User talk:MusikAnimal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MusikAnimal!

-- 05:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Beach Fossils live in 2012.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Beach Fossils live in 2012.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Re:Wikilove for you![edit]

Thank you! :D --SunOfErat (talk) 14:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

"J train crossing Williamsburg Bridge 2012.jpeg"[edit]

Hi MusikAnimal, I was just working through the speedy deletions category (I'm an admin) and saw that you tagged this image. Quite a coincidence: I took the image :-). The original is here --Dschwen (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Ha! How about that! Yes, I have been sifting through images on my phone and uploading the cool ones using the Commons app. I guess there's some images on here that I must of downloaded... I caught the mistake when I saw that the metadata said it was taken with a Canon, which I do not own. Anyways, excellent image :) and apologies for the mistake — MusikAnimal talk 19:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear MusikAnimal,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

COM:QI[edit]

Hi, only work by Commoners (i.e. photographs made by Commons User) are eligible for QI status. So your flickr image nominations are not valid. Thanks,  revimsg 15:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

@-revi: Hey revi! I was wondering if that was the case. Makes sense. I have some of my own I consider to be fairly good, but aside from a few taken with a professional camera, they're all either with an iPod Touch, Nexus smartphone, or GoPro. For me a lot of it is capturing the moment, not just the quality. Hopefully I won't embarrass myself in thinking some of these are good... Thanks — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

John Hopkins Glacier Bay Mount Orville Mount Wilbur Alaska 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Hopkins Glacier Bay Mount Orville Mount Wilbur Alaska 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sky Reflector-Net in Fulton Building.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sky Reflector-Net in Fulton Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

NYPD police boat, Brooklyn Bridge and Downtown Brooklyn at sunset.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NYPD police boat, Brooklyn Bridge and Downtown Brooklyn at sunset.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tombs at Lafayette Cemetery No 1 Garden District New Orleans 16.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombs at Lafayette Cemetery No 1 Garden District New Orleans 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Question about Twinkle[edit]

Greetings, I already asked AzaToth this but he said to ask you and see what your thoughts are on it. I opened a well meaning but possibly misplaced suggestion on Phabricator about using Phabricator to track Twinkle feature requests and bugs but it really should come from the developers of you are interested. Before I close it, I wanted to ask if it was even something you were interested in using and if not then I'll just close it out. Cheers and let me know if you have any questions. Reguyla (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Reguyla: Something like phabricator would be nice.. we could triage and prioritize features/bug requests so much easier. Right now for the block module, which is what I've been working on, I'm using the wiki to track requests at w:User:MusikAnimal/twinkleblock. I recommend also getting in touch with User:This, that and the other (probably on enwiki) as he/she is one of the primary maintainers. Best MusikAnimal talk 14:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Ok cool, AzaToth was positive about the idea as well. If its something that you are interested then I would recommending commenting on the suggestion here. I would be happy to help migrate any open requests you have if you want help with that. This isn't mean to eliminate on wiki discussion BTW. I can't edit ENWP (long story there) but if you want to drop him a note to contact me on here or on Phabricator I would appreciate it and would be happy to discuss it with them. Again I am not trying to sell you all anything, I just wanted to ask if its something your interested in. Reguyla (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind about the note on ENWP. I see they edit here often as well. Reguyla (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Donkey and the Pyramid of Djoser.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donkey and the Pyramid of Djoser.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Great Pyramid of Giza from southeast corner.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Great Pyramid of Giza from southeast corner.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Ramesses II in Karnak Temple in Luxor Egypt.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Ramesses II in Karnak Temple in Luxor Egypt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hot air balloon over Cappadocia, Turkey.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon over Cappadocia, Turkey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hot air balloon at sunrise over Cappadocia, Turkey.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon at sunrise over Cappadocia, Turkey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

User:MusikBot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks! MusikAnimal talk 15:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

JS[edit]

Hi. I suppose you have very good JS skills. Can you take a look into MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js‎ - would it be difficult to make Cat-a-lot work on Special:ListFiles/$1? --XXN, 21:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello MusikAnimal, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)