User talk:OSX II

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, OSX II!

-- 05:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Picture improvement Mazda 121[edit]

Mazda 121 Utrecht 1989.jpg

Many thanks for improving the picture I uploaded a few years back. It looks much more natural than it did, and a much sunnier day than one usually gets in Utrecht. I'm not sure how far I am meant to feel permitted to retain some sort of pride ownership for "my" pictures having uploaded them to wikipedia, but I'm afraid I do. And it's pleasing on several levels when someone takes the times to improve a picture for which I still feel some responsibility! Regards Charles01 (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the message Charles. OSX II (talk) 00:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Mic's photographs[edit]

Hello OSX! Passed by to let you know I've created a category here for photograps by Mic from Flickr, since I've noticed most if not all of them were uploaded by you. Cheers –Cloverleaf II (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! I will try to remember to create such categories in the future. Regards, OSX (talkcontributions) 16:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Categorisation[edit]

Hello. The categorisation of your recent uploads does not follow the categorisation guidelines. Please ensure the images are placed in the most appropriate categories. Regards. Alan Liefting (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

My apologies, for one of my recent batches I forgot to deselect the automatic categorisation feature. Most should be fixed now. OSX (talkcontributions) 03:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
This one had 14 inappropriate categories. Alan Liefting (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

bb Polo[edit]

Dear OSX II

You requested the speedy deletion of the following files:

  • File:Tuned VW Polo II by bb 4.jpg
  • File:Tuned VW Polo II by bb 3.jpg
  • File:Tuned VW Polo II by bb.jpg
  • File:Tuned VW Polo II by bb 5.jpg
  • File:Tuned VW Polo II by bb 2.jpg
  • File:Tuned VW Polo by bb.jpg

However, these files have been copied from a genuinely creative commons licenced Hungarian blog. In the right column, in the 14th box from the top it shows the CC BY 2.5 HU licence under the header "Licenc". Could you please check this and get the photographs re-installed? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

@NearEMPTiness. The images had metadata from eBay embedded into the files. This means that they were originally taken from an eBay listing despite the Creative Commons licensing. Unless evidence can be provided of otherwise, the metadata suggests that the uploader did not have the authority to license the files as CC-BY-2.5. Regards, OSX (talkcontributions) 05:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. It would have been useful to mention this at an earlier stage. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I mentioned it during the nomination process. My rationale when nominating them was something along the lines of: "Images taken from eBay as per metadata". OSX (talkcontributions) 06:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your photo uploads to Commons.

If possible, thank you to categorize your photos. Yesterday and today, I correctly categorized many of your photos. For example, the "Motorcycles" category should be empty, there was yesterday about sixty photos.

I noticed big errors on categorization: example, example, example.

If you have a question about categorization, you can contact me. Good luck. --Cjp24 (talk) 11:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Same demand as Cjp24, and I was about to create a new subject about this before reading his message...
Please, OSX II, try to check a little the categories of the pictures you import from Flickr: I just made some cleaning for pictures of Ford Transit you imported a few days ago (only 8, for this time, a kind of holidays given your usual imports): I understand that some are hard to differentiate, but a file named "1966 Ford Transit (16422831173).jpg" must be easy to categorize when you only have the choice between the 1965+ and the 1978+ models for the old vans...
Like apparently some other people, I spent often time to recategorize dozens of your imports. Using a bot is easy, and I understand that you use one, but maybe you should include some more "human part" in your work? If you decide to do so, I think that several of us will thank you for it.
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Edit: this must be a joke, but I really don't know when to laugh about it: you and your bot added 72 files to the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter category, with 55 of them having a year in the name. Please again, try to read and interact a bit with your bot...
For the record, as the sub-categories of the Sprinter are already overloaded, adding more pictures of that van may not be that useful?
BarnCas (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violation File:Sign for 1930 Bentley Speed Six Nutting Coupe.jpg[edit]

Hi OS X, what's your logic there?. Eddaido (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Photographs of pictures/documents cannot be uploaded freely. As the image is primarily focused on a copyrighted work, a free license is invalid. The picture contains a reasonable amount of prose, an image and a logo that are unlikely to be licensed under a Creative Commons licence. Regards, OSX (talkcontributions) 04:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Good heavens, so I see. I have to admit I don't mind their loss enough to check with Pebble Beach. Have a nice new week. Eddaido (talk) 08:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Fiat 125T[edit]

1972 Fiat 125T (7156851486).jpg

A couple of years ago, you asked a question in the description of your photo, which today I used to illustrate de:Fiat 125#Sondermodelle. Judging from the picture here, my guess would be a conditional "yes". ATB, Kängurutatze (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I never asked the question, NZ Car Freak from Flickr did. I just uploaded his photo here. But thanks for clarifying anyway. Regards, OSX (talkcontributions) 23:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Categorizing of automobile images[edit]

Hello, it's me once more. As you also are a member of WikiProject Automobiles and I'm new to the project, I'd like to know your opinion on the modalities of categorization in principal. For example the following files, which were categorized by you, caught my eye:

You categorized "1969 Austin Mini Mk II Countryman (22018127522).jpg" as "Austin Mini" - but why didn't you put it in the far more precise and accurate category "Austin Mini Countryman (Mark II)"?

You categorized "File:1912 Simplex Quinby Toy Tonneau (21612839750).jpg" as "Simplex vehicles" (a category that I had created together with the subordinate "Simplex automobiles") - but why didn't you put it in the more precise category "Simplex automobiles"? Vehicle is the superordinate term which also comprises truck, motorcycles, buses, bicycles and so on...

Kind regards, --Purzelbier (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

When I upload thousands of files from Flickr in one go I categorise quickly. It is impractical for me to place each file into the specific category each time. Where it is obvious to me I do so, but do not always get to do this. For vehicles I am most familiar with, I tend to do better. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Well, I understand the limitations of categorizing such a vast amount of images. I really appreciate your work of uploading so many valuable files from Flickr. When it comes to me, my aim is to categorize every historic automobile as precise as possible and useful. For example when a user is interested the "Škoda MB1000", he probably won't look at files in the superordinate "Škoda automobiles" or even in the most generic "Škoda vehicles", when he finds a category "Škoda MB1000". So I'll feel free to further categorize files uploaded by you. Kind regards, --Purzelbier (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! Yes, please feel free to replace categories as you see fit. OSX II (talk) 07:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Category[edit]

You thing the car is not noteworthy?--Juandev (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Juandev, as per COM:CAT, we should endeavour to stick to the "main subject" and "noteworthy features of the image" when categorising photos. The cars found incidentally in pictures of streets or buildings are not noteworthy.
File:Slatina (okres Litoměřice), dům s velkou střechou.JPG illustrates its intended subject very well. However, I do not believe it to be very useful at illustrating Renault Mégane I Phase I automobiles which the image is also categorised in because it contains a glimpse of the said vehicle. By the same token, one could also add categories for the tree, the sky, street lamp, the grass, the house number "9", et cetera. These also make up a small/minority part of the image. However, none of these items contained within the image would be particularly useful for someone searching for a photo of a street lamp or a tree.
Considering that most images of locations in built-up areas taken near a road will contain vehicles as incidental subject matters, the systematic categorisation of these vehicles cause massive over-categorisation problems.
If it bothers you to have these cars as "unidentified" so to speak (because there is not a category to specify exactly what they are), then Commons is better served by using annotations on the image itself or by placing a note in the description. Clogging up categories with junk seems quite counterproductive. OSX II (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Merc cats[edit]

Hi OSX, Please could you stop removing the Merc cats ?, The main subject in some of those images is the Mercs,
I appreciate not all images are actual closeups of the vehicles however they're close enough to be of relevance and close enough to be identified so IMHO are worthy of being categorized,
Cheers & Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 19:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Davey2010, I most certainly disagree. May I please ask that you read my response to a very similar question here? Thanks, OSX (talkcontributions) 00:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi OSX, After taking a break (and reading the above link) I've now realized they're not that close up and perhaps shouldn't be categorized so I've removed the cats & added the annotation thingys .... I to a point think they should be categorized however as we've both said somethings are just over categorized and it's ridiculous, Anyway sorry for reverting & Thanks for replying!, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 03:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion nominations[edit]

Hi, you removed my decision is some DR's and apparently you did that on purpose. Don't do that again! And please stop with your unnecessary nominations. Jcb (talk) 14:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Automobiles with license plates[edit]

Hi, OSX II, I know you are blocked but nevertheless, when the block expires, this image clearly shows the license plate. Please upload another version with the license plate blurred. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category[edit]

What part of "PLEASE DON'T CATEGORIZE THIS IMAGE AS SOME WILL BE DELETED - I'D RATHER YOU DIDN'T WASTE YOUR TIME CATEGORIZING SOMETHING THAT COULD END UP DELETED, THANKS" do you not understand?, I also don't appreciate you moving the files especially when you so kindly don't leave me any message inregards to the changes, Needless to say pull this stunt again and I will have you blocked per en:Disruptive editing, Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 10:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Davey2010. Um, why do you have to be so rude? I was actually uploading some of jeremyg3030's photos today, and some files got stuck because they were already uploaded by you (but not sorted yet). You had left these files untouched in some cases for many months. You don't have a monopoly on these files. Other users are allowed to correctly sort files worth keeping if you just leave them there. Anyone is allowed to improve the content at Commons.
The reason I renamed the files is because they were incorrectly listed as "CX2500" when the correct model name as per the badging is "CX 25". OSX (talkcontributions) 11:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Because I'm sick to death of people removing the category, I appreciate people wanna help & stuff but picture this - You spend 20-40 minutes on each file categorizing them .... I come along 2-3 days later and have the image deleted, That's over 40 minutes of your life just wasted on images that have been deleted .... To put it bluntly you're going to think "Why the hell did I just bother?" .... So to prevent that scenario as well as preventing people wasting their life I've created this category,
It frustrates me when the entire cat is in caps and it's at an extremely low level of basic English and yet people still remove it, Some of the images I've uploaded (take this as an example) are images that serve no purpose here and a few will be deleted,
I apologize for the rude warning which I've now struck it's certainly not my intention to be rude but when editors just remove it etc etc you can understand why I get annoyed especially when it's now been 4-5 people,
Anyway I genuinely do appreciate you categorizing them and moving them around it means alot but don't worry I'll sort them all out eventually :),
Thanks for your contributions here and again I apologize for the above message, Anyway happy editing/categorizing/uploading :), –Davey2010Talk 12:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Davey2010. Thanks for the response. I understand what you are trying to do. However, it is important to note that a Flickr file can realistically only be uploaded here once (otherwise we end up with duplicates). If someone wants to use a file that you have put aside to "sort later" and you state people cannot touch these files, you are effectively prohibiting other editors from using those files. This is not a workable means of operating cooperatively.
The reason I feel it is important you understand this is because you keep undoing my edits (e.g. this). I have clearly spent the time fixing this one up because I deemed the image worthy of retention. I only fixed up a small handful of images that I saw that grabbed my attention. I fail to see how reverting this work is actually constructive. Thanks, OSX (talkcontributions) 12:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi OSX, I totally understand and agree with that, At the moment I'm using a TV screen as a laptop screen as the laptop screen's packed up ... and basically the colours are different so at the moment I don't want to sort the images out and then find out on the laptop screen they're not great at all,
It's not constructive at all but in all fairness neither is me allowing someone to categorize something that I could delete (A few you sorted I actually planned to delete however I probably won't if you believe there's some value in them being kept), I don't mean to sound like a dick but why not have categorized them and left the other cats as they were or failing that asked me first?, (I'm not trying to blame you far from it)
Also I'm the only one that has tons of albums at the moment which need sorting and IMHO I think it's only fair I sort them - I'm not someone who uploads images, dumps them in a category and says "right fuck it you lot can deal with it" if you see what I mean, I prefer to sort, csd/cat myself as that way I'm not taking up someone elses time,
Anyway I'll readd your edits back but with the cats as that way I know what's what,
Thank you for replying as well for remaining calm and civil throughout - If only everyone (me inc) was like you :),
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

العربية | Azərbaycanca | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | jbobau | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 08:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Basvb (talk) 08:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Tesla S P85 (14061719044).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tesla S P85 (14061719044).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:1998 Fiat Coupe 20V police car - Top Gear (5963110349).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1998 Fiat Coupe 20V police car - Top Gear (5963110349).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 18:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:1962 Triumph Herald 1200 amphibious car - Top Gear (5963830910).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1962 Triumph Herald 1200 amphibious car - Top Gear (5963830910).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:1981 Volkswagen Transporter T3 "Dampervan" amphibious car - Top Gear (5963836900).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1981 Volkswagen Transporter T3 "Dampervan" amphibious car - Top Gear (5963836900).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:1992 Fiat Panda 1000 CLX stretched limousine - Top Gear (5963682544).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1992 Fiat Panda 1000 CLX stretched limousine - Top Gear (5963682544).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:1994 Lexus LS400 police car - Top Gear (5963727156).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1994 Lexus LS400 police car - Top Gear (5963727156).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:1996 Nissan D21 4WD "Nissank" amphibious car - Top Gear (5963231625).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1996 Nissan D21 4WD "Nissank" amphibious car - Top Gear (5963231625).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DeFacto (talk). 21:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

File:GAZ M-20 Pobeda (26312670005).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:GAZ M-20 Pobeda (26312670005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Iveco Eurocargo (6974652840).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Iveco Eurocargo (6974652840).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Davey2010Talk 15:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Wife, dog and the Little mermaid (15491870837).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wife, dog and the Little mermaid (15491870837).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

File:1941 Ford V8 Coupe (8782115393).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1941 Ford V8 Coupe (8782115393).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

File:MDS Girl (14019546023).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:MDS Girl (14019546023).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

141.196.195.218 21:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:National Australia Bank - Yass NSW (5623698548).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:National Australia Bank - Yass NSW (5623698548).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stopselliese (talk) 01:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Chevrolet Camaro Z28 (10065927676).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Chevrolet Camaro Z28 (10065927676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

71.30.28.10 13:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Toyota Tundra "TRD Rock Warrior" (11840639606).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Toyota Tundra "TRD Rock Warrior" (11840639606).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

216.140.155.151 14:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:MDS Girl (14019546013).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:MDS Girl (14019546013).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

E4024 (talk) 12:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:It's ALIVE!!! (4961925169).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:It's ALIVE!!! (4961925169).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mindmatrix 19:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

File:From Mexico-Desde México (4173896817).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:From Mexico-Desde México (4173896817).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)