User talk:O/2011/February

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:Al-Bakhit.jpg

O, could you handle this quickly please? It's currently on the Indonesian Wikipedia's homepage.--Chaser (talk) 03:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

very, very much! --Brackenheim (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

No problem! You deserve it! --O (висчвын) 22:45, 03 February 2011 (GMT)

Do not undo old closures

Du not undo old closures of deletion requests. It is disruptive. Make a new DR if you must. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

As an admin, I am entitled to re-open in this case, where those DRs were closed by a non-admin improperly. Non-admins do not close DRs unless it is absolutely uncontroversial (i.e. another admin speedied, DR withdrawn). These DRs had the non-admin acting in a judging manner (with some even closure reasons that should have been part of the discussion), which would be considered controversial here. My re-openings were based on that and that only; the discussions in the DRs did not play a role anywhere. I am reverting any DRs you re-closed—improperly. --O (висчвын) 23:44, 04 February 2011 (GMT)
The DRs had been open for ages. None of the 200 Commons admins had had time to close them. That was more than half a year ago. Such reversions are highly improper. Why cannot you just make a new DR like anybody else? If you persist, I will take this to an admin board. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
It does not matter how long they were open. If I had opened new DRs, it would signify that (1) the closures were proper, and (2) the reasons for nomination came straight out of the discussions (result not included), neither of which is the case here.
Looking at the user's edits further shows how the closures were controversial—talk page messages to the nominator(s) with content that should have been part of the deletion discussions.
And in terms of persisting, there is no need to edit/wheel war anymore, since I was already going to open a discussion on the admin noticeboard if we could not resolve this here. --O (висчвын) 00:05, 05 February 2011 (GMT)
Bam. --O (висчвын) 00:18, 05 February 2011 (GMT)