Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There are other abandoned sections of the Pennsylvania Turnpike besides the one in Breezewood, Pennsylvania. You know that, right? --DanTD (talk) 12:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm going based on the common name of the stretch of pavement called "Abandoned Pennsylvania Turnpike." It would be out-of-place to see the crumbling former four-lane roadway or tunnels that are in Bedford/Fulton counties to all of a sudden see long shots of an interchange in Berks County next to active roadways. —Mr. Matté - En. 'pedia talk13:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I took the image with the specific intention of depicting the town - the street is incidental, the Orthodox church is just as important as the road in a general view of the town. The Frackville category itself uses the image for the town. Overly specific categorization makes things like this unfindable for casual browsers of images. Acroterion (talk) 21:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't disagree that some photos, especially roadway pics, are sometimes over zealously categorized (see other parts of SE PA), but that particular photo does feature the road in the center of the pic. But I'll warn you, the others who did those SE PA counties will make their way to this area and move anything with a mere speck of pavement into that kind of category. I'm trying to be a little more conservative in what I move into these cats since there's other municipalities in Schuylkill County that feature too many road pics in the main category (Tower City for example, most of which were my pix anyway). —Mr. Matté - En. 'pedia talk22:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I've seen that sort of thing. The issue, which structural on Commons, is that the categorization system was inherited from Wikipedia, where it exists in parallel with article hyperlinking. No such synergy exists on Commons, and we end up with images pigeonholed into the narrowest possible description. Based on usage, that image would be eligible to be a valued image of Frackville based on its widespread usage in many languages as a depiction of the town. As a member of a state highway, where it is unused in that context, that would make no sense. Categorization should respond to usage. Acroterion (talk) 22:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!