User talk:Multichill

Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail. I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

De Broen, Johannes / Joannes[edit]

Hoi Multichill, op wikidata zijn twee items ~de Broen J. Namelijk Johannes en Joannes . Ondanks dat ze volgens aangegeven bronnen tien jaar verschil in geboortedatum hebben vermoed ik sterk dat het om dezelfde kunstenaar gaat vanwege gelijk sterfjaar en slechts een J de Broen bekend bij RKD. Kunnen deze twee items samengevoegd worden met respect voor beide varianten van geboorte data? Of welke is het meest betrouwbaar? En hoe doe je dat het beste? Bedankt. Opm. Toch spreekt ook het RMA over Johannes de Broen (I) alsof er wel twee zouden zijn. Peli (talk) 12:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peli welke items bedoel je precies? Multichill (talk) 13:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Joannes De Broen (Q109833242) en Johannes de Broen (Q95347357) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelikana (talk • contribs) 21:13, 18 October 2022‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peli ik denk dat bij Joannes De Broen (Q109833242) de geboortedatum van zijn broer Gerrit de Broen (Q18701443): Dutch engraver (1659-1740) per ongeluk is gebruikt en dat Johannes de Broen (Q95347357): Dutch engraver (1649-1730) wel klopt.

Kan geen goede bron vinden om samen te voegen dus voorlopig maar even gekoppeld via said to be the same as (P460). Multichill (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hoi Multichill, wil je even assisteren met een creator-template voor Carl_Friedrich_Reimer. Er ontbreekt nog een element, volgens de alert op de pagina. Bedankt Peli (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

great work on structured data in wikimedia[edit]

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.65.36.14 (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		great work on structured data in wikimedia

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ouzo 2ltr.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mesdag / Utrecht[edit]

Hi Multichill, bij circa 63 foto's van het panorama mesdag gebouw staan verkeerde bestandsnamen, ~~foutieve adresbeschrijvingen en ook verkeerde cats~~. Ze betreffen alle zo te zien het wel het panorama Mesdag in Den Haag en hebben dus niets met Utrecht te maken. Hoop van dienst te zijn, hoop dat het opgelost kan worden, groet. Peli (talk) 04:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Het komt neer op een hernoeming van ca. 50 bestanden waarbij de connotatie Utrecht moet worden vervangen door Den Haag. ~~En dan hercategorisatie. En descr. nakijken.~~ Er zijn wat meer ondercats voor dit museum nu. Meeste is aangepast nu, behalve de hernoeming van de bestanden. Kun je dat effeciënt doen? Bedankt. Peli (talk) 13:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dat wordt gewoon met het handje. Ik loop het wel na. Multichill (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tag Bot SDC edits[edit]

Hi Multichill, I've been asked (Commons:Village_pump#SchlurcherBot) to tag my bot's SDC edits, so they can be easier identified (and filtered out if needed). I've looked into Special:Tags and apparently any admin can generate new tags and technically the tag can be added as a parameter to the wbeditentitiy post-request quite easily. I've tried tags=ACDC succesfully. Overall I am willing to implement this. It would be great, if your bot uses the same tag. So a couple of questions:

Would you agree that a tag is appropriate?
Would you use the same tag for your bot's edits?
If 1. and 2., would you please generate a tag and let me know the code. My suggestion would be something along the lines Tag short name/code: BotSDC (for Api Use) Tag description: Automated SDC edit (with link to the SDC page, an even shorter description would be better).

Best regards, -- Schlurcher (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Schlurcher: Sounds like a plan. Added it to Special:Tags and created MediaWiki:Tag-BotSDC & MediaWiki:Tag-BotSDC-description. Let me know how testing is going. Multichill (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perfect. Thanks. I've updated my script, only an additional tags=BotSDC needed. --Schlurcher (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done I did the same. Multichill (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Multichill: Can you please change MediaWiki:Tag-BotSDC and MediaWiki:Tag-BotSDC-description to use Special:MyLanguage so it links to the translations --Nintendofan885^{T&Cs apply} 17:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nintendofan885:

Done. Multichill (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did something change with BotMultichillT?[edit]

Hi, I've noticed in the last few days that BotMultichillT isn't visiting my photos as much to add SDC to them - particularly newly uploaded photos, which it used to find quite regularly within 24 hours of them being uploaded. For example, it has yet to find File:Alcazaba de Almería 2022 060.jpg - it has visited File:Alcazaba de Almería 2022 061.jpg, except it only added copyright rather than the rest of the usual data. Not a critical issue, but I thought I'd give a heads-up in case something had gone wrong. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The tracker category Category:Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 missing SDC copyright license seems to be missing since this change so the bot wasn't picking up the files. I undid it for now and reported at Module talk:SDC tracking.

Code for the bot didn't change for a while, just self missing so it doesn't get picked up as own work. Multichill (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for finding the problem! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot adding same statement three times in one day[edit]

Look at the history of File:The Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh with the Infosys awardees, at the Infosys awards 2010 presentation ceremony, in Mumbai on January 06, 2011.jpg. There were the same statements added three times. If this happened to more files it should be cleaned up by the bot. Mirer (talk) 16:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sint in spanje.jpg[edit]

File:Sint in spanje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

213.162.6.130 10:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:US Navy 101207-N-8335D-911 Boatswain's Mate Seaman Josh Hiner directs a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force SH-60K Sea Hawk helicopter.jpg[edit]

File:US Navy 101207-N-8335D-911 Boatswain's Mate Seaman Josh Hiner directs a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force SH-60K Sea Hawk helicopter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

HPS911 (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Luc Schuiten, Habitarble canal - 222976 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luc Schuiten, Habitarble canal - 222976 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luc Schuiten, Habitarble canal - 222976 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Backward Step[edit]

Hello Multichill, It was very easy for you to delete Geograph images by place categories but you have now left a completely useless category of Geograph Britain and Ireland which now has a massive 4,128,666 images in it. This is making it completely unworkable to find images for a particular location in the UK. I think you have made a big mistake here. Regards Kolforn (talk) 11:11, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/11/Category:Flickr images by location. Multichill (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RCE-links naar rijksmonumentencomplexen[edit]

Moi Multi, zonet ontdekte ik op Category:Rijkshoogereburgerschool ('s-Hertogenbosch) dat de RCE-link naar het monumentencomplex niet meer werkt. Na wat steekproefjes lijkt dat ook bij andere RCE-rijksmonumentencomplexverwijzingen het geval te zijn. De links naar de individuele rijksmonumenten werken nog wel. Ik meld het maar bij jou, want ik zou zo gauw niet weten waar ik er anders mee naartoe zou moeten (of het zou Rudolphous moeten zijn). Groet, Wutsje 14:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RCE heeft in de link van de monumentencomplexen blijkbaar het woord "monumenten" vervangen door "complexen". Het voorbeeld hierboven: https://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/monumenten/522400 is geworden: https://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/complexen/522400. -- Vysotsky (talk) 16:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wutsje and Vysotsky: hebben ze het nu alweer stukgemaakt? Ongeveer elke twee jaar is er weer een hoop links die niet werken. Met deze bewerking zou het hier weer moeten werken en door deze bewerking zou het op Wikidata ook weer moeten werken. Multichill (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Een en ander lijkt het inderdaad weer te doen. Dank! Groet, Wutsje 19:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wutsje: ben nu wel blij dat ik hier en op Wikidata ooit de monumenten en de complexen grotendeels uit elkaar heb geplukt. Volgens mij moeten we dat op Wikipedia wel nog doen. Multichill (talk) 13:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RCE-links naar gewezen monumenten[edit]

En hoe zit het ook alweer met gewezen monumenten? Door de link in het sjabloon wordt deze bv verkeerd gekoppeld in Wikidata... Ciell (talk) 14:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ciell: hier worden toch twee molens door elkaar gehaald? https://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/monumenten/39060 en Category:De Vrees, Winterswijk gaan over de afgebrande molen die op https://www.molendatabase.org/molendb.php?step=details&nummer=828 & https://zoeken.allemolens.nl/tenbruggencatenummer/00094 wordt beschreven.

Puurveense molen (Q16070739) is de opvolger beschreven op https://zoeken.allemolens.nl/tenbruggencatenummer/12543 .

Ik zie het al, iemand heeft De Vrees (Q17448078) samengevoegd en daarmee er een beetje een potje van gemaakt. Multichill (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, dank! En blijven de rijksmonumentnummers bij het RCE dan altijd behouden voor het specifieke voormalige Rijksmonument, ook als het nu dan inderdaad niet meer bestaat...? Ik dacht even dat ze misschien het nummer van De Vrees hergebruikt hadden (ik zie ze ervoor aan...). Ciell (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kijkend naar de geschiedenis van het item moet het waarschijnlijk terug naar voor de bewerkingen door ~~Sjoerd~~. Daar worden beide molens door elkaar gehaald volgens mij. Ciell (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

En verder kijkend heeft je bot het al vanaf het begin door elkaar gehaald...? Vreemd. Ciell (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ciell: er is iets raars aan de hand. De aanwijzing is nog steeds op het oude adres waar nu een huis staat. https://www.molendatabase.nl/nederland/molen.php?tenbruggencatenummer=12543 heeft het erover dat de status van rijksmonument is meegenomen. Dat lijkt me vrij sterk, maar zou natuurlijk kunnen. Zouden we na moeten vragen bij de RCE hoe het nu precies zit. Multichill (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Akoopal: jij bent ook wel van de molenpuzzels. Puurveense molen (Q16070739) & De Vrees (Q17448078) lopen in dit geval door elkaar heen. Multichill (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh wauw, haha: leuke uitdaging inderdaad!

Nou is het zo dat in deze boerderij onderdelen van deze burcht zijn herbruikt (ik meen de plafonds als vloeren), dus het is volgens mij niet heel ongewoon maar ik heb het nog niet eerder gemodelleerd gezien in WD. Ciell (talk) 15:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deze is inderdaad heel lastig, nog niet uitgebreid gekeken, maar ik vrees dat de RCE vragen de enige oplossing is. Ik ga eens proberen bij een contact van mij daar. Akoopal (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ciell,@Multichill Mail terug van mijn contact, de status van de molen is inderdaad wel meegegaan, de Puurveense molen is dus inderdaad rijksmonument. Het register moet nog aangepast worden, hij raad aan dat te mailen naar het generieke e-mail adres van de RCE. Akoopal (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg[edit]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English (1).jpg[edit]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Straatjes[edit]

Hoi Multichill, allerbest wensen voor 2023. Leuk data je wikidata infoboxen toegevoegd hebt. Ik heb zo'n 50 straatjes op wikidata gekoppeld, maar bedacht me later dat je er misschien nog mee bezig bent en botgewijs dit een stuk sneller kan koppelen. Er zal wel een restgroep ontstaan van historische straatjes en straatjes die in de volksmond onder twee namen bekend bestaan die ook het nodige uitzoekwerk gaan kosten. Mocht er een lijstje ontstaan van uit te zoeken dingen wil ik wel helpen er een paar te doen. Rudolphous (talk) 10:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rudolphous: jij ook de beste wensen! De aanleiding was deze bewerking.

Sandra, heb jij een manier gevonden om dit (semi-)automatisch te doen? dit is nog een behoorlijke lijst.

Via de Rijksmonumenten is het natuurlijk goed te vinden. Category:Krepelstraat, Zierikzee -> Category:Krepelstraat 17, Zierikzee -> Krepelstraat 17, Zierikzee (Q17449849) -> located on street (P669) -> Krepelstraat (Q19314083). Dat is iets wat een robot weg zou kunnen werken. Multichill (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Multichill: Van mij ook de beste wensen aan jullie allebei!

Voor het toevoegen van Commons sitelinks aan de straatjes heb ik een soort halfslachtig systeempje uitgedokterd: workflow met PetScan (zoek straten-categorieen zonder Wikidata Infobox) en OpenRefine (reconcile straatnamen mbv gemeente) en QuickStatements (toevoegen van de sitelinks, want dat kan niet in OpenRefine zelf). Ik heb dat nu met een aantal grote steden gedaan, en kan jouw hierboven gelinkte lijst ook via die manier doen. Nuttig en niet te moeilijk klusje; laat me maar weten als je nog lijsten hebt voor het aanmaken van sitelinks met Commons (bij Rijksmonumenten zou het helpen als ik een rijksmonument ID heb horende bij de categorie). Spinster (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Spinster: ik ben Category:Rijksmonumenten with known IDs nagelopen en de missende {{Wikidata Infobox}} op de categorieën toegevoegd.

Op https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=23588498 staat nu wat er nog gekoppeld moet worden. Daar zit wel wat raar spul tussen zoals Category:VVV Ouddorp/Category:Blaeuwe Huus/Category:Bosweg 2, Ouddorp, maar dat wordt mooi zichtbaar als het normale werk is gedaan. Ik heb op https://multichill.toolforge.org/queries/commons/rijksmonumenten_no_item.txt een lijstje gezet die je volgens mij zo in OpenRefine kan laden. Multichill (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Multichill Ik heb intussen via de hierboven beschreven workflow ruim 1000 straten van Commons sitelinks voorzien. Van de rest in de lijst ben ik minder zeker (reconciliation is niet betrouwbaar omdat gemeente ontbreekt of omdat de juiste straat op Wikidata niet teruggevonden werd). Het is in elk geval iets! https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/QSv2/107860/ Spinster (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Spinster: dat is zeker iets! Dat schiet wel lekker op zo.

@Rudolphous: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=23588265 is nu een stuk korter om aan te werken. Multichill (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heb er weer een stuk of 50 gedaan, maar er wordt ook hard door andere meegeholpen zo te zien! :-) Rudolphous (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bedankt Sandra, jij ook de gelukkig nieuwjaar en de beste wensen. Rudolphous (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Er zijn nog 250 straatjes over. De rest vergt wat meer uitzoekwerk. Rudolphous (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sir Joshua Reynolds - The Ladies Waldegrave - NG 2171 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg[edit]

File:Sir Joshua Reynolds - The Ladies Waldegrave - NG 2171 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

StellarHalo (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SRWIKI[edit]

Hi! Hope you arrived safe into 2023!

I tried to fix sr:Шаблон:License migration is redundant but for some reason it does not work. Perhaps you can spot the problem? --MGA73 (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Found out. It has to be Cc-by-sa... not CC-BY-SA... or cc-by-sa... --MGA73 (talk) 14:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MGA73: o wait, missed your message between all the templates. Glad you found out. Multichill (talk) 16:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Koreatyp01.jpg[edit]

File:Koreatyp01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Koreatyp02.jpg[edit]

File:Koreatyp02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Koreatyp03.jpg[edit]

File:Koreatyp03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1784 -> 1991[edit]

Moi Multi, auteursrechtprobleempjes, zie

Groet, Wutsje 00:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wutsje and IronGargoyle: every once in a while painters get mixed up and my bot ends up uploading contemporary art. Thanks for flagging and deleting these files. Multichill (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Raphael - Pope Julius II - 20.205 - Rhode Island School of Design Museum.jpg[edit]

File:Raphael - Pope Julius II - 20.205 - Rhode Island School of Design Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:De pastorij van Poppel - 368055 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg[edit]

File:De pastorij van Poppel - 368055 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dentonny (talk) 13:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artworks posted on Flickr by the artist[edit]

What's the procedure for artworks on Flickr that have EXIF and that are posted by accounts that say they're the artist? Do we COM:AGF and not ask for VRT verification or do we require VRT verification. Currently looking at File:Abstract watercolor painting on paper 'No title, gouache no. 6.100', painted in 1996 by Dutch painter Fons Heijnsbroek - free download image of colorful painting art.jpg which required a license reviewer to look at. It is properly licensed per Flickr page. I just wanted to check before I pass the license review for the file. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: that looks fine to me. I don't think we have any reason to doubt that the Flickr user is the painter. Multichill (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Akime[edit]

Alimentation —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.243.17.170 (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

? Multichill (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geograph upload gap[edit]

I've just noticed that there's a gap of about 19,000 pictures in uploads from Geograph Britain and Ireland between 1780732 and 1800000. See this Quarry query. Maybe you could have GeographBot go back and fill it in? --bjh21 (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bjh21: that's weird? Maybe I started the upload at a too high number? I can probably fill the gap. I'll have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AJA 13-di-1-adamantylimidazol-2-ylidene.svg[edit]

File:AJA 13-di-1-adamantylimidazol-2-ylidene.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Clryt19tt13ges.jpg[edit]

I don't speak Dutch but are any of the sentences shown in the file copyrightable or are they just facts about the Colruyt Group? (Came across this file while helping with the media needs categorization backlog). Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload CC-BY 4.0 images of CC0 paintings[edit]

Hi, a local museum has recently started uploading high-res pictures of paintings in their collection. Most of them are CC0 due to the date of death of the creator. However, the photographs of the pictures themselves are pulished under CC-BY 4.0. I am under the impression that your bot automatically flags the uploaded media as CC0 which, I think, should not be done for the images my this case. Is it possible to use your bot for such images? Thanks! FbrG (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@FbrG: great that they are contributing to Commons! You seem to be mixing up copyright status and the license a bit. Happens all the time because it's quite complicated.

First we have the original work, for example a painting. If the painter died more than 70 years ago it's in the public domain in Germany and if it's published more than 95 years ago it's also public domain in the USA. So that's the combination to look for. So all the painters who died before 1928 are public domain and good to go here on Commons.

Second part is the license. When you take a photograph, you're the copyright holder of that photograph. Taking a photograph of a 2D work of art (like a painting) doesn't add new copyright in the USA, but might in other countries (like Germany) so we add a fallback license to cover that case. This is all described at Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

Let's take Half-length Portrait of a Man in Armor (Q117047976): painting by Wilhelm Trübner as an example. The original painting is in the public domain due to age. I updated the image and added the relevant PD-art tag.

If we take Portrait of J. Giessler (Q117048947): painting by Willy Oeser as another example. The original painting is still in copyright until 2037 because the painter died in 1966.

So that means that the underlying work of File:Bildnis von J. Giessler - Willy Oeser - Augustiner M Freiburg.png is still in copyright so the museum can't license it, because it's not in the public domain and I doubt they did a copyright transfer with the painter or heirs. Multichill (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Only https://w.wiki/6TSy are at risk of not being PD-art so that's not too bad. Multichill (talk) 13:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like only one unlucky shot. Started Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bildnis von J. Giessler - Willy Oeser - Augustiner M Freiburg.png. Multichill (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your in-depth reply!

Regarding the artwork Portrait of J. Giessler (Q117048947): painting by Willy Oeser, the description on the museum page states that the painting was gifted to the museum by a heir of the portraied person. But i guess this has little to do with transferring the rights to the museum? Maybe its a mistake on their behalf for publishing it under CC-BY 4.0, as all other images where the creator died before 1953 are still copyrighted.

For the other image that shows up in your query, no date of death can be found for the creator Hermann Eder (Q95274189): . However, given his date of birth and life expectancy at the time i would say it is reasonable to assume that he died before 1953. FbrG (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Renaming a file[edit]

User talk:GO69#Renaming_a_file. Don't spread discussions around. Multichill (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adding descriptions to files BotMultichill uploaded[edit]

Hi Multichill. A file, File:Anonymous - Landscape - 1985.111 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff, was brought to my attention at the Help Desk as lacking a description, even though the API your bot likely used (https://github.com/ClevelandMuseumArt/openaccess) has a description. I added the description manually, but is there a way to do this in bulk you're aware of? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: catching up (I thought I replied to you already). The whole workflow described at d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Automated image uploads is focused on having all the data on Wikidata. In this context I don't care that much about the description. If people want to read the description from the museum, they can click the link and read it at the museum website. We shouldn't just be copying everything over. If you look at current uploads, you'll notice it's even less wikitext. Next step is probably the copyright and license information in structured data to get to this point.

I'm still adding categories because that's still the way to find images and search based on SDC is still not very good. Multichill (talk) 12:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo stuck in category until when?[edit]

When can File:Taiwan district boundary sign comparison.jpg finally leave Category:Pages with local camera coordinates and missing SDC coordinates? I have removed all the conflicts. Thanks. Jidanni (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jidanni: given the number of files in Category:Pages with local camera coordinates and missing SDC coordinates, I guess one of the bots is not running properly.

Manually it does work. I need to look into this to figure out what's wrong. Multichill (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Interieur, een van de glazen panelen waarin het leven van Comenius is geëtst (ontwerp- Jaroslav Benda) - Naarden - 20527961 - RCE.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Interieur, band met glazen panelen en enkele bezoekers - Naarden - 20527958 - RCE.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality image based on template instead of membership of Category:Quality images[edit]

hi! i have a suggestion. your bot should edit based on {{QualityImage}} rather than the category, so as to pre-empt https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=737496782 , because i have seen users adding the cat manually in the past. RZuo (talk) 06:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RZuo: I think it was discussed, but not actually implemented like that. See https://github.com/multichill/toollabs/blob/master/bot/commons/quality_image_add.py

It's probably because of the template soup like for example on File:Loewe frontal.JPG. It is a quality image, but doesn't have the template, instead it uses {{Assessments}}

The statement should probably be removed from these files. A bot removed the template, but statement is still on the files. Multichill (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎[edit]

What exactly is your issue with Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎ being in Category:Stereo cards by source? Like I said, it's a distinction without a purpose. You can go up more level to Category:Stereo images by source and there's plenty of categories in that one are exactly the same kind of categories. For instance Category:Stereo images in Boston Public Library. So what's the difference and why does it matter? Adamant1 (talk) 09:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adamant1: See Commons:Categories#Major_categories. Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎ is the topical category for stereo cards that are in the collection of the Rijksmuseum. So where they are.

Category:Stereo cards by source is in the Category:Media by source tree for who provided the files. That's a different angle. Not all images of stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum are provided by the Rijksmuseum.

I would create a category tree for the collection holder similar to Category:Collections of photographs by museum to group the different collections together. Multichill (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll have to think about that. I'd appreciate it if you left the category alone until then. Or you can do it yourself, but repeatedly shuffling categories around for no reason isn't really helpful. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Creator QIDs for SDC[edit]

Hi, thanks for configuring BotMultichillT to add structured data to the files I've uploaded. Would it be possible to configure the bot to tag files I've created with creator (P170) Minh Nguyễn (Q69873076) instead of creator (P170) somevalue / Wikimedia username (P4174) Mxn, perhaps based on the presence of Minh Nguyễn (Q69873076) Wikimedia username (P4174) Mxn on Wikidata? Broadly speaking, when there's a Wikidata item about the creator, it would be more stable than a Wikimedia user name that could potentially change. Thanks! Minh Nguyễn ^💬 00:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't do vanity items and it also raises privacy concerns. So (still) not doing this. Multichill (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:California_Historical_Landmarks_in_Stanislaus_County,_California[edit]

California Historical Landmarks in Stanislaus County, California has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2601:203:380:7C80:D1F6:9214:E37C:9A3D 04:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reverted the edit. Can you block the IP for troll editing and deal with the rest of it? --Adamant1 (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's impossible to communicate with ipv6 users. Closed the request. Looks like first error so I'll just let it be. Multichill (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. That works. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thaksin poster is cleared from Ratchadamnoen Nok.jpg[edit]

File:Thaksin poster is cleared from Ratchadamnoen Nok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111013-OC-UNK-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111013-OC-UNK-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111010-OC-UNK-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111010-OC-UNK-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111004-OC-UNK-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111004-OC-UNK-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TASC Peaches2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:TASC Peaches2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BFFAIMG 0792 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:BFFAIMG 0792 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Multichill

De Broen, Johannes / Joannes[edit]

great work on structured data in wikimedia[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Mesdag / Utrecht[edit]

Tag Bot SDC edits[edit]

Did something change with BotMultichillT?[edit]

Bot adding same statement three times in one day[edit]

File:Sint in spanje.jpg[edit]

File:US Navy 101207-N-8335D-911 Boatswain's Mate Seaman Josh Hiner directs a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force SH-60K Sea Hawk helicopter.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Luc Schuiten, Habitarble canal - 222976 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg[edit]

Backward Step[edit]

RCE-links naar rijksmonumentencomplexen[edit]

RCE-links naar gewezen monumenten[edit]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg[edit]

File:Election campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English (1).jpg[edit]

Straatjes[edit]

File:Sir Joshua Reynolds - The Ladies Waldegrave - NG 2171 - National Galleries of Scotland.jpg[edit]

SRWIKI[edit]

File:Koreatyp01.jpg[edit]

File:Koreatyp02.jpg[edit]

File:Koreatyp03.jpg[edit]

1784 -> 1991[edit]

File:Raphael - Pope Julius II - 20.205 - Rhode Island School of Design Museum.jpg[edit]

File:De pastorij van Poppel - 368055 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg[edit]

Artworks posted on Flickr by the artist[edit]

Akime[edit]

Geograph upload gap[edit]

File:AJA 13-di-1-adamantylimidazol-2-ylidene.svg[edit]

File:Clryt19tt13ges.jpg[edit]

Upload CC-BY 4.0 images of CC0 paintings[edit]

Renaming a file[edit]

Adding descriptions to files BotMultichill uploaded[edit]

Photo stuck in category until when?[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Quality image based on template instead of membership of Category:Quality images[edit]

Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎[edit]

Creator QIDs for SDC[edit]

Category:California_Historical_Landmarks_in_Stanislaus_County,_California[edit]

File:Thaksin poster is cleared from Ratchadamnoen Nok.jpg[edit]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111013-OC-UNK-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111010-OC-UNK-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20111004-OC-UNK-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:TASC Peaches2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

File:BFFAIMG 0792 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu