann benutzbar sein müssen. in COM:OTRS/de steht, wie es geht und dort sind auch Textvorlagen (E-Mail) verlinkt, die man möglichst durch den Rechteinhaber "unterzeichnen" lassen sollte. Dann ist es sicher ausreichend.
Einzig nützlich wäre deine Recherche/Erlaubnisanfrage, wenn darin bestätigt wird, das der Fotograf unbekannt ist und somit die aktuell bei der Datei angefügte Lizenzvorlage (anonymes Werk) bestätigt wird. Ist darin soetwas enthalten? Schicke es mir vielleicht einfach mal per E-Mail weiter. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

links

die beiden fotos sind von den personalausweisen der von der DDR 1955 hingerichteten personen durch die BStU abgescannt. das heißt, die bildrechte lägen bei der DDR. wie soll mir die BStU als verwalterin der dokumente eines untergegangenen spitzelstaatsgebildes mehr geben, als das schriftliche okay für die wikipedia? ich sehe die lage ähnlich wie bei fotos im bestand des bundesarchivs; beispiel: der globke-prozess in der DDR (wie in dem bild links). da sind jede menge leute zu sehen, der fotograf war ein x-beliebieger anonymer stasi-, also behördenfotograf.
ich maile mal die bescheinigung der BStU an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, aber erst am montag. ps. Deine mail hab ich erhalten, danke! Maximilian (talk) 22:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Wenn sie die Rechte hätten (das widerspricht natürlich der Annahme, dass es ein anonymes Werk ist dessen Urheberrecht abgelaufen ist), dann müssten sie entsprechend Commons:Lizenzierung (siehe den äußerst sinnvollen Formtext Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einverst.C3.A4ndniserkl.C3.A4rung_.28Rechte-Inhaber.29) jedermann (nicht nur der Wikipedia) die Nutzung erlauben.
Alternativ könnten sie bestätigen, dass der Fotograf niemandem bekannt ist (oder ähnlich). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
gibt's erfahrungen mit wikipedia und dieser riesenbehörde BStU? müsste es doch geben. frag ich mal, bevor ich dort eine endlose neurecherche beginne, bis hinten ein zettel herauskommt, der sagt: nö. Maximilian (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
BStU: Keine Ahnung - habe ich noch nichts von gehört. Wenn man mal sucht: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=BStU Dann findet man hauptsächlich Dateien von dir, die ich lieber nicht gesehen habe. ;) Ich denke nicht, dass das amtl. Werke i.S.V. http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__5.html Abs. 1 sind. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
ich mache das jetzt so, dass ich a) die von der BStU freigegebenen weiteren dokumente am montag scanne und hier einpflege. es sind texte minderer schöpfungshöhe, z.b. die hinrichtungsprotokolle oder eine stasi-telefonabhörmitschrift. ich versehe sie dann auch beim hochladen mit dem null-schöpfungshöhe-lizenzbaustein, nicht als staatsdokumente, okay? für die beiden personalausweisfotos schicke ich b) den üblichen erlaubnis-entwurf an die behörde und harre der dinge, die da kommen.
hier schließen sich viele fragen an, die Du nicht an dieser stelle beantworten musst. wie kommen die bundesarchivfotos hier in so großer menge in die commons? welchen rechten unterliegen von anonymen DDR-beamten aufgenommene prozessfotos aus den 50er jahren, die jetzt bei BStU oder beim bundesarchiv liegen? wie läuft, wenn ich z.b. in der fachliteratur ein solches foto ohne urheberangaben finde, die freigabe über das bundesarchiv? viele grüße, Maximilian (talk) 22:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Ja, okay. Die Bildfreigaben durch das Bundesarchiv sind alles andere als unumstritten - eben wegen deiner Frage. Das Bundesarchiv hat sich einfach hingestellt und gesagt, wir haben die Rechte, hier habt ihr die Fotos. Und wir glauben es ihnen - mehr oder weniger. Am besten stellst du die urh. Fragen in de:WP:UF - da sind die Experten. Hier in Commons wird die Schöpfungshöhengrenze regelmößig niedriger, als in de.wikipedia gesehen (siehe auch Commons:Images_containing_text). Lade also solche Dokumente besser in de.Wikipedia hoch - sonst könnten sie hier gelöscht werden.
Deine Frage zu der Fachlit. verstehe ich nicht so ganz. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
die fachliteratur meinte ich so (beispiel): ich lese ein 1995er buch über DDR-geschichte, wo diverse fotos von dokumenten und prozessen aus den 1950ern drin sind, ohne quellenangaben, aber ganz offensichtlich aus der DDR-zeit, aufgenommen von DDR-beamten-gerichtsfotografen. scanne ich die dann und pflege sie hier als deutsches behördendokument ein? so, wie ich Dich verstehe, stelle ich aber auch diese frage besser in de:WP:UF. Grüße! Maximilian (talk) 23:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Ja, besser nach UF. Das ist ein Thema in dem ich mich nicht ganz so gut auskenne. Ich schätze aber, dass das nicht als amtl. Werk nach Abs.1 gilt. Abs. 2 ist für uns nicht brauchbar. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Bild EuroHawk in Manching[edit]

Es handelt sich hier um den Hangar 123 der WTD61 und nicht der benachbarten EADS/Cassidian. Das System wurde auch nicht von Cassidian übernommen, sondern vom BWB/WTD61. Die zur EADS gehörende EuroHawk GmbH, bzw. die Cassidian aus Friedrichshafen, die nur organisatorisch zur Cassidian in Manching gehört, baut/intergriert in der Halle als Gast das Missionssystem ein. Ich sehe allerdings auch, dass die Cassidian in Manching aus marketingzwecken den Anschein erwecken will hier die Systemführerschaft zu besitzen, was aber nicht richtig ist. Ich beanstande auch allgemein, dass in den Medien, inklusive Wikipedia das alleinige Fluggerät und nicht das Gesamtsystem behandelt wird. Ohne das am Boden stehende LRE, sozusagen als Cockpit, kann das Fluggerät nicht gestartet/ gelandet werden und ohne MCE mit den Satellitenverbindungen nicht weltweit geflogen werden. Das Missionssystem an Bord ist auch nur zusammen mit der Bodenstation nutzbar. Die optisch so eindrucksvoll neben der Halle 123 der WTD61 stehenden Anlagen in den Containern, inklusive des Antennenturmes und Satellitenschüssel sind also funktionale Teile des Systems EuroHawk ohne die das Fluggerät nicht fliegt. --79.250.0.30 09:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

danke für das feedback! mir (und anderen) hat bei der pressekonferenz der pressesprecher von cassidian explizit erklärt, dass der hangar brandneu, eigens für den eurohawk gebaut wurde. der hangar selbst ist (ich war ja drin) tatsächlich nagelneu. und klar sind die nebem dem hangar stehenden teile die steuergeräte für eurohawk, also die bodenstation. Maximilian (talk) 09:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Das ist richtig, dass die Halle neu ist. Es stand da früher eine andere Halle, die renoviert werden sollte. Man enschloss sich aber dann zum Abriss und Neubau. Aber es ist weiterhin eine Halle der WTD61, die auch für den Eurohawk verantwortlich ist.--87.175.250.56 16:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Arnold Ehret - Skizze - HJ Brehm.jpeg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arnold Ehret - Skizze - HJ Brehm.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arnold Ehret - Skizze - HJ Brehm.jpeg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Der Urheber der Skizze, Hans-Jörg Brehm, hat sein OK schon gestern an die permissions-Leute geschickt. Maximilian (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Ja. Das ist ok. Nur hat er die „Skizze“ von einem Porträt unbekannter Urheberschaft abgepinselt, welches selbst noch geschützt sein kann. Als „abgeleitetes Werk“ wäre die Skizze dann nicht frei zu lizensieren. Sollte das Original-Bild hingegen alt genug sein, so kann es anstelle irgendwelcher Privat-Zeichnungen verwendet werden. Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC) (Ich packe mal was auf deine de.wp-Diskussionsseite)

Meines Wissens "pinselt" Brehm (professioneller Grafiker) nichts ab, sondern abstrahiert aus verschiedenen Vorlagen was Eigenes. Wie kommst Du auf die etwas diskreditierende Annahme, hier würde abgekupfert? Maximilian (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Der_schwarze_Kanal_-_DDR_Fernsehen.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Der_schwarze_Kanal_-_DDR_Fernsehen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Antemister (talk) 19:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:04, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Christian Wulff - Weihnachtsansprache 2011.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Christian Wulff - Weihnachtsansprache 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:LSO_Super-Cookies.gif[edit]

Hi there, I saw you recently uploaded this file. There is an issue with the license. Screenshots of software can only be used if it is open source software. What is the software you used and does it have a GNU license? If you don't know about licensing, please reply with the name of the software/plug-in and I will look it up for you. Also, in the future, please don't use GIF's. GIF's are good for animations, but can't be scaled very well. For graphics it is prefered to use JPEG and for text heavy images it is advisable to use PNG. Thank you. --Vera (talk) 22:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

If I may... Looks like the Mozilla Firefox Addon BetterPrivacy to me. --Schwäbin (talk) 07:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

PNG is a good idea, i'll look into it. and, Schwäbin was right: BetterPrivacy was my source, a plug-in for mozilla firefox. Maximilian (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Kreuznet Webseite 11. Oktober 2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kreuznet Webseite 11. Oktober 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 07:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Hermon Ould on -Gleichschaltung- of the German PEN Club - Speech from 1947.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hermon Ould on -Gleichschaltung- of the German PEN Club - Speech from 1947.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Fritz Kahn Foto web.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fritz Kahn Foto web.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Held 1989 über das Ende der DDR, der SED, über Demokratie und Freiheit.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Held 1989 über das Ende der DDR, der SED, über Demokratie und Freiheit.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Tom Araya Slayer 19 January 1989 Three Lyrics Writers in the Band.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tom Araya Slayer 19 January 1989 Three Lyrics Writers in the Band.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Duncan Brinsmead - Realism in digital music and 3D computer animation.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Duncan Brinsmead - Realism in digital music and 3D computer animation.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:John Lasseter - Pixar - Cars - interviewed by Maximilian Schönherr 2006.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:John Lasseter - Pixar - Cars - interviewed by Maximilian Schönherr 2006.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hassfurt Stadtpanorama 1926 Stadtarchiv.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hassfurt Stadtpanorama 1926 Stadtarchiv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Joey Ramone - Interview by Maximilian Schoenherr - 1988.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Joey Ramone - Interview by Maximilian Schoenherr - 1988.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Zigarrenschaukel 1942.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zigarrenschaukel 1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin Vermont Police Emblem.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Berlin Vermont Police Emblem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Friedrich Ludwig Bauer über die Enigma - Interview von 1996 - Maximilian Schönherr.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Friedrich Ludwig Bauer über die Enigma - Interview von 1996 - Maximilian Schönherr.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Elke Steinbach über das Audioarchiv der BStU.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Elke Steinbach über das Audioarchiv der BStU.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kai Krause 1995 über das World Wide Web.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kai Krause 1995 über das World Wide Web.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Allan Alcorn on Atari, Pong and becoming a capitalist.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Allan Alcorn on Atari, Pong and becoming a capitalist.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Bill Reeves, Pixar, 1995, on rendering algorithms, raytracing and global illumination.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bill Reeves, Pixar, 1995, on rendering algorithms, raytracing and global illumination.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Steve Jobs on computer graphics - Interview excerpt from 1995.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Steve Jobs on computer graphics - Interview excerpt from 1995.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Elli Barczatis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Elli Barczatis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Laurenz.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Laurenz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Bautzen 1959.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Bautzen 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Entlassungsschein Bautzen 1959.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Entlassungsschein Bautzen 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Einlieferungsanzeige 1955.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Wilhelm Fricke - Einlieferungsanzeige 1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:DDR-Prozess gegen Zeugen Jehovas - 1950.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DDR-Prozess gegen Zeugen Jehovas - 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Otto Fleischer in Neues Deutschland 1953.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Otto Fleischer in Neues Deutschland 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:12, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Otto Fleischer Vernehmungsprotokoll 1953.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Otto Fleischer Vernehmungsprotokoll 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Harm Lagaay - Porsche Design 2004.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Harm Lagaay - Porsche Design 2004.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ryan Church on Painting for Film 2004.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ryan Church on Painting for Film 2004.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:2011-05-12 Cornelia Rogall-Grothe Bundesinnenministerium.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2011-05-12 Cornelia Rogall-Grothe Bundesinnenministerium.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Claudia Klüppelberg über die Finanzkrise - 2010.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Claudia Klüppelberg über die Finanzkrise - 2010.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kölnische Illustrierte Zeitung Titelblatt 11.Nov. 1933.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kölnische Illustrierte Zeitung Titelblatt 11.Nov. 1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kai Krause 1995 über das Brettspiel Go.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kai Krause 1995 über das Brettspiel Go.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

my ogg files - important note[edit]

most of the ogg files listed above were recorded in professional interview situations, mainly for public radio germany. it always was clear to the interviewed people that this was an official publication environment, with me holding the microphone, switching on a tape recorder etc. please take this into account before deleting all the files. i never choose audio material which would offend my interview partners.

other ogg files listed above were taken from the german public radio audio archive DRA. they are old enough or were speeches in a large public environment, so there should be no problem with CC. Maximilian (talk) 12:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

That is not enough. It may have been clear for the people who were interviewed that this was to be broadcast on the radio, but at Commons we want only files that are free to be used by everybody for every purpose, including commercial ones. For that you need an explicit permission by every author, and the interviewed persons are co-authors. Old records would only be "old enough" if the people speaking were dead for at least 70 years, then they would be in the public domain. If those speeches were public or not doesn't matter as far as copyright (or Urheberrecht in German) is concerned. Radio etc. may use such records, but Wikimedia Commons is not radio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
the massive deletion of the files i uploaded in the past few years has the impact that i won't upload much any more. some files, imho, like the scans of karl wilhelm fricke's imprisonment documents were uploaded with mr. fricke's appreciation. i cannot repond to so many deletion requests individually; it would cost me hours of extra work. less mass deletion would have been more constructive. Maximilian (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately, Mr Fricke's appreciation is not what matters as far as copyright is concerned, what is needed is the properly documented consent of the respective authors of the images or audio files. I filed those deletion requests not to anger you or to give you extra work, but because all those files didn't comply with the rules of Commons. I don't postpone such requests, but file them when I see the problematic images. And yes, uploading files with properly documented permissions to Commons is time-consuming. That time should have been invested before or just after uploading the files. If you can procure the necessary authors' permissions for one or more of the files, you can always request undeletion at COM:UNDEL. Just in case: Commons:OTRS outlines the procedure to provide permissions and have them documented. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

File:OK-button - Macro photography of a remote control.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:OK-button - Macro photography of a remote control.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

87.65.231.117 19:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Price Water House Cooper Attn. Marius Kohl 2010 Luxembourg-Leaks.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Price Water House Cooper Attn. Marius Kohl 2010 Luxembourg-Leaks.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Price Water House Cooper Attn. Marius Kohl 2010 Luxembourg-Leaks.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

太刻薄 (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

das ist mir zu viel aufwand. laut [1] liegen diese dateien in der public domain. entscheidet selbst. Maximilian (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Price Water House Cooper Attn. Marius Kohl 2010 Luxembourg-Leaks.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Price Water House Cooper Attn. Marius Kohl 2010 Luxembourg-Leaks.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Katrin Degenhardt Sprecherarbeit Deutschlandfunk Regie Maximilian Schönherr.ogg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Katrin Degenhardt Sprecherarbeit Deutschlandfunk Regie Maximilian Schönherr.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

i have entered the tag self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all as advised – without actually knowing in detail what it means. one thing for sure: i am the one and only author, and this is no photo, no movie, it's audio only. best, Maximilian (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you![edit]

Cheeseburger.png Thanks for a new version of InFocus_Mobile_M330_20141106.jpg. ~User:OnionBulb (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
welcome! Maximilian (talk) 17:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

File:New York Times - faked Spoonerisms 1928.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New York Times - faked Spoonerisms 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

RJaguar3 (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)