User talk:Mef.ellingen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Mef.ellingen!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Kameraad Pjotr 17:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Heinz_Schillinger.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Heinz_Schillinger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

Mef.ellingen 18:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Surprise GroBro.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 11:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Segelzeichen Surprise.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 11:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, Mef.ellingen!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 20:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Patenschaftsteller.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Patenschaftsteller.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airport Verona1.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Sandvig Bf.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


TUSC token 8738e00194f47ca40afefdec0a51c212[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File source is not properly indicated: File:Angelika Schorer.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angelika Schorer.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Angelika Schorer.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Motopark (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove the information template? And after the removement ask for this information????? I did not understand...... --Mef.ellingen (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now the template are OK but it's needed OTRS-permision, please send it.--Motopark (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dazu gibt es keine OTRS-permission. Das Foto wurde mit einer Pressemeldung der CSU an einen öffentlichen Presseverteiler verschickt. Nach deutschem Recht kann dann jeder Empfänger diese Pressemitteilung frei verwenden. Die Pressemitteilung war irgendwann 2009, die ist in meinem Pressebüro schon lange gelöscht worden. Sollte es auf Commons Probleme damit geben, müssen wir das Foto auf der de-Wiki unterbringen. Grüße --Mef.ellingen (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
@Mef.ellingen, eine Freigabe als Pressefoto entspricht nicht einer freien Lizenz in unserem Verständnis; das gilt m.W. auch für :de. Es spricht aber nichts dagegen, direkt beim Rechteinhaber um eine Erlaubnis (samt Erteilung einer Commons-kompatiblen Lizenz) nachzusuchen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stimme dem zu. Der Benutzer hat ja gesagt was benötigt wird: Schriftliche Freigabe des Urhebers bzw. dessen schriftliche Bestätigung, dass der Urheber alle Rechte aufgegeben bzw. ein unbeschränktes Nutzungsrecht für jeden eingeräumt hat. Deiner Vermutung das dass einer Pressemitteilung beigelegte Foto frei verwendbar sei (frei im Sinne von frei/gemeinfrei) glaub ich auch nicht ganz. Solche Freigaben in Pressemitteilungen

1) richten sich häufig an einen bestimmten Kreis, eben die Medien,
2) sind häufig an einen bestimmten Zweck gebunden, Veröffentlichung im Zusammenhang mit der Meldung,
3) beinhalten keine explizite Freigabe zur Bildbearbeitung bzw. schließen Bearbeitung die über kosmetische Änderungen hinaus geht explizit aus.

Im Sinne von Commons:Lizenzen (Bilder und andere Mediendateien, die von jedem und für jeden Zweck benutzt werden dürfen) sind solche Bilder nicht frei für 1) Jeden, 2) Jederzeit, 2)&3) Jeden Zweck. Dieser Eindruck wird noch verstärkt da ein gewisser "User:Cschorer" die Bildbeschreibungsseite des Bildes von Frau Schorer geleert hat und anschließend ein Bild mit dem vielsagenden Namen File:Mama.jpg hochgeladen hat auf dem gleiche Person abgebildet ist. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mef.ellingen. Ich arbeite nur einmal die Woche (Mittwochs) für 2 Stunden an der Franken-Wikipedia mit, hab Deine Nachricht darum jetzt erst gesehen. Ich habe im Eifer der vielen Arbeit schlicht übersehen, Deinen Namen unter den Link und den Bildverweis von wikicommons zu setzen und möchte mich hiermit herzlich bei Dir entschuldigen. Natürlich habe ich das jetzt nachgeholt. Vielen Dank für die schönen Bilder die jetzt weitere Honore für Dich im bekannten und gut besuchten franken-wiki.de einbringen.

Mit besten Grüßen

schmom

Seite Pleinfeld im Franken-Wki[edit]

Hallo Mef.ellingen. Ich arbeite nur einmal die Woche (Mittwochs) für 2 Stunden an der Franken-Wikipedia mit, hab Deine Nachricht darum jetzt erst gesehen. Ich habe im Eifer der vielen Arbeit schlicht übersehen, Deinen Namen unter den Link und den Bildverweis von wikicommons zu setzen und möchte mich hiermit herzlich bei Dir entschuldigen. Natürlich habe ich das jetzt nachgeholt. Vielen Dank für die schönen Bilder die jetzt weitere Honore für Dich im bekannten und gut besuchten franken-wiki.de einbringen.

Mit besten Grüßen

schmom

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nove Udoli4.JPG[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nove Udoli4.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Own work --Mef.ellingen (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szlaga.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Szlaga.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Wiktoryn (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte Polarbahn.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Paul Emile Victor.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Emile Victor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahnhof Altoetting.jpg[edit]

Hallo!

Hast du das Bild gemacht? Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jou, ist von mir … Grüße --Mef.ellingen (talk) 19:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arno-Holz-Medaille[edit]

Woher kommt denn die Medaille bzw. kann man sie irgendwo kaufen?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holz-Medaille_2013.jpg

Sie wurde bei den Veranstaltungen zum 150. Geburtstag an Ehrengäste vergeben. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 21:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ostküstenbahn[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Ostküstenbahn has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Ich hab den Baustein mal rübergeschubst, der kam versehentlich auf meiner Disk. an. -- Platte U.N.V.E.U. 08:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Örebro - Svartå Järnväg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Örebro - Svartå Järnväg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gilt auch für:
--El Grafo (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo US today Papier.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo US today Papier.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 02:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Unterbreitenlohe alte Kapelle1.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Unterbreitenlohe alte Kapelle1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

done --Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Löschantrag Ruebenkopf Logo.pdf und File:Ruebenkopf Logo.png[edit]

20. März 2016

Sehr geehrte/r Mef.ellingen,

Sie haben einen Löschantrag der Graphiken Ruebenkopf Logo gestellt. Der Grund sei ein »private fake«.

  • Wie ist »private fake« definiert, wann wird ein Löschantrag mit dieser Begründung gestellt?
  • Inwiefern ist das Bild eine Fälschung (»fake«)?
  • Warum darf man auf der Benutzerseite kein perönliches Logo einfügen?
  • Gibt es Relevanzkriterien für hochgeladene Bilder bei Wikimedia Commons?
    • Wenn ja, warum ist das Bild für die Benutzerseite nicht relevant?

Vielen Dank im Voraus.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Rübenkopf

Nachträglich unterzeichnet: --Rübenkopf (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bahnhof Altenhof.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bahnhof Altenhof.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Assensunfall.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Assensunfall.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Wdwd (talk) 05:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assensunfall.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Assensunfall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 04:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Lentini Diramazione.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lentini Diramazione.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schleusingen 12 94.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schleusingen 12 94.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Monmowomno (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Westeingangsbauwerke 527 u. 409, Zufahrt für Kraftfahrzeuge.JPG[edit]

Hi Mef.ellingen. Worum handelt es sich bei dieser von dir transferierten Datei? Wo ist das? --Leyo 20:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist nicht mein Foto. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 09:52, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Partisan[edit]

Even the Danish Wikipedia says the ship was commissioned in 2000, and also according www.navalhistory.dk and here --Stunteltje (talk) 06:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information, i get my information from German Wikipedia. So we should rename all the pictures and delete my category wit 2001? --Mef.ellingen (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer just reverting the action. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 10:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Lokschuppen Simmelsdorf 2017.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Günther Felßner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Günther Felßner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dandelo (talk) 23:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

E(II)?[edit]

Hello! What is the purpose of Category:SJ Class E(II)? Is it supposed to be E2 - that category exists already. No. 952 is an ordinary E class locomotive in any case, never rebuilt to the E2 class. Is there something special with this particular locomotive? ACo2c (talk) 17:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, whats your problem? See her: de:SJ E (II) and her: http://www.svenska-lok.se/damp.php?s=19&litra=E&typenr=2, this ist E(II). And No. 952 is not an ordinary E class locomotive, it is a E(II). It exists no ordinary E class in Sweden. After you reed the following, perhaps you have no more problem? Additional: http://www.svenska-lok.se/damp.php?s=19&litra=E&typenr=1 - this is E(I) and http://www.svenska-lok.se/damp.php?s=19&litra=E2&typenr=0 - this ist E2. Rather, the E(I) is an ordinary E, see description: Littera E från 1876. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you have found a random website and an unreliable online encyclopedia :) referring to the type as E(II), or rather using "(II)" as a disambiguation, but SJ never did. The standard works about SJ steam locomotives, Normalspåriga ånglok vid Statens Järnvägar by Diehl, Fjeld and Nilsson (1973) and SJ:s ånglok by Lars Olov Karlsson (2008) both refer to the 1907 type as "E". Neither "E(I)" nor "E(II)" are designations ever used in reality. You will notice that even the "Svenska lok" page only uses "E(II)" in the heading, calling the type "E" in the body of the text and in the list of locomotives.
And if you look in Category:SJ Class E, all images are of the 1907 type; at the very least, all images of the same locomotive type should be in the same category. Why have you put this particular one in its own category? I cannot find that we have any images of the 1876 type, and if we had, they could be categorized as class De, the designation they carried from 1898. ACo2c (talk) 13:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know that in Sweden when the last locomotive of a serie was canceled, the serie was re-assigned. Unfortunately, the standard works on SJ steam locomotives are not found on the net. I also know that neither "E (I)" nor "E (II)" are terms that used in reality - but there must be distinguishing features - regardless of whether there are pictures of the first series of E. If there are any, you can sort them in Sweden, as you like. The article in the German WP can not be called Class De (the designation they wore from 1898), since in Germany, according to the rules, normally the first designation is to be used. I've moved the only picture in the category back to category E. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no desire to change any German Wikipedia naming conventions, but they were a bit confusing when suddenly applied at Commons. Thank you for putting all images in the same category. ACo2c (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem to do it the way it is normally handled in the country. Greetings. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Ryomgard 1915.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nina Klenowska.jpg[edit]

Für die Nutzbarkeit wäre jetzt noch schön zu wissen, wo und wann das ist. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne, du bist ja der Spezialist für Biathlon - 2012, Datum ist im Bild, WM Ruhpolding. Ich hab da im Laufe der Tage noch paar mehr. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Finde ich auch schön. Dennoch sollte das auch in der Beschreibung und möglichst auch in einer Kat auftauchen. Macht es einfach viel besser auffind- und damit nutzbar. Wäre doch sonst schade. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Im Text habe ich es hinzugefügt. Gibt es eine Kat. für die WM in Ruhpolding? Mach ich dann gerne. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

town limits in Denmark[edit]

Please note that the limits of Højer and other towns in Denmark are at the signs: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/2IeJEJbbxm3Cesq_JjkupQ. Højer isn't a separate administrative unit either. It's just an urban area in Tønder Kommune.--Hjart (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But it does not matter to forgive categories even for subgroups as Category:Buildings in Højer ... Commons does not require an exact demarcation, as is the case with Danish places in Denmark according to legal regulation - it is also the case with German groups. But it's okay if you do that. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nochmal, aber warum steht folgendes im dänischen Artikel (i have found in da-WP): Højer (tysk: Hoyer) er en by i Sønderjylland med 1.176 indbyggere (2020) – "en by"? Und dann: "En by er en stor og permanent bebyggelse eller..." – en by -> deutsch (in German) "eine Stadt" - but not "a separate administrative unit"? And what is "Højer Borgmesterkontor"? --Mef.ellingen (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hamnfärjan I in Marstrand.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Hamnfärjan I in Marstrand.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hamnfärjan I in Marstrand.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]