User talk:Minihaa

Geschmolzenes Telefon

Hallo Minihaa, was spricht hier gegen die Verwendung der Kategorie "Deutsche Bundespost"? Gruß --Sir James (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey Sir James,

ich dachte mir, dass die Post wohl nicht der Hersteller ist - was soll der "Verwender" in einer Kategorie auftauchen? Das war mein Gedanke. Grüße --Minihaa (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Minihaa, Du hast natürlich recht; der Hersteller war nicht die Deutsche Bundespost (mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit wurde dieser Fernsprechtischapparat von SIEMENS und/oder Schaub-Lorenz hergestellt). Die Bundespost war aber zu dieser Zeit die einzige "Anbieterin" von zugelassenen Telefon-Apparaten. Die Bildbeschreibung "Telefon der Deutschen Bundespost" meint nicht etwa, dass es in irgendeinem Büro der Post als Eigentum dieser Behörde in Benutzung war, sondern der einzige Vertriebskanal. Das Telefon musste (durch den "Fernsprechteilnehmer") von der Post gemietet werden; es blieb also Eigentum der Deutschen Bundespost. Heute kaum mehr vorstellbar: es mussten alle Geräte von der Bundespost zugelassen werden und der Anschluss inkl. Hardware war halt nur von und über die Deutsche Bundespost zu bekommen. Insofern halte ich also die Verwendung der Kat für richtig; sogar nötig. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 06:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Ich finde, es ist ein wenig damit zu vergleichen, dass der File auch in Category:Fire war: Natürlich hat das Telefon irgendetwas mit Feuer zu tun (ist dadurch geschmolzen), ein Leser wird aber nicht nach so etwas suchen, wenn er in die Category geht. Aber da es dir wohl wichtig ist, habe ich es gerne wieder hinzugefügt. Viele Grüße und weiter viel Spaß an Commons --Minihaa (talk) 19:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Rand

Demo

Hallo Minihaa. Ich empfehle dir, bei Strukturformel einen schmalen Rand (~5px, je nach Basisskalierung) einzufügen. Sonst kleben diese in der Chemobox an den Begrenzungslinien oder (noch stärker) bei Thumbnails am Rahmen. --Leyo 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Moin Leyo, das schrieb mir Roland.Chem in der De.Wiki auch schon, Danke dir. Mache ich in Zukunft auch, das hier ist allerdings ein älteres Bild. Viele Grüße --Minihaa (talk) 14:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Für mich kommt es vor allem darauf an, ob ein Bild in einem Artikel eingebunden ist oder nicht, und nicht aufs Alter. --Leyo 15:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Ice_in_technical_background

Ice in technical background has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Surendran Shelini PhD thesis.pdf

File:Surendran Shelini PhD thesis.pdf has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Surendran Shelini PhD thesis.pdf This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Abbildung im Artikel "Phasenübergang"

Lieber Minihaa,

im Artikel Phasenübergang wird diese Abbilung von dir verwendet, unter dem Abschnitt Ehrenfest-Klassifikation:

Ich denke hier ist ein Fehler bei der Entropie für den Phasenübergang zweiter Ordnung. Nach Ehrenfest-Klassifikation muss die zweite Ableitung diskontinuierlich sein, also $C_{p}$, wie auch in deinem Plot. Da $C_{p}=T{\frac {\partial S}{\partial T}}$ muss allerdings die Entropie $S(T)$ dann einen Knick bei der kritischen Temperatur haben. Siehe zum Beispiel hier oder hier skizziert.

Es wäre schön wenn du das korrigieren könntest :).

Viele Grüße --2A02:3037:41D:157F:F4A3:DA03:32E3:E1E7 08:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo, danke für die Mühe, das so aufzuschreiben. Komme ich aktuell leider nicht zu. Das Bild ist mittels Inkscape erstellt (kostenloses Programm), du kannst es gerne korrigieren. Minihaa (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at 2 May 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

• 

  

  First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.
  Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
• 

  

  Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.
  Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
• 

  

  Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.
  Attribution: public domain

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:04, 9 May 2026 (UTC)