Jump to content

User talk:Obayd

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Howardcorn33 in topic Notification about possible deletion
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Obayd!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ລາວ | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Abdul Basit Abdel Samad

[edit]

All sound files found in Category:Qur'an recitation will be tagged with deletion notice, as there is no proof that they are really PD. Please provide more info on them, before I tag the sound files.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quran files

[edit]

Basically, I was asked to look at them (on IRC) and we agreed that the rationale wasn't enough to result in an acceptable licence, and given that the Internet archive has little quality control with regards to rationales, it was agreed they were best deleted.

I wouldn't have done it if I thought there any chance of getting a valid free-use rationale, but I checked the site the Internet Archive got them from, and no chance, at least in the short term.

I don't like doing this: Arabic and Muslim music are both underrepresented. But what could be done? Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

JazakAllahu Khairan Katheeran feeDuniya walAakhirah

[edit]

Assalamualaykum, Just noticed that you've uploaded a number of PDF files containing Arabic text from individual Surahs of the glorious Qur'an. MashaAllah, that is very good work! May Allah SWT reward you aplenty (ameen). Wassalaam. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Elazeez) Contributions/59.160.74.254 10:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Category:Surahs

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Surahs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


160.161.206.63 22:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Howardcorn33 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply