User talk:Prolineserver

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:NordiskaMuseetBot)
Jump to: navigation, search

Please add new discussions at the end./Bitte neue Diskussionsbeiträge unten anhängen.


Welcome to the Commons, Prolineserver!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 19:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


Contents

Image Tagging Image:Albert_Weisgerber_self_portrait.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert_Weisgerber_self_portrait.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Magnus_Gösta_Mittag-Leffler.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnus_Gösta_Mittag-Leffler.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lupo 16:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Magnus_Gösta_Mittag-Leffler_portrait.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnus_Gösta_Mittag-Leffler_portrait.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lupo 16:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:Willkommen in Schonach.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Willkommen in Schonach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 20:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Signature Bärbel Dieckmann.jpg[edit]

Hallo Prolineserver,

die Unterschrift haben wir als Gründen der Persönlichkeitsrechts nach einem ernsten Schreiben im OTRS löschen müssen. Raymond Disc. 18:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Scale of Image:Four pulleys.svg[edit]

Four pulleys.svg

I adjusted the scale of your drawing: Image:Four pulleys.svg. This was a comment on the English Wikipedia that some users had in the Featured Picture Candidates discussion [1]. I hope the image is still acceptable to you. -- Atropos235 17:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Pictures of Nobel prize[edit]

Nice with pictures of Horace Engdahl from when he proclaimed the winner of the Nobel prize. Did you do anything fo wikinews? //moralist (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Unfortunately no, I don't have the time to write anything for Wikinews. I just took the images of the Chemistry and Literature Press conference expecting that anybody uses them on Wikinews. However, up to now I couldn't find any article. On Monday I'm going to attend the Press Conference of the Economics Prize hoping that somebody will writes a Wikinews article on it. --Prolineserver (talk) 21:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Nobel lecture med 08 unknown 1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 12:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Prolineserver!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Fotos der Münchner Konferenz für Sicherheitspolitik[edit]

Hallo Prolineserver, ich habe deine Email an das Support-Team gelesen und beantwortet. Das ist ja ein wahrer Schatz an Bildern, der uns bereit gestellt wurde. Viele sehr gute Bilder von hochrangigen Politikern. Ist geplant diese Bilder in einer zentralen Aktion hochzuladen, oder nimmt sich da jeder das Bild, das er gerade braucht? Gruß, --Church of emacs (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe diese Frage auch gleich noch mal an ein größeres Publikum gerichtet. Gruß, --Church of emacs (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Prolineserver. You have new messages at Multichill's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Failed uploads[edit]

Hi Prolineserver, some uploads at User:Prolineserver/MSC failed:

  • One because of missing extension ( msc_2009-Saturday,_14.00_-_16.00_Uhr-Moerk_001._Griechenland )
  • 58 because of url encoding (like msc_2007-Saturday,_14.00_-_16.00_Uhr-M%C3%B6rk045_Iwanow.jpg )

Could you prepare the renaming files? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Probable copyfraud of your Montagnier image at Flickr[edit]

Hi Prolineserver,
in case you are not identical to Flickr user wjwmorrow, it seems wjwmorrow has copied your image of Prof. Montagnier to Flickr without any credit to you, thereby suggesting ownership over the image. This Flickr user had done the same with my 1995-image of Montagnier (File:LucMontagnier1995 065.jpg), that now has been taken down[2] after my formal complaint against Flickr. Aas your image was uploaded only yesterday, it seems to was his reaction to the deletion of my image from his account. Mist, gerade sehe ich, dass du deutsch sprichst; alles vergebliche Mühe ;-). Ich hatte mich schriftlich bei Yahoo-Deutschland beschwert. Falls du das auch machst, wäre es vieelicht ratsam, auf die vorherigen Beschwerde Bezug zu nehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

ich habe dir eine Mail geschrieben. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Gut dass du das hier vermerkt hast, die Mail hing nämlich unberechtigt im Spamfilter. --Túrelio (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 7cc05081b815c9d02eeb8d55618124a8[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Giovanni Jona-Lasinio-Nobel Lecture-2.jpg and File:Paul Krugman-press conference Dec 07th, 2008-8.jpg[edit]

Hello Prolineserver.

I am questioning you about your two images which I wrote in the Title here. This was brought to attention in the FA nom of Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nobel Prize/archive2. Both of these images are licensed under "Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 2.0". However, they seem also to be attempted to be licensed under GFDL-1.2. Which is the right license?

I hope you can help! --Esuzu (talk) 11:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

They are not licenced under GFDL-1.2. They are licenced under GFDL-1.2-only. The way both images are licenced is completely ok. Two licences means that you can decide which of the two licences you want to use. If you need commercial use then you have to select GFDL, for everything else you could also take CC. -- Cecil (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image promotion[edit]

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05.jpg was promoted to a valued image. --Ainali (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Great, thanks! --Prolineserver (talk) 07:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification: Category:Kostiantyn Grischtschenko[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Kostiantyn Grischtschenko has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Content removed to [[Category:Kostyantyn Hryshchenko]]; his name was misspelled.

Thanks for uploading this pic which was/is in the above mentioned categories!

Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 19:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Victoria's wedding[edit]

Hello! I've seen that you uploaded lots of photographs related to the Crown Princess of Sweden's wedding. Are there any photopgraphs of Charlene Wittstock among those? Surtsicna (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Hej, I don't think I have a picture of her, even if she is on the guestlist-at least I do not remember her face (or her fiancé). I have more pictures that I didn't upload, and I may look at them at some point, but they are qualitatively bad. Btw: Thanks for cropping the pictures, but you forgot to copy the attribution line from the CC-template and the geocoordinate as well as the exif data... --Prolineserver (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Aww, too bad, Wikimedia has no photograph of the future Princess of Monaco. I hoped one could be found among your photographs, which are a real treasure. I've used them in en.wiki's articles about the Earl and Countess of Wessex, the Crown Princes and Crown Princesses of Denmark, Norway, Serbia, Belgium and Netherlands and many Swedish politicians. Any photo, regardless of quality, could be used. Anyway, I simply followed the procedure of uploading derivative work of a file from Commons which did not mention any of those things. Each file also links back to the original file where that information can be found. Surtsicna (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Well, that these tings get lost is some bug in derivativeFX, but you probably read the red Text and compared the automatically generated new Licence and the original one. And than you had to check the checkbox that you did so. If the Attribution is not copied correctly the license is simply invalid... --Prolineserver (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry. Could you please make the corrections in one of the files (eg. File:HRH The Crown Princess of Serbia.jpg) so that I know exactly what to do in other files? Thanks. Surtsicna (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
done. I know its not you fault but a bug in the tool... Have you had a look at cropbot? --Prolineserver (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I've just seen the cropbot. I hope I'll learn how to use it :) I'll start fixing the problems with the already cropped images. Surtsicna (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

User:MSCBot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:DD_Stammtisch_090324.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DD_Stammtisch_090324.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

User:NordiskaMuseetBot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

reprinting photo[edit]

We would like to reprint the Michelson Interference photo in a commercial book ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michelson_interference_laser.jpg). We wanted to let you know and double-check that this is all right with you. Please email me if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks,

maureenbell4 at gmail ˜˜˜˜

Tack för bra jobb![edit]

GLAM barnstar.png The GLAM Logo Barnstar
Som tack för stort och bra jobb i samband med uppladdningen av bilderna från Nordiska museet får du den här stjärnan. /Haxpett (talk) 10:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Firma dankt![edit]

11-11-19-mv-wmde-01.jpg

Im Namen der Zählkommission: Danke für den Gruß, sowas baut auf! --Ralf Roleček 21:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Ich hoffe ihr hattet Spass, ich habe die letzten Tage auf der Fotomesse verbracht, desshalb konnte ich nicht kommen. --Prolineserver (talk) 08:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Nobelpreisträgerinterviews[edit]

... wow, ein sehr prima Projekt - DANKE! -- Achim Raschka (talk) 16:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Danke, hat auch sehr viel Spass gemacht! --Prolineserver (talk) 22:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Nobel-Barnstar[edit]

100px Nobel-Barnstar
Hiermit verleihe ich dir die Nobel-Barnstar für die Fotos von der diesjährigen Nobelpreisverleihung Raymond 16:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Danke! Eigentlich duerfen wir doch die Medaille hier gar nicht haben... --Prolineserver (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Dein Foto im WMF-Jahresbericht[edit]

Hi Prolineserver,

wie dir eventuell schon aufgefallen ist, haben wir im kürzlich veröffentlichten Jahresbericht 2010/2011 der Foundation eins deiner Fotos von der schwedischen Königshochzeit verwendet [3], da mir das noch als schönes Beispiel von der Signpost-Story bzw. deinem Blogposting damals erinnerlich war. Vielen Dank für deine Arbeit! Wenn du gerne ein gedrucktes Exemplar hättest, lass mir deine Postadresse per Mail zukommen. Grüße, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC) (HaeB)

Bug on Glamorous[edit]

Hello,

In glamorous, it seems there is a bug in the Detailed access statistics : it keeps telling me the pages have been viewed 0 time. Here is an example. Can you please check this ? Ash_Crow (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I fixed it, it was a change in the syntax of the response. Thanks, --Prolineserver (talk) 21:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Question about your tool Glamorous Picture[edit]

Hello

I'm trying to have stats about a category wich contain only audio files : category:Audio files from the États généraux du multilinguisme dans les outre-mer. These files are mostly use on fr:wikibooks but I know that one is used on fr:wikipedia [4] and it does not appear in Glamorous Picture. I am a little bit surprised to see 0 hit for all the files because I know that some files have been seen by several contributors. My question is : does your tool run with audio files or not ? And for video files (I have an other category with video files and in a couple of weeks I'll need some stats too.). Thank you in advance for your answer (and for your work on these tools !). --SereinWMfr (talk) 09:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, the files on the French Wikipedia are not in the main namespace, and are therefore hidden by default since most of the users are not interested in files in other namespaces than the main namespace. I removed the checkbox at some point to make it more userfriendly, however you can override it: If you click on "Copy the URL of this link to return to this view." you get a long url which contains ns0=1. If you change it to ns=0 it shows all namespaces. Wikibooks unfortunately doesn't work: the tool gets its data from http://stats.grok.se/ which provides Wikipedia and Commons data only. Therefore, it shows 0 hits for Wikibooks which i should change to N/A at some point. --Prolineserver (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Lene-Voigt-Park[edit]

Hallo, ich würde gerne das Foto des Lene-Voigt-Parks im Print für eine Leipziger Imagebroschüre benutzen. Welche genauen Namensangaben soll ich im Heft von Ihnen angeben? Herzlichen Dank und schöne Grüsse. Henrike Uthe

Hallo, die freie Lizenz fordert die korrekte Angabe des Urhebers und der Lizenz, also "Holger Motzkau, CC-BY-SA 3.0" online bzw. "Holger Motzkau, CC-BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.de)" im print. Weitere Details zur Weiternutzung von freien Inhalten finden sich hier. Über ein Referenzexemplar freue ich mich natürlich auch immer unter prolineserver@gmail.com ;) --Prolineserver (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank!

Nordiska museet[edit]

Hej. Ville bara varna för att jag varit tvungen att uppdatera {{Nordiska museet link}} som används av {{Nordiska museet image}}. Mallen tar nu två parametrar istället för en, i praktiken innebär detta enbart att punkten i {{{accession number|}}} nu ersätts av ett lodstreck. /Lokal_Profil 00:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Prolineserver,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Prolineserver,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 14:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Revision-wmse-2011.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Revision-wmse-2011.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 06:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Prolineserver,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Prolineserver,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Stamp Albert Einstein 2005.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamp Albert Einstein 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Videoconvert[edit]

Hi Prolineserver, I just tried your excellent tool "videoconvert," to convert this video which I had downloaded from YouTube as an MP4: File:Turning a Resource into an Open Educational Resource.webm I have two questions:

1. Can you comment on your choice to use this command:

  • avconf -i infile.mov -acodec libvorbis -aq 7 -ac 2 -qmax 25 -threads 1 outfile.webm

instead of:

  • ffmpeg -i infile.mov outfile.webm

? I don't know much about the advantages of one over the other -- I am pleased to know there are multiple options. One thing I noted in this case is that ffmpeg produced a smaller webm file (11 MB vs. 22 MB, each using a source .mp4 file of 19 MB). I'm not sure which webm file is better quality. This is a very open ended question: I do not know a great deal about the technology, but am curious what options exist and what the pros and cons might be.

2. Have you thought about what it might take to incorporate your tool into the upload process at Commons -- permitting a user (for instance) to upload a .mp4 file, and have it automatically converted to webm for storage on Commons? Curious to know your thinking. This is under discussion at Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video/Analysis of responses -Pete F (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


Ah, I think I may have found the answer to question #1 above: [5] (Perhaps your documentation contains a typo, "avconf" instead of "avconv" --?) -Pete F (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your feedback.
  1. I just fixed the typo in the docs, thanks. As you already saw, ffmpeg complains that it wants to be called avconv on newer systems. I tried to chose the options in a way to always get a result with a high audio&video quality, irrespective of the resolution. I tried to make the tool as easy as possible without any options for the users (and I'm going to remove some more buttons...), and there its more important to make sure that the conversion has as little loss as possible. If you have a video with a low bitrate from the beginning it might get bigger. On the other hand if you have a low bitrate and you convert it again with a low bitrate and another compression it might get really bad.
  2. I prepared it to be able to upload files directly to commons. My idea is that you upload the file to the converter, begin conversion and meanwhile can edit the image description. If its done it should get transferred to Commons automatically even if the conversion takes a while. In the future I would like to render kdenlive files in the cloud, kdenlive allows the use of online resources in the project and this would allow users to edit videos easily afterwards.
--Prolineserver (talk) 05:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
This is great. I would love to help, if I can, getting this enabled in a way that makes it very accessible to Commons contributors. (While the editing functions would be cool too, I hope the implementation of the convert-and-upload tool doesn't get delayed in the process!) Do you plan to work this into the existing Upload Wizard, or create a separate uploading process? Would you start by creating a gadget or...? -Pete F (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, right now its a minimum viable product and a stand alone version. I won't have too much time/knowledge to integrate it into Mediawiki, but it should be pretty easy to make some links appearing on relevant places using some gadgets. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
OK, thank you for clarifying that. I'd like to enter a bugzilla request, in the hopes that somebody else might move forward with integrating it into a MediaWiki gadget or similar. However -- when I visit the tool's link today, it says it is not online. Do you know what happened? -Pete F (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, It feels toollabs is not really a production environment. The webserver/proxy system was changed (again), which stopped the webservice. Otherwise, the standard PHP environment variables are filled with internal information from the proxy servers and other, non standard variable names are used to store the original information, and those also changed every two weeks, breaking the backend each time :( --Prolineserver (talk) 07:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
@Prolineserver: Thanks a lot for your good work on this! Just FYI: I received two times the message: "(1) 1397625447-9784 – (2) 1397626383-5587 – Error The uploaded file exceeds the post_max_size directive in php.ini" although the file had only 12.59 MB. --BR, Jan S. (media) 09:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
@Jan: What Browser/OS are you using? This might be a problem with older versions of the Internet Explorer not supporting chunked uploads. "Chunked file uploads are only supported by browsers with support for XHR file uploads and the Blob API, which includes Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox 4+." --Prolineserver (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Bot de-flagging notification[edit]

Hi Prolineserver, I'm writing to you because your bot Prolinebot (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


GLAMwiki toolset[edit]

Hi Prolineserver,

Congratulations on becoming a user of the GLAMwiki Toolset. You can find some frequently asked questions and helpful links for using the tool at GLAMwiki Toolset. As your first step, please add yourself to the list of users at GWToolset users and follow the good practice of creating pages explaining your new projects, as these can help create a focus for our wider community of volunteers. A standard place to set up a project page is at Batch uploading, though long term GLAM programmes may fall under GLAM. To discuss the tool with fellow users, please join the email list GLAMtools or try chatting at #wikimedia-commons webchat. SteinsplitterBot (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

New Video Template for metadata[edit]

Hi User:Prolineserver, Atlasowa mentioned you were working on an upload and conversion tool for video on Commons and might run into some of the same question as we do. The audio-visual archive where I work will soon be donating more video (we are the providers of Media from Open Beelden), but we would like to use a different template for our metadata, the information template is just too limited. Now, I already had a custom template created template:OBvideo, based on the artwork-template, but we would much rather have a standard template:video template, but that one is already in use as a template to add tags and descriptions. The reason why we would prefer to have a standard template has everything to do with the developments at Wikidata and we would like our metadata to be fully machine-readable. What are your thoughts on creating a standard video template? Would it be used by more organizations and individuals in the community? And what would be a way to move forward with this? Thank you for your feedback! 85jesse (talk) 07:22, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't think about the templates, but my spontaneous thought is compatibility: Using another template than the standard Information template might break (or at least require some modification) for example for tools. So rather than starting from a full new template I would prefer an extension of the Information template: Fill the standard information in that template, and nest another template with the additional parameters in the other_fields parameter. Than you combine compatibility with flexibility and machine readability. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I think we'll move forward with the artwork template since it covers almost everything we have in our meta-data. If a standard video-template were to be created we could still change the entire category to that template. Thank you for your thoughts! 85jesse (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shadiye Heydari sv.webm[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shadiye Heydari sv.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Videos für Wikipedia-Artikel: Workshops und Wettbewerb[edit]

Hallo Prolineserver!

Vwa logo svg

Wir haben gesehen, dass Du Dich vor einiger Zeit an einem der verschiedenen Wiki-Video-Projekte beteiligt hast, vor allem am Landtagsprojekt/Video. Daher wollen wir Dich auf „Videos für Wikipedia-Artikel“ aufmerksam machen. Wir möchten eine Diskussion darüber anstoßen, welche Bildsprache der Wikipedia angemessen ist. Dazu veranstalten wir einen Video-Wettbewerb – anlässlich des Wissenschaftsjahres 2014 zum Thema „Digitale Gesellschaft“. Für diejenigen, die Interesse haben, aber sich mit Videoproduktion noch nicht auskennen bzw. wenn sie Video-Kenntnisse haben, diese teilen möchten, gibt es Workshops. Der erste, zum Thema „Dokumentation/Interview“, findet am 30. und 31. August in Lüneburg statt. Es würde uns sehr freuen, wenn Du Lust hast mitzumachen! Viele Grüße,--NSm (VWA) (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej Prolineserver,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC).

Upload mit Videoconvert[edit]

Hallo Holger, gerade habe ich drei Videos mit Deinem genialen Tool konvertiert und hochgeladen, finde aber nicht wo sie sind. Kannst Du mir helfen? toollabs:videoconvert sagt:

  • 00006.MTS 45.91 MB ... published on Commons 37.98 MB
  • 00007.MTS 31.56 MB ... published on Commons 24.31 MB
  • 00008.MTS 17.79 MB ... published on Commons 20.54 MB

--user.js ({{it:Talkpagelinktext}}) 12:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Wenn du auf den blauen "Options"-Button zur jeweiligen Datei klickst kannst du den Dateinamen angeben und die Beschreibung anpassen. Da du die Beschreibung nicht geändert hast wurde die Datei als 00006.webm hochgeladen, und Mediawiki hat sie nicht publiziert, da der Dateiname ungültig ist. Du solltest die Datei aber in deinem upload-stash finden. Ausserdem habe ich jetzt noch einen Check in mein Tool eingebaut, sodass eine Fehlermeldung aufkommt, wenn die Datei nicht publiziert wurde. --Prolineserver (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

question about videoconvert[edit]

hi! I uploaded one 300+ Mb video to videoconverter and clicked "convert": no result appeared in 15 min, after refreshing the page "convert" button was active again. Does the conversion stop if page is refreshed or closed? Is there any progress bar? I am a bit confused that nothing happens with video or the process couldn't be just started and the result seen when the page is re-visited some time later. rubin16 (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Hej! It seems something is going wrong with the filename starting with cyrillic letters, I have to look into it. For now I renamed the file and it should work, you can set the upload file name if you click on the Options button.
Usually after you pushed the convert button the video is send to the queue and you can close the site or reload it. Here, the render task is started after queuing a while, and in your case exits with an error, therefore the blue convert button shows up after a while again. --Prolineserver (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks a lot, now it works fine :) just one more question: how do you convert it and what parameters do you use? I am a bit excited by converting of 450 MB file (mp4) to 24 MB file (webm) :) rubin16 (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, webm is pretty good:) Often rawmaterial has a much higher quality than you actually need or can see a visual difference. You can see the conversion command on the options page (after conversion), and there you can also reduce the quality if the file is too big. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Video Convert, External link option?[edit]

Might be a good idea to allow users to add external video links to convert and upload videos to commons, since its on OAuth, any "abuse" would be found and dealt with but since you have an excellent tool with a lot of promise. Not many tools can convert to .ogg or .webm and users find it hard to do it on their PC and then upload to commons and some like me cannot download 500mb files and then try to re-upload them to commons on a limited data plan..I hope you add this option in the future..--Stemoc 00:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons video convert[edit]

Hi! I' a user of this tool, and I think it's formidable, but I've found some errors in its use. For instance, I've found that some files are uploaded but not in its full lenght. For instance, this video is about 1.30 h long and in commons is only about 15 min. long. also here. In both videos, the uploaded lenght is only abou 15 min. Do you know what could have failed? (You can find the full lenght videos in Youtube, where they are properly licensed).--Coentor (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Video convert for Commons[edit]

Hi user:Prolineserver, thanks for developing this tool! It is amazing. I have used it before, but now I have trouble getting my converted video back to upload to Commons. I wanted to upload directly, but it shows me an error after completing the options («bad token»). I have checked with other files I uploaded with similar authorship details, and nothing seems to be out of place. I don't know what this means. And I can't download it. When I try yo do this, it takes me to a page where the video is embedded. Can you please help me? You can get back to me on my talk page if you want! Thanks, MCruz (WMF) (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know why it stopped working, my guess is this change and this report. I tried to make the changes in the tool according to this new documentation, but it didn't seem to help and the rest of the documentation for editing and uploading is not yet updated. Since I have no time now for any try-an-error I will wait until the documentation is updated. --Prolineserver (talk) 19:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the response! MCruz (WMF) (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I also think this is a great tool, though I had a problem with it so I thought I would let you know about it. I successfully uploaded and converted a video, but when I tried to upload it to the Commons the upload failed because I had forgotten to give the video a descriptive name. However, even after changing the name of the video under "Options" and refreshing the page, the "upload to Commons" button did not reappear. I had to delete the file and start all over again.

Also, would it be possible to modify the tool so that it automatically refreshes itself from time to time, rather than requiring users to manually refresh the page? Thanks! — Cheers, JackLee talk 11:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm, even after deleting and reuploading the video, I got the same error message: "An error occured: An error occured: unknownerror: Unknown error: 'titleblacklist-custom-filename'". It seems that deleting and reuploading the file did not purge the original information about the file from memory, because I noticed that what I typed previously for the original file reappeared under "Options". — Cheers, JackLee talk 11:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

You get the error since your filename is blacklisted on Commons (files like VID_000123.webm), and you need to specify another one in the options before uploading.--Prolineserver (talk) 08:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
I forgot to give the file a more descriptive name the first time around, but when I changed it the webpage wouldn't accept it. Even deleting and reuploading the file didn't work. How do I "reset" the system? — Cheers, JackLee talk 11:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
What page didn't accept it? The options page of videoconvert? What filename did you try to use, and what error message did you get? I was changing a big fraction of the code to delete files the last days, did you try to delete it now? --Prolineserver (talk) 11:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Actually, I haven't tried it since October 2014 because I encountered this problem. I switched to Firefogg which seems to work well too. I'll try it again when I have a video file and see if I still have issues with it. Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee talk 13:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Questions/issues about Video Converter[edit]

Hello, I'm trying to use Video Converter, but it looks like I haven't been able to upload a file successfully so far. After converted the file, I clicked on Commons-Upload, the tool indicated uploading and nothing seems to happen. If I refresh the tool indicates ? check options and the Commons-Upload button has disappeared, but I can't find the file on Commons, so I assume the upload has failed.

By the way, it seems like I've been logged out after a while (even if I am still logged in on WP and Commons), because if I try to click on Options I'm redirected to OAuth.

So far I tried two uploads and both failed with 2 differents errors: first one is «badtoken: Invalid token», and the second is «stashfailed: An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-swift-eqiad".» I have no idea what that could possibly mean...! Thanks, Gyrostat (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

I just uploaded a file successfuly with Video Converter, but it is only 1,3 second long. I think it's because the uploading on Video Converter failed in the first place. Gyrostat (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

infinite conversion[edit]

Hi! I uploaded a number of files yesterday and pressed "convert" button - some of them were converted yesterday but half of them got stuck in "converting" status - now it's been converting for more than 24h already... rubin16 (talk) 07:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hej! I don't know what went wrong but it seems the files were not properly submitted to the conversion queue. I added some more debug logging and submitted the files again, it should be done soon. Let me know if this happens again. --Prolineserver (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Question about converted video thumbnail[edit]

Awesome tool.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Barge-test.webm . The thumbnail or opening frame is not exactly what I would have chosen. Is there a method to set a default frame?

Thanks

When you add the video to the article you can specify the frame using the thumbtime parameter: w:Wikipedia:Creation_and_usage_of_media_files#Video_usage. --Prolineserver (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Video Converter issues: stuck at "starting conversion", and user options dialog is broken[edit]

Hallo Prolineserver,

thanks for this very useful tool! (Btw, I assume you have seen this thread?)

When trying to use it yesterday, I encountered the following two problems:

  • After uploading a video and clicking "convert", it has been stuck at "starting conversion" for about 12 hours now.
  • Some things seems to be wrong with the "User options" dialog (can provide more detail in case no errrors are immediately reproducible, but among other things clicking the "Save" button results in a 404 error).

Grüße, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Hallo,

No, I've not seen this discussion as I don't follow the list.
  • There seems to be a configuration change that broke the tool, I can't fix it right now. So have to wait for https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68882
  • This was related to another configuration change in PHP, suddenly <? didn't work anymore and code needed to be masked with <?php. This issue is fixed.
Well, I start getting tired needing to continously debug the tool after changes to the servers :( --Prolineserver (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick fix! It is working nicely again. Grüße, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 07:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Access to Videoconvert[edit]

Hi, just to let you know that I'm unable to connect to Videoconvert for several days now. I can access tools.wmflabs.org/videoconvert/, I can click 'login' and access to OAuth, but when I click 'Allow', I'm redirected to Internal error on Wikimedia Tool Labs. Do you know when Videoconvert will be available ? Gyrostat (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

I had the same problem yesterday, unfortunately. --Atlasowa (talk) 10:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Yup, me too. — Cheers, JackLee talk 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I restarted the webservice, it should work now. --Prolineserver (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I just encountered the same error (it says "The URI you have requested, /videoconvert/OAuth.php?oauth_verifier=(...)&oauth_token=(...) appears to be non-functional at this time."). Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why it just broke, probably some change on toollabs again :/ I have to debug it when I have some time. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Problem solved, it had to do with the change to https. Though the Oauth login request to Commons was already encrypted, a server name in the API reply used to identify the source only contained http. That server name in the reply changed to "https", and a hardcoded check verifying the source failed. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Gyrostat (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2015 (UTC)