User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2010/May

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Pink flower closeup

I use a w:k800i to take my pictures. How to adjust the sharpness of the image? Is there any way to increase the sharpness to reasonable levels with a digital editor? --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 23:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

It's very difficult to receive sharpness by editing, isn't it possible to change the relation between shutter speed and opening? --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
There is no such settings in the K800i. Can you also review my other pictures. Thanks! --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 14:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Wuppertal-100508-12673-Graureiher-Detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100508-12673-Graureiher-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wuppertal-100508-12665-Eisbär.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100508-12665-Eisbär.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
gesehen --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Mandarin Oriental, Munich

FYI, I deleted File:MOMUC MARKS 01.jpg, the last remaining file from Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Mandarin Oriental, Munich. The point of the DR was more about apparent copyvios than promotional. I found that specific one at http://www.mandarinoriental.com/munich/dining/restaurant_marks. Wknight94 talk 20:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

OK, I didn't believe that there was a problem concerning copyrights because I thought they tried to promote their hotel and because of the EXIFs, but I accept your decision. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
At the very least, it would need COM:OTRS as a previously published image, but I don't think that was coming anytime soon. Wknight94 talk 21:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Wuppertaler Schwebebahn

Um das Geheimnis zu lüften:

Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Dank Dir für die Kategorisierungshilfen, es kommt noch etwas... Wie beobachtest Du diese Kategorien? Mit Catscan? --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Rombergpark-100516-12995-Bärlauch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rombergpark-100516-12995-Bärlauch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rombergpark-100516-13150-Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rombergpark-100516-13150-Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rombergpark-100516-13074-Oldenburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rombergpark-100516-13074-Oldenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wuppertal-100522-13185-Mural.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13185-Mural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wuppertal-100522-13319-Schwebebahn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13319-Schwebebahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wuppertal-100522-13378-Werther.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13378-Werther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wuppertal-100522-13361-Werther.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13361-Werther .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wuppertal-100522-13326-Werther.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13326-Werther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wuppertal-100522-13253-Pelikane.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13253-Pelikane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Wuppertal-100522-13366-Werther .jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13366-Werther .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wuppertal-100522-13188-Hauptkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wuppertal-100522-13188-Hauptkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

thx for the hint. --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Spät, aber nicht vergessen...

DANKE für deine Worte! Mit besten Grüßen, High Contrast (talk) 21:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Gern. Durch die lange Zusammenarbeit kam die Unterstützung aus Überzeugung. --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

New Admin

Thanks for your support.       Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Nice that you support our work. There is a lot of annoying material in the backlogs.... I hope you'll have fun anyway. I think the atmosphere is mostly OK on the Commons except temporary cases of panic, disposal and imbecility. You will see... *g* --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

QI question

I was wondering if you my photos, especially this one: File:Odontotaenius_disjunctus_leaves.jpg may be QI material. The rest of my photos are at User:Rlevse/gallery, User:Rlevse/gallery2, User:Rlevse/gallery3, and User:Rlevse/gallery4. Thank you for your time. RlevseTalk 19:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but the example is imo not QI: In full solution the head is out of focus and the background slightly overexposured. I will look at your galleries later. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Dortmund-100529-13803-U.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-100529-13803-U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Do-Eving 20100529 787-Minister-Stein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Do-Eving 20100529 787-Minister-Stein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dortmund-100529-13735-U.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-100529-13735-U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dortmund-100529-13758-U.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-100529-13758-U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schachtzeichen-100528-13675-Gneisenau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachtzeichen-100528-13675-Gneisenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schachtzeichen-100528-13625-Gneisenau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachtzeichen-100528-13625-Gneisenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schachtzeichen-100528-13560-Gneisenau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachtzeichen-100528-13560-Gneisenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Schachtzeichen-100528-13574-Gneisenau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schachtzeichen-100528-13574-Gneisenau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

IMG 8114 Kopie-Alte-Kirche-Wellinghofen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG 8114 Kopie-Alte-Kirche-Wellinghofen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.