User talk:Moheen/Archive 2016

Archives 2013-14 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-22 2023

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faculty of Arts and Humanities at University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 12:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faculty of Arts and Humanities at University of Chittagong (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sukanta Bhattacharya.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sunil Gangopadhyay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Satyendranath Bose.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Firoza Begum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangladesh Navy School and College.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 14:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sara Zaker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nusrat Imrose Tisha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

File:MusicBrainz homepage.png

File:MusicBrainz homepage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Library (East-West view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

You have a distortion problem: the stairs are not for curves. This image is better [:file:Chittagong University Library (01).jpg]] because it more accurately describes the subject. You can correct your images and recharging it is not difficult. If you have problems asking for help. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

---

•  Info Perspective solved. Re-opened for Valued image candidates. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful--মিনার মাহমুদ (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Solving distortion seems good. Raihan Rana (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support. Foysoll Aurdree (talk)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faculty of Law at University of Chittagong north front side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, as this is a multi-sided building, I think the view direction needs to be added to the scope. DeFacto (talk). 23:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Done ~ Moheen ^(talk) 05:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, thanks, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Raihan Rana (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, best in scope & accurate direction.--Rafaell Russell (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Independence Memorial Mural at University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull--মিনার মাহমুদ (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Raihan Rana (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful.--Rafaell Russell (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sasha Grey in AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Raihan Rana (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Rafaell Russell (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kanan Devi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope. Raihan Rana (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, best in scope.--Rafaell Russell (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battersea Power Station (South-North view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful--মিনার মাহমুদ (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment This scope is too broad. There are many images in the gallery (different states of repair, position of camera etc.) and you need to be more specific, then the image could be assessed. Charles (talk) 09:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose For complex and asymmetrical building, it would be good to give the direction of the shooting. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Done. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 05:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World Trade Center Chittagong from west-south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support useful. Raihan Rana (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anopheles stephensi (Female).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. Jiel (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faculty of Biological Science at University of Chittagong (Eastern front side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alela Diane in Paradiso (Amsterdam).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Raihan Rana (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edward Thomas Devine in 1916.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Only in this scope. --Raihan Rana (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles Greeley Abbot in 1910s.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madame Tussauds Vienna entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Raihan Rana (talk) 16:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lakshminarayan Roy Chowdhury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Only in this scope. --Raihan Rana (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chandra Mahal, Bagerhat west front side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anti Terrorism Raju Memorial Sculpture font view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Administrative building at University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swadhinata Stambha (front landscape).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Stats code

Hello Moheen,

I've "stolen" the code of your stats columns. This is really cool!

Best regards,

--Basotxerri (talk) 20:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Oh! Sure. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side view of Patenga sea beach (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --A.Savin 08:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rama Zadi Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajbana Vihara Buddhist Temple side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Info Scope specified cause there are another VI, which I did not get before the nomination. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 07:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alice Rohe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kean Bridge and Ali Amjad's Clock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shilaidaha Kuthibadi southern front view in 2007.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. The building has been repainted this aspect is no longer the reference. We must give the date it change appearance in the scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

 Done ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

We must give the date in the scope, since the monument your image has changed color: it is red. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Oops thanks! ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Support ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shilaidaha Kuthibadi western corner view in 2007.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. The building has been repainted this aspect is no longer the reference. We must give the date it change appearance in the scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Done ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexander Hays.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astoria Houseboat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prof. Dr. M. Kamaluddin Nursery & Research Centre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

< Comment it would be useful that this image is used.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

• Please check. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madhubala.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Ritter Beard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Che Guevara Mausoleum from west-east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Sorry, several and serious perspective issues, none vertical line are vertical --Ezarateesteban 23:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

 Comment these types of technical issues @Ezarate: are not usually reason to oppose a VI nomination. Charles (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

 Comment The perspective issues affect the VIC guideline #3: Must illustrate its subject well. The subject isn't well ilustrated. Thanks for your opinion Charles Ezarateesteban 15:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Done Perspective has been set. Wish it will be batter. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support It was more easy than I think, useful now --Ezarateesteban 22:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duplantier Family Tomb by Dan Leyer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Are they a notable family or is the tomb designed by someone notable? Charles (talk) 21:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Some years ago, when I began at Wikipedia, we had only a few VIs and also much lesser articles in Wikipedia. So the restriction on important subjects (like e.g. "cathedrals") perhaps made sense. Nowadays we have much more articles to be illustrated, not only articles on cathedrals, also of "normal churches", at least in articles on villages. So I think, it is useful, also to have pictures to illustrate such articles. A single picture of a church can't describe all. Some details are better illustrated in a close up. I addition, we are service providers for the Wikipedia authors. We provide pictures for their articles. And I think, that we should not wait with our pictures, until an article is written, but to offer a pool of pictures for the autor, who writes the article. When we have already VIs, before an article is written, it will be easier for the autor, to select good pictures. And perhaps an article (or a part of an article) on a detail of a church (or somewhat else, for example this picture) is written only by the fact, that we have appropriate illustrations for demonstration, for the autor is inspired by the picture. So I think, our aim should be: first the pictures, then the article. --Llez (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose see my question above. Charles (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This document is interesting for not by the subject, but to its author: Dan Leyer. I suggest to change the scope for "Duplantier Family Tomb by Dan Leyer". But in this case the best image is file:Historic American Buildings Survey Dan Leyrer, Photographer April 1965 VIEW FROM THE SOUTH - Duplantier Family Tomb, North Claiborne Street, New Orleans, Orleans Parish, LA HABS LA,36-NEWOR,55-2.tif. The caption is perfect in the other case it does not understand the interest of the document. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Info Scope changed. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Duplantier Family Tomb to uplantier Family Tomb by Dan Leyer {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swaran (front, eastern, view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image seems useful but I do not understand. The caption should indicate what is important. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hanging Bridge, Kaptai Lake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abdul Karim Sahityavisharad Reference Library.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Mykonos, Little Venice (15804791419).jpg

File:Mykonos, Little Venice (15804791419).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarana Halim in 2016.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

ফাইলের নাম

মহীন ভাই, উপযুক্ত কারণ ছাড়া ফাইলের নাম পাল্টানোর দরকার নেই। ফাইলের নাম ইংরেজি হলে অবাঙালীরা সহজে বুঝবে এটাও সঠিক কারণ হতে পারে না। এটা একটা বহুভাষীক প্রকল্প, ফলে যে কোন ব্যবহারককারী তার ইচ্ছামত যে কোন ভাষাতে ফাইলের শিরোনাম দিতে পারেন। আপনি নাম পরিবর্তন না করে বরং ফাইলের বিবরণে ইংরেজি যোগ করে দিতে পারেন। ধন্যবাদ। Aftab (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

ঠিক আছে। ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martyr Shamsuzzoha Memorial Sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cycle rickshaws parking in Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Stuttgart library interior.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Stadtbibliothek am Mailänder Platz (wide view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aung Chan Sa Nine Planet Pagoda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoordinates. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Info Added now. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Ok good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Letohrádek Hvězda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wooden Ferris wheel in Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Bangladesh Naval Academy in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office of the Postmaster General in Postal Academy, Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Molly Malone

Hi Moheen,

Thank you for your comments regarding the Molly Malone statue. I have now moved it to the MVR section.

Regards Martinvl (talk) 20:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Votes in VI

Thank you to close a few votes here lightens my work. But be careful to wait 48 hours after the last vote to close. Thank you, continuing to come it is a pleasure to have you with us. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: You are welcome and thanks for that you mentioned here. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Pritilata Hall, University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patenga Sea Beach Road (West-East axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Security office, University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shree Shree Dashanami Akhara (Third shrine).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Badges of seven freedom fighters on Swaran Monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Shuvo Mazumder (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangladesh Last House.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Shuvo Mazumder (talk) 14:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karnaphuli River and Port of Chittagong at night (east-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is imprecise --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Karnaphuli River to Port of Chittagong (East-west view) --El Grafo (talk) 08:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Scores:
1. Karnaphuli River at night (01).jpg: +2
2. Karnaphuli River at night (02).jpg: 0
=>
File:Karnaphuli River at night (01).jpg: Promoted.
File:Karnaphuli River at night (02).jpg: Declined.

---

Scope changed from Port of Chittagong (East-west view) to Karnaphuli River and Port of Chittagong at night (east-west axis) ~ Moheen ^(talk) 09:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Support useful. Shuvo Mazumder (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Certificate of Independence Day Award to Muhammad Siddiq Khan.jpg

File:Certificate of Independence Day Award to Muhammad Siddiq Khan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patenga Road in 2015 (north-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Welcome sign in Chittagong Export Processing Zone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fishing net washing at Patenga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Road.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tea Gardens in Sripur, Sylhet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sheikh Mujib Road, aerial view, south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moder Gorob.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burdwan House facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support But the colors seems a little yellowish; maybe needs to fix the white-balance? -- Mathieu MD (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Info  Done It seems good now. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 18:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tokyo Skytree in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spring Temple Buddha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:De handelsloge van de VOC in Hougly in Bengalen Rijksmuseum SK-A-4282.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De handelsloge van de VOC in Hougly in Bengalen Rijksmuseum SK-A-4282.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Jessie Bond as Iolanthe in 1882.jpg

File:Jessie Bond as Iolanthe in 1882.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cube00 (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Lalon (south front).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bibi Russell in 2009.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good but it would be useful that this image is used.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Info  Done ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Chittagong (south-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque of Piazzale Flaminio and Via Flaminia, Roma.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jainta Hill Resort, Tamabil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple Pyramid, Chacchoben (west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Railway station (eastern axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masterda Surya Sen Hall (north axis), University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fundació Cultural Privada Rocamora, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue evoking Bugs Bunny at Butterfly Park Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Souravdgx (talk) 08:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope. --Pierre André (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mahiya Mahi in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Welcome signs in Butterfly Park Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good, provided there was no copyright. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

The view orientation

What is actually mean by "the view orientation" term? thanks.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 04:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Masum-al-hasan: এটা হলো ছবিটা ভৌগলিক ভাবে কোন দিক থেকে প্রদর্শিত হচ্ছে তার উল্লেখ। আপনি এই ছবি গুলো দেখুন: ১, ২, ৩, ৪, ৫। এখানে স্কোপের পাশাপাশি ছবিটি কীভাবে প্রদর্শিত হচ্ছে তার উল্লেখ রয়েছে। এছাড়াও কিছু জানতে চাইলে জানাবেন। ধন্যবাদ। ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

"Perspective needs to be corrected" এখানে Perspective দিয়ে আসলে কি বুঝানো হচ্ছে?--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

পরিপ্রেক্ষিত বা চিত্রানুপাত হলো ছবির দৃশ্যমান বস্তু/বিষয় ঠিকভাবে সোজা রয়েছে কিনা। আপনার এই ছবির বিষয়বস্তু: ভবন, দেয়ালসহ অন্যান্য বিষয় বাঁকা ভাবে রয়েছে। কোয়ালিটি চিত্রের মতোন ভ্যালুড চিত্রের জন্যও বিষয়বস্তুকে সোজা হতে হয়। একটা উদাহরণ দেখুন: প্রথম ছবিতে সিঁড়ির অংশসহ পুরো ভবন কিছুটা বাঁকাভাবে রয়েছে, পরের ছবিতে তা ঠিক করা হয়েছে। আরো দেখুন: বিকৃতি। ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

হুম বুঝলাম। চিনিকলের যে ছবি দিছি ওইটা তাহলে Valued Image হিসেবে একসেপ্ট হচ্ছে না কোনভাবেই। ধন্যবাদ ভাই।--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 04:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pond in Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences (from south axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ananda Bazar Beach Road (south-north axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Postal Officers Colony, aerial view, (south-east exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of tiger in Museum of Rajas' (side view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opening plaque of Independence Memorial Mural, University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

wikidata

Hi

Put it in Wikidata --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done ~ Moheen ^(talk) 09:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, entrance, University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freeport circle (south exposure), Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dola Swarani, (east exposure), University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abdul Karim Sahityavisharad, Illustration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:55, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industry Corporation (Chittagong Regional Office) exposure from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Road, (south-north exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Library garden (west exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gallery Diagram, Chittagong University Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. -- Raihan Rana (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Busts of Aristotle, Roman copy after a Greek bronze original by Lysippos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Moheen Reeyad, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anna Maria Pierangeli in 1957.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Plato in front of the Academy of Athens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Mathieu MD (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Reviewing my Files would be really appreciated!

Hello, I noticed that you recently been granted File Reviewer right and I've also noticed that you passed licenses of some Bollywood Hungama files. Even I also love to upload images from Bollywood Hungama and I've uploaded many from it to Commons. My files from no. 1 to 231 have not been reviewed yet, though a few of them in the middle of them have been reviewed. I know that reviewing all my files on a single day is very difficult, but just divide into days, like 3-5 days? If you could take some of your time in reviewing my files, it would be really appreciated. I would look to give you a Barnstar! Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 17:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I know that some source links given on Bollywood Hungama files are working and some aren't. But you don't stop reviewing them, because some source links are working. This happened because BH administrators have changed the layout of their website completely. Just review those files whose source link are working and which aren't working mention them on my talk page. I'll try to fix them, but don't nominate them for deletion like you did for File:Amit Sadh at the launch of Manasi Scott's album 'Manasi - The Ideal Woman'.jpg. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 06:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Binodini Dasi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Tran Anh Phuong.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mother Teresa in 1920.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Divya Khosla Kumar graces the success party celebrating the cover story of Better Homes & Gardens (01).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Divya Khosla Kumar graces the success party celebrating the cover story of Better Homes & Gardens (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Divya Khosla Kumar graces the success party celebrating the cover story of Better Homes & Gardens (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Revent^talk 22:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Evelyn Sharma at the Hello Winner's Cup 2016 (01).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Evelyn Sharma at the Hello Winner's Cup 2016 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Evelyn Sharma at the Hello Winner's Cup 2016 (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Revent^talk 22:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Evelyn Sharma grace Vogue Beauty Awards 2016 (01).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Evelyn Sharma grace Vogue Beauty Awards 2016 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Revent^talk 22:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Huma Qureshi grace the SIIMA 2016 finale in Singapore (01).jpg

File:Huma Qureshi grace the SIIMA 2016 finale in Singapore (01).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Revent^talk 17:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kim Sharma at mahurat of Ladies Tailor (01).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Sharma at mahurat of Ladies Tailor (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Revent^talk 15:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kim Sharma at IIJW 2012 show Day - 2 (01).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Sharma at IIJW 2012 show Day - 2 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kim Sharma at IIJW 2012 show Day - 2 (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Revent^talk 15:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Manasvi Mamgai at Lakme Fashion Week 2016 - Day 3 (01).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Manasvi Mamgai at Lakme Fashion Week 2016 - Day 3 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Revent^talk 17:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Monica Dogra grace Vogue Beauty Awards 2016 (01).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Monica Dogra grace Vogue Beauty Awards 2016 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Revent^talk 17:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nauheed Cyrusi unveil F2 coffee in Barista, Juhu on 2009 (01).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nauheed Cyrusi unveil F2 coffee in Barista, Juhu on 2009 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nauheed Cyrusi unveil F2 coffee in Barista, Juhu on 2009 (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Revent^talk 17:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nargis Fakhri at the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016 (01).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nargis Fakhri at the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nargis Fakhri at the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016 (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Revent^talk 18:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Nargis Fakhri at the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016 (01).jpg

File:Nargis Fakhri at the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent^talk 18:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Bollywood Hungama

Just so you know, I'm not trying to 'troll' you, I'm working on the backlog of images from this source needing review (which was over 400). A lot of these seem to be due to BH having moved the images around... just the 'image itself', and not a page that shows it, isn't really sufficient to show it meets the terms of that (odd) OTRS ticket. Hopefully the source can be fixed, and these then be ok. Revent^talk 22:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

OK. I got the point. Thanks! ~ Moheen ^(talk) 04:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:POTD bnwiki

Hello Moheen, I think that we have already a bunch of templates and information in the description pages of the articles. Therefore I suggest that, if you chose in bnwiki a POTD instead of adding a completely new template in a language most people cannot understand anyhow do something like this. Yesterday I updated the Assessments template to accomodate the bnwiki. I know that POTD and FP are not strictly the same but still, as you don't seem to have a FP process, the content that you feature is the POTD one. What do you think? Regards, Poco² 12:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: Yes, POTD and FP are not strictly the same but you did that good. But can you help me to add this category as default with this template? Thanks! ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marie Eline.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomas Bangs Thorpe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wenona Marlin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment it would be useful that this image is used. . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info: Reset status to "supported". Review rules demand at least one  Oppose and one  Support to get a "discussed status".  Comments do not count in detrermining the submission status. Martinvl (talk) 10:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus: This image is now used in her article at en.wiki. lNeverCry 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)