User talk:Olybrius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

絕學無憂
档案

Category:Trees_in_Portugal_by_name[edit]

Auntof6 (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Regions of France/sandbox[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your work on January categories in France. Per Commons:Bots/Work requests#Replacing_Template:Regions_of_France.2Fsandbox_by_Template:Regions_of_France, Template:Regions of France has been replaced by the contents of Template:Regions of France/sandbox, so please use Template:Regions of France directly, and stop using .Template:Regions of France/sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 11:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Régions de France[edit]

Salut, le principe c'est juste mais tu le faisait de mauvais façon. C'est pas ça, tu devrait renommer la vieille catégorie , pas créer une nouvelle. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:2009_in_road_transport_in_India[edit]

Auntof6 (talk) 23:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Things named after Alexandre Dumas[edit]

Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Things named after Jacques Prévert[edit]

Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:March_2011_France_photographs[edit]

Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:June_2014_France_photographs[edit]

Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project[edit]

Hello Olybrius,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:Month by year in Occitanie[edit]

Hello I assume you speak French, otherwise let me know:

Bonjour, il y a quelque chose qui cloche avec ce modèle que tu as créé, dans cette catégorie le modèle ajoute automatiquement la catégorie "Winter 2016-2017 in Occitanie", cela devrait etre "Winter 2017-2018 in Occitanie", j'ai essayé de jeter un coup d'oeil au code mais cela me dépasse. Pourrais-tu jeter un petit coup d'oeil s'il te plait? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done En fait c'est fait, je crois que j'ai trouvé. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Non en fait je n'ai fais que déplacer le problème, les catégories relatives à l'hiver sont bien gérées mais une nouvelle catégorie s'ajoute à l'automne "Autumn 2018 in Occitanie" Category:October 2017 in Occitanie... Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Enfin après refection, ce n'est peut-etre pas ma faute...je n'ai pas fait attention si le bug était visible avant mon intervantion. En tout cas pour Category:December 2017 in Occitanie maintenant ça va, c'est le seul mois ou ça va en fait. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hé, bien vu, C'est un vieux bug introduit en 2013 par Verdy p en essayant de réparer je sais pas trop quoi sur la version midi-pyrénéenne. J'ai rétabli la version antérieure hybridée avec un petit bout de son amélioration. Je comprends rien au Lua non plus malheureusement mais ça à l'air à peu près fonctionnel maintenant. - Olybrius (talk) 11:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Super, bien joué! merci :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Multiples modèles...[edit]

Bonjour, je suis tombé sur {{Month by year in Haute-Garonne}}, {{Month by year in Haute-GaronneOC}}, {{Month by year in Haute-GaronneMP}} et {{Month by year in Haute-GaronnepdMP}}, je comprends l'utilitée d'en avoir deux, une pour avant 2016 et une pour après, mais pourquoi quatre? puis-je en effacer deux? Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Ben si pourtant. Leur seul différence est la catégorie parente :
  • Le premier/générique étant à conserver comme raccourci vers le modèle standard actuel.
  • Le dernier est obsolète et servait aux années antérieures à la création de Midi-Pyrénées avec "in present-day Midi-Pyrénées". Il faudrait le remplacer par une version "in present-day Occitanie".
  • J'en rajouterais même un {{Month by year in Haute-GaronneFr}} catégorisant directement/temporairement dans France pour ceux qui ne veulent pas se compliquer la vie quand la catégorie "in present-day Occitanie" n'existe pas. - Olybrius (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Bon boulot, il était temps que quelqu'un s'intéresse aux saisons et remarque cet antique bug ! - Olybrius (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Juste une petite chose, lorsque tu fais ce genre de chose, ce serait pas mal si tu pouvais rajouter la categorie en meme temps. Comme çà tous les modèles peuvent facilement etre retrouvés... Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Toulouse - Rue de la Madeleine - 20110325 (1a).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Toulouse - Rue de la Madeleine - 20110325 (1a).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpanishSnake (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wax_figures_by_country[edit]

E4024 (talk) 12:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Waiters_by_century[edit]

E4024 (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Waiters_in_the_21st_century[edit]

E4024 (talk) 08:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

les départements français avant 2016[edit]

Bonjour Olybrius, merci pour tes contributions, je pense qu'il faut faire attention, avant 2016 les départements français font partie de régions différentes de celles créées en 2016. Merci Garitan (talk) 07:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Toutafait, mais 'Champagne-Ardenne' n'existait pas non plus avant 1956, ce que tu fais est donc anachronique. 'Present-day' signifie 'actuel' et c'est un bon compromis, selon moi, pour avoir tout ce qui concerne l'actuelle région sans faire croire qu'elle existait déjà à l'époque. Donc le plus simple est d'utiliser 'present-day Grand Est' jusqu'à la création de 'Champagne-Ardenne'. On peut aussi se prendre la tête et chercher les autres entités qui ont existé jadis dans les parages, comme pour les départements occupés par l'Allemagne. - Olybrius (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour Olybrius, la remarque sur ce qui se passe avant l956 est fort valable, mais alors c'est cette partie avant 1956 qu'il faut modifier et pas vraiment en y projetant ce qui ce passe aujourd'hui et n'existait pas à l'époque. Comment faire pour anticiper les prochains changements administratifs ? Le compromit serait de faire par département qui existaient et par régions géographiques, ecclésiastiques, seigneuriales qui existaient alors. La Champagne est ce qui est le plus proche territorialement pour recouvrir les départements des Ardennes, de L'aube, d'une partie de l'Aisne, de la Haute-Marne et de la Marne. Champagne est un terme qui se trouve depuis le moyen âge comme organisation territoriale. Et, à partir de là inclure ces régions historiques dans une catégorie, en sous partie de l'organisation présente. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 08:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Oui, '"Champagne" on peut l'utiliser, de même qu'"Ardennes" (région d'Europe différente donc du département). Ce sont des régions culturelles/historiques qui existent sans exister administrativement et donc on ne fait pas vraiment d'anachronisme en les utilisant. Ça va être un peu lourd à gérer mais sera moins absurde que des trucs comme '1644 in Champagne-Ardenne'. Dans le même genre nous avons "Category:Normandy by year" (région historique européenne) / "Category:Normandie by year" (région admin. française) ou encore "Category:Occitanie by year" (région admin française) et "Occitania by year" (région culturelle européenne, mais cette cat n'existe pas encore). Quant à "Grand Est", bien sûr il faudra renommer toutes les "present-day Grand Est" dès qu'elle cessera d'exister, les bots s'en chargeront sans problème a priori. - Olybrius (talk) 22:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour Olybrius, et oui ce n'est pas simple et la Champagne d'ancien régime recouvrait les Ardennes géographique en partie pendant des siècles c'est por celà qu'il existe Ardennes département et ardennes région géographique qui est actuellement en Belgique. Je ne te parle pas en détail de l'archiepiscopat de Reims qui allait jusqu'à la Manche, avant la création de l'évêché de Malines...Je pense qu'il ne faut pas détruire les anciennes catégories Champagne-Ardennes et j'attend que tu propose une meilleure solution ǃ Revenir aux provinces d'ancien régime et créer généralité de Chaalons par année ? Par contre tu peut inclure les catégories anciennes dans histoire de Grand-Est ce qui est juste historiquement. Garitan (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

"Historical photographs of Washington"[edit]

I see you've created Category:Historical photographs of Washington (state) and placed 25 photos in the category. What are supposed to be the criteria for whether a photo belongs in this category?

We have thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of photographs of Washington, which are (or should be) categorized by year, or if that is not known almost certainly by decade. Are you proposing to put them all in this category as well? Wouldn't that just be redundant to their classification by place and date? - Jmabel ! talk 15:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I understand these 'historical photographs' categories as relevant for photographs taken before the 21st century and tend to use them as 'maintenance categories' to regroup older photographs for further subcategorization by century (like for instance Category:20th-century photographs of Texas), then, if the number of files is important, by decade, etc. But still some will have to remain at the root as we often do not even know in which century a photograph was taken. This categorization may be considered disputable, rather similarly to 'Category:Old maps' (although better named maybe) and we could have 'undated photographs' categories instead and nothing to regroup older photographs, however I can't help finding these categories very handy for maintenance. - Olybrius (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit Summary[edit]

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Aw, that needs much inspiration. - Olybrius (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:1839 in Champagne-Ardenne[edit]

Hello, you claimed this category should be deleted in view of the existence of a category... which does not exist. Can you please clarify, as there is a a bunch of categories with a similar situation in Category:Other speedy deletions? Thanks, — Racconish💬 16:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, that's work in progress and I lost track of some I fear. Just revert when you encounter this situation, like Jcb does, and I will fix them. - Olybrius (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Rennes - Biocoop Scarabée.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rennes - Biocoop Scarabée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.157.228.142 10:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint-Girons - Biocoop - 20110307 (1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saint-Girons - Biocoop - 20110307 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.157.228.142 10:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint-Girons - Biocoop - 20110307 (2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saint-Girons - Biocoop - 20110307 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.157.228.142 10:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint-Girons - Moines de Sera à la Biocoop - 20110928.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saint-Girons - Moines de Sera à la Biocoop - 20110928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.157.228.142 10:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Wish[edit]

Hello. Help improve for [1]. Thanks you.125.214.50.74 12:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Former_railway_bridges_in_France[edit]

Fr.Latreille (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Sousa[edit]

Please stop categorizing uses of Portuguese (and other Lusophone) particle+surname "de Sousa" as the surname "De Sousa", which seems to merely be one of the way it is macarronically assimilated abroad. -- Tuválkin 19:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Moving from Contents Category:Waiters in Austria to Category:Waiters from Austria[edit]

Hi Olybrius, I think this movements are not correct, because I know, that the waiters were in Austria, but I know woo from 2 of there, that the are not from Austria. They were coming from Eatrern countries. --K@rl (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi K@rl, I understand your point but I think that this distinction a bit fussy. The fact that these waiters live and work in Austria is enough for them to be considered as 'from Austria' to me. I wanted to standardize and have all the national categories phrased similarly. Having both categorizations 'in' and 'from' seems over the top (maybe later when there are more photographs will that be more pertinent but personally, I would rather merely have additional and distinct categories like 'Foreign workers in Austria','Czech diaspora in Austria', etc.).
Could asking a bot to move all categories to 'Waiters in' (and doing the same with waitresses) be a solution?
Or tagging the parent category as 'for discussion' to have the input of other users? Maybe there was already some consensus elsewhere on these 'in/of/from' issues? - Olybrius (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion would be a solution for both, but not from myside, because my english is too bad for a real discussion. So it's beter if you set it. Also my working is not so essential in categorization from strange images. --regards K@rl (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Grottes du Volp, Volp Caves[edit]

Dear Olybrius, THANK YOU ever so much for bringing in some pics to these caves. At least the Tuc d'Audoubert (so far ?). Been looking for some, did the stupid thing of importing a lesser-quality pic that already existed I swear I didn't see that first one it turned up just as I was looking for mine, Now we're loaded with a crap pic :/ Am half+-way thru a total overhaul of the fr articles for the 3 caves + writing a new one for the site as one unit, and of Henri Begouën. You've seen the scarcity of pics, so any pic is most welcome anyway but your last one here is so fresh, makes one want to get one's feet in there... Did you just recently take it ? I'm too far, 400+ mi. Sergio09200 is nearby but he's got motricity pbms. We're stuck ! I really really hope you've got some more and feel like putting them in, they'll be of good use I promise ! Thanks again, this is so welcome. Pueblopassingby (talk) 23:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Pueblopassinby, you are welcome. Regrettably I haven't been at the other caves. Next time I'm in Montesquieu, I'll try to visit them, promised (but actually I'm not sure if they will be as photogenic as AudoubertClin). Great job you are doing on the cave pages, congratulations! - Olybrius (talk) 13:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)