User talk:Mezzofortist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Instrument ranges question[edit]

Hello, and thanks for uploading the pictures of instrument ranges! I have a question: why are there four notes for the wind instruments? Are the middle two notes the ones that can be played "comfortably", and the outside two notes harmonics? Thanks for the information! --bdesham 23:43, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The normally sized middle two notes show the ususal range that should work in any case. The possibility to play the (outside) little notes usually depends on the kind/quality/type of the instruments and/or players. I designed these graphics mainly to use them in articles about musical instruments, where the range (and so the meaning of the little notes) should be explained separately in the text, too. Greetings Mezzofortist 15:04, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)


Hi Mezzofortist, ich wollte nur sagen, dass die GNU-FDL verlangt, dass man den Autor immer nennt. Das ist bei Image:Violin Details.jpg nicht geschehen. Ich habe es jetzt ergänzt. Bitte immer den Autor angeben! schöne grüsse -- Breeze 20:04, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Bei Image:French_horn.jpg fehlten auch wichtige Angaben, z.B. die Genehmigung des Fotografen. Wäre das deutsche Bild mittlerweile gelöscht worden, hätte man das ohne die Angabe nicht mehr nachvollziehen können und das Bild wäre hier eventuell irgendwann bei Zweifeln gelöscht worden. Kuck dir einfach an, was dort ergänzt worden ist! Bitte immer alles angeben, was geht. --Jon 4 July 2005 14:56 (UTC)

Bassoon pictures[edit]

Hello to another bassoonist! I have some photos (taken by User:Gmaxwell, Image:FoxBassoon.jpg and Image:Bassoon-reeds2.jpg) of a bassoon and reeds to replace the ones on English Wikipedia which had no license information. I went to see if other languages' projects had the same photos on them and saw your images. (Nice work on the Fagott article—I wish I knew German well enough to translate it to English! Your reeds look much better than mine, too...) I don't want to just replace your work now that I've seen it on de:, so I thought I would let you choose whether you'd like to or not. Happy playing, Mindspillage 06:39, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Herodot.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Herodot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 09:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Tip, habe da jetzt ein wenig aufgeräumt - aber ausgerechnet beim Herodot weiß ich wirklich nicht mehr, wo ich den her habe... selbst photographiert ist er jedenfalls nicht - peinlich, aber dann wird man ihn wohl rausnehmen müssen... LiGrü --<small>Mezzofortist</small> 15:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Needing help for instrument range[edit]

I see that you are the one who usually takes care of the instrument range images. I'm currently working on the English-language alto clarinet article; I know the ranges for the instrument but have no clue how to make images of your caliber. Is there any chance you might be able to help me? The written range is from E-flat 3 (optional, otherwise E natural 3) to G natural 6, making its sounding range from G natural 2 to B-flat 5. I understand if you are not able to help me out; thank you for your time and effort. MToolen

Of course i can do it, just give me a few days... --mezzofortist 10:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I'm in a similar boat as MToolen, above. I'm working on improving the handbell article, and I think it would be greatly improved by one of your snazzy range images! Would you mind working one up? The range is C2 to C9 (big, I know). If you can help, I'd appreciate it! Godofbiscuits 20:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Oboe range[edit]

There are two oboe ranges. Wich one is the correct? The files are called Range oboe.png and Oboe range.png. I think the first one is riht.But I'm not sure. answer me in Usuario_Discusión:OboeCrack Thanks Oboe Crack

Range for the virginals[edit]

Hi, are you able to help create an image for the musical range of the virginals? I'm a reviewer; the primary editor of the article is Nick Michael, so if you have any questions they should be directed to him. Thanks in advance. — Cheers, JackLee talk 14:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC), updated 20:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Range balalaika.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Range balalaika.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ПростоУчастник (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)