User talk:Metrophil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Metrophil!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating redirects for deletion


Dear Metrophil44,

Please don't nominate redirects for deletion just because you believe they are redundant. Especially when the file has been around for years. The redirect can be used via instantcommons, via an edit summary or via a link at another project. Plus it creates extra and unneeded admin workload. I declined your speedy nominations. Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Natuur12, I didn’t know this was not wanted. Greetings, -- Metrophil44 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Hello, Metrophil!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nenntmichruhigip: Ich weiß wie kategorisieren funktioniert und dass man das schnell machen sollte. (In meinen Beiträgen siehst du, dass ich in letzter Zeit viel bei der Straßenbahn Düsseldorf herumkategorisiert habe) Allerdings hatte gestern Abend nach dem Upload (vom Handy aus!) wenig Zeit weiterzukategorisieren, da mein Zug kam LG -- Metrophil44 (talk) 13:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Phil,

Thanks for the new Croydon Tramlink map you made. It has a small error, at the Centrale stop there is no interchange with the National Rail. Could you fix that? IIVQ (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IIVQ, I just uploaded a new version of the map. Greets, -- Metrophil44 (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Super!. Could you, by any chance, also upload the SVG version at File:Tramlink map 2016.svg? IIVQ (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sydney Metro logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland


Hallo Metrophil!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Euregio-Fahrplan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ( You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Euregio-Fahrplan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Didym (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Didym: Moin, was ist denn das Problem mit der Datei? --Metrophil (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Die abgebildeten Objekte sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, es ist also eine Freigabe erforderlich. --Didym (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Hallo. Eine Kleinigkeit: File:Netzplan Straßenbahn Mannheim und Ludwigshafen.png zeigt die Haltestelle Theresienkrankenhaus auf der falschen Neckarseite. --Mopskatze (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mopskatze: danke für den Hinweis, ich muss die Karte eh bald noch mal neuzeichnen... LG --Metrophil (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mopskatze:  hab’s mal eben gefixt, fange aber gerade an, einen neuen Plan zu zeichnen. LG --Metrophil (talk) 13:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated


Hello Metrophil, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tramnet Gent.png


Dear Metrophil, thanks for the nice update and re-drawing of my 'Ghent tram network'! Just two things: there are no NMBS train stations at 'Gentbrugge Moscou' (line 4) and 'P+R Gentbrugge' (line 2). There is a NMBS train station (called: 'Station Gentbrugge') near the depot of Gentbrugge ('stelplaats Gentbrugge'), but there is no direct connection at all between the tram and the train stop. It's about 15 minutes walk... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven57 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Steven57: bedankt voor de lof van mijn kaart! Wat de NMBS stations betreft: Openstreetmap zegt dat er een NMBS station is nabij Gentbrugge Moscou, met de naam Gentbrugge Perron C.W., maar nu zie ik ook op Google dat dit station is gesloten. En ik dacht dat Gentbrugge dichterbij de tramhalte was. In ieder geval, bedankt voor de melding van deze twee foutjes, ik heb ze nu gecorrigeerd. Groetjes, --Metrophil (talk) 09:17, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wien Update


Servus, danke erstmal für den schönen Netzplan von der Wiener Straßenbahn ;) Ich wollte nur darauf hinweisen, dass sich am 2. September einiges ändert (längere U1, kürzere 67, 2 und 44 im Westen getauscht, 10 und 60 verlängert, 58 gestrichen, viele neue Haltestellennamen). Wäre schön wenn der neue Plan pünktlich parat liegt ;) --Dreikommadrei (talk) 15:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreikommadrei: Danke für deinen Hinweis. Habe nun eine neue Version hochgeladen (File:Netzplan Straßenbahn Wien 2017.png), die kann dann am 2. September in alle Artikel eingesetzt werden. Liebe Grüße, --Metrophil (talk) 17:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have a suggestion regarding File:Tramlink map 2017.png, is there any way you could make an additional map that overlays a geographic map, like File:Map of Manchester Metrolink.png or File:Map Midland Metro.png? --MetrolandNW (talk) 12:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MetrolandNW! I already created File:Tramlink geographical.png awhile ago, but I’ve updated it now so that it shows the OSM background map. Is this what you were looking for? --Metrophil (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what I was looking for! I wanted to use a map like this for the Tramlink Wikipedia article. But File:Tramlink geographical.png is a bit off and not that clear. I would love if you could modify that map to remove the National Rail lines, and make the destination names larger and clearer like it is on File:Map Midland Metro.png. I think that would be perfect. --MetrolandNW (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi MetrolandNW! I updated the design now, so I hope everything is fine now (I didn’t remove the NR+LU lines since I think it would be interesting how the Tramlink interacts with them). --Metrophil (talk) 09:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! In Cottbus gibt es seit dem 22. Oktober 2019 ein verändertes Liniennetz. Gruß! --Hamsteraner (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hamsteraner, danke für deinen Hinweis! Ich habe soeben einen neuen Netzplan erstellt (direkt zweisprachig, dann brauch sich CellarDoor85 die Mühe nicht machen), werde den noch von einem Sorbischsprecher kontrollieren lassen und dann hochladen und einbinden. Liebe Grüße, --Metrophil (talk) 19:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ist jetzt hochgeladen unter File:Cottbus Strassenbahnnetz 2019.png. --Metrophil (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank! Auch für das direkte Einfügen der sorbischen Übersetzungen. Der Haltestelle Badesee Madlow fehlt allerdings noch ein „e“, und die Endstelle Neu Schmellwitz fehlt komplett. --Hamsteraner (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ist nun korrigiert --Metrophil (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kann aber noch keine neue Dateiversion sehen. Hast du sie schon hochgeladen? --Hamsteraner (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ups, ich hatte sie nur auf meiner Festplatte aktualisiert, mein Fehler. Ist dann jetzt hochgeladen. --Metrophil (talk) 18:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Metrophil,

Since july 8, 2022 the Utrecht Tram network has changed:

  • Line 60 is replaced by line 20, which runs from Nieuwegein Zuid to P+R Science Park
  • Line 61 is replaced by line 21, which runs from IJsselstein Zuid to P+R Science Park
  • Line 22 stays as it is.
  • The stop Nieuwegein Stadscentrum (where lines 20/21 split) is renamed Nieuwegein City
  • The stops CS Centrumzijde en CS Jaarbeursplein do not have a dash but a space after the CS.
  • There is a Depot next to the P+R Science Park as well (no services, just stabling of trams)

For information (this does not need to be mapped): No trams run between Utrecht Centraal Centrumzijde and P+R Science Park in late evenings and weekend, which means line 22 doesn't run at all and 20/21 run their old routes, but extended to CS Centrumzijde (the east side of central station)

It would be nice if you could update the tram map! IIVQ (talk) 11:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IIVQ, apologies for the late answer. I just corrected the map with the updates that you mentioned. If there's still anything left to change, do tell me :) Metrophil (talk) 15:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, we all have busy lives. Yes, this looks ok! Thanks! IIVQ (talk) 08:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast diese Karte zuletzt bearbeitet. Könntest Du bei Gelegenheit die RE 47 Düsseldorf–Remscheid-Lennep (seit Dez 2022) hinzufügen? --Köhl1 (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]