User talk:Nightflyer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contact: de:Benutzer:Nightflyer

Mein erstes Qualitätsbild (noch mit meiner Taschenknipse: Ixus 70):

Kronenkranich IMG 1123.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronenkranich IMG 1123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Danke...[edit]

fürs reparieren der falschen {{Location}}s. Wir sind immernoch am Rätseln warum während WLE 2016 so viele Dateien mit diesem Problem hochgeladen wurden. Vorher war die entsprechende Wartungskategorie nämlich ziemlich leer. Hast du vielleicht eine Idee? Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung, ich kenn auch die Anzahl der früheren Fotos nicht. Ich hab nur beim Aufräumen für WLE etwas helfen wollen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Das Problem mit den Nominierungen ohne peer review[edit]

taucht immer wieder auf, schau dir bitte meinen Kommentar dazu bei Atamari an. Ich kann dir versichern, Uwe Aranas ist einer von den Guten! --Hubertl 03:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Danke für die Bearbeitungen. A,Ocram (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Prost! Face-smile.svg Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg Danke für die Bearbeitungen! That was extremely kind of you to do! Face-smile.svg w.carter-Talk 22:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Danke, den Kaffee trink ich aber erst zum Frühstück, sonst kann ich nicht schlafen Face-smile.svg Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
May I also ask what program you were using for the noise reduction since it seems to be better than mine? Sorry for not writing in German, I understand it but my spelling and writing is awful. w.carter-Talk 08:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Ralf Roletschek told me, that dfine from the Google Nik Collection is the best for noise-reduction. I use it as a standalone program. Sorry for my poor english. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 11:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for telling me, I will try it. Also if we speak again, which is likely, you can write in German and I in English. It is a common way of talking on Commons. :) w.carter-Talk 12:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Nightflyer!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Nightflyer!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Black and White[edit]

Es hat sich erfüllt: „sein“ letztes Album! Und nun verstehe ich es endlich auch: wusste zuvor nicht, ob es bewusst unklar, d. h. wohlmöglich provokativ oder sogar manipulativ, zu interpretieren sei. Nun schmerzt es - umsomehr: er wagt es auf seine ganz eigene, besondere Art zuzugeben, wie es in ihm aussieht ... Und trotz weißer Tünche da draußen nun täglich immer dunkler und dunkler, aber: in sechs Wochen wird es dann wieder heller und heller, von Tag zu Tag! Wünsche Nightflyer dafür erstmal „die Geduld der Spinne, die die Zerstörung ihrer Netze nicht zählt“ und dann „den Mut des Grases, nach so vielen Wintern zu grünen“! --Vitavia (talk) 06:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

So is es. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Ergänzung: Ich hab ihn gehört in Hamburg im CCH, als er sein Album "Various Positions" vorstellte. Kam nicht gut an. Aber nach der Pause gab es nur eine dunkle Bühne, ohne Orchester usw, nur einen Spot auf einen dunkel gekleideten Mann, der allein mit seiner Gitarre seine alten Lieder sang. Unvorstellbar, wer nicht dabei war kann es nicht begreifen: Ein drei-Meter-Spot im riesigen CCH und der Saal tobte.
Man muss erst tot sein, um gewürdigt zu werden... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 00:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
… aber wohl nicht in seinem Fall – bei YouTube jede Menge „letzte Interviews“. Dein CCH-Erlebnis (von schätzungsweise 1985) war sicherlich nachhaltig beeindruckend, erstaunlich was dann doch noch aus Titel 1/Seite 1 und vor allem Titel 1/Seite 2 auf Various Positions wurde! Zusätzlich recht viel Himmelblaues wünscht --Vitavia (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Bilder Ausstellung Klappbarer Weihnachtsbaum[edit]

Hallo,

ich recherchiere gerade für eine Arbeit über das Weihnachtsfest im Ersten Weltkrieg. Ich suche vor allem viel Bildmaterial. Ich bin im Internet auf Ihr Bild bei Wikipedia gestoßen. Dieses Bild würde mir sehr weiterhelfen. Ich wollte fragen, aus welcher Ausstellung dieses Bild stammt (wann und wo); ob Sie mehr Bilder dieser Ausstellung haben und ob es möglich ist, mir diese Bilder zukommen zu lassen.

Sie würden mir damit überaus weiterhelfen.

Das Bild meine ich: Klappbarer Weihnachtsbaum

Ich hoffe auf eine Rückmeldung.

Beste Grüße AW --2A02:8109:AD40:224:EC66:29CD:AE8D:E152 19:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo unbekannter Anfrager. Danke für Ihre Nachfrage, das kommt nicht oft vor. Meistens werden die Fotos, "weil Wikipedia ja frei ist", einfach geklaut. Ich habe die Bildbeschreibung mit einer freieren Lizenz ergänzt: Jeder kann dieses Foto ab heute kostenlos zu jedem Zweck herunterladen und verwenden. Das Bild ist nicht wirklich gut, da durch eine Glasscheibe aufgenommen mit einem Spiegel als Hintergrund. Obwohl jetzt nicht mehr nötig, würde mich ein Bildhinweis als Quelle: "Nightflyer, Wikipedia" freuen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo und Danke für die schnelle Antwort. In der Tat war es mein Anliegen zu erfahren, auf welcher Ausstellung die Bilder gemacht wurden. Zudem würde ich mich freuen, weitere Bilder mit dem Bezug zur Weihnacht in der Zeit des ersten Weltkrieges auffinden zu können. Wenn Sie hiervon noch weitere Motive verfügbar haben, könnten Sie diese eventuell bei Wikimedia online stellen? Besten Dank und viele Grüße, AW --2A02:8109:AD40:224:DCDE:4F0C:E649:9E01 18:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo unbekannter Frager, du scheinst aus Itzehoe zu kommen, nach [1]. Zu deiner Frage: Nein, ich hab keine weiteren Bilder zum Weihnachtsfest. Vielleicht hift dir unsere Kategory weiter? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Update zum beabsichtigten G.d.F-Upgrade[edit]

Der überwiegende Teil der Aufnahmen in Category:Garten der Frauen wurde an ein und demselben Tag im Monat April gemacht: Ohne Sonne wirken sie recht düster, bei Sonneschein kommt es zu starken Reflektionen auf hellem Gestein; der jahrzeitbedingt tiefe Stand bewirkt zudem die bekannten Schattenphänomene: filigranes Geäst und unfreiwillige Selfies. Gegenlichtaufnahmen verbieten sich ohnehin. Die WLM-Seite rät: Zu einem günstigeren Zeitpunkt wiederkommen! Man wird also nicht alle angestrebten Aufnahmen gleich hintereinanderweg machen können, wohl auch nicht mit Mega-Kamera.

Die Bezeichnung “Garten” ist zutreffend: das Areal ist sogar kleiner als unser Kleingarten, den wir einst unterhalb des Kalkbergs am Segeberger See hatten! Wenn dann auch nur 1 fremde Person umherschlendert (und wahrscheinlich währenddessen auch noch die Biografie-Tafeln studiert), kann das den geplanten Fotografier-Eigenrhythmus empfindlich stören – von wandelnden Damenkränzchen ganz zu schweigen. Bei meiner letzten Stippvisite Ende November wirkte der Bereich wie immer sehr gepflegt: frisch laubgeföhnt, einige Teile dezent abgedeckt, was die Enge abmildert. Wenn ab Frühjahr dann die bunte Vielfalt aufblüht, wirkt alles sehr viel unruhiger. Selbst wennn “die Bahn frei” ist, sollte man nicht nach Gesamtalphabet im Zickzack vorgehen sondern nach Stein-Art, so wie es die Liste sinnvollerweise mittels Sortierpfeil ermöglicht. Sonst läuft Nightflyer Gefahr, durch spontanes Vorundzurücktänzeln und abrupte Drehungen abends wieder eine Art “Barkassenspätphänomen” zu erleben, weil das Gehirn alles wieder zurückspulen will oder muss.

Von den insgesamt 54 fehlenden Personen gibt es für 44 bei genalogy.net nützliche Abbildungen, von den übrigen zehn habe ich acht vor Ort lokalisieren und trotz einfallender Besuchergruppe schnappschussartig dokumentieren können. Aus alldem mache ich jetzt mal eine bebilderte Suchhilfe-Liste, die ich irgendwohin als E-Mail-Anhang senden könnte oder, falls du mal wieder einen Besuch im Kontor beabsichtigst, “z. Hdn. Nightflyer” rechtzeitig dort in den Briefkasten einwerfe. Nachwievor würde ich dir natürlich gern vor Ort assistieren, weiß aber nicht, inwieweit es sich bei mir terminlich weiter zuziehen wird (umständehalber seit einiger Zeit “Omi-Azubi” mit aufwändiger An-/Rückfahrt und jeweils unvorhersehbarer Verweildauer).

Insgesamt dürfte es absolut im Sinne von Wikipedia sein, dass die begonnene Liste/Category zu bemerkenswerten Persönlichkeiten vervollständigt bzw. optimiert wird - gut dass du diese Projektabsicht in deiner ToDoliste führst. Gruß --Vitavia (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Auf meiner ToDoListe steht eigendlich ganz vorne die Liste der Ehrenmale im Kreis Steinburg. Da kümmert sich niemand. Ich bin überall gewesen, aber die fehlenden Fotos von mir sind fürn Arsch, ich kann es aber nicht besser. Und gerade um diese Zeit der Trauerwoche, Volkstrauertag, Buss- und Bettag usw... sind die Gräber ziemlich sauber, aber oft mit Kränzen geschmückt. Das passt nicht zum Denkmal... Im Winter hab ich meine Knipse sowieso eingemottet und warte auf den Frühling... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
… und für die Katz' ist hier noch so manches andere!
Auf der von dir genannten Liste finden sich viele der mir geläufigen kleinen Orte, da waren meine Vorfahren aber bereits abgewandert - bis auf eine etwa 1900 nach Itzehoe hin Verheiratete; die daraus sich ergebenden beiden Familiennamen gibt es lt. Google dort immer noch, so dass sie die schlimmen Zeiten irgendwie überstanden haben.
Kommt Zeit kommt Rat, Nightflyer! Gruß --Vitavia (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

… Sollte mich allerdings nicht wundern, wenn das obige Projekt für dich gar nicht mehr von Interesse ist, nachdem die örtlichen Gegebenheiten von mir als ziemlich verzwickt zerredet worden waren.
Immerhin konnte im Herbst nach lebhaft-konstruktivem E-Mail-Austausch mit der Vereinsgründerin die im Wiki-Artikel enthaltene Liste bereinigt werden.
Übrigens befindet sich die Erinnerungsspirale, erweitert durch neue Blöcke und zusätzliche Inschriften, im Vgl. zu 2011 jetzt an entgegengesetzter Garten-Stelle, auch insofern wären insbesondere neue Übersichts-Aufnahmen mit leistungsstarker:) Kamera sehr angebracht! Und mit (recht) weitgefasstem Hamburg-Bezug auf WikiLovesMusic wäre es schön, wenn auch die noch bildfreien Musikerinnen/Sängerinnen bedacht würden. Alles natürlich eine Prioritätsfrage ... Gruß --Vitavia (talk) 08:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Mit meinen Vorbehalten hatte ich nicht übertrieben.
Bei meinem heutigen Besuch bei einer befreundeten Grabstätte in unmittelbarer Nähe zum GdF waren nur wenige einigermaßen verwertbare Aufnahmen möglich: Die Sonne warf jede Menge Muster auf die Steine, oder aber es spiegelte sich der Himmel. Andere waren stumpf durch Moosbefall oder hochgespritztes Erdreich. Nicht, dass ich nicht auch schon gewischt hätte – es kam dann bald noch ein Putz- und Verschönerungs-Geschwader (muntere Vereinsmitglieder-Damen) mit Utensilien bis hin zur Schubkarre. Und nun stehen auch noch Baubarbeiten ins Haus/in den Garten: der Wasserturm, aus dem ich gern mal herausgeschaut hätte, wird wegen Renoverungsarbeiten während der kommenden Vereinssaison geschlossen bleiben. Statt dessen wird im Garten selbst ein Pavillon errichtet; dafür wurden bereits ein Baum gefällt und zwei Grabsteine versetzt. Ab Mai geht’s dann auch schon wieder los mit Gruppenführungen und Familienausflüglern. Man kann also nur hin und wieder mal Foto-Glück haben – wenn man "nur" oft genug vorbeischaut.
Werde es im Auge behalten, aber für feine Übersichtsaufnahmen ist meine Kamera nicht gut genug! Vielleicht fühlt sich ja ein (Mit)Lesender angesprochen …? Gruß--Vitavia (talk) 17:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Moin Vitavia, ich war am letzten Wochenende in Würzburg. Jetzt gibt es die
c:Category:Jüdischer Friedhof (Würzburg) und
c:Category:Jüdischer Friedhof (Heidingsfeld)
Von beiden gab es noch keine Fotos.
Von der c:Category:Hauptfriedhof Würzburg hab ich noch ca. 50 nicht hochgeladene Bilder... Eine urkatholische Gegend, ich hab noch nie einen so gut gepflegten Friedhof gesehen. Damit ist mein Bedarf an Gräbern erstmal gedeckt, zumal Wiki Loves Earth bald beginnt. Da hab ich auch noch so einiges vor. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Wirklich ganz erstaunlich - nicht nur das Wetter !!! aber gut nachvollziehbar, dass nun dein „Aug' nach grüner Farb' verlangt“. In Ahrensburg hatte ich beide „Kategorien“ auf 1 Blick: den Jüd. Friedhof und das Naturdenkmal 43 Stieleichen. „Warum in die Ferne schweifen ...“ Gruß --Vitavia (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Zum Wetter kann ich nur folgendes sagen: Ich kam einen Tag früher an und reiste einen Tag später ab. Glück gehabt!! Zum Wetter beim Treffen Süddeutschland siehe hier. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Auch ein Glück für die von dir zusätzlich erfassten Fassaden und Skulpturen! Warum auch nicht! Bleib unbedingt so reiseengagiert – dir selbst und Wikipedia zur Freude!
Bei Sonnenschein machte ich („stadtfein“) gestern vom Bf. Ohlsdorf einen neugierigen Abstecher zum GdF (= 2 min. Busfahrt). Kaum angekommen entlud sich eine hinterlistige Wolkenwand :-((( , mein Blick war ja eher gebückt nach unten gerichtet gewesen ... Für die Optik der Inschriften hat die obige Putzaktion „rein“ gar nichts gebracht. Meine Fotos sind daher lediglich als Information/Orientierung/Listenkomplettierung zu betrachten, können ja mal (?) durch bessere ersetzt werden. Gruß --Vitavia (talk) 07:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Und nun auch noch Touri-Busse (LWL, KI …) mit sich zum Garten hinschlängelnden Senioren-Karawanen, aber vor Ort auch schon mal eine grünuniformierte Gärtner-(Betriebs-)Versammlung bzw. -Aktivitäten oder Schülergruppierungen mit Aufgabenzetteln. Da kam dann höchstens ein oder gar kein Foto zustande - nicht weiter schlimm, da ich sowieso mehrmals wöchentlich am Bf. Ohlsdorf umsteigen muss.
Wenn die obigen alle bei Wikipedia reinschauen, findet sich nun wenigstens;/ eine vollständig bebilderte Liste dank deinem:) Projektvorschlag vom letzten Herbst.
Eine vielseitige schöne Wiki-Saison wünscht weiterhin --Vitavia (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Admin?[edit]

Sag mal, wäre es nicht mal an der Zeit, daß du noch etwas mehr Verantwortung übernimmst und auf Commons Admin wirst? ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Nööööö... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Genauer:
  1. Commons ist english. Mein Schulenglisch liegt 40 Jahre zurück. Wenn ich hier mitlese, stütze ich mich meist auf Google-Translate ab.
  2. Und ehrlich: Es reicht mir, wenn ich als filemover manchmal eigene oder fremde Dateien mal richtigstellen kann.
Schuster, bleib bei deinen Leisten Auf DE hab ich es ja mal ein Jahr Admin probiert, war aber nicht wirklich glücklich damit... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Ist nicht wirklich vergleichbar. Ist hier meist sehr viel gechillter. Und man könnte das hier fast ohne Englischkenntnisse machen ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Marcus, nett gemeint. Aber ich erinnere mich an eine Diskussion über die Sperrung von Bernd Gross. Da wurde der Sperrer ganz direkt böse angegangen. Das gab einige Seiten an Diskussionen (find ich leider nicht mehr). Erst als ich auf deutsch meinen Kommentar schrieb, und jemand den ins englische übersetzte, kam Ruhe auf, der Überbringer der Nachricht wurde nicht mehr angegiftet. Also nicht böse sein, danke für dein Angebot, aber ich will einfach nicht. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Dann muß ich dich versuchen anders zu quälen ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Ach, ich bin beratungsresistent Face-smile.svg. Aber ich muss hier aufräumen, die Signaturen funktionieren nicht mehr. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Konvertierung.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 9172.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 9172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Würzburg, Residenzplatz 2 20170422 003 bearbeitet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würzburg, Residenzplatz 2 20170422 003 bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Nightflyer!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »
Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Karl V. Unterschrift[edit]

Hallo Nightflyer! Ich hoffe Du bist damit [2] einverstanden.--Koppchen (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Ja sicher. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde, Wildes Moor NIK 1497.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde, Wildes Moor NIK 1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure this needs so much empty sky, though --Daniel Case 05:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1892.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1871.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 09:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1876.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 09:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1874.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1862.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 08:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2069.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2062.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderlügumer Binnendünen NIK 2062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderberge bei Süderlügum NIK 2043.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturschutzgebiet Süderberge bei Süderlügum NIK 2043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CHT China Shanghai.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Zaccarias (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2471.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2567.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brammer, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sandergebiet westlich von Brammerau NIK 1344.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brammer, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sandergebiet westlich von Brammerau NIK 1344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you add an English description? Good quality otherwise. --Trougnouf 12:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ DoneMy english is very poor, but I have it tried... maybe wrong... --Nightflyer 21:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, thank you! --Trougnouf 13:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 05:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Krumstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Landschaftliches Hochmoor NIK 2415.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Krumstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Landschaftliches Hochmoor NIK 2415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 23:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Schülp b. Rendsburg, Rüsterbarg NIK 2165.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schülp b. Rendsburg, Rüsterbarg NIK 2165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 11:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Nightflyer/common.js[edit]

Hi Nightflyer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Nightflyer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 16 character 6: Label 'User' on The statement. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
  2. ISSUE: line 16 character 9: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
  3. ISSUE: line 16 character 33: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC).


Code issues in User:Nightflyer/common.js[edit]

Hi Nightflyer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Nightflyer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 16 column 10: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2905.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2900.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2809.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2853.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Hennstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Hennstedter Moor NIK 2690.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hennstedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Hennstedter Moor NIK 2690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Delve, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Südermoor bei Schwienhusen NIK 2557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice natural scene --Daniel Case 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2436.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Mühlenteich NIK 2436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Some of the sunny spots blown, but they're so small as not to detract from the overall wish-I-could-walk-into-it quality of the image --Daniel Case 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3261.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you remove the spot on the left just above the horizont? --Podzemnik 21:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ DoneSorry, --Nightflyer 21:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you! Quality is good. --Podzemnik 03:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2920.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3412.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3270.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2939.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2974.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 20:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2971.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 20:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Kuden, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Klev von St. Michaelisdonn bis Burg NIK 3160.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kuden, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Klev von St. Michaelisdonn bis Burg NIK 3160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 20:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2960.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 2960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 20:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 3035.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kronenloch Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 3035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 20:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2808.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Gieselautal NIK 2808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Elpersbüttel, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Jägersburger Heide NIK 3316.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Elpersbüttel, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Jägersburger Heide NIK 3316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 01:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Borsfleth, Störmündung NIK 3070.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Borsfleth, Störmündung NIK 3070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3403.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kudensee und Umgebung NIK 3169.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kudensee und Umgebung NIK 3169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Nur eine dumme Frage …[edit]

zu diesen zwei WLE-Beiträgen, den Du in Ineligible submissions for Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Germany verschoben hast: Was ist denn damit falsch? Ist das Ohmoor kein Schutzgebiet oder zeigen die Fotos das falsche Moor? Laut unserer Liste wäre das Ohmoor in Hamburg OT Niendorf ein Landschaftsschutzgebiet … und laut der Kategorie ein FFH-Gebiet.

Nichts für ungut, keine Kritik, ich wollte nur mal dumm fragen! ;–) Von mir selbst weiß ich, dass man mit HotCat schnell auch mal ein Bild in die falsche Kategorie sortiert, und ich dachte, das könnte ja auch hier der Fall sein. Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Moin Aristeas, Verklickt hab ich mich nicht, aber ich hätte den Benutzer informieren sollen. Das Problem sind die Koordinaten. Ich wollte die WDPA-Id eintragen, und bekam diese Karte angezeigt. Da ist kein Schutzgebiet angegeben.Also stimmt entweder die Lage oder die Bezeichnung nicht. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 11:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Nightflyer, stimmt, die Koordinaten passen absolut nicht zur Beschreibung. Ich würde ja tippen, dass die Koordinaten falsch sind (denn dort, wo sie hinzeigen, können die Bilder kaum aufgenommen worden sein, das wäre ja mitten auf der Straße :–), dass aber die Bezeichnung stimmt. Aber das sollte tatsächlich am besten der Benutzer klären … Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Ach so, jetzt fällt mir noch das Problemchen auf, dass der Benutzer die Bilder Hamburg-Niendorf zugeordnet hat (in Dateiname und Beschreibung), dass laut unserer Kategorie das Ohmoor aber zu Garstedt, Schleswig-Holstein gehört. Das würde ich jetzt aber als Irrtum verstehen, da das FFH-Gebiet tatsächlich hart an der Grenze liegt (siehe WDPA-Info), sodass sich der Fotograf vielleicht gar nicht bewusst war, dass er Hamburg verlassen hatte. Ist aber zugegebenermaßen noch eine Unklarheit. Magst Du den Benutzer mal fragen, ob er vielleicht die korrekten Koordinaten schätzen kann? Dann sehen wir weiter, ob es dann passt … --Aristeas (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich hab auf seiner Disk eine Nachricht hinterlassen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Danke Dir! --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kudensee und Umgebung NIK 3196.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Kudensee und Umgebung NIK 3196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 10:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Wöhrdener Loch NIK 3242.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Naturschutzgebiet Wöhrdener Loch NIK 3242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 10:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Borsfleth, Störmündung NIK 3374.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Borsfleth, Störmündung NIK 3374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 05:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 3009.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Speicherkoog Dithmarschen NIK 3009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 05:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3049.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 3049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Kuden, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Klev von St. Michaelisdonn bis Burg NIK 3163.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kuden, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Klev von St. Michaelisdonn bis Burg NIK 3163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 22:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturerlebnisraum Posberg NIK 2002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturerlebnisraum Posberg NIK 2002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturerlebnisraum Posberg NIK 2001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Naturerlebnisraum Posberg NIK 2001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is good but there is a dust spot on the right --Podzemnik 02:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Elpersbüttel, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Jägersburger Heide NIK 3296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Elpersbüttel, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Jägersburger Heide NIK 3296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 15:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3413.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brokdorf, FFH-Gebiet NIK 3413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 15:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2918.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Dithmarschen, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Speicherkoog Dithmarschen (Nordkoog) NIK 2918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 15:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Mission erfolgreich bendet[edit]

Da meine Fotos als Juror bei WLE 2018 nicht teilnehmen dürfen, wollte ich mindestens 5% als QI bewerten lassen. Face-smile.svg Der Rest ist das Sahnehäubchen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Es gibt Zufälle,[edit]

die man nie bemerkt oder über die man nie benachrichtigt wird: Einige meiner Bilder kamen tatsächlich in die zweite Runde: Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2017/Winners/Germany Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your downloads, but you are saturating (with about 500 images) the Category:Motorcycles which is a parent category: a specific category name must be found for each file. Thank you. --Cjp24 (talk) 08:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

See also this discussion on French Commons Bistro. --Cjp24 (talk) 10:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Bitte um Geduld. Die meisten Motorräder dürften identifizierbar sein => Teilnehmer- und Modelliste. Das kann aber dauern, Hilfe ist gerne gesehen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
How many time to categorize 468 files? One month? More? Category:Motorcycles is saturated, normally it does not contain any files. --Cjp24 (talk) 08:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Noch bin ich bei WLE 2018 ziemlich beschäftigt. Das Einsortieren ist eine Aufgabe für lange, dunkle Winterabende. Solange wirst du dich gedulden müssen. Aber die Bilder sind jetzt da, und commons hat neue Fotos von Motorrädern von vor 1945.
I'm still pretty busy at WLE 2018. Sorting is a task for long, dark winter evenings. As long as you will have to be patient. But the pictures are now there, and commons has new photos of pre-1945 motorcycles. (google translation) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Motorcycles is overloaded: please categorize or remove "Motorcycles" for 371 files in Category:Zehnte Internationale VFV ADAC Zwei-Tage-Motorrad-Veteranen-Fahrt-Norddeutschland und 33te Int-Windmill-Rally. See Commons:Categories. --Cjp24 (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nordrhein-Westfalen, Xanten, LVR-Archäologischer Park Xanten NIK 4474.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordrhein-Westfalen, Xanten, LVR-Archäologischer Park Xanten NIK 4474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Complex structure handled well (try to do something about the slight CA on the windows at left, though) --Daniel Case 19:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

WikiLovesMonuments 2018[edit]

Lieber Nightflyer!

Die Korrektur der falschen Koordinaten zu dem Bild bekomme ich nicht hin. Die Umrechnungshilfen überfordern mich. Statt der Kameraposition (51°07'43.26"N / 09°58'21.30"E) habe ich jetzt die Geodaten der Kirche eingesetzt, in der Hoffnung, dass das besser ist als unrichtige Angaben.

Vielen Dank für Deine Nachricht und vor allem:

Herzlichen Dank für Deinen Einsatz und Deine Mühen bei den „Wiki loves“-Wettbewerben. Ich, und sicher viele andere, wissen das sehr zu schätzen und sind voller Respekt.

Verliere bitte nie die Lust am Weitermachen! Mit herzlichem Gruß --Heinz K. S. (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Moin User:Heinz K. S., so geht es natürlich auch. Für diese Fälle gibt es das Template: Template:Object location. Ich hab dein Foto entsprechend angepasst. Und danke für die netten Worte, das entschädigt für den vielen Stress der Sitzungen Face-smile.svg Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2029.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1975, MiNr 2029.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 16:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald[edit]

Hallo Nightfligher, es macht meiner Meinung nach keinen Sinn ein einzelnes Bild in die Kategorie die das Innenere eines Gebäudes darstellen soll zu kategorosieren. Das Bild ist über die Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" ja in der Kategorie vertreten. --Wuselig (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Moin Wuselig, nach deiner Aktion gab es oft gar keine Kategorien mehr. Das hätte früher oder später ein bot bemerkt und Alarm geschlagen. Atamari hat jetzt alle Fotos erneut verschoben: Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald (Hauptgebäude). Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Nightfligher, dass die Bilder gar keine Kategorien mehr hatten ist sicher ein Cat-a-lot Unfall. Der war so nicht geplant. Ich versuche, beim Hochladen meiner Bilder gleichzeitig die Unordnung in der Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" zu beseitigen, die durch unsere GLAM-on-Tour und die damit verbunden Massenuploads verbunden sind. Du und Atamari haben die Sache nicht gerade leichter gemacht, da, ich hoffe Du nimmst mir die Kritik nicht krumm, Eure Bildbeschreibungen und auch die Kategorisierungen mehr als dürftig waren. Ich finde die Kategorie Category:Interior of Jagdschloss Grunewald (Hauptgebäude) sollte nur Innenansichten, aber keine Einzelbilder enthalten. Einzelbilder, die noch nicht in einer Einzelkategorie in der alle Versionen, Teilansichten etc. des jeweiligen Bildes zusammenfassen enthalten sind, sollten, noch in der Kategorie "Paintings in Jagdschloss Grunewald" verbleiben (bis aufgeräumt wurde), aber nicht in der jetzt von Euch gewählten Kategorie. --Wuselig (talk) 21:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Is ja nich weiter schlimm, Wikipedia ist unzerstörbar Face-smile.svg Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
PS: Ich würde dich ja gerne als Orga-Mitglied nach Berlin einladen, aber du darst ja sowieso dabeisein.
Ich werde in Berlin schon dabei sein. Ich würde mich aber freuen, wenn sich aus der Jury noch jemand findet mir den Preis auch zu überreichen.
Bezüglich der Kategorisierung. Überlegt Euch bitte nochmal, ob Ihr die Bilder nicht besser in die Bilderkategorie verschiebt und Bilder vom gleichen Motiv in eine gemeinsame Kategorie. Die "Interiors" Kategorie ist meines Erachtens eine Architekturkategorie in die keine Einzelansichten von Objekten gehören. --Wuselig (talk) 11:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5716.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Gut Qualität --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5719.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Museum Europäischer Kulturen, GLAM on Tour im Museum Europäischer Kulturen (2018) NIK 5719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Es scheint leicht geneigt zu sein --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
✓ Sorry, ist korrigiert --Nightflyer 20:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality now. --Aristeas 15:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5638.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5632.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Anliegeplätze an der Stör NIK 5632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6000.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wittenborn, Ehrenmal NIK 6000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Workaround Lions´Head from Daniel Case[edit]

Sers, ich finde Deine BEA nicht schlecht, nachdem nun der dritte in den farbliche Topf (Richtung) greift, scheint es so sein zu sollen. Daniel ist dieses WE auf einer Veranstaltung, dann ist Wiki-day am Montag (ich hatte was geschrieben, nur wieder mal den html-coder bei QI zerwuselt, ist echt schlimm hier). Commons ist in der Form nicht gedacht, Bearbeitungen auszutauschen, was ich aber gerade für wertvoll erachte. Man lernt ja nie aus....Mich wundert Deine Bildgrößeǃ Naja, ein psd habe ich für Daniel hier abgelegt inkl Doku der Einstellungen in ACR. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gST1ri7xJVqsf-Sl3c4PeYZfXplZb0jd Damit lassen sich meine Einstellungen nachvollziehen und persönliche Vorlieben direkt umsetzen. (Mir fehlt zB der rote Steinanteil, direkt im Löwenkopf). Ich sehe das übrigens nicht als final an, sondern als Arbeitungsgrundlage. Sein Sensor ist schmutzig wie ein Fußabstreifer und eigentlich ist es auch schon ziemlich frech von ihm, or just a lazy dude.... Schönen Sonntag, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Die Bildgröße mcht Gimp, ich hab keine andere Bilbearbeitung. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenhörn, Chemietanker NARCEA NIK 5742.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenhörn, Chemietanker NARCEA NIK 5742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Schafstedt, Ehrenmal NIK 5750.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schafstedt, Ehrenmal NIK 5750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Unterfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4400.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Unterfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Oberfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4414.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Oberfeuer Glückstadt 2018 NIK 4414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:11, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, St. Thomas von Aquin (Akademiekirche), Relief NIK 7582.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, St. Thomas von Aquin (Akademiekirche), Relief NIK 7582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Geschichtspark Ehemaliges Zellengefängnis Moabit NIK 7446.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Geschichtspark Ehemaliges Zellengefängnis Moabit NIK 7446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Berlin, Zeughaus, rechts vom Haupteingang NIK 7678.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Zeughaus, rechts vom Haupteingang NIK 7678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Geschichtspark Ehemaliges Zellengefängnis Moabit NIK 7453.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Geschichtspark Ehemaliges Zellengefängnis Moabit NIK 7453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Theodore Monod - Adrar de Mauritanie - Oued Akerdil - Décembre 1998.jpg[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Theodore Monod - Adrar de Mauritanie - Oued Akerdil - Décembre 1998.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Wvdp (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

???????????????????????????? --Nightflyer (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Wvdp ???????? --Nightflyer (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Hanerau-Hademarschen, Ehrenmal NIK 9864.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hanerau-Hademarschen, Ehrenmal NIK 9864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Tsaag Valren 22:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Namenlosestraße NIK 6705.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Glückstadt, Namenlosestraße NIK 6705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Verum 22:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Pinneberg, Ehrenmal NIK 3484.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Pinneberg, Ehrenmal NIK 3484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Bauakademie, Demonstration NIK 7665.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Bauakademie, Demonstration NIK 7665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Nice, sharp, and it is good that you captered this view! However the verticals are leaning in a bit and IMHO this should be corrected. --Aristeas 11:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done --Nightflyer 20:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Lunden, Heimatmuseum NIK 5850.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Lunden, Heimatmuseum NIK 5850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Tornesch, Naturdenkmal 12-01 NIK 2221.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Tornesch, Naturdenkmal 12-01 NIK 2221.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
*Symbol support vote.svg Weak supportGood quality for me. But the tree is cut out too small.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Aukrug, Tönsheider Wald NIK 9796.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Aukrug, Tönsheider Wald NIK 9796.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Sendemast NIK 2032.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Süderlügum, Sendemast NIK 2032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality high enough for Q1, but a bit oversharpened. IMO it would have been an improvement to crop the top and a bit from the left and right part --Michielverbeek 22:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Lunden, Denkmalsplatz am Gänsemarkt NIK 9456.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Lunden, Denkmalsplatz am Gänsemarkt NIK 9456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 00:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done --Nightflyer 21:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Shadows a little bit disturbing, but acceptable. --XRay 19:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019[edit]

WLE Austria Logo.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin, Siegerehrung WLM 2016 NIK 4517.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Siegerehrung WLM 2016 NIK 4517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Eatcha 15:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Barkassenfahrt NIK 6734.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Barkassenfahrt NIK 6734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

There are some dust spots and building needs perspective fixing --Podzemnik 23:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done --Nightflyer 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Hum I don't think tha the sides of the building are straight... --Podzemnik 22:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment???? --Nightflyer 22:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Yeah they're leaning, aren't they? We can wait for other reviews what other users think --Podzemnik 20:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done New Version:ShiftN --Nightflyer 20:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks OK to me. Please add English description, too. JiriMatejicek 18:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Seemannsclub Duckdalben NIK 6872.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Seemannsclub Duckdalben NIK 6872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Barkassenfahrt NIK 6787.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg,Wikipedia Ahoi, Barkassenfahrt NIK 6787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schablone Logarex 25525-S, Chemie III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 05:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Niedersachsen, Cuxhaven, Fähranleger NIK 8853.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niedersachsen, Cuxhaven, Fähranleger NIK 8853.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 7208.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 7208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Fähranleger Süd NIK 7214.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Fähranleger Süd NIK 7214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. But I'd be more carefull with sharpening / luminance sliders + English description would be good --Podzemnik 01:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 7199.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brunsbüttel, Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 7199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1974, MiNr 467.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Adolf Slaby Briefmarke 1974 mit Ersttagsstempel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Achterweidenbrücke[edit]

Achterweidenbrücke, die dritte von vorne

Moin Nightflyer,

im Hamburger Kontor verfolgen wir das ehrgeizige Projekt, alle benamten Hamburger Brücken zu erfassen und mit Foto und ein paar Rahmendaten in der "Liste von Brücken in Hamburg" aufzuführen. Du hast auf nebenstehendem Bild die Achterweidenbrücke erwischt, die uns in der Liste noch fehlt - leider ist es die hinterste Brücke. Hast Du auf dieser Barkassenfahrt noch ein Foto geschossen, auf dem die Brücke besser zu sehen ist? Fragende Grüße, --Enter (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, ich hab alles brauchbare hochgeladen. In der Category sind 232 Fotos, davon 222 von mir. Es wurde doch jede Menge fotografiert, wo sind die anderen Bilder? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Danke für die rasche Antwort - wenn wir nach den Brücken die Hamburger Kanäle angehen, werden deine Bilder vom Müggeburger Kanal sehr nützlich sein. Kannst Du dich erinnern, wer bei Eurem Törn noch fotografiert hat? Fragende Grüße, --Enter (talk) 17:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Ist etwas her, aber nach meiner Erinnerung mindestens Emma7stern und NordNordWest => [3]. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis! Grüße, --Enter (talk) 06:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@Enter: Ein besseres Bild habe ich leider auch nicht, wir sind nicht näher rangefahren. NNW 13:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg
Hallo Nightflyer,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Albersdorf, Friedhof NIK 8490.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Albersdorf, Friedhof NIK 8490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Axel Tschentscher 23:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Doppelte Kategorie?[edit]

Hallo! Irgendwie ist da jetzt was doppelt. Schau mal hier: Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments Germany. Und hier: Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments Germany 2019 und Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Germany. --XRay talk 11:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Ich hab die Seite de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2019/Deutschland/Organisation#QI auf der Beo. Und dort wurde die Cat nach dem Vorbild WLE angelegt (die übrigens von dir stammt). Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 11:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Und nu, was tun? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Die Schemata sind leider nicht einheitlich. Eigentlich bin ich immer dafür, alles oder nichts. Schwer durchzuhalten. Bei WLM macht bisher nur die Kategorie der Ukraine eine Ausnahme. Hier bin ich für Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments Germany 2019, denn das ist das Schema der vergangenen Jahre. Also alle 6 Bilder rüber und ein Redirect bei Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Germany auf die Kategorie. Mit den restlichen Unstimmigkeiten kann man leben. --XRay talk 11:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Vielleicht ist es anders herum doch konsequenter. Das ist aber mehr Arbeit, die Jahre zurück und die vielen Länder. --XRay talk 12:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Die Deutschland zugeordneten Kategorien habe ich mal angepasst. So sind zumindest diese einheitlich. --XRay talk 04:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Danke, gut gemacht! Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thüringen, Weimar, Herderplatz 16 NIK 9262.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thüringen, Weimar, Herderplatz 16 NIK 9262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Can you do anything with dark area, tonemapping? --Ezarate 21:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Even in the shadow the things are clear visisble and not noisy. --Stepro 18:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thüringen, Weimar, Haus am Horn NIK 9242.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thüringen, Weimar, Haus am Horn NIK 9242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Masumrezarock100 22:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Thüringen, Weimar, Hofapotheke NIK 9143.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thüringen, Weimar, Hofapotheke NIK 9143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Thüringen, Weimar,Rathaus NIK 9150.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thüringen, Weimar,Rathaus NIK 9150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3148.jpg[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3148.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1988, MiNr 3148.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 0015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 0015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 9980.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 9980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 9982.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nordrhein-Westfalen, Wuppertal, Wikicon 2019 NIK 9982.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Deine Bilder von der WikiCon 2019[edit]

Hallo Nightflyer, da ich jetzt mehrfach angeschrieben und gebeten wurde, persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzende Bilder von Dir zu löschen, muss ich Dich dringend bitten, VOR dem Upload sorgfältig zu prüfen, ob auf den Bildern Personen abgebildet sind, die mit orangefarbenen Lanyards deutlich zu erkennen geben, dass sie auf keinen Fall fotografiert werden wollen!
Sollte ich weitere Anfragen auf Löschung wegen dieser Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzung erhalten und Löschanträge aus dem gleichen Grund bearbeiten müssen, ist es sonst durchaus im Rahmen des Möglichen, dass ich eine Massenlöschung durchführe, weil Deine Uploads nicht vertrauenswürdig sind. Gruß -- Ra'ike T C 06:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry. Ich hab über 300 Fotos aussortiert. Ich kann nicht ausschließen, das ich in den Wimmelbildern ein rotes Lanyard übersehen habe oder das sich jemand unvorteilhaft oder unscharf dargestellt fühlt. Bin halt nur ein Knipser, und kein Fotograf... Aber vielleicht sind es für den Einen oder Anderen trotzdem eine Erinnerung. Dann bitte keinen Löschantrag stellen, das erweckt nur Aufmerksamkeit. Eine Wikimail an einen Commons-Admin wäre besser. Mindestens Raymond und Didym waren ja vor Ort. Es sind über 500 Bilder, da hab ich leider einige wenige übersehen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 08:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Ebenfalls sorry, ich hatte Deine Meldung auf der WikiCon-Seite übersehen. Das entbindet Dich zwar grundsätzlich erstmal nicht von der Pflicht, die Bilder vor dem Upload zu prüfen, aber ich gehe mal davon aus, dass Du ohne weitere Informationen mit entsprechend begründeten Löschungen einverstanden bist. Gruß -- Ra'ike T C 09:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Da braucht man gar nichts begründen. Einfach löschen und gut ist. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 09:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Persönlichkeitsrecht[edit]

Hat hier das Tier auch zugestimmt das du es Fotografieren darfst? :-)--WikiBayer (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Aber klar. Nur ist leider die Tinte des Modellvertrages im Wasser verlaufen... :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hausanschluss[edit]

Hallo Nigthflyer, vielen Dank das Foto Sachsen, Boxberg, Ortsteil Zimpel, Hausanschluss NIK 5812.JPG. Zur Zeit hab ich den Spleen auch Infrastruktur wie Strommasten und Versorgungsleitungen zu fotografieren und zu kategorisieren. Dabei sind mit ständig die Verbindungen zu den Häusern aufgefallen. Interessant aber scheinbar nur für eine Randgruppe interessant :-) Ich hatte immer überlegt eine entsprechende Kat anzulegen, um diese Anschlüsse zu sammeln, wusste aber nicht genau, wie ich sie benennen soll. Gestern hab ich wieder mal gesucht und im Artikel Hausanschluss fiel mir dein Foto auf und dann gab es kein Halten mehr. Besonders im ländlichen Raum in Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Brandenburg sind sie noch zahlreich vorhanden, wer weiß wie langen noch. Viele Grüße --Z thomas 10:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

achs so... es geht um diese cat Category:Electrical connections with houses in Germany. vielleicht hast du nen besseren namen dafür. --Z thomas 10:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, keine Ahnung... Die Kats auf commons interessieren mich auch nicht wirklich. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Nightflyer,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Twitter Logo Mini.svg Science&Wiki Facebook icon.svg Science&Wiki Linkedin icon.svg Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--00:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 7527.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 7527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Nightflyer,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1894.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Jörl, Naturschutzgebiet Düne am Rimmelsberg NIK 1894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5573.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5573.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5579.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5579.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

I think that here is a problem with the perspective. --Tournasol7 00:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Korrigiert --Nightflyer 20:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Milseburg 17:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Uploadwizzard.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Uploadwizzard.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Elements of non free content
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Herby talk thyme 12:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Das Bild kann ruhig weg. Es sollte nur zeigen, das der Uploadwizzard tatsächlich nicht funktioniert, obwohl das von den Entwicklern bestritten wird. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2530.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1980, MiNr 2530.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Schlosser67 (talk) 09:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1393.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1393.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Schlosser67 (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Schleswig-Holstein, Flensburg, Sail Flensburg - Das Maritime Bürgerfest (2016) NIK 2231.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schleswig-Holstein, Flensburg, Sail Flensburg - Das Maritime Bürgerfest (2016) NIK 2231.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.90.245.218 11:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 0384.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 0384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020[edit]

Hallo Nightflyer,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 08:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

E-Mail...[edit]

...für dich. :) Pan Tau (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Itzehoe, Malzmüllerwiesen NIK 0574.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Itzehoe, Malzmüllerwiesen NIK 0574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0662.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0668.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0675.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0677.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Sachsen, Dresden, "Nur für Arier" NIK 7147.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Dresden, "Nur für Arier" NIK 7147.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gute Qualität; ich hoffe, dass in der Zukunft nicht noch mal derartige Restriktionen für Bänke wie in den 1930ern gelten werden --PantheraLeo1359531 20:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Kannst du mir Schloss Leinstetten etwas[edit]

vergrößern und in den Artikel Schloss Leinstetten einsetzen ?--Nina Eger (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 13:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Young Shatskii ShiftN.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Young Shatskii ShiftN.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 13:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Ich seh bei mir keinen Fehler. Wenn das Original falsch oder fehlerhaft lizensiert wurde, kann ich nichts dafür. Ich hab das Original als Quelle angegeben. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020[edit]

WLM-Banner-Bg.jpg

Hallo Nightflyer,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenfelde, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Hohenfelder Moor NIK 6971.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hohenfelde, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Hohenfelder Moor NIK 6971.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Nutteln, Mitfahrbank NIK 0600.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nutteln, Mitfahrbank NIK 0600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Fieler Moor NIK 0634.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Nordhastedt, Fieler Moor NIK 0634.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0640.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Klein Nordende, Liether Kalkgrube Juni 2020 NIK 0640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Schacht-Audorf, Friedhof NIK 0766.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Schacht-Audorf, Friedhof NIK 0766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. I added at least one more category for the signs - please check --Podzemnik 06:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1773.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1670.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1678.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1734.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 20:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1784.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fockbek, Naturschutzgebiet Fockbeker Moor NIK 1784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and very good -- Spurzem 20:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 9138.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 9138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 21:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 0987.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wewelsfleth, Peters Werft und Peking NIK 0987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 21:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rigmor 2007 Bild 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rigmor 2007 Bild 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Bad Bramstedt, Katenmoor NIK 5978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Bad Bramstedt, Katenmoor NIK 5978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good -- Spurzem 18:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Bad Bramstedt, Katenmoor NIK 5972.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Bad Bramstedt, Katenmoor NIK 5972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality -- Spurzem 18:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Vaale, Vaaler Moor NIK 0445.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Vaale, Vaaler Moor NIK 0445.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 18:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Vaale, Vaaler Moor NIK 0453.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Vaale, Vaaler Moor NIK 0453.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 18:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5081.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5081.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5076.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5076.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5064.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kreis Steinburg, Lohmühlenteich NIK 5064.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Oelixdorf, Breitenburg, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Charlottenhöhe NIK 6809.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Oelixdorf, Breitenburg, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Charlottenhöhe NIK 6809.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Please add some more categories. --Tagooty 01:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Schleswig-Holstein, Neumünster, an der Margarethenschanze NIK 4998.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Neumünster, an der Margarethenschanze NIK 4998.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 20:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)