User talk:Nicola

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive – this talk page is manually archived


Hi Nicola Can you tell me the exact location of the Weckerling memorial and plaque and would it be possible to give me the GPS position. With your permission I would like to use the photographs in a book of cycle racer memorials I am producing. Kind regards Charles

Hello Charles, you may use the photos - if I get a copy of the book, please Symbol support vote.svg Support
And I will try to find out the GPS position, please be patient. --Nicola (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, yes, unfortunately the people, who have the license, did not answer. May be they will after a while, I will remind them. --Nicola (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
If you are still reading here: Please do send an email to me. --Nicola (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Velodromo Bicentenario[edit]

Hi. Absolutly... Well, I can take pictures of the outside of the building. In the inside maybe when there's a competition, but I will try. --Luisalvaz (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Good morning Luisalvaz, thank you very much! Outside would be nice already :) May be there is just a training and you would be allowed to enter.
I started to write the article- --Nicola (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Jules Beau[edit]

Hello, thanks for categorizing pictures of Jules Beau ! I'll continue to upload his albums soon (I'm downloading n°17 atm). JeanBono (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, I mostly categorized the cyclists and cycling events, because this is where I know about. But I will have to have correct some categories after, because some things only became clear after a while. I am really thankful for the photos! I wrote articles about most of the old cyclists for the German Wikipedia, but I did not have photos or bad ones from old newspapers :) --Nicola (talk) 07:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Actually I wanted to upload all these albums and crop/rotate all pictures later (next winter) and link pictures to Wikidata and/or WP articles. However I'm glad someone else do this for me :) JeanBono (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, this is hard work :) May be we can do a sort of "job sharing". I am now doing a "first tour", but that wont do. --Nicola (talk) 11:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your license template[edit]

I just noticed that your personal license template is transcluding the "Files by DerHexer" category... I'm assuming you used his as a model, and missed removing that. It's way down at the bottom. Revent (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

 :( --Nicola (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
It's fixed now. Just FYI, I skimmed over the whole set (yes, all 400-odd, lol), fixed the double licenses, fixed the orientations that were left, and found a few places where templates had somehow gotten mangled. Also, there were a dozen or so with typos in the filenames... they were "2015 2015". Also fixed. Enjoy. :P Revent (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
@Revent: OMG, I feel ashamed... I knew about "2015, 2015" that was a copy and paste-mistake. I will have a look at the measures that I hopefully I will not make mistakes like this again. Thank you so much, --Nicola (talk) 18:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Nothing to feel ashamed about, at all.... think of it this way.. other than the VFC misfire (and it's not an easy tool) you made about a dozen errors in approximately 400 files... that's well over a 95% reliability. Everyone makes some mistakes. Revent (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:6 May 2012 giro d italia cropp.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:6 May 2012 giro d italia cropp.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Amitie 10g (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Nicola, das Originalbild auf Flickr ist (C)ARR. Vermutlich hat der Flickr-Benutzer die Lizenz irgendwann geändert. Wenn du diesen Ausschnitt benötigst, dann musst du ihn einfach von der unbeschnittenen Version auf Commons erstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Hab ich :) Muss ich einfach nur die Lizenz ändern? Das ist mir doch alles zu hoch.... --Nicola (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Aber dann hast du diesen Edit gemacht und damit das Unheil heraufbeschworen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Weimar Roldán 2013 crop.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Weimar Roldán 2013 crop.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo UEC-EM 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Logo UEC-EM 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leonprimer (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Bahn-EM 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Logo Bahn-EM 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leonprimer (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Para-cycling German championships and Europe Cup 2016 86 cropp.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Para-cycling German championships and Europe Cup 2016 86 cropp.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 08:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Köln Gröppersgasse 68.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Köln Gröppersgasse 68.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Nicola!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)