User talk:Multichill/Archives/2009/May

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Strange bot categorisation

Any idea about this one ? --Foroa (talk) 08:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Let me see, the image is in use at ja:醫師神社.
Quality of the categories could be improved by adding more commonscat links at the ja Wikipedia. Multichill (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
The bot is getting more clever. My comments relate mainly to long standing redirects (another one is fish/fishes) that seems not be taken into account. --Foroa (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
It might have to do with the fact that you don't have the {{Categoryredirect}} variant in you list. --Foroa (talk) 09:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
I know, it's on my list. Multichill (talk) 09:44, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Rolled back tagging

I've removed your {{Proposed}} tagging, that policy is codifying how things are already done here. Let's continue to discuss... ++Lar: t/c 13:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes. First discus, than remove, that's the right order. Multichill (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
It's not a proposal, merely a codification of existing practice, and the tag was added incorrectly. You are edit warring by readding the tag. I suggest you revert yourself. ++Lar: t/c 13:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Your Bot's pictures

Hi Multichill, could You please be as kind as telling us [1] what the pictures show, Your Bot loaded on commons? Thanks a lot Redlinux (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what this is. Multichill (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
In the meantime we found it [2] Greetings Redlinux (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

All Berlin images to History of Berlin

Hello Multichill,
could just explain me why you move (or commanded to move) all uncategorized Berlin images from the German Federal Archive to Category:History of Berlin? Now it's quite difficult to recategorize them (or categorized them better) as they don't contain the Uncategorized-BArch-Template anymore. Actually, it was a unnecessary and rather senseless action. --Jcornelius (talk) 22:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

After four months we still have a lot of barch uncategorized files. These files all had something to do with Berlin so i put them in Category:History of Berlin. That's how categorization works. Uncategorized -> some general category -> more specific categories. Multichill (talk) 19:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Pages uncategorized which were rather blanked, harder to revert after your edits to them

File:Ichtus Icon for Stub.jpg, File:Darwin fish (1).png and File:Statue of Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian.jpg were rather 'blanked' than uncategorized, i.e. licensing and similar information was also removed. I have not checked how many other pages you have added templates to vandalized versions of. Bots can certainly not distinguish between reasons for uncategorization, but, just in case you know how to fix it, I tell you that some vandalized pages might be using templates wich block some methods for reverting them because there is a non-vandal who has contributed to the page after the changes to be reverted. 12:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

The new abusefilter should help in fighting page blanking vandalism. Multichill (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Licence missing in File:Dtr.svg?

Below it says "{{cc|2.5}}", so it is categorized. Alvaro qc (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

{{cc|2.5}} is not a valid license, please pick one from Commons:Creative Commons copyright tags (for example {{Cc-by-2.5}}). Multichill (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Images:Rino.fisichella-a-lodi.JPG and Cucciolo-bracco-italiano.JPG

I categorized this image as Archbishops and Animnals, why you say that I didn't giva a category? Thank you to help me.

Rei Momo (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

No you didn't, my bot did. Please take a look at the history. Multichill (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


Een gewetensvraag: Wat is eigenlijk precies jouw inzet om steeds maar weer bewerkingen van "mijn foto's" terug te draaien? Dit ziet uit naar machtswellust en bazigheid, en dat past een moderator niet. Wat is de meerwaarde voor het publiek? Je bent er inmiddels achter waarom deze bewerkingen gebeurd zijn, daar zou je respect voor moeten hebben!--Aelske (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Aelske. Multichill (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

wrong cats

Do NOT use these categories, please:

All pictures categorised by your bot in those categories are wrong. Adolf Warski (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Without examples I can't fix this. Please provide some sample files. Multichill (talk) 11:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Image:Overheidspamflet 23021981.jpg

Hi Multichill! @ User talk:Bert56 you wrote "Image:Overheidspamflet 23021981.jpg is uncategorized since 26 April 2009." However, no copyright – apart from my own – is appliccable, at 15:06 +0200 26-04-2009 I sent an e-mail to about that. Could you please tell me how to proceed? Bert56 (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Looks like it's ok now. Multichill (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

{{Unidentified header}}

Hello Multichill,
First of all, thanks a lot for {{Unidentified header}} it is good stuff. I will use it a lot.
Your bot successfully added {{Unidentified header}} to the 'category:Unidentified XX' I created.
But your bot hasn't suppressed the text contained in those categories.
Look at Category:Unidentified Stylommatophora.
All the 'category:Unidentified XX' I created contain the same text (Of course I used copy/paste ;-)).
Could you launch your bot to replace:

{{Unidentified header|subject=XXXXX|category=XXXXX}}
;Unidentified, unclassified, unknown or mis-labelled species.:
;Please name after species, re-name and re-categorise, if you are able to identify them.:


{{Unidentified header|subject=XXXXX|category=XXXXX}}

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 13:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

By the way, I tried to add a documentation to {{Unidentified header}} in {{Unidentified header/doc}}.
But with my poor english and my poor level in literature, I failed to find a proper description of parameters subject and category.
I think that the difficulty is that their are 2 usages for that template: biology and the rest.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Liné1, I will have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm cleaning up now. Multichill (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

categorizar imágenes

en respuesta a este enlace:

en mi página de discusión, gracias por la ayuda. En realidad estoy subiendo videos. Te agradezco tu ayuda, ten por seguro que en cuanto aprenda a categorizar, empezaré a ordenar todo el material, sólo dame tiempo.

Por cierto, sólo decirte que estoy subiendo videos, no imágenes, de matemáticas, y todas serán enlazadas a mi proyecto de wikiversidad, no te preocupes, que no subo las cosas para llenar espacio. Todo es con un objetivo. Además, acabo de retomar un proyecto que estaba abandonado, espero que me ayudéis a vigilar que nadie me venga a borrarlo, uno de los motivos por el que no he vuelto a colaborar más e wikipedia ha sido porque alguna persona me borró unos materiales. Espero que no ocurra esto en wikiversidad, no obstante tengo miedo de hacer mi trabajo para que luego alguien se dedique a borrarlo ¿cómo podría evitarse esto?


--Thirteenmartian13 (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand you. Multichill (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
The notice (Template:Please link images) is about images, while the user uploaded a movie. This seems to confuse the user. --Leyo 16:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Movies are moving images right? ;-) Multichill (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkpage guidelines and Babel

Hi Multichill. How do you get the “Talkpage guidelines” and “Babel” being displayed during editing your talk page? --Leyo 12:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

We changed MediaWiki:Editnotice-3 and now every user can put a page at User talk:Multichill/Editnotice. So in your case that would be User talk:Leyo/Editnotice. Multichill (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I created that subpage, too. Maybe, I will add a language switch later. Done now. --Leyo 12:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC) PS. Is that feature available on any Wikipedia yet?
It's enabled at enwp and nlwp too, Multichill (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Considering Google also in frwp, ptwp and svwp, but not in dewp. --Leyo 09:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
... and now also in dewp. --Leyo 17:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Great! Multichill (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

your real name

MultiChill. I don't want to know your real name.

Your edit history and performance here are disturbingly good fodder for a little something that I needed to prove and I am quite certain that knowing your real name could ruin your life.

I don't want you to tell your real name to anyone. -- carol (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Harassment by User:CarolSpears. Please stay away from my talk page. Multichill (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


Hello BotMultichillT!

Thank you for your attention! I followed the instructions. Only need to check if the images are ok.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Image:Nissen vida.gif categorized as "Categories: Buddhism".
  • Image:HBS- Honmon Butsuryu-Shu.jpg is categorized as "Categories: Buddhism".
  • Image: Butsumaru.jpg is categorized as "Categories: "Buddhism", "Buddhist symbols"

Thank you a lot! Carolina

Sure, categories are good to start with. Permission on the other hand....... Multichill (talk) 14:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File:3 pence beaver stamp.jpg

Hi. Your bot added template, that this file is uncathegorized. I added cathegory during uploading - it must have been a bot's error. Could you check if it's working properly? Thanks. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 00:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

I added a(n additional) category. --Leyo 20:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
No bot error. {{PD-Canada-stamp}} seems to add a topic category, that's bad. That should be fixed. Multichill (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

nuke template


What is the nuke template good for? (see: [3]).

Greetings from an admin.

--08:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

See Template:Nuke --Leyo 09:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I started it because I was tired of the incomplete deletion summaries and wanted to make it easier for admins to delete something with a proper summary. Multichill (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


i dont understand why your bot keeps leaving me warnings all over my talk page! my images were and are correctly categorized, no differently than any of my other images. please fix your boT !! EraserGirl (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at the images and their history again. --Leyo 09:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Please have a look here to see what categorisation means on Commons. --Foroa (talk) 10:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for replying. I guess she didn't read my faq ;-) Multichill (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


sure, delete! --PlaneMad 10:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done, see User talk:PlaneMad#Template:Moved. Multichill (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Technical issue

Protecting User talk:BotMultichillT prevents Javascript from properly processing the deletion requests of pictures uploaded by the bot. The DR page is not added to the daily log. --Eusebius (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree, crappy javascript sucks @ss. Multichill (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
"Crappy" is a tad hard. Anyway, I'm going to try to fix this. If all goes well, you shouldn't see anthing, but if you see a couple of strange edits to this page here in the next few minutes, it's just me testing. If anything goes wrong, i'll clean it up again. Lupo 07:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, should be fixed. BTW, the script should have shown Eusebius the page User talk:BotMultichillT open for editing, unmodified, with a pink box above the edit box saying that the page was protected and giving him two links: one to edit the page all the same, and a second one to execute only the remaining modifications (namely, adding the DR to the log). Anyway, the script now follows redirects.[4] Unfortunately, it'll take 30 days until everyone has this correction, unless people reload their browser's cache. Lupo 07:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your work. Honestly, I didn't pay attention to the links you mention, maybe they appeared on the page. I guess many other users wouldn't have paid attention either, so it's indeed better if redirections are followed. --Eusebius (talk) 07:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Just joking around. Would be strange if I had to change it because of a bug in the script. As you can see Lupo is always very quick when it comes to fixing scripts. Good job again Lupo! Which images I uploaded are nominated btw? Multichill (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Horsepower and Rocketpower - GPN-2000-000040.jpg --Eusebius (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Nota: I stop watching this page. --Eusebius (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. I deleted the image. Multichill (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Foutje bij Commonscat

Ter informatie: de BotMultichill heeft ten onrechte een commonscat Altos toegevoegd bij de NL pagina Alt. Zie ook bij Altos. Ik ga het herstellen. Groeten, Wouter (talk) 08:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Tja, er sluipt helaas wel eens een foutje in. Ik zou trouwens Category:Altos, Brazil aanmaken ipv Category:Altos (Brazil). Dat is meer de conventie bij geografische cats en in lijn met Category:Altos, Paraguay. Multichill (talk) 09:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Dat laatste (Altos, Brazil) gelijk gedaan. Ik had de naam van de Wikipedia gekopieerd. Wouter (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Top. Ik zie dat je zelfs de pt pagina hebt aangepast :) Multichill (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Creator templates with images

Thanks for fixing category:Creator templates with images. I asked for that fix few weeks ago using {{Editprotected}} and was just beginning to suspect that that approach for fixing problems with protected templates is not working very well. --Jarekt (talk) 12:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I cleared out most of the requests in the category and will keep an eye on it. Multichill (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Cats per Bot

Hello Multichill, these edits [5] were initated by you. It is not good to dump files that are nicely sorted in a topical category into a town cat. So please don't do that again. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

That's how categorization works. Uncategorized -> some general category -> more specific categories. Feel free to find more specific categories. Multichill (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

That is shit. Put the files directly into the more spezific cat and safe others people time. We are taking about 50+ files. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 13:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Because of this kind of ignorance somebody else had to recategorize more than 400 files by hand [6] which could have been easyly correctly categorized the first time by a bot if somebody had thought before acting. This behaviour and attitude pisses me massivly off. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 13:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Please be mellow. If you have some images which are categorized in a too general category i can fix it for you. I just need the temp category (Category:Images from the German Federal Archive, location Elektrochemisches Kombinat Bitterfeld), the too general category (Category:Bitterfeld-Wolfen) and the new category (Category:Elektrochemisches Kombinat Bitterfeld). Multichill (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


Hi! I was wondering could you help me with something? How can someone create a category? Thank you for you help in advance! The Geek from Earth (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2009 (CEST)

You should have taken a look at my faq. You would have found en:Help:Category#Creating a category page. Multichill (talk) 11:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

IP vandalism + BotMultichill

Is there any way you could have your bot skip adding the {{Uncategorized}} template to pages where the last editor was an IP? I run across several instances on a daily basis where an IP has vandalized a page, removing categories, and the bot comes along and adds an uncategorized template to it; this makes it much harder to revert the vandalism, as I can't use rollback to fix it. I have to wait for the history page to load, use popups to revert two revisions back, go back to the history page to find the IP's talk page and then warn them, instead of hitting "rollback" and then having it take me right to the IP's contribs where there's a link to their talk page. It's a much lengthier process when the bot is involved :(

Here is one example: [7]. I love what the bot does and have no complaints about that, it's just cases where IP vandalism is involved where it gets bothersome ;) Cheers! -- Editor at Largetalk 18:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

This kind of vandalism should probably be caught by the Abusefilter before my bot comes along. Multichill (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
How does the abuse filter work exactly? Is it somehow connected to how the bot functions? It's a new addition since I was around last a couple of years ago so I confess to be a bit behind the times ;) -- Editor at Largetalk 03:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
It's a new (powerful) toy to prevent users from doing certain edits. You should probably read en:Wikipedia:Abuse filter. Multichill (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


ready categorize the file:xiao.jpg --Xiao Xiao (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:IMAGE is not a good category. Multichill (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


Beste Multichill, In 8 january 2009, heeft u de foto: "MapaetniasNordesteHistrico.jpg" uit Wikimedia Commons verwijdt. Dat vond jammer, het was een goede bron van informatie. Ik begerijp het argument, maar er bestaan andere foto’s van dezelfde bron en niemand bemoei daar mee. Dus vraag ik u om uw beslissen te gezien en nog of de foto alveer terug kan verplaatsen. Groenten, J. Terto de AmorimTerto de Amorim (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

De afbeelding is voorzien van {{PD-oud}}, maar de foto is uit 1944 dus dat kan nooit kloppen. Vandaar dat de afbeelding verwijderd is. Als er meer afbeeldingen uit dezelfde bron zijn dan zullen deze ook verwijderd worden. Multichill (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


Thanks for the unblock. People like you make it hard to become too cynical. ;) -Fcb981 (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You do have to explain your actions at File:Jimmy Wales Fundraiser Appeal.JPG. Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Fcb981: Indef block removal and User:Mike.lifeguard Admin privilege revocation. would be a good place to do this. Multichill (talk) 11:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


I got a message from your bot telling me to cathegorize the images I have placed. Sorry, but after a couple of hours searching, I still don't understand how to do this. Am I supposed to invent cathegories myself, or is there a list somewhere I can choose from?

Eldberg 11:27, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Did you read Commons:Categories? Multichill (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


Could you fix it so that BotMultichill leaves a suitable delay between tagging a file as being uncategorised and attempting a bot categorisation, I think about a month will do, preferably two. I ask because I've just gone through a cluster of clumsily categorised files in which the delay was about half a day, and which I'm sure I could have dealt with if I'd come across earlier. All bot categorisation is doing with such a short delay is transfering files from one backlog to another. Thanks, and apologies if I sound ungrateful.KTo288 (talk) 01:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Finding suitable categories for files is much easier when you have suggestions. I won't add a delay. Multichill (talk) 11:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Thats fine when the suggestions are good ones, when they are bad ones files just get lost. Because it has a longer history there is a community of users checking through uncategorised files, I don't know how many people go through the backlog of bot categorised files needing to be checked. The reason for the suggestion of introducing a delay is because of the files now in Category:Hong Kong Adventure Corps. The files now there were all bot categorised, with categories that were tangential at best about half a day after being bot tagged as being uncategorised. Scanning through each days uncategorised files those files together would have formed an obvious cluster which would have led to their effective categorisation earlier. The effect of an almost immediate bot categorisation has the effect of letting everyone believe that a backlog is being cleared, but only, if I may repeat myself, by creating another one.KTo288 (talk) 12:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I thing bot-assisted categorization is great. But you get better results if the wiki where the pictures are used have many (and good) commonscat-templates to direct the bot to the right category. In my view we should have bots maintaining commonscat-links just like they maintain iw-links. But thats an other story. If the bot put on many bad categories you could check if there is a bad commonscat on "the home wiki". As far as I know pictures with a bot categorization is in a category so they will not be forgotten and it should be easy to fine pictures that need a human eye. --MGA73 (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure, the bot doesn't seem to be just use the commonscat templates, it appears that if a parallel category exists in Commons to those used to categorise the article the file is used in the bot seems to add all those categories to the file, which sometimes leads to files with five or six categories not all of which are appropriate. When I speak of lost files I'm using a figure of speech of course, they are still there in the category of bot categorised images needing review, but how many are actually reviewed. I'm not actually against bot categorisation, I just think that we should have longer before the bot does its business.KTo288 (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
It might be a good idea to add a "user category" to those uncategorised files. Most users submit files for a specific theme or location so having them all in one user category might speed up the categorisation process. --Foroa (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
One sort of already exists with BotMultichill's notification of Users on their talk page of uncategorised images. You can sometimes find a streak of images of uncategorised images you are interested in if you folow the trail back to a Users talk page.KTo288 (talk) 20:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Nuke button for {{Fair use}}

Could you please add one, or is there a reason why there shouldn't be one? --Eusebius (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done, you might want to change the default summary. Multichill (talk) 16:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! I stop watching your talk page. --Eusebius (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

File:KI.KA Logo seit dem 23.06.2008.gif

Hi, you tagged this image as missing permission, but don't you think this is {{PD-textlogo}}? Especially knowing it comes from Germany, which has a pretty high threshold of originality. –Tryphon 00:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Might be, not sure. Multichill (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


in three languages you may read it
i let someone block my takpage
still you did not get it?
what do you need? some colorfull blinking javascript?
as I'm not an admin on commons i ask you to remove what you bot-like wrote on my talk page.
thank you very much ...Sicherlich Post

you really need blinking java script to react in any way is it? ...Sicherlich Post 11:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Sicherlich, any autoconfirmed account can remove that note. Is there any reason why you would like Multichill to remove it? I'm not sure if you know, but you can indeed remove it yourself. However if this was just to be courteous, okay. Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 12:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Kanonkas; check the log [8]; it was not and was only done for short time as Multichill kindly ignores what was written on the page, ignored the protection and ignored my request on his talk page. Excellent behavior. ...Sicherlich Post 22:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Oh I didn't notice the last bit. Thank you for explaining it. Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 03:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Protected talk page? That's very strange and unwiki-ish. I want to leave you a note here because {{Please link images}} doesn't work at the German Wikipedia. Multichill (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Why not adding a notice like this instead? If an admin would nominate one of your uploads for deletion, a new section would automatically be created on your talk page anyway. --Leyo 16:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
I have that at all my Wikipedia talk pages. I opened a new topic at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Protection of talk page to see how other admins feel about this. Multichill (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
oh great; "I have that at all my Wikipedia talk pages." but you ignore it when others have? Exzellent. - The protection was there to help people understand that they can get in touch with me in other ways. But maybe when even an admin on commons who i thought is experienced is not able to handle that it might be useless anyways ...Sicherlich Post 22:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Bot needed

Hello Multichill,

thanks for recategorizing the pictures by bot, that was a great help. Could you please do the following moves as well:

Add Category:VEB Arzneimittelwerk Dresden to all uncategorized files in Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Arzneimittelwerk Dresden.

Categorize uncategorized in Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Arzneimittelwerk Dresden to VEB Arzneimittelwerk Dresden remove Category:Dresden

Add Category:VEB Chemiewerk Greiz-Dölau to all uncategorized files in Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Chemiewerk Greiz-Dölau.

Categorize uncategorized in Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Chemiewerk Greiz-Dölau to VEB Chemiewerk Greiz-Dölau

Add Category:VEB Edelstahlwerk 8. Mai 1945 Freital to all uncategorized files in Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Edelstahlwerk 8. Mai 1945 Freital.

Categorize uncategorized in Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Edelstahlwerk 8. Mai 1945 Freital to VEB Edelstahlwerk 8. Mai 1945 Freital remove Category:Freital

Add Category:VEB Elektronik Gera to all uncategorized files in Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Elektronik Gera.

Categorize uncategorized in Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, corporate body VEB Elektronik Gera to VEB Elektronik Gera remove Category:Gera

Thank you very much --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I will have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done. Multichill (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Cleaning after BetaCommandBot

File:Grenoble - Fontaine au lion.jpg File talk:Grenoble - Fontaine au lion.jpg Just wondering... Are you going to undelete? Should I do it myself? I'm not sure what is happening and why you needed to delete the file. Apparently the proper file history was on the talk page, I had not seen it. I had the file universally replaced, the original was deleted already, I'm afraid it's going to be delinked from everywhere. --Eusebius (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Please recover all your deleted images. Beta asked me to delete all of todays uploads. Before i did that i checked if any of the source files where deleted already. Looks like you did it right after that. Multichill (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
OK. --Eusebius (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

About the uncategories images

Thank you for informing me about the uncategorized images. But you told me that Kamalapur_(4),Kamalapur_(2),Kamalapur_(5)these files are uncategorized since 29 December 2008. But i categorized those files that time so i can not understand why i am getting this message.

[[User:Nasir8891|Nasir Khan Saikat]] (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I guess you didn't read my faq. You added the categories in January. Multichill (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Moulting of Ondata.PNG

Please rename my image to proper suggested name. Mathiasrex (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


hello, i´d like to knwo if it´s possible to uplaod a musci file for thsi artist: simone bittencourt de oliveira. ho is it possible to uplao and then make it available on her article at wikipedia? Jackiestud (talk) 19:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Multichill I notice you have a category called 'Boxers of the New Zealand'. The correct way of saying this is Boxers of New Zealand, leaving out 'the' Can you please change it to the correct way of pronouncing it. Thanks ~