User talk:Mefusbren69

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Your picture of a fresco in Saint Jakobus in Liemberg[edit]

Hi Mefusbren,

Giorgio writing. Surfing on the newest uploaded files I have stumbled on a very good picture of yours about a fresco taken in the church of Saint Jacobus in Liemberg. Firstly, thank you for sharing your work with the rest the world. And what a good work, indeed. I would like to use it for a post in my blog too and show it even to my readers: it worths. Well, observing the fresco I get curious about what it is actually painted there and, as far as I see, we have a woman, a saint, beheaded; a king or some kind of royal ordering her martyrdom and another crowned woman. Plus, an angel carrying a baby. The only saint I was able to find matching, more or less, the illustration was Catherine of Alexandria http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_of_Alexandria. And about the baby I have found that in her iconography she is represented as spiritually married with Christ figured as a baby bringing a ring. But it's just my guess, a shot in the dark. I can be soundly mistaken. Do you have more precise information about that fresco? Do you know who's represented there? Or what it could be? Anyway I really thank you for your work on Commons and for your attention to my silly speculations. Sincerely.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 02:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Monet - Interieur der Rue Carcel.jpg[edit]

Hello, I think File:Monet - Interieur der Rue Carcel.jpg should be nominated for deletion. As as far as I can tell, it is a lower quality version of File:Paul Gauguin 073.jpg, with erroneous painter's attribution. Please tell me if I missed something.--Zolo (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Emil Orlik - Josef Hoffmann - 1903.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Klimt - Theater in Taormina.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


File:Klimt - Gemalter Kompositionsentwurf zur Medizin.jpeg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Hüttenberg - Ruine Silberberg1.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 21:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


Hallo Mefusbren69,
steht die Skulptur in File:Millstatt - Skulptur 21a.jpg im Innen- oder Außenraum bzw., um genauer zu fragen, steht die Skulptur in einem öffentlich frei zugänglichen Raum? --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Außenraum: Siehe auch: File:Millstatt - Skulptur 21.jpg

Ok, dann geht es als FOP. Du musst Fotos von Skulpturen, deren Erschaffer noch nicht >70 Jahre tot ist (und die damit noch unter dessen Copyright stehen), mit FOP taggen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Mefusbren69,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Parrkirche Wieting on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 20:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

Koordinaten Klein Sankt Paul[edit]

Hi, ich glaube bei den Koordinaten von Klein Sankt Paul Bild 0 bis Bild 3 (habe ich geprüft) ist dir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Deine Koordinaten liegen irgendwo mittem im Gebirge?! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

van Rysselberghe "Sitting Nude" is by different artist[edit]

The image (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Theo_van_Rysselberghe_-_Sitzender_Akt.jpeg#filehistory) purported to be "Sitzender Akt" by van Rysselberghe is misattributed. The painting is actually by Edmund Cross (see signature at upper right). Nice image.


I think this painting is by Theo van Rysselberghe , dedicated to Edmund Cross Mefusbren69 (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Bildnis des Malers Max Oppenheimer - Where is this painting exhibited?[edit]

Hello,


Could you tell me where this painting is exhibited? Schiele - Bildnis des Malers Max Oppenheimer - 1910 Maybe it's in the book from which you copied the picture? It would help a lot.


Thank you,

greg

Datei:Spittal - Burgplatz - Bild Muro Vechio - Valentin Oman.jpg[edit]

Die auf dem Foto "Datei:Spittal - Burgplatz - Bild Muro Vechio - Valentin Oman.jpg" abgebildete Fassadengestaltung wird dem falschen Künstler zugeschrieben, es handelt sich bei der Emailwand um ein Werk von Giselbert Hoke wie sowohl einer Presseaussendung der Sparkasse in Spittal an der Drau und dem Werksverzeichnis des betreffenden Künstlers auf der Homepage des Kärntner Kunstvereins zu entnehmen ist. Könnten Sie die Beschreibung des Bildes bitte entsprechend ändern.

Templates[edit]

Vielen Dank für ihren Beiträge. Um automatische Uberstzungen zu erlauben und Wartung leichter zu machen, können Sie "{{oil on canvas}}" eher als "{{de|öl auf Leinwand}}" und "{{private collection}}" eher als "{{de|Privatsammlung}}" schreiben ? Weitere Informationen finden Sie zum Beispiel auf template:technique.--Zolo (talk) 10:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Noch eine Bemerkung: template:painting heißt nun "artwork" (weil auch Skulpturen ein Inbobox brauchen) und ID ist nun auf Inventarnummer begrenzt. Werkverzeuchnisse sollen in "references" geschrieben werden.--Zolo (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Kanzelaltar Tschöran[edit]

Guten Tag Mefusbren69, ich (Lektorin) würde gern Ihr als PD gekennzeichnetes Foto vom Kanzelaltar in Tschöran in einem Kulturführer publizieren, aber in den Bildnachweis möglichst einen "echten" Urhebernamen und nicht "Mefusbren69" eintragen. Wenn Sie Ihren Namen hier nicht öffentlich nennen möchten, könnten Sie mir vielleicht ein E-Mail schreiben an gudowius[at]web.de Würde mich sehr freuen, vielen Dank!

Mir ist meine Anonymität wichtig Mefusbren69 (talk) 17:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Dann immerhin auf diesem Weg: Herzlichen Dank für Ihre Bilder!


File:Hugo Simberg - Verwundeter Engel - 1903.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hugo Simberg - Verwundeter Engel - 1903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Óðinn (talk) 05:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Constable_-_Der_Heuwagen.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Constable_-_Der_Heuwagen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ham (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Reproduktionen Bilder von Felix Esterl und Markus Pernhart[edit]

S.g. mefusbren69, wie Sie dem Impressum der "artbooks", aus denen Sie die Arbeiten von Felix Esterl und Markus Pernhart reproduziert haben, entnehmen können, sind diese keineswegs rechtefrei. Ich fordere Sie daher auf, entweder sämtliche Bilder unverzüglich zu löschen oder aber sich jeweils für 3 Bilder Ihrer Wahl zu entscheiden, dann aber als Quelle nicht schlicht "an artbook" anzugeben, sondern Autor/in, Buchtitel, Verlag und Erscheinungsjahr des Kunstbuches zu nennen. Achim Zechner, Verlag Johannes Heyn Klagenfurt

Die Bilder sind "rechtefrei", sie sind gemeinfrei, da die Künstler mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben sind (§60 Urheberrechtsgesetz Österreich). Durch bloße Reproduktion eines 2D-Werkes wird kein erneutes Werk produziert Die herrschende Meinung geht davon aus, „dass … jeder Teil nur dann geschützt ist, wenn er als solcher eine ‚eigentümliche geistige Schöpfung‘ ist. (Anderl in Kucsko, urheber.recht (2008) [100]). Vielmehr ist die Behauptung, Rechte zu besitzen eine de:Schutzrechtsberühmung. Die Bilder sind also vollkommen korrekt lizenziert. Der Verlag besitzt keinerlei Rechte an den Bildern. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
@Ralf, ist das (Repro 2D) tatsächlich auch vor österr. Gerichten belegt, oder nur vor deutschen? --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Bzgl. der vollständigen Nennung der Quelle, incl. des Photographen, sofern diese Angaben bislang fehlen, gebe ich Herrn Zechner recht; das sollte einfach aus Respekt vor deren Beitrag genannt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Ich interpretiere die Situation anders: Verletzt werden hier tatsächlich nicht die Rechte der Maler, sondern jene der Fotograf/inn/en (§§73 und 74 des österreichischen Urheberrechtsgesetzes). Anders als das Scannen einer Buchseite ist das professionelle Fotografieren eines Gemäldes meiner Auffassung nach nämlich keine „bloße Reproduktion eines 2D-Werkes“, sondern erfordert neben der Arbeitszeit u. a. Kompetenz, Ausstattung, Räumlichkeiten und ggf. auch aufwendige Bildbearbeitung.

Der Verlag BESITZT keine Rechte an den Bildern, hat aber sehr wohl die Verwertungsrechte von den Autoren/Fotografen i. d. R. erworben und zwar i. d. R. für eine ganz konkrete Ausgabe/Auflage eines Buches. Der Verlag hat dafür Sorge zu tragen, dass diese mit den Urhebern (oder auch nach §74: Herstellern von Lichtbildnissen) vereinbarte Verlagspublikation dessen Recht, über eine weitergehende Verbreitung ihrer Texte/Bilder selbst zu bestimmen, nicht einschränkt. D. h. wenn uns das nicht angefragte/genehmigte Kopieren des konkreten im Verlag erschienenen Werkes bekannt wird, müssen wir im Sinn der Urheber/Hersteller aktiv werden.

Abgesehen davon entsteht dem Verlag – und den Autor/inn/en, die i. d. R. Tantiemen von verkauften Büchern beziehen – ein wirtschaftlicher Schaden, wenn wie im Fall des Esterl-Kunstbuches ALLE (!) Werkreproduktionen, die über Thumbnailgröße hinausgehen, auch ohne Buchkauf zugänglich gemacht werden. Um sich der Gepflogenheit des Zitates anzunähern, bleibe ich deshalb bei meinem auch vor Urhebern/Herstellern vertretbaren Vorschlag, einzelne Bilder unter Nennung der Quelle in der wikimedia zu behalten, den Großteil aber herauszunehmen. Unentgeltlich anschauen wird man die Bilder übrigens immer noch können – in vielen Bibliotheken nämlich, die immerhin Tantiemen an die entsprechenden Autor/inn/en ausschütten. Achim Zechner, Verlag Johannes Heyn

Es wurden für alle Dateien Felix Esterl und Markus Pernhart betreffend ein Löschantrag gestellt. Mefusbren69 (talk) 12:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Originalität/Individualität und möglichst originalgetreue Wiedergabe einer gemeinfreien Vorlage schließen einander aus; soweit EU-Recht betroffen ist, gibt es keine Anhaltspunkte, dass dieser Satz nicht auch bei österreichischen Lichtbildern gilt --Historiograf (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Der Verlag hat offenkundig keine Ahnung von der Rechtslage und betreibt hier Bedrohung durch eine selbsgemachte Möchtegerninterpretation. Falls der Uploader Mefusbren69 sich einen Rechtsstreit, der auch bei an sich klarer Rechtslage immer ein Problem ist, ersparen will und er Anhaltspunkte sieht, das sein Realname bekannt sein oder ausforschbar sein könnte, können wir die Bilder aber natürlich löschen. Es kann aber sein (und ist sogar sehr wahrscheinlich), dass sie dann ein anderer Nutzer ohne Angabe eines Realnamens wieder hochladen wird. Dem Verlag in seiner abzulehnenden Rechtsauffasung ist jedenfalls damit dann auch nicht gedient, und das ist auch gut so. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Botticelli_-_Bildnis_einer_jungen_Frau_(Simonetta_Vespucci).jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Botticelli_-_Bildnis_einer_jungen_Frau_(Simonetta_Vespucci).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ham (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Van_Gogh_-_Ernte_in_der_Provénce.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Van_Gogh_-_Ernte_in_der_Provénce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Simone 18:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Fotos auf Austria-Forum[edit]

Hallo Mefusbren69, beim Durchblättern beim Austria-Forum habe ich gesehen, dass folgende Fotos von dir Anklang gefunden haben :-)

File:Diex - Gemeindeamt.JPG - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Diex/Gemeindeamt
File:Diex Wegkreuz.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Diex/Wegekreuz
File:Schloss Großkirchheim.JPG - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Gro%C3%9Fkirchheim/Schloss
File:Döllach - Filialkirche St Andreas1.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Gro%C3%9Fkirchheim/Pfarrkirche

Du findest dabei jeweils dein Foto bei Commons und die Adresse im Artikel beim Austria-Forum. Es ist leicht möglich, dass sich noch weitere unter den vielen von Commons verwendeten befinden. Nachdem die Bilddatenbank laufend vergrößert wird, können es sicher noch mehr werden :-) Falls eine oder andere Bildbeschreibung noch nicht ganz passt bzw. nicht lizenzkonform ist - so wird das in den nächsten Tagen repariert.

gruß K@rl (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Klimt - Erfülllung.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Klimt - Erfülllung.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tfm4wiki (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Ernst Ludwig Kirchner - Nackte liegende Frau - 1931.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ernst Ludwig Kirchner - Nackte liegende Frau - 1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Winklern - Ehemaliges Bezirksgericht.jpg[edit]

Bei dem Photo "Winklern - Ehemaliges Bezirksgericht.jpg" handelt es sich nicht um das ehemalige Bezirksgericht: es ist das Stammhaus der Aicher von Aicheneggs und seit Mitte 1650 in deren und deren Nachfolger Besitz.


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DcoetzeeBot (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Anton Faistauer - Entwurf für die Fensterwand des Salzburger Festspielhauses - 1926.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anton Faistauer - Entwurf für die Fensterwand des Salzburger Festspielhauses - 1926.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Markus Pernhart - Triglav2.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Markus Pernhart - Triglav2.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 19:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Brueghel Jan - Das Gehör.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brueghel Jan - Das Gehör.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oursana (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Félix Vallotton - Krug mit gelben Primeln.jpeg[edit]

Das sind keine gelben Primeln, sondern Narzissen / Osterglocken / Märzenbecher !

File:Van Gogh - Blick auf Paris aus der Nähe des Montemartre.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Van Gogh - Blick auf Paris aus der Nähe des Montemartre.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Léna (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Monet - Die Elster.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monet - Die Elster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andy Mabbett (talk) 13:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Dürer - Maria von einem Engel gekrönt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dürer - Maria von einem Engel gekrönt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oursana (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)