User talk:Norro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
archive 2005 archive 2006 archive 2007

Shakedown_2008_Figure_1.jpg on FPC[edit]

Hi, Just a friendly mention that I've uploaded a better version (Alternate 2) with some correction of the file. You'll maybe consider support it instead of the original here. Have a good day. --Acarpentier 03:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission[edit]

Hi!

Can I get your permission to use an edited version of the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Epipolar_geometry.svg in my master thesis?

I'll include a reference and a thanks in the report!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.239.40.125 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 15. Jan. 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you have my permission. If you get an account here on commons, you can write me an email to get an official permission per mail. norro 20:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello now i have an account! Gasol (talk) 08:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Now you can send me an email (here) and I will send an official permission in return. Regards, norro 15:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Buenos Aires - Argentina. Can I get your permission to use an edited version of the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Remote_Center_of_Compliance.svg in my master thesis? I'll include a reference and a thanks in the report! thanks

Yes, please use it. Cheers, norro

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Spit Bruny Island.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Spit Bruny Island.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--D-Kuru (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:NYC_Panorama_edit.jpg[edit]

I have uploaded a restitched version of Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:NYC_Panorama_edit.jpg with more width and quality, please take a look and vote if you like. --LiveChocolate (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

danke[edit]

für dies hierfür. Hab es gerade erst entdeckt und eingebunden. Jedenfalls danke vom Hauptautor. --91.37.183.239 09:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen :) Gruß, norro 10:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Translation possible removed[edit]

Sorry, I removed it by mistake, I only meant to move the file to Category:Crystal radios. I have restored it already. Sv1xv (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. --norro 06:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP bot[edit]

Hi, in April 2008 I saw you mentioned that you were thinking about a bot for FPC closure. Did it get any further with that ? I have been thinking if I should start looking into it. /Daniel78 (talk) 10:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retina[edit]

Hi Torro, I saw that you have File:Fig retine.png on your todo list. Apart from conversion to SV graphics I see a need to clarify the direction of light travel, e.g. by indicating curvature of the eye ball as in File:Fig retine bended.png. Obviously non-expert readers get easily confused because traversion of the nerve layer seems quite absurd at the first glance, see also the discussion at de:WP:Redaktion Medizin#Netzhaut - Einfallsrichtung des Lichts.

Unfortunately graphics design is really not my field of expertise, so I can't do it myself. Therefore I am trying to find someone willing to take this task, see also de:WP:Grafikwerkstatt#Netzhaut. What do you think? Maybe File:Retina.jpg could also serve as a starting point for conversion. Regards, --Burkhard (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Norro!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norro style icons[edit]

Hello. I create few month ago Category:Flat round icons by Norro, and Category:Round icons by Norro to merge all icons look like that same. I create a lot of categories by "theme", because i like to see all icon look like the same together, it is usefull to select/compete a theme. And now i often use the author name into the category name, because identifying a "style" with only words can create a very big category name (i dont know... "bordered round icons with shader at the right", it became ridiculous).

But i have got problem Commons:Deletion requests/Norro categories, then do you have an idea for the category name? Or a name for your styles?

Maybe the problem is not the author name but the "by", because a lot of people create icons using your style, and with the "by Norro" we can understand you create the file. Then, maybe "Norro round icons", and "Norro flat round icons" can be better. Here, "Norro" is used as a common noun, and not as a proper noun.

As you see, someone rename one of this categories, and we have another discussion at Category talk:Round voting icons.

Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

malo (talk) 01:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SSW Wahldiagramm[edit]

Hallo Norro. Da du schon die Landtagswahlergebnisse des Südschleswigschen Wählerverbandes in eine so ansprechended Form gebracht hast (File:SSW Landtagswahlergebnisse.svg), wollte ich dich bitten, dir auch mal diesen Pixelsalat vorzunehmen. Und eventuell könntest du auch die Landtagsreihe mit den Ergebnissen von 2009 aktualisieren? Das wäre sehr nett. De728631 (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Current source schematic symbols[edit]

I'm wondering if you know about the usage of the last two symbols in your figure "International_graphic_symbols_of_current_source.png‎".

Internationally, physicists like to use the last two. I know the last one is an american/international standard. The second to last one is also used, and is often preferred by physicists because it doesn't look like a voltage source (which is a single circle), and instead looks like two linked circles. You have this title "nicht DIN" or "not DIN" for that one but it seems like it also must be a standard symbol for usage somewhere. Do you know where? Do you know how the usage of 2 circles started? Also, sometimes I've seen 2 opaque overlapping circles for a current source. Any information that you have on this would be appreciated.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Betonpumpe.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Betonpumpe.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Unimate.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Unimate.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Unimate.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request to extend permissions[edit]

Hi,

Im currently writing a thesis for my master in medical imaging. I would've liked to use your picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Epipolar_geometry.svg to illustrate epipolar constraints in stereovision, but you published it under CC-BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), and my thesis is writen under CC-BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which prevents me from using your image because of the "Share alike" clause.

However, I believe the intent behind those two licences are essentially the same, and I therefore ask you your permission to use this illustration in my thesis under the CC-BY-NC-ND licence. Would you agree to let me do so?

File:Buttons_5a.jpg[edit]

File:Buttons_5a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mathonius (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bändchenmikrofon.svg[edit]

Text should read "gefaltetes" instead of "gefaltenes". Joachim Schnitter 11:45, 13 May 2012 (CEST)

File:C-Rohrweiche.jpg[edit]

File:C-Rohrweiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--MGuf (d) 10:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rotorpumpe.jpg[edit]

File:Rotorpumpe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--MGuf (d) 10:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blossfeldt 71a.jpg[edit]

File:Blossfeldt 71a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blossfeldt 148a.jpg[edit]

File:Blossfeldt 148a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 21:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blossfeldt 94a.jpg[edit]

File:Blossfeldt 94a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 21:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blossfeldt 96a.jpg[edit]

File:Blossfeldt 96a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 21:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Konzerthaus-photo[edit]

Hallo, Ich bin per zufall auf die Seite vom Konzerthaus-Berlin gestolpert, wo ja Ihr photo vom Facade erscheint... Ich würde sehr gerne ein 'gscheites Foto vom grossenn Saal dazu haben. Aber extra hierfür noch ein Foto einzusetzen fände ich blöd; Daher habe ich Ihr Foto, mit ein Saal-Foto zusammengelegt: http://s2.postimg.org/v23ctinuh/Konzerth_Berlin2.jpg Am besten Sie entscheiden, ob Sie es auch so benutzen wollen. (Im übrigen war Ihr photo gewiss mit eine schöne grösse, aber eigentlich viel zu gross für Wiki-infos, finde ich...). 

Danke

A kitten for you![edit]

Just thank you.

RomanLier (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeughaus 2a.jpg[edit]

File:Zeughaus 2a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gnom (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BMW Isetta[edit]

Hallo Norro, ich sehe jetzt erst zufällig Dein Detailfoto einer BMW Isetta, bei dessen Beschreibung Du Dich hast täuschen lassen. Das Bild zeigt nämlich nicht den rechten, sondern den linken Scheinwerfer. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder Epipolargeometrie[edit]

Hallo Norro, Ich schreibe gerade eine Masterarbeit über Selbstkalibrierung und bin daher interessiert an Darstellungen der Epipolargeometrie (wie diese https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epipolargeometrie#/media/File:Epipolargeometrie3.svg). Wie haben Sie das Bild erstellt? Haben Sie Quellcodes zu diesem Bild? Können Sie mir Tips geben, wie ich ähnliche Bilder erstellen kann? Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Ar3np (talk) 10:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/How-to[edit]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/How-to has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Majora (talk) 22:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Switch Element für Windenergieanlagen[edit]

Ihre SVG von einer Windenergieanlage gibt es für jede Sprache in einer separaten Version. Gibt es einen Grund dafür, dass Sie das Switch Element, welches eine Sprache abhängig vom Benutzer machen würde, nicht verwendet haben? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Meise (talk • contribs) 00:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, dahinter steckt keine Absicht. Dieses Switch kannte/kenne ich einfach nicht. Gruß, norro 19:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Datei:Epipolargeometrie2.svg[edit]

Hi Norro, ich möchte die Datei (s. Abb.) verwenden und bin gerade dabei einen Abschnitt aus dem Artikel Epipolargeometrie auf meiner Benutzerseite zu überarbeiten. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass das Bild nicht korrekt dargestellt wird. Die Beschriftungen stehen senkrecht, wenn die verschiedenen Auflösungen anklickt. Nur die Originaldatei scheint korrekt dargestellt zu werden. Wäre schön, wenn du das reparieren könntest! Danke, und Gruß! OlafTheScientist (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Norro, ich hab das Problem mittlerweile selbst gelöst. Ich habe Inkscape benutzt, um die senkrechten Texte waagerecht zu stellen. Die korrigierte Version habe ich dann als neue Version hochgeladen. Gruß, Olaf! OlafTheScientist (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:StraßenbahngleisplanKolkataOktober2004.jpg[edit]

Hello. If possible please update this map. reference. ArnabSaha (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Я считаю стюардов на Мета-Вики должно быть на данный момент не больше 89 875 517 873 681 764 человек

Блинов Рюрик Петрович (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know more about licensing your Arecibo Message[edit]

I put this message in the wrong place a day or so ago.

As concerns the image at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Arecibo_message.svg , it's not clear to me what is in the public domain and what is YOUR intellectual property/original work. My GUESS is going to be that the 0s and 1s that can be made into black and white squares is in the public domain, and that maybe the black and white squares are in the public domain too, with a further GUESS being that the way some of the white squares have been changed to COLORED squares is all according to YOUR original ideas and done by YOUR original alteration of a previously black-and-white image. Is that true? If it is (i.e., if the color-scheme is YOUR work, not taken from NASA or other public-domain source) then does the license say that other people can use it ONLY if they give credit? That image, as it is colored-in at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Arecibo_message.svg HAS been used without giving you any credit (but maybe that's ok, maybe not). It's in the YouTube video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm1tBF4h8nQ but I don't see a Source listed for it within the video or in the text on the video's page. In fact, the uploader even says "I'll make it colorful" at 3:06 and, at 3:35, "By the way, when I replaced the black and white image with the colored image, I made the black pixels the zeroes". (Formerly the zeroes had been white pixels.) Well, she's talking as if SHE's the one who did the coloring. Obviously, she did not. If you did, perhaps your copyright is being infringed (unless she gives credit to you and I just can't find it). There are many suppositions in this post that I'd have to know to be correct before I can say "I am fairly sure that Norro's copyright is being infringed", so I just don't know. But YOU know, and you know whether or not you made arrangements with the uploader allowing her to say that "she" colored the pixels a certain way. Just to check certain things in the video I came to the Wikipedia article on the Arecibo Message, and imagine my surprise to find that SAME COLORS for the 0s and 1s in the Wikipedia article. At the very least if this coloring is a standard reference in the public domain the uploader should not be claiming that SHE colored it. So, I just thought I'd be sure you are not unaware of this video. If the URL I pasted above does not work for you, search YouTube for the Channel "Up and Atom"'s video titled "Can You Decode This Alien Message?" uploaded less than a week before this post (Oct 16, 2023, 2:34 New York Time). Maybe everything is fine. Maybe you're being abused. Maybe it's something in-between.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 06:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Jasper McJasper[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Norro&oldid=812270112"