User talk:Metilsteiner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Metilsteiner!

Tips zu Bildern in COMMONS[edit]

Thank you![edit]

The Commons Barnstar
For all the wonderful images you are finding in the Mechanical Curator collection and uploading. Jheald (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to give you this barnstar to thank you for all the fantastic images you have been finding in the Mechanical Curator collection and uploading here.

I have noticed in a couple of other sets that the images uploaded to Flickr can be different to images in the PDF. For example, the Flickr images are sometimes higher resolution or higher quality. I think the PDFs were made several years ago; but the Flickr images were made only a few months ago, starting again from the original full-resolution scans of each page. So that might explain why the two don't quite match up. I'm in touch by email with the chap at the British Library who extracted the Flickr pics, so I will ask him about this the next time that I'm writing to him. All best, Jheald (talk) 11:29, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Loving the "Golden Transvaal" set. Very nice!
A couple of little suggestions that could make it even better -- first, is there any chance that you could fill in either the description or the title field of the {{Artwork}} template, perhaps when you are going through and adding categories. (Also the artist/photographer would be great, if they are identified). Even if the description just repeats the filename, it is nice to have it there -- for one thing, it can encourage people to make wikilinks, that help even better identify the picture. For example "Castle Line" in a description in File:CASTLE LINE RoyalMailService (1893).jpg and "Union Line" in a description of File:UNION LINE AfricanRoyalMailservice (1893).jpg might each be linked to the article en:Union-Castle Line / de:Union-Castle Line, which go a little into the history of that shipping line. (Well, the English version of the article does; the German version only really starts at 1900). Or the description of the President Kruger image could link to en:Paul Kruger / de:Paul Kruger.
The other little thing is the British Library shelfmarks. I think you must have an allergy to them!
But seriously: really good. It's fantastic, the work that you're doing here. Jheald (talk) 18:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK - very interesting pictures and a treasure for the Johannesburg early history... but it takes time..--Metilsteiner (talk) 23:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"This map depicts the city of Johannesburg as it existed over a hundred years ago. With the first discoveries of gold reefs in 1884, Johannesburg began as a small mining settlement and grew rapidly. In 1886 it counted around 3000, primarily European, inhabitants but a mere ten years later, the town comprised over 100,000 people. The map categorizes the population into five racial categories, obviously problematic but nonetheless indicative of a colourful and cosmopolitan urban centre with a diversity of culture and language. Tragically, we also see that, more than 50 years before Apartheid, the city was already being crafted into racial areas. A ‘Native Location’ hovers over what is now Vrededorp and Brixton, and ‘Kafir’ and ‘Coolie’ locations are indicated alongside the railway in what is now Burghersdorp.
"Made by one of the oldest publishing houses in the country, Grocott and Sherry Publishers still exists as Grocott’s Publishing and Printing (based in Grahamstown). The map is signed by Burnie Dobie Melvill, brother of the landsurveyor Edward Harker Vincent Melvill, who gave his name to the suburb of Melville. Only just proclaimed, Melville is outlined by a dotted line at the very edge of the city.
"Other fascinating features of this map include a large red dot indicating the location of the city’s only telephone between Devilliers and Plein Streets. The intersection of Bertha and Jorissen, where Wits Art Museum is located, already exists, while the rest of Wits University’s east campus is an ‘Agricultural Show Ground’, and west campus is a blank space."
Burnie Dobie Melvill, whose father Samuel had been government Surveyor-General, was born in 1866. [1]. I can't see a date of death for him on the net; but the image is certainly okay under United States law, as it was published before 1923. The copyright term in South Africa is "life + 50 years". On New Year's Day 1964, B.D. Melvill would have to have been 97 -- not impossible, but unlikely (especially then), so the map is very strongly likely to be copyright-expired now under South African law as well. Jheald (talk) 22:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für die schönen Fotos des Möhraer Lutherdenkmals in der Morgensonne! Aarp65 (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

10,732 images now in Category:Images from the British Library Mechanical Curator collection !! And you've been finding some great images to upload. I'm sorry that so many of my uploads still need some work done to them, but yours are great. I was wondering, is there any particular program or settings that you have been doing to enhance the images (eg colour and black / white levels)? Your uploads look so good, and you manage to upload so much -- you must have a really good system for doing it. Hope this finds you well, best wishes, Jheald (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Many thanks for all your effort uploading the Mechanical Curator images! It's a really impressive piece of work. Andrew Gray (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

London illustrated[edit]

Just seen your upload of Category:London illustrated. Almanach. (1872-83). Very very nice! Jheald (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for uploading and ading pictures in the Latvian Wikipedia. We really appreciate it! --AgrisR (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Metilsteiner, wenn du vielleicht Lust und Zeit hast, könntest du über meine Eisenach-Uploads drüberschauen, ob sie richtig einkategorisiert und benannt sind. Bei einigen, wie z. B. den Reliefs in Backstein oder der verfallenen Fabrik ist mir nicht klar, um welche Hausnummer bzw. um welches Gebäude es sich genau handelt. Wie gesagt, nur wenn du Lust hast. Danke und schöne Pfingsten noch... --Arnd (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Arnd, vielen Dank für die vielen hübschen Bilder von Eisenach, doch das muss im Moment etwas warten, da ich mich intensiv um einige berufliche Belange kümmern muss, aber wie das Sprichwort schon sagt Aufgeschoben....

Viele Grüße --Metilsteiner (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
In recognition of your hard work on categorization. (talk) 23:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Nachdem ich heute zum ich-weiß-nicht-wievielten Male über eines deiner schönen Fotos aus der Eisenacher Gegend gestolpert bin, dachte ich mir: Höchste Zeit für eine kleine Anerkennung! Vielen Dank für dein langjähriges Engagement und deine vielen guten Fotos hier! Der Wikipedia würde wirklich etwas fehlen ohne deinen Beitrag. Tkarcher (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK und vielen Dank für die netten Worte ...--Metilsteiner (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Река Западная Двин (1893) by САПУНОВ has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jarash (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Das Denkmal zeigt Käte Duncker als Lehrerin in Friedrichroda, es befand sich bis 2009 im Kurpark der Stadt und wurde mit der Neugestaltung der Kurpromenade entfernt. Nach Auskunft des Bauamtes soll das Denkmal etwa im Jahre 2018 wieder im Kurpark aufgestellt werden."[edit]

... laut Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Friedrichroda

Hast du, vielleicht, irgendeine Quelle ("wiki-Quelle") fuer das info das dieses Denkmal soll etwa 2018 zurueck zum Kurpark eintreten gesehen?

Am besten, mit "url", aber ohne "url" koennte auch mir hier hilfreich werden.

Mit Dank im Voraus und Gruessen Charles01 (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Ich habe diese Frage schon an de:Benutzer:CTHOE gestellt. Natuerlich ich suche nur ein einziges Antwort.)

Hallo - leider ist der Beleg bereits gelöscht - als ich die Datei hochgeladen hatte, war zufällig noch ein Bericht in der Thüringer Landeszeitung - Lokalredaktion Gotha online, doch die haben den Text inzwischen wieder gelöscht. Inzwischen habe ich mal einen DDR-Führer zu politischen Denkmälern im Bez. Erfurt gekauft, dort ist das Denkmal auch aufgeführt. ... Ich empfehle den kurzen Dienstweg - ruf doch einfach mal in der Stadtverwaltung Friedrichroda, (03623) 330-100 an und verlange das Bauamt oder Abt. Garten und Fiedhofsamt ..., die kennen den aktuellen Stand. --Metilsteiner (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm. Und besten Dank. MfG Charles01 (talk) 15:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haus Am Amrichen Rasen 18 in Eisenach[edit]

Die Glasmosaiken zeigen Darstellungen aus dem Straßenbau (Bauherr des Gebäudes war Paul Enke, der mitten in der Weltwirtschaftskrise die gleichnamige Straßenbaufirma gründete, die auf dem Hof links neben dem Gebäude ansässig war).--77.182.52.195 20:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info - darüber liest man meistens nichts in der Zeitung ...--Metilsteiner (talk) 13:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Falsche Jahreszahl[edit]

Hallo Metilsteiner, ich hätte mal wieder eine Anmerkung, dieses Mal zwecks einer Datierung. Dieses Foto (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eisenach_Jakobsplan_1978.jpg) ist auf 1978 datiert. Das stimmt aber nicht, da selbst die Bäckerei erst 1988 aus dem Gebäude raus ist, wie die Familie selbst erzählt hat. Das Foto kann daher nur 1988 entstanden sein, wurde auch desöfteren in einem Forum darüber diskutiert. Kannst du das bitte ändern, damit die ständigen Falschmeldungen enden. Ebenso muss es dann auf der Eisenach Seite geändert werden. -- Frarenatin (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Farentin - Danke für den Hinweis. Im Gegensatz zu (Foto-)Positiven, wo ab und zu mal ein Datumsstempel vorhanden ist, kann man einem Negativ nicht ansehen, wann es konkret belichtet wurde. Mein Cousin ist 1978 in einer Wohnung in unmittelbarer Nähe der damaligen WG Gaststätte Zisterne (Jakobsgasse) eingezogen, ich erinnere mich noch sehr gut, das damals auch bereits die Nordseite vom Jakobsplan mit Plattenbau-Gebäuden bebaut war und bereits zahlreiche Häuser auf der Südseite (Sophienstraße) bereits leergezogen waren. Es wurde aber dann erst im WG Nord weiter gebaut, wie Dr. Brunner in seiner Geschichte der Stadt Eisenach (Wartberg-Verlag 2004, S. 114) berichtet. Der Grund war simpel - das AWE und andere Eisenacher Großbetriebe sollten zusätzliche Arbeitskräfte erhalten, die Innenstadtsanierung musste pausieren. Es ging dann auch erst mal in der Fläche zwischen Elisabeth-Kirche und Stadtschloss und zeitgleich auch östlich beim Markscheffelshof und mittlere Alexanderstraße weiter. Dann kam die Wende und die nördliche Altstadt hatte große provisor. Parkplätze ... Kurz und gut, ich werde die Datierung berichtigen ....--Metilsteiner (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stolpersteine in Vacha[edit]

Hallo Metilsteiner, solltest du mal in Vacha sein, im Steinweg 2 sind 5 noch nicht fotografierte Stolpersteine. Viele Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 11:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Arnd, habe Deinen Bilderwunsch registriert, ich hab noch BORSCH und zwei kleinere Orte bei Geisa auf meiner Arbeitsliste, in Vacha ist der Umstieg auf den Bus nach Geisa möglich, das passt also schon mal irgendwann. Am SO warst Du in Eisenach Hötzelsroda - Dürrerhof, da stand ich zeitgleich in Schmalkalden - eine ganz herrliche Stadt, ich hab bei mittelprächtigem Wetter vielleicht 33 % der Altstadt geschafft, und dann gibts auch noch die 'zig Vorörtchen. Also ein paar Foto-Touren werde ich dieses Jahr noch machen, aber es wird halt immer aufwändiger, dort hinzukommen ... ich habe vor ein paar Jahren das Autofahren aufgegeben, der TÜV usw. man kommt auch ohne über die Runden.--Metilsteiner (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:HAWAII (1898) KING LUNALILO - PRINCE BILL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:SM Zillbach 33c.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SM Zillbach 33c.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 00:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ŻÓŁKIEWSKI(1835) p008 Hetman Żółkiewski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Удивленный1 (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

can you see File talk:JÁSZAY(1846) p1.006 Mária magyar királyno.jpg. sorry for my english --Chatsam (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:ESA Schützenstr. Bild1.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Elisabethgalerie in Wartburg Castle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Friedrichroda Bergziegenrennen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It's a poster, ofcourse not free
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrichroda Bergziegenrennen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1924 - NSU Motorrad Werbung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte vor dem Hochladen genauer hinschauen. Wenn eine Zeichnung klar signiert ist wie diese, kann man die nicht einfach als gemeinfreies Werk eines unbekannten Künstlers hochladen. Danke. --Rosenzweig τ 19:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:PD Illustration of Österreichischer Motor 1920-1937 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+ Template:PD Illustration of Helios 1894-1944. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung[edit]

Hallo Metilsteiner, scheinbar bist du nicht mehr besonders aktiv. Aber vielleicht hast du ja trotzdem Lust eine Menge von Bildern von Tilman2007 genauer zu kategorisieren. Die meisten sind in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Eisenach zu finden. Wäre schön. Wenn nicht, alles Gute. --Arnd (talk)

Bilder aus der Eisenacher Gegend[edit]

Hier hat Arjooy einige Bilder aus der gegend Westthüringen-Gerstungen hochgeladen und kann sie nicht genau zuordnen. Da Du vermutlich aus der Gegend bist, könntest Du sie ja mal anschauen und gegebenfalls die Beschreibung und Kategorie ergänzen. Bei einigen Bilder habe ich bereits Ergänzungen vorgenommen, es schadet aber nicht, wenn nochmal jemand drüberschaut. --79.214er (talk) 11:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Metilsteiner, I see that you uploaded File:DRYDEN(1760) p3.061 Richard Edwardes.jpg in 2014. Surely this is of Geoffrey Chaucer, not Richard Edwardes? See File:Chaucer1853.jpg for comparison. Ham II (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLEMENT(1895) pg341 The Tower of Galata.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nanahuatl (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



File:Dixi Logos.png has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:999:21:9948:E9E1:53BA:5069:968B.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Neerlands-Oost-Indie (1852-1857) by BUDDINGH has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 20:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

War memorials in Landkreis Altenburger Land has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


87.147.61.158 09:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MECHELIN(1894) p288 Frans Ludwig Schauman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:WAK Otzbach Asphaltwerk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EACC80 (talk) 16:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]