User talk:OlafJanssen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Atlas Schoemaker-ZEELAND-1012R-Zeeland, Aldegonde.jpeg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Atlas Schoemaker-ZEELAND-1012R-Zeeland, Aldegonde.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

kaarten[edit]

Leuk om je te ontmoeten vanmiddag. De kaarten heb ik gevonden, eens kijken of ik ze ergens kan gebruiken. Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help decide the future of Wikimania[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bedankt voor de boekbanden! / Thanks for all the bookbindings![edit]

Dear Olaf,

Thanks and congratulations for your recent upload of many beautiful bookbindings! Best regards, Hansmuller (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Towards a New Wikimania results[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear OlafJanssen,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

empty GWToolset files[edit]

Hi, since now over a year there are some GW Toolset files listed in Commons:Database reports/Blank single-author pages, which are:

Can you check them and if not anymore needed delete them please. Thx. --JuTa 14:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you tell me how to delete them, I'll be happy to do so. As far as I know I don't have such permissions --OlafJanssen (talk) 14:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I deleted them now. I had to declare temp. myself as a GWToolset-User because otherwise I didn't got any delete links. regards. --JuTa 16:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interview als bron (vraag Commons)[edit]

Of je een eigen interview als primaire bron kan gebruiken. Probleem is de verifieerbaarheid. Volgens mij is het geen probleem als de interview andere bronnen aanvult. Het hangt ervan af wat je wil onderbouwen. Is de te onderbouwen stelling controversieel of heeft de geïnterviewde er persoonlijk belang bij (voorbeeld: hij wil bijvoorbeeld bewijzen dat hij een rol speelde in het verzet terwijl anderen hem van collaboratie verdenken) De geïnterviewde is overleden maar misschien zijn er nog mensen die hem kenden en hierdoor zijn uitspraken naar waarde kunnen inschatten. En welke reputatie heeft deze persoon? (morele getuigen bij de rechtbank) Volgens mij kan je ook een stelling onderbouwen door vele kleine en zich zwakke bronnen te gebruiken, die onafhankelijk van elkaar een stelling ondersteunen. Historisch onderzoek met primaire bronnen is altijd een zekere mate van eigen onderzoek. Het gaat erom of de stelling niet voor interpretatie vatbaar. Als iemand anders een andere conclusie kan trekken met dezelfde bronnen dan trek je een stelling die onderbouwt wordt door secondaire bron. Maar is de conclusie vanzelfsprekend en onbetwistbaar dan is het voldoende. Simpele rekenwerk is soms ook voldoende.Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Handleiding 1Lib1Ref Nederlands.pdf[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Handleiding 1Lib1Ref Nederlands.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Design drawing of the Arnhem perfume fountain for the Centennial Exposition in 1876.jpg[edit]

Hallo Olaf,

Ik heb een vraag over deze ontwerptekening? Weet je misschien waar deze zich bevind? Welk museum of welk archief.

Bedankt. Mvg, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fotodag Bibliotheek Midden-Brabant (Tilburg)[edit]

Bedankt voor het begeleiden van de fotodag bij de Bibliotheek Midden-Brabant. We hopen je weer te zien op een toekomstige bijeenkomst! Michelle Boon (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kinderboeken op Wikidata?[edit]

Beste Olaf, via de nieuwsbrief van Wikimedia Nederland kwam ik op Category:Een aardig prentenboek met leerzame vertellingen terecht. Heb je overwogen om deze boeken ook aan Wikidata toe te voegen? Dat zou denk ik wel een leuke aanvulling zijn. Maakt het ook gemakkelijker doorzoekbaar. Multichill (talk) 12:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Multichill, daar zit ik inderdaad nog wel aan te denken, maar weet niet 123 hoe je dat het best/snelst/handigst aanpakt. Zijn daar tools voor? Heb jij advies? Met vriendelijke groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 13:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Daar zijn allerhande tools voor. Voor de Flemish art collections, Wikidata and Linked Open Data heeft Sandra bijvoorbeeld File:Flemish art collections, Wikidata and Linked Open Data - Manual 20160331.pdf geschreven. Je zou 1 boek kunnen nemen als voorbeeld en deze helemaal kunnen uitwerken op Wikidata. Op d:Wikidata:WikiProject Books kan je een hoop informatie vinden over de verschillende properties voor boeken. Daarbij heb je verschillende lagen van abstracties van een algemeen boek, via een editie naar een specifiek exemplaar. Multichill (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nozeman[edit]

Dag Olaf,

onlangs zat ik wat te rommelen met Nozeman, en toen ontdekte ik het volgende: onderaan de pagina met de afzonderlijke afbeeldingen staat een verwijzing die niet meer werkt.

Bijvoorbeeld: File:Nederlandsche vogelen (KB) - Lanius excubitor (120b).jpg Daar zie je onder de "Summary" bij Source/Photographer: "Plate with file number '120b' gelinkt. Die link werkt niet meer. Ik heb het ook bij een paar andere platen gecheckt. Het lijkt alsof het hele "bladerboek" niet meer bestaat.

Wat wel nog werkt is: deze ingewikkelde link. Weet jij hoe dit zit en wat we er aan zouden kunnen doen? Vanzelfsprekend ben ik graag bereid te helpen.

Ik hoor graag van je, --Dick Bos (talk) 07:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:De Arnhemsche Eau de Colognefabriek, 1873-1937, Reconstructie van een bedrijfsgeschiedenis aan de hand van historische krantenberichten. Deel 1, de beginjaren 1873-1876 - Arnhems Historisch Tijdschrift Dec 2016 - O.Janssen.pdf[edit]

Dag OlafJanssen, zonet zag ik de geschiedenis van de (Koninklijke) Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek en ik liep me af te vragen, of je niet heel eenvoudig het lemma Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek kan aanmaken. Dit hier is niet eens een "beginnetje", je maakte er een heus artikel van. De naam werd reeds opgenomen in de Lijst van organisaties met het predicaat Koninklijk in Nederland, maar het is (nu) nog een rode link. Wat denk je? :) Lotje (talk) 07:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kerstkaart.jpg
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
OlafJanssen, ...

Lotje (talk) 05:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag OlafJanssen, gewoon even aankloppen, of je het lemma uit het oog verloor. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Tante Keetjes prentenboek[edit]

Hallo, OlafJanssen zou je er een probleem mee hebben de naam van de category te wijzigen in Category:Tante Keetje's prentenboek, zo luidt namelijk de titel. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag Lotje, daar heb ik geen problemen mee, ga je gang. Met groeten, --OlafJanssen (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo OlafJanssen, only me again, ook Category:Sythoffs prentenboek - de boekenkast staat Sythoff's. Je zal er wel een reden voor hebben, maar dan weet ik het graag. Nieuwsgierigheid weet je wel. Lotje (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag Lotje, hier het zelfde, hernoem gerust. Ik heb toen ik al deze kinderboeken ging uploaden alle titels ontdaan van vreemde karakters waar Commons en tools/scripts die ik gebruik potentieel over zouden kunnen struikelen (', "", ?, * etc). Vandaar dat er nu titels tussen zitten met Keetjes ipv Keetje's (terwijl de eerste variant in de huidige spelling wel de correct is overigens) Groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Atlas Schoemaker-ZUIDHOLLAND-DEEL1-1362-Zuid-Holland, Aarstbergen.jpeg[edit]

Hallo Olaf, momenteel ben ik op zoek naar het portret van Overleg:Alexander van der Capellen en liep deze afbeelding tegen mijn virtuele lijfje. Het zal waarschijnlijk een typo zijn: Aartsbergen ipv Aarstbergen. Of zie ik iets over het hoofd? Thank you for your time. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goedemorgen, ja, dat zal zo te zien inderdaad een typo op de bronwebsite geweest zijn, op de prent zelf staat duidelijk Aartsbergen. Ik pas het Commons even aan... Met vriendelijke groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 08:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bedankt Olaf. Lotje (talk) 08:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek[edit]

@OlafJanssen: had je al tijd (en goesting) om het lemma Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek klaar te stomen voor de nl.wikipedia? Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 05:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lotje: , nee, nog niet helaas, de tijd die ik dit jaar beschikbaar had voor onderzoek naar de fabriek heb ik al gebruikt (ik ben naar Philadelphia gegaan om daar aanvullend onderzoek te doen naar de deelname aan de Wereldtentoonstelling van 1876). Mijn eerstvolgende prioriteit in 2019 is het afronden van het derde deel van de fabrieksgeschiedenis. Pas als dat klaar is ga ik me actief richten op het schrijven van WP-artikelen over de fabriek en de Cuypers-fontein. Met vriendelijke groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 11:10, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gevecht tusschen de Russen en Turken-Catchpenny print-Borms 0640.jpeg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Gevecht tusschen de Russen en Turken-Catchpenny print-Borms 0640.jpeg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gevecht tusschen de Russen en Turken-Catchpenny print-Borms 0640.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Het kasteel van Nesle-Catchpenny print-Borms 0479.jpeg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Het kasteel van Nesle-Catchpenny print-Borms 0479.jpeg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Het kasteel van Nesle-Catchpenny print-Borms 0479.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Inspirerende slide uit presentatie (44708672640).jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Inspirerende slide uit presentatie (44708672640).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 13:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Inspirerende poster (45802509984).jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Inspirerende poster (45802509984).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 13:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Code issues in User:OlafJanssen/common.js[edit]

Hi OlafJanssen, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:OlafJanssen/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 2 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magnus Manske/sdc_tool.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 11:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Your recent uploads[edit]

Olaf,

I noticed you uploaded bunch of great medical images lately, like File:Bone matrix 4 -- Smart-Servier.png, but I also notices that

  • you are using some of the fields in a way breaks things a bit. {{Artwork}} template is mostly meant for works of art and museum pieces and most of the fields are interpreted from that point of view. The proper use of each field is documented thereAuthor field is expected to mention a person, however since I guess we do not know the names of the artists then the employer is fine.
  • Wikidata item number is meant for the wikidata item for the specific artwork, artifact or document with some unique inventory or accession number. Your current use is more like "structured data" depicts (P180) statements, and should be moved there.
  • The date field is for the date of creation, not the upload and should be in 2019-09-29 form as opposed to string "29 September 2019", that way the date is displayed properly in other languages.
  • The last point, is about the {{SMART-Servier Medical Art-license}}: that template should not include {{Cc-by-3.0}} template, which should be added separately to each image. The reason for that is that licenses like that should not change, and we would want to avoid situations when someone changes license templates in {{SMART-Servier Medical Art-license}} which is usually not watched by anybody. Adding {{Cc-by-3.0}} directly to the file, ensures that any changes to the license will be recorded in the file history and easier to check latter. If you have any questions, I can elaborate more, but in the mean time please do not upload more files using current format. Also I can assist you in fixing current uploads, with the help of User:JarektBot account. The only think I can not help with would be moving wikidata IDs to "structured data" depicts (P180) statements. --Jarekt (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi @Jarekt: , thanks for your feedback, much appreciated. I'll provide you with a more elaborate response and some questions a.s.a.p. Just to let you know I'm not planning to do any new Smart-Servier uploads soon, I'll do the remaining 2700 images (in batches) as soon as we've improved the templating & licensing, for which your assistance I'd appreciate. Regards, --OlafJanssen (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jarekt: , I fixed the data fields in all uploads. I split the {{SMART-Servier Medical Art-license}} into {{SMART-Servier Medical Art}} and {{Cc-by-3.0}}. I was actually inspired by {{Nationaal Archief-license}} to combine them into 1 template, but have 2 separate ones is also fine
As for the use of the {{Artwork}} template : I could argue that these medical images are artworks in their own right, but won't do that. When I was preparing the upload I was actually already thinking about creating a custom {{Smart-Servier Image}} (or something named like that) template, derived from {{Artwork}} template, like the ones in this category. Problem is: I'm not sure/confident how to do this, I've very limited templating skills. Could you help with that? This {{Smart-Servier Image}} could be very similar to {{Artwork}}, maybe omitting all non-used fields, but keeping the Wikidata field, which then could be used/defined as the way I've done that so far, as this won't affect its intended use in the {{Artwork}} templates.
Speaking of which, I'm aware that adding the WD-Qid to the P180 field would be nice, but couldn't find any info how to do that via the API. Do you happen to know this? Best, --OlafJanssen (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And many thanks for adding the images to Wikidata items! --OlafJanssen (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OlafJanssen, Thanks for your fixes, I see you got familiar with VisualFileChange, which is a great tool. About adding wD-Qids to depicts (P180) I do not know of a way to do it through API if some mass edit tool. I am sure such tools are coming but are not here yet. I know it is possible (see contributions of user:BotMultichill but at the moment you would have to do it in python. My guess is that within a half a year or a year there will be such tool. As for link to Wikidata, although I think those images are great and very needed, they are no notable in Wikidata sense of the world. No museum have then cataloged, no articles are written about each one, there will be no Wikipedia article about the artwork, etc. And the wikidata fields are for use only for linking with items describing given artwork, book, object etc. However what I would suggest, is to maybe move the content of the description to title ( you could also put all the translations in to {{LangSwitch}} template so only most appropriate is displayed) and to use now empty description field to displayed stuff pulled from wikidata. You can use {{Q|Q1424568}} -> "Osteon (Q1424568)" or {{P|180|show_p=no}} {{label|Q1424568}} [[File:Wikidata-logo.svg|20px|wikidata:Q1424568|link=wikidata:Q1424568]] -> "depicts Osteon wikidata:Q1424568". I would hid the details of it in a template like {{Smart-Servier description}} and even add some statements from Wikidata like {{P|P1343|show_p=no}}: {{#statements:P1343|from=Q1424568}} ->"described by source: Gray's Anatomy (20th edition)". Nice thing about this convoluted approach is that all the text will be internationalized for non-English users. I wrote many templates now in Category:Infobox_templates:_based_on_Artwork_template and there is a big downside to such templates, that other users are not familiar with them and do not know how to contribute if they want to improve the descriptions, also future improvements by bots looking for some text patterns do not work as well and the files end up with much less contributions from other users who otherwise mighet want to help. I think we could accomplish most of what you need by much smaller description field only template. --Jarekt (talk) 02:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One more observation, some of your most useful images have English heading above the graphics. Cropping the writing out would make them much more usefull, especially on non-English wikis. --Jarekt (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Band van blank perkament-KONB12-1762G117.jpeg[edit]

Hallo OlafJanssen, ik vroeg me af of deze afbeelding iets met David Origanus van doen heeft. Thnks Lotje (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geen idee, ik ga het aan onze collectiespecialist Boekbanden vragen... ik kom er dus op terug. Maar ik vermoed (gezien de beschrijving) dat deze band om het boek Almanach nade nieuwe ende oude stijl: op het schickel-jaer ons Heeren 1652. Door Doctor David Origanus heen zit. Groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ik heb antwoord van onze collectiespecialist: Met de boekband als zodanig heeft Origanus (sterrenkundige) niets te maken, hij is immers al jaren voor de publicatie van de almanak overleden. Ik denk dat het gaat om de astronomische informatie die in het almanakje wordt genoemd, en die teruggrijpt op zijn bevindingen. --OlafJanssen (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bedankt voor de toelichting OlafJanssen :-) Lotje (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ik kreeg zojuist nog wat meer info toegestuurd : De geleerde Origanus wordt op de titelpagina genoemd als auteur, zie foto van de titelpagina: http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=stcn:394182243:01. Het gebeurde wel vaker bij almanakjes dat iemand die ooit met een bepaald type almanak was begonnen nog eeuwen genoemd werd. De oprechte Italiaensche waarzegger werd nog tot in de 19e eeuw op de naam van Antonio Magini gezet, terwijl die in 1617 was overleden. Het was meer een kwaliteitskenmerk dan een auteursvermelding. --OlafJanssen (talk) 14:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek[edit]

Hallo OlafJanssen, had je er nog eens over nagedacht om de {{w|Lijst van organisaties met het predicaat Koninklijk in Nederland|Koninklijke Arnhemsche Eau de Cologne-fabriek]] aan te maken? :-) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nog maar eens aandringen? Lotje (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ja, dat staat nog steeds ergens op mijn tedoenlijst, maar ik heb het laatste jaar niet meer aan de fabriek gewerkt. Ik heb wel veel onderzoek gedaan, ben er in 2018 zelfs nog speciaal naar de VS voor gevlogen om archieven te raadplegen en te filmen, maar dat moet ik nog steeds uitwerken en publiceren. Ik heb ooit dit opzetje gemaakt, maar er is inmiddels veel materiaal bijgekomen --OlafJanssen (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Improved counters on Wikimedia?[edit]

Dear Olaf,

The problem with counters on WikiMedia is that "click-and-gone" counts (40%?) are not eliminated (a free Google tool eliminates this problem). Not so on Wikimedia (or has it been done in the meantime?).

Hello Hans, do you have some (links to) backgroundinfo so I can understand the issue better? Kind regards, --OlafJanssen (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Olaf, i do not know much more than w:nl:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Analytics (GA) and general web links (for some you have to log on at Google) tell us. The proper name of this effect is "bounce". (With misleading statements in the header it can be over 95%! Try it perhaps :-)) As a volunteer, I used GA as a free PC software tool to optimize my web texts and pages in 2012-2013 at the website for Milieucentrum Utrecht, when GA already was standard. It showed which pages and words worked best for traffic and web surfer retention on web pages, great! Without knowing the specific bounce factors for individual webpages, the number of clicks can only be used for hand-waving relative comparisons.

  • On Wikimedia pages, we should have a GA-like tool, to support the kinds of arguments you are good at. Shall we ask for it on Fabricator etc. (or is it already done? Your colleagues at kb.nl surely use GA or something similar. I asked for it 5 years ago, but perhaps Magnus didn't want to back then, i don't remember.)

Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 09:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GA (and similar tools) are used for marketing and SEO (Search Engine Optimization). Hansmuller (talk) 14:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi @Hansmuller: , there is actually this Phabricator issue asking for input on what the KB would like to be able to measure It may also be very interesting to ask Olaf what he would *like* to measure (and what his management would like to know) if anything was possible and there were no technical limitations at all. Could you add your idea/suggestion in there?
In the KB we (still) use GA to measure webtraffic, but that is under debate because of privacy/GDPR and 'Big tech USA' issues --OlafJanssen (talk) 11:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Olaf, i see your last message only now. So i have just started phabricator task T270234: a proposed Wikimedia Analytics tool, perhaps a silly request - already been considered long ago? - because i don't know the present availability of Wikimedia tools in detail... Vriendelijke groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 07:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Auteursrecht scan KB Spinoza ?[edit]

Beste Olaf,

Iets anders: kun je me helpen met de kwestie van auteursrecht voor scans van oude KB boeken door een firma? Ik rommel wat aan Spinoza voor Wikimedia en vind op spinozaweb.org een link NS naar diens Nagelaten Schrifte bij de KB. Als je die fraaie pdf opent, blijkt op elke afbeelding te staan "Early European Books, @Copyright 2011 ProQuest LLC. Images reproduced by courtesy of Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag. 450 D8."

  • Is deze pdf niet gewoon publiek domein PD-old-100-1923 ?

De andere link op spinozaweb "OP" leidt naar een scan van de Opera Posthuma van Spinoza in de Wolfenbüttel Digital Library (Herzog August Bibliothek, Ac. 343), met hun auteursrechtenverklaring op elke bladzijde, een soortgelijk geval? Wat vind je daarvan?

Ping je me even als je antwoordt? Welbedankt en wikigroet, Hansmuller (talk) 09:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag @Hansmuller: , dat Spinoza-boek is destijds gedigitaliseerd als onderdeel van een deal die de KB gesloten had met Proquest. Daarbij heeft ProQuest toen bedongen dat zij auteursrechten mochten doen gelden op die boeken (en daar een verdienmodel aan konden hangen), in ruil dat zij de digitalisering zouden betaalden. Dat auteursrecht is natuurlijk absurd, gezien het feit dat boeken gezien hun ouderdom in het PD zitten. Destijds was de KB nog niet zo auteursrechten- en PD-bewust als nu, dus ik vraag me af of de KB dergelijke deal anno 2020 nog zou sluiten. Anyhow, dat Spinozaboek zit gewoon in het PD, ondanks die copyright-footer op elke pagina. (die je dus volgens punt 10.b van deze voorwaarden niet zou mogen verwijderen)
Over die "OP": ik ken de details van de Duitse ateursrechtenwet niet, maar als ik aanneem dat dat ook 70 jaar na dood maker is, is de verklaring op de eerste bladzijde van die PDF laakbaar te noemen. Ik zou me er (net als bij NS) weinig van aantrekken (als dit werk inderdaad in het PD valt... je zou die wet die op de eerste pagina genoemd wordt moeten checken).... Groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Beste Olaf, dank voor je snelle antwoord! Aan de Wolfenbüttelaars kan ik een fiets terugvragen maar de KB schoffeer ik liever niet en ja, die copyright-footer gunt Spinoza die "scanners" wel grootmoedig :-)) want Spinoza Ethica Deel 4 stelling 11. Vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 13:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weer die Spinoza[edit]

Beste Olaf,

Ooit bracht je dat aardige en verrassend goed leesbare (anders dan bijvoorbeeld Oldenbarnevelt) manuscript Korte verhandeling (Category:Spinoza, Korte verhandeling van God, de mensch, en deszelvs welstand - Manuscript) naar Commons. Maar je moest blijkbaar ophouden bij pagina 199.

  • Mag de rest ook?

Welbedankt, pas op voor die krans :-), Hansmuller (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Banners & attribution[edit]

Beste OlafJanssen, Vandaag zag ik bij toeval dat je recent een twintigtal banners hebt gemaakt. Het zijn aantrekkelijke compilaties, en ze fleuren inmiddels veel pagina's op. Ik heb over die compilaties een vraag: je gebruikt vaak foto's van verschillende fotografen, en die zijn onder uiteenlopende licenties op Commons gezet. Diverse zijn onder een CC-BY-licentie geplaatst, wat bij hergebruik naamsvermelding verplicht maakt, ook in compilaties. Het lijkt me het simpelst om onder Description, Source en/of Author correcte naamsvermelding van die andere fotografen te zetten en jezelf compilator of zoiets te noemen. Verder lijkt het me correct om bij Other versions de gebruikte foto's te vermelden. Vysotsky (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ja, dank voor het pingetje, je hebt gelijk, ik moet uiteraard nog een overzichtje van bronbeatanden + attributies van al die banners maken, dat had ik in de gauwigheid nog niet gedaan, maar staat wel op mijn lijstje van nog-te-doene-zaken. Ik heb ze primair gemaakt om een aantal Wikidataprojecten mee aan te kleden (zie d:Wikidata:GLAM/Koninklijke Bibliotheek Nederland), maar heb er nu ook een paar gebruikt buiten Wikidata, zoals op c:Category:Collection_highlights_of_Koninklijke_Bibliotheek of nl:Categorie:Topstukken_van_de_Koninklijke_Bibliotheek_(Nederland). Over met name die laatste - dus zo'n banner gebruiken op WP:NL twijfel ik nog wel, vind jij dat gepast op die plek? Groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 20:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gepast? Volgens mij ben ik geen lid van de banner-fanclub, dus ik ben niet de beste om het aan te vragen. Lijkt me een goede vraag voor in De NL-Kroeg. Vysotsky (talk) 21:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arnhems Historisch Genootschap Prodesse Conamur[edit]

Hallo OlafJanssen zonet maakte ik de Category:Arnhems Historisch Tijdschrift aan om der te brengen in Category:Arnhems Historisch Genootschap Prodesse Conamur. Vind je dit geschikt of had je een andere naam voor ogen? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Coole deelauto's doen het delen versnellen (32656325798).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Coole deelauto's doen het delen versnellen (32656325798).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pibwl (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Den Haag[edit]

Beste Olaf, ik zag dat je een heleboel foto’s als “Den Haag” had gecategoriseerd. Nu ken ik Den Haag een beetje, en daarom heb ik deze foto’s, voor zover mogelijk, verder gecategoriseerd. Zo vermijden we dat de “The Hague”-categorie een container wordt met een overvloed van willekeurige foto’s van Den Haag. Als het je leuk lijkt, en genoeg tijd over hebt, kun je altijd nog aparte categorieën als “Openbare ruimte in Den Haag” of “Foto’s van Den Haag door Nanda Sluijsmans (20XX)” maken. Zo krijgen haar foto’s ook een goed plekje op de Commons-site. Groetjes,Jeff5102 (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, ja dat klopt, ik was foto's uit de c:Category:Photographs_by_Nanda_Sluijsmans met de Cat-a-lot-tool aan het indelen in de 'juiste' categorieën: eerst grof (alles over DH in de category over DH, foto's over Pijnacker in de bijbehorende (hoofd)cat, alles over Nederlandse wadis in deze cat, grastegelfoto's in deze cat etc. etc. Ik was er nog niet aan toegekomen om daarna alle foto's in de specifiekere subcats te zetten. Dus/maar bedankt dat jij dat al gedaan hebt voor de foto's over DH. Met vriendelijke groet, --OlafJanssen (talk) 12:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 1.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Olaf, metadata attribute copyright to "Jan de Vries Fotograaf". What does that mean? Same problem with the images mentioned below. --Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for calling this out! Please remove these images a.s.a.p., as they are cleary copyvio. "Jan de Vries Fotograaf" means the photographer is Jan de Vries (=a rather common Dutch male name), who states on his website https://www.jdvf.nl/about that all his images are copyrighted.
I'm trying to reconstruct how/why I thought I could upload these images to Commons (or alternatively: what what wrong with me at the time), but I really can't give a decent explanation. Anyhow, pls remove them (if you have permissions tot do so, or I can ask a Commons admin myself) . Kind regards, --OlafJanssen (talk) 16:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 2.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 3.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 4.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Openbare Bibliotheek Den Helder School 7 - interieur 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tank-top inspired by Adriaen Coenen's Visboeck.png[edit]

Hallo OlafJanssen, de beschrijving stemt niet helemaal overeen. Kan je dit even aanpassen? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Algemeen Letterkundig Lexicon Banner Wikimedia NL.jpg[edit]

Hallo OlafJanssen, omdat je die afbeelding "klaarstoomde" vroeg ik me af of je een aparte afbeelding van de Moffenspiegel hebt. Die zou wonderlijk passen in de de Category:Bezige Bij, die ik, als je 't mij vraagt, liever zou opgedoopt zien in Category:De Bezige Bij, in analogie met het lemma Face-smile.svg Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Lotje, die afbeelding heb ik hier vandaan: https://www.kb.nl/themas/geschiedenis-en-cultuur/tweede-wereldoorlog/oranje-bitter-nederland-bevrijd/vrijheid/moffenspiegel-en-jappenspiegel - Ik zie nu overigens in onze catalogus dat die afbeelding niet rechtenvrij is (de tekenaar Links overleed in 1982), dus ik moet die banner daar nog op aanpassen (ergo: die moffenspiegel vervangen door een andere afbeelding). MVG, --OlafJanssen (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh wat jammer nou, ik vond het een heerlijk plaatje. Lotje (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎[edit]

Hello Olaf! I hope all is well :-) As you may be aware, OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions!

Specifically, I'm curious to hear if you'd be willing to help us test new features as they are released. Perhaps you would be interested in running tests with some of the materials you work with at Koninklijke Bibliotheek? If you are interested in providing feedback and early testing, you can fill in this form to indicate your interests and availability.

Many greetings! SFauconnier (talk) 14:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @SFauconnier, thanks for the notices! Yes, I'm happy to stay up-to-date, and I'm happy to test feedback for improving the develoment. I'm looking forward for OR to support SDoC, I've been wishing/looking for this feature many times, so it can't be released quickly enough. In the meantime I've made my own script to add SDoC from an Excel --- Best, OlafJanssen (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Newspapers from Koninklijke Bibliotheek[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Newspapers from Koninklijke Bibliotheek has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Weihnachten, Schriftzug "VROLIJK KERSTFEEST" -- 2021 -- 9187.jpg Merry Christmas OlafJanssen

Hi OlafJanssen, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
Lotje (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OpenRefine and Structured Data on Commons: community meetup, February 22[edit]

OpenRefine logo

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about Structured Data on Commons (SDC) functionalities in OpenRefine.

The OpenRefine team has made quite a bit of progress in the past months. We warmly invite you to a meetup with updates and a first demo of the newly developed SDC editing functionalities in OpenRefine. Bring your questions!

  • When? Tuesday, February 22, at 15:00-17:00 UTC (check the time in your timezone).
  • For whom? For anyone who is curious about the current status of SDC support in OpenRefine!
  • Where? Online, via Zoom. The event's info page has the link.
  • The meeting will be recorded and the recording will be published to Wikimedia Commons afterwards.

Check the event page for more info. With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OpenRefine and SDC updates: user survey and monthly office hours[edit]

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about the Structured Data on Commons (SDC) features that are currently developed for OpenRefine.

Short survey for SDC features in OpenRefine[edit]

OpenRefine logo

OpenRefine is running a short survey to learn about user needs and expectations for its new SDC features. If you upload files to Wikimedia Commons and/or edit structured data there, please help by filling in this survey!

Monthly OpenRefine and Wikimedia office hours[edit]

OpenRefine's community meetup of February 22 was very well attended. You can see its recording, slides and notes here. The team now hosts monthly, informal office hours for Wikimedians (online, via Zoom). Upcoming office hours are:

The Zoom link of the next office hour will be posted on OpenRefine's info page on Wikimedia Commons. Please drop by and say hi!

All the best! SFauconnier (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]