User talk:mxn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

vi:Special:Upload[edit]

It's OK now, right?

Really weird... the software is very arbitrary sometimes!! pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BTW, are you interested in helping translate the interface into Vietnamese? For a start we could fix the upload page by having translations for MediaWiki:Licenses (just the bit after the pipe "|" in each line) and also MediaWiki:Uploadtext. And I noticed many of the menu items aren't translated, either. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See User talk:Pfctdayelise/Archive05.
Cool, thanks for the translations! I had to delete half of the licenses from vi.wp, since the Commons doesn't allow any fair use. I hope I figured them out OK. I have to figure out how to implement the other changes properly. Good luck with an updated file :) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 23:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

interface translation[edit]

How does it look? :D

The links at the bottom are a bit screwed up. Not sure what that's about. BTW if you (or anyone else) actually translates any of those pages into vi:, let me or another admin know and we can correct the URL. pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Di dau cung gap[edit]

Chao Mxn, di den dau cung gap Minh. Than men. Thaisk 21:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Usurpation request[edit]

Ver User talk:Dodo.

Gracias, lo vigilaré. Un saludo. --Dodo (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image:Open_End.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Open_End.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  eesti  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  français  español  Esperanto  English  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

J.smith (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Open End.jpg.

File:2003_Ohio_License_Plate.jpg[edit]

In case you're not watching this page, I just want to let you know I've temporarily undeleted File:2003_Ohio_License_Plate.jpg. Please let me know when you've completed the transfer. –Tryphon 14:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See User talk:Tryphon.

Pedido[edit]

¡Hola! Quiero hacer una solicitud. ¿Usted puede hacer otra versión de la imagen "Wiktionary-logo wpstyle-en with transparency.png", pero con la segunda página igual a la segunda página de la imagen "Wiktionary-logo wpstyle-en.png"? El tamaño de la imagen puede ser el mismo da la primera imagen. Otra cosa, sería mejor si la nueva imagen es más clara. Cumprs. Łυαη fala! 20:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ver User talk:Luan.

Về việc thêm Việt Nam vào trang user cá nhân[edit]

Hiện nay mình đã tạo trang Users in Vietnam để tạo trang user cho từng cá nhân có quốc kỳ Việt Nam. Vì mình thấy là trong trang Users in Asia đã có tất cả các nước, ngoại trừ Việt Nam. Bạn có thể thêm Việt Nam vào phần Babel trên trang user của bạn. Chúc bạn vui và làm rạng danh Việt Nam trên cộng đồng Wikipedia: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Users_in_Vietnam dokientrung (talk) 29 December 2011

Category:Ohio_township_route_shield_templates[edit]

Category discussion warning

Ohio township route shield templates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Fredddie 17:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Malaysia Airlines MH370 path labelled vi.svg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Malaysia Airlines MH370 path labelled vi.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of St. X[edit]

Thanks for importing my Flickr picture, File:St. Xavier High School (Cincinnati), chapel exterior.jpg, and for adding it to the St. X article! Next time I visit Cincinnati, I'll take a better picture to replace that one. By the way, I loved your piece on the Wikipedia portal. Fascinating stuff! --Eekim (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Se User talk:Eekim.

FOP-Vietnam[edit]

Hi Mxn, I was informed about Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:FoP-Vietnam, and I am wondering if you might be able to assist with finding out what the law says, or means, especially with regards to 'introduction purposes'. The IP law link on that template, http://www.ecap-project.org/fileadmin/ecapII/pdf/en/information/vietnam/ip_law2005.pdf , is dead. :-( John Vandenberg (chat) 06:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:FoP-Vietnam.

State seal copyright[edit]

States do *not* own a general copyright in representations of their state seals, which may not make sense at first blush. However, please see Commons:Coats of arms. In general, most seals have a written description, and drawings made of that description are *not* derivative works of the description -- they each have an independent copyright as an individual expression of the same idea. All the representations share the idea, but they do not share any of the copyright. A drawing is never a derivative work of a literary copyright. In any representation, there is going to be artistic creativity in all of the small details which are not mandated by the general idea/description. These are the details which have a copyright; therefore each different drawing has a separate copyright, and we have find a license or PD rationale for each *representation*. While the general design of a state seal is in basically all cases very old (PD-1923), or published without a notice, and they are also all generally part of state law and thus uncopyrightable to begin with, that is basically irrelevant when it comes to the copyright of a specific representation. Therefore we can not simply take any representation we find; the copyright tags on each representation must relate to the history of that representation in particular. Someone can draw their own and license it CC-BY, or we can find a representation which was published without notice, or (in the case if the 1967 Ohio seal you just edited) it was a representation drawn by the U.S. federal government and is therefore PD-USGov. All of these (and more) are possible, but we cannot simply put a PD-old stamp on any an all seal representations. A file from Brands of the World might be a simple scan of a PD representation, or it might have a valid copyright that we cannot copy here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See User talk:Clindberg.

File:Chester Township, Morrow County, Ohio, route shield template.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Chester Township, Morrow County, Ohio, route shield template.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bearfield Township, Perry County, Ohio, route shield template.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bearfield Township, Perry County, Ohio, route shield template.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nyttend (talk) 06:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Flags_of_townships_in_Ohio[edit]

Category discussion warning

Flags of townships in Ohio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xeror (talk) 19:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vector logo of Russian Wikiquote[edit]

Hi. Could I ask you to vectorize the logo of the Russian Wikiquote (File:Wikiquote-logo-ru.png)? There is already a vectorization (File:Wikiquote-logo-RU.svg), but the font in it is too bold, and it is not very similar to the original. I saw how you processed the logo of the English Wikiquote, and I really liked it. — putnik 17:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Xi'an Famous Foods logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Xi'an Famous Foods logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chuy's logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Chuy's logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MUTCD W7-1a.svg[edit]

Hello. I just saw your rename request for File:MUTCD W7-1a.svg. I did a bit of research, and I could find this, it shows that the sign is W7-1a, and I couldn't find any W7-1b. Could you please give a source for this request? Thank you. Ahmadtalk 17:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ahmad252: I was going off the image description in Special:PermanentLink/346932855, but based on the source above, I think it actually is W7-1a. I requested the move because it seemed to conflict with File:MUTCD W7-1A.svg. But that image was based on the 2003 standard; looks like the "HILL" option had been removed by 2009. [1] We should move File:MUTCD W7-1b.svg back to File:MUTCD W7-1a.svg. It's worth keeping File:MUTCD W7-1A.svg around but probably under a different name like File:MUTCD W7-1a (old).svg. Thanks for double-checking! – Minh Nguyễn 💬 11:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Adding to the confusion, SHS 2004 has "HILL" as W7-1a and the pictoral version with the 8% legend as W7-1b. [2][3] – Minh Nguyễn 💬 11:26, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I also think it has been removed by 2009. SHS 2004 and 2009 edition both have W7-1 as the truck sign, but other signs have mostly changed. For example, W7-2 in SHS 2004 is W7-2P in 2009 edition, W7-2b is W7-2bP, W7-3 is W7-3P etc. Ahmadtalk 11:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
By the way, I also moved the file back to W7-1a. I also agree about File:MUTCD W7-1A.svg and the confusion it might cause, but I'm not sure if we should move it to another name or not, so I just leave it be for now. Ahmadtalk 11:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editing .tab files from a spreadsheet[edit]

We're discussing this right now with User:1Veertje in the wmhack cloudchat, using your Santa Clara work as an example... --SJ+ 20:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sj: Yep, I'm already watching, thanks for the heads-up! – Minh Nguyễn 💬 20:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, great - you were scrolled off of my grid :) --SJ+

FP Promotion[edit]

Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dividing stations by county[edit]

I don't really see the value in dividing BART and Caltrain stations by county. At that's done is add an extra category layer that doesn't provide any real benefit. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: There were already a few categories dividing BART and other Bay Area rail stations by city, while on the English Wikipedia the navboxes were sorting them by county, so I was just trying to put in something between the city and state levels. Category:BART stations in Santa Clara County, California is admittedly a bit barren and will be for some time, but the other categories have more members. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do see your point. However, the most common use case is probably going from the BART stations category to an individual station, in which case this just adds an extra step. As you're probably aware, there's a lot of debate on Commons over when to create intersection categories; I tend to fall on the "only when necessary or particularly useful" end. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Pi.1415926535: Until now, I was only aware that different users go to different lengths to categorize, but I didn't know there's actual controversy over categories that intersect only two facets. For the BART stations, I was actually thinking of adding a parallel set of categories by line, since that's how I normally navigate among the stations. For example, Category:Milpitas station would be a member of Category:Berryessa/North San José–Daly City line and Category:Berryessa/North San José–Richmond line, in addition to Category:BART stations in Santa Clara County, California. Should I reconsider that in light of your concerns? – Minh Nguyễn 💬 22:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, the biggest arguments have been over time+geography intersection cats (ie Category:2020 in CITYNAME). I've thought about making categories for the lines before, but I held off because the "lines" are really named services, so all those categories would contain are "XYZ line stations" and "XYZ line trains" (the latter requiring a lot of identification work). I have already made Category:BART lines for the infrastructure segments. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ohio road signs[edit]

Greetings. You recently uploaded several road signs from Ohio sourced to the OMUTCD. However, when I tried to access it, it turns out to be protected behind a login. May I ask how you were able to access it? I would love to view the documents and add them to my collection. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Fry1989: That's odd, I'm able to access it without any authentication. Are you able to access the PDFs from the SDMM portal or the ODOT homepage? ODOT recently redesigned their website, and it was completely unusable until a couple weeks ago, so maybe this is still growing pains.

Incidentally, I was about to ask for your help with OMUTCD road signs. I've been cataloguing these signs on the OpenStreetMap Wiki to help mappers learn how to tag signs that they encounter in street-level imagery and also develop new tagging standards based on Ohio-specific signs. It would be tremendously useful if Commons had the full set of SVGs. Unfortunately, my Inkscape skills haven't progressed far beyond basic text placement. The lane use diagrams are making my head hurt. I'd be very grateful for any help you could provide, once we figure out why you're unable to access the specifications.

 – Minh Nguyễn 💬 19:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your response, and how funny that you also intended to contact me. I first tried the source link on File:Ohio MUTCD R3-H4b.svg, but when I click on it it does ask for a login and password. I then did a Google search and found that ODOT appears to have a web-app, but when I click to launch that, I also get a request for a login. And the same issue is happening once again when I click your link for the SDMM portal. I was trying to think of what could possibly cause this issue for me and not for you, and finally I figured it out. I have an HTTPS Everywhere extension in my internet browser. Once I turned it off, the links work fine. Very strange.
Now that that is out of the way, I would be happy to help where I can. The US is so extensive with their signs, with varying federal and state variations, that it is a long-term exercise and I imagine I will be working on the US for years to come. I can give you pointers in Inkscape, and also create various signs myself. I'm very happy to see a new road signs enthusiast on Commons. We're a very small community, but it is nice to have friends. Fry1989 eh? 20:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello again. You seem to be doing well with the lane use signs so far. I do have a small proposal that you may or may not agree with in regards to file naming. Since all the federal signs are named "MUTCD XXXX", I've started renaming many of the state variations to use this, followed by the state USPS and ISO abbreviation; for example Californian signs are named "MUTCD-CA XXXX". This would allow the signs to sort alphabetically and group together naturally. Would you be willing to adopt this for your signs as well? Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Fry1989: Sure, I'm open to that. I think search result quality won't be impacted too much since all the file descriptions already spell out "Ohio". It will result in some redundancy, such as "MUTCD-DE W21-7-DE" for Delaware signs, "MUTCD-NY NYR2-2" for New York signs, and "MUTCD-OR OR3-10a" for Oregon signs, but it wouldn't be a problem for Ohio signs. (Ohio is one of a few states that place a letter like H or X after the hyphen instead of using a state abbreviation in the sign code.) Just let me know when the changeover happens so I can stay consistent with my uploads. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 19:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The duplication for some states would be slightly annoying, I agree. I am open to any alternatives you can think of as well. Otherwise, since I have file mover rights, I can rename and replace the signs you have already uploaded, and then you can continue uploading as normal. Fry1989 eh? 19:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Fry1989: I take it the current pain is around making the category listings more navigable? I'm not personally affected by it much, but I can understand that someone who works with these files a lot would find it nice to have some predictability. For now, the only alternative I can think of is to use sorting keys, but unfortunately the upload wizard doesn't seem to support adding sorting keys directly. I'm hopeful that at least some of the ideas in mw:Community Wishlist Survey 2021/Results/Categories will be tackled eventually, making us less reliant on file naming conventions that are inherently fragile (since they aren't baked into the upload interface). Anyways, it looks like you've already starting this naming convention for some states, so no objection to doing it for Ohio too. Thanks for the heads-up! – Minh Nguyễn 💬 19:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The only other alternative I know of to keep related signs grouped together, aside from a naming convention, is to add it to the categories manually. So, for example, File:British Columbia R-009-1.svg and File:Ontario Rb-19.svg are both in the No Entry signs category as [[Category:Diagrams of No Entry road signs|Canada]], otherwise they would categorise alphabetically and be very far apart. I'll have to try and fix the Canadian signs in the future as well. It's easier when signs are part of a national standard and the naming convention I put in place several years ago "Country road sign XXXX", but with varying regional signs it is a bit more tricky. I'll give you a little more time to think it over, but if you don't have any further objections, I can start renaming your uploads later today and let you know when the process is complete. Fry1989 eh? 20:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Fry1989: I think the MUTCD-XX scheme you proposed above is fine. (Besides, relying on sorting keys is problematic because you have to manually edit a file description page after uploading.) I'll probably end up creating more specific categories for Ohio signs anyways, because some of these series (like R3-8) have a lot of Ohio-specific signs. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 20:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I believe I have finished. Let me know if I missed anything. Fry1989 eh? 02:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Fry1989: Thanks for taking care of all the renaming. Do you think it would be possible to leave redirects on some of them, especially the non-lane files that had been around a bit longer? These files have been linked quite a bit outside the Wikimedia wikis, particularly on the OSM Wiki but also on non-wikis that are more difficult to edit after the fact. I'm trying my best to track down existing usage, but I'm sure to miss something. Is it just a matter of adding a normal #redirect at the file description page, or is there anything special about file redirects that would be necessary for InstantCommons to pick up the files elsewhere? – Minh Nguyễn 💬 02:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't like re-directs. I see them as clutter. However, you do have a very valid argument that there is off-wiki usages that may be disrupted, so I am going to have to learn to get over it. To add a re-direct, you just go to the former namespace (for example) and add "#REDIRECT [[File:]]" with the current name. Fry1989 eh? 15:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, thanks for understanding. It'll just be a few for the files that have been around longer. I don't plan on adding redirects systematically. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 19:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Cambrian_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

Cambrian School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Campbell_Union_High_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

Campbell Union High School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Cupertino_Union_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

Cupertino Union School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Fremont_Union_High_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

Fremont Union High School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Oak_Grove_School_District_(San_Jose,_California)_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

Oak Grove School District (San Jose, California) schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:San_Jose_Unified_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

San Jose Unified School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:East_Side_Union_High_School_District_schools[edit]

Category discussion warning

East Side Union High School District schools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Data talk:COVID-19 Finland cases per municipality.tab[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Data talk:COVID-19 Finland cases per municipality.tab has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this data ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

5-HT2AR (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wikipedia-logo-vi balloons.png[edit]

Hello anh Minh, if you have any time to spare, please consider create a high-quality svg version of this file. Being the first anniversary logo ever of the Vietnamese Wikipedia, it bears a special sentimental meaning to the project. The simplicity in the design also makes it versatile and can be used on different occasions, which is why I used it on the community portal. But I think having an SVG high-quality version is still better though. Băng Tỏa (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Băng Tỏa: Indeed, I had originally designed the image to be generic but elegant, with the intention of reusing it on multiple milestone occasions. (Nothing against the later logo variants; I had no idea the puzzle ball could be modified in so many creative ways!) I can try to make a higher-quality version, but should it combine File:Balloons-aj.svg with File:Wikipedia-logo-vi, 2005-2009.png or File:Wikipedia-logo-vi-big.png, to be historically accurate, or with File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-vi.svg or File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-no-text.svg to be more versatile in non-historical contexts such as the community portal? Unfortunately, there isn't a good SVG version of the v1 project logo, only approximations. (This is also true of the original English version of the logo. It's one of the reasons the Foundation cited for replacing it with the more clinical v2 design in 2010.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 20:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Anh Minh, thank you so much for such a quick reply. I had no idea it was part of your original intention. I used it on the community portal because I found both its design and its author to be adorable. This time I want it to be versatile, so SVG format is a must. Let’s make it based on the new version of the Wikipedia logo. The sentimental historical meaning would still be reserved so long as it contains the balloon pic. It probably should be created as a separate file also. Băng Tỏa (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Băng Tỏa: Wikipedia-logo-v2-vi with balloons.svg – Minh Nguyễn 💬 05:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you anh. Have I mentioned that you're adorable? xD Băng Tỏa (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MUTCD-OH R2-H2a (open text).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:MUTCD-OH R2-H2a (open text).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:D0EB:3FC8:9EE1:3406 02:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikibooks tiếng Việt[edit]

Xin chào bạn Nguyễn Xuân Minh, nhờ bạn làm việc với Phabricator, kêu họ cài đặt extension TabberNeue cho Wikibooks tiếng Việt. Theo dõi thảo luận trên Wikibooks tại trang này. Theo dõi thảo luận trên Phabricator tại trang này. Xin cảm ơn! Đức Anh (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tôi đã trả lời bạn tại trang này rồi. Nhờ bạn làm việc với bên Phabricator tại trang này. Tôi thấy phần mở rộng này là cần thiết. Đức Anh (talk) 06:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikibooks tiếng Việt 2[edit]

Tôi nghĩ có thể dùng jQuery UI Tab thay vì cài đặt phần mở rộng, nhưng giao diện không được đẹp. Bạn có thể định lại CSS/JS y hệt như Extension:TabberNeue không? Trăm sự nhờ bạn.

TabberNeue-screenshot-Vector.png

Đức Anh (talk) 15:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:San_José,_California,_spelled_with_acute_accent_mark[edit]

Category discussion warning

San José, California, spelled with acute accent mark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Displaytitle ở Vietnamese Wikibooks[edit]

Xin chào bạn Mxn. Tôi có việc cần nhờ bạn. English Wikibooks cho phép tùy chỉnh tiêu đề theo ý muốn bằng Displaytitle, nhưng Vietnamese Wikibooks thì không. Bạn có thể giúp tôi nhờ Phabricator bật chức năng chỉnh sửa tiêu đề theo ý muốn được không? Đức Anh (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Xem Thảo luận Thành viên:Đức Anh tại Wikibooks tiếng Việt.
Tôi đã trả lời. Đức Anh (talk) 08:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Đã có đồng thuận ở Wikibooks tiếng Việt. Đức Anh (talk) 02:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Caltrans Adopt-A-Highway logo.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Caltrans Adopt-A-Highway logo.svg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caltrans Adopt-A-Highway logo.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed. Minh Nguyễn 💬 21:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MUTCD-CA G66-22K (open text).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:MUTCD-CA G66-22K (open text).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ikar.us (talk) 13:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two-way concurrencies[edit]

What exactly do you mean by this? The name is vague and probably should be reconsidered. Two-route concurrencies? Two-direction concurrencies? Please consider making it more clear. Famartin (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Famartin: Yes, I was referring to two-route concurrencies, as part of Category:Concurrencies by number. If I'm not mistaken, this is the usual term for concurrencies that consist of two routes. I created a separate Category:Wrong-way concurrencies for concurrencies where the routes go in opposite directions. Minh Nguyễn 💬 21:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You would be mistaken. A "way" would be the cardinal direction... north, south, east or west. That's why a "wrong way" concurrency is a thing... one ROUTE goes NORTH, the other goes SOUTH (or one goes EAST while the other goes WEST) while simultaneously following a single road in the same direction. I've therefore renamed the categories the make it more clear what you are thinking of. Famartin (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Famartin: OK, sounds good to me. Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nhờ xử lý (Wikibooks)[edit]

Mọi người ở Wikibooks đã đồng thuận cài đặt Extension:TabberNeue từ lâu (xem tại đây). Phiền bạn Mxn giúp tôi mở yêu cầu tại Phabricator. Đức Anh (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Đức Anh: Rất tiếc, bạn đã đề cập đến cuộc biểu quyết khi yêu cầu nhóm phát triển cài đặt phần mở rộng này trên máy chủ WMF trong phab:T286475. Điều này yêu cầu nhóm phát triển xem xét tính bảo mật, hiệu suất, chất lượng của phần mở rộng, nhưng họ đã từ chối vì lý do mất công, không có đủ lợi ích cho một wiki tương đối nhỏ. Tôi có quyền review các thay đổi mã nguồn nhưng không phải là một "chủ mã nguồn" được tin tưởng để thực hiện việc xem xét chất lượng của phần mở rộng mới.

Hình như Wikibooks tiếng Việt đã cài đặt b:vi:MediaWiki:Common.js/TabberNeue.js có chức năng tương tự với TabberNeue về mặt frontend. Tôi cảm thấy script đã hoạt động tốt nên thực sự không có lý do cài đặt phần mở rộng này. Nếu muốn dễ bảo quản hơn thì nên sửa nó để sử dụng thư viện OOUIjs một cách chính xác thay vì xây dựng các phần tử DOM một cách thủ công truyền thống. wikt:vi:MediaWiki:Gadget-TabbedLanguages.js đã được hiện đại hóa theo mô hình này; xem thí dụ các mục từ Wiktionary có thẻ ngôn ngữ đàng hoàng.

 –  Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gần đây truy cập trang TabberNeue tôi thấy chuyển từ trạng thái beta sang stable, tôi tưởng là đã đạt yêu cầu. Nhóm Phabricator nói rằng họ thấy mất công cũng phải, đây là một extension mới, các wiki khác có lẽ chưa biết đến nên chưa yêu cầu, nay có Wikibooks tiếng Việt xung phong dùng thử. Tôi nhận thấy đây là một extension hay, nếu lần này thành công chắc sẽ có nhiều wiki khác áp dụng.
Về phần wikibooks tiếng Việt đã có mã javascript đặc chế, theo tôi nghĩ cài một extension vẫn hơn. Tốc độ nhanh hơn, cú pháp rõ hơn, không cần bảo trì.
Về việc xây dựng dựa trên thư viện OOUI JS, tôi đang tìm hiểu nó dựa trên tài liệu của Wikimedia, nhưng mất khá nhiều thời gian. Wikimedia cũng đã có demo y hệt thế này nhưng tôi chưa thấy được source code của nó. Nếu được phiền bạn giúp tôi tìm. Đức Anh (talk) 08:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Đức Anh: OOUI chỉ có một hướng dẫn sơ quatài liệu được tự động tạo ra từ mã nguồn, đúng là mới đầu khó hiểu, nhưng cuối cùng sẽ đơn giản. Thí dụ tiện ích TabbedLanguages tải các mô đun nhân của OOUI, chờ hook wikipage.content, tạo một dãy đối tượng miêu tả các nội dung thẻ, tạo dải thẻ ("bố trí chỉ mục"), rồi gắn thêm các đối tượng thẻ. Nếu muốn chuyển thẻ theo phần hash trong URL thì theo dõi sự kiện hashchange. Minh Nguyễn 💬 09:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Mapping points of interest in Santa Clara County (Silicon Valley).pdf[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mapping points of interest in Santa Clara County (Silicon Valley).pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:MUTCD-PR R7-3a (open text).svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:MUTCD-PR R7-3a (open text).svg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MUTCD-PR R7-3a (open text).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nhờ giúp đỡ tại Wikibooks[edit]

Xin chào bạn Mxn, tôi có một vài việc muốn bạn giúp đỡ.

Phần mềm MediaWiki đã đưa ra 3 tiêu chí để đếm số content page, và đó cũng là cách đếm content page trên wikibooks tiếng Việt. Tuy nhiên, có vẻ như wikibooks tiếng Anh lại có cách đếm khác với tiếng việt nói riêng và mediawiki nói chung. Trong khi một trang tiếng việt không có liên kết thì không được tính là một content page (ví dụ ở đây), thì một trang tiếng anh không có liên kết vẫn được tính là một content page (ví dụ ở đây). Bạn có thể tìm hiểu giúp tôi tại sao lại thế được không? Nếu nguyên nhân là do cấu hình của wikibooks tiếng Anh khác chúng ta, vậy chúng ta có thể yêu cầu Phabricator cấu hình giống wikibooks tiếng anh không? (Tôi thấy cách đếm content page này không phù hợp với wikibooks nói chung, bởi không phải trang nào cũng cần liên kết đến trang khác). Đức Anh (talk) 11:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Đức Anh: Chào bạn, có lẽ bài tiếng Anh nhúng b:Template:BookCat thì được coi là một "liên kết" đến bản mẫu đó, mặc dù bản mẫu chỉ có kết quả xếp bài vào thể loại. Minh Nguyễn 💬 03:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Không đâu, tôi đã thử nghiệm rồi, rất nhiều trang tại wikbooks tiếng việt có sử dụng Bản mẫu:BookCat nhưng vẫn không được tính là một contentpage (ví dụ ở đây). Do vậy, nhúng bản mẫu không thể coi là liên kết, trừ trường hợp trong bản mẫu đó có liên kết. Đức Anh (talk) 05:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Đức Anh: Nhìn lại thì đúng là Wikibooks tiếng Anh được đếm một cách khác với mặc định do phab:T29256phab:T188472. [4] Nếu cộng đồng biểu quyết chọn phương pháp đếm "any" thì có thể yêu cầu thay đổi này. Minh Nguyễn 💬 05:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Cảm ơn bạn, tôi nghĩ chúng ta nên theo cách đếm ở bên wikibooks tiếng anh. Tuy nhiên tôi không biết nói gì để mở thảo luận, nhờ bạn Mxn viết mục mới kèm một vài câu tại trang thảo luận của Wikibooks để mở biểu quyết cộng đồng. Đức Anh (talk) 06:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Đức Anh: OK, tôi đã mở thảo luận. Minh Nguyễn 💬 05:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thảo luận được mở đến nay đã gần 10 ngày, nhờ bạn Mxn đệ trình lên Phabricator vấn đề này để giải quyết sớm nhất có thể. Đức Anh (talk) 04:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Đức Anh: Tôi đã yêu cầu thay đổi này. Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:OpenHistoricalMap logo and wordmark.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:OpenHistoricalMap logo and wordmark.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]