User talk:OppidumNissenae

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, OppidumNissenae!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, OppidumNissenae!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Italian aircrafts[edit]

Hi, OppidumNissenae, Thank you for your letter. If I understand well, you want me to draw sketches according to the document you sent me. First: I have no any software device by means of which I could automativally transfere raster drawings to vector ones, so I have to construct every drawing with hard hand work. Second: The simplified drawings are suited for identification of planes, but not for illustrations for the Wikipedia. Third: I plan make svg drawings about Italian airplanes too, but I need a lot of time for it and better source drawings. I have already a drawing about the Reggiane R.2000, and now I work on Macchi M39. Please, look at my author home page in the Wikimedia Commons from time to time, and probably you will find you want. Regarding:Kaboldy (talk) 10:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Grazie per le foto, caricane quante ne vuoi[edit]

Ciao, OppidumNissenae, grazie per aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments! Ti ricordo che mancano poche ore alla mezzanotte, termine per l'invio delle immagini, e che puoi sí puntare tutto sulla tua foto migliore, ma non ci sono limiti numerici né di dimensione: hai ancora tempo per caricare moltissime foto, tutte quelle che riesci. Saranno tutte utili al progetto e tutte saranno considerate nel concorso. --Nemo 09:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caltanissetta - scorcio di Via XX settembre.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A architecture in Caltanissetta building on Via XX settembre..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Campanile e cupola di Santa Maria Nuova a Caltanissetta settembre 2013.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A architecture in Caltanissetta, bell tower and cupola of Santa Maria Nuova in Caltanissetta; south view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Palma nana a Segesta.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamaerops humilis (saw palmetto).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Comment on VIC[edit]

OppidumNissenae; If you did not see my last comment on Commons:Valued image candidates/Palma nana a Segesta.JPG, may I bring it to your attention, please? Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

VIS of Illuminated manuscript letters[edit]

Hi Oppidum Nissenae-

The VIS you created is not linking correctly and the scope is a bit off. Would you mind if I took a stab at redoing it for you and then erasing what is currently there?-Godot13 (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Caltanissetta Santa Maria la Vetere portale particolare.tiff[edit]

It is not advisable to place a number in the title to be top of the category. I rename your file. But this broke your nommination in VI. I suggest you do it again with the new name. For the trouble I will support your image. Good Day --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caltanissetta - Antenna RAI.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RAI antenna of Caltanissetta, Sicily, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FIAT Balilla 508 coupè Stanguellini mod. 03.tif
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiat 508 S Berlinetta view 3/4 rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Racalmuto (AG) - Chiesa S. Giuseppe XVIII sec..jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of the church of st Joseph in Racalmuto in the province of Agrigento, Sicily.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lancia B24 spider 0006.tif
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lancia Aurelia B24 Spider/Convertible, Radiator grille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ashley a Caltanissetta 0012.tif
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A Ashley 750 (1958-61) view 3/4 front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ashley 750.tif
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ashley 750, view of 3/4 lateral..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Opuntia ficus indica on the roof 0028.tif
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opuntia ficus-indica (Indian fig opuntia) on the roofs in Caltanissetta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Biblioteca Scarabelli, Psalterium nocturnus (illuminated manuscript letters).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Biblioteca Scarabelli, Psalterium nocturnus (illuminated manuscript letters).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.


Category:Ashley car[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Ashley car has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--Passerose (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Ashely_car[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Ashely_car has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Passerose (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear OppidumNissenae,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear OppidumNissenae,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

VIS Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Fruit shaped marzipan of Sicily.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Fruit shaped marzipan of Sicily.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Category:Gipsoteca[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Gipsoteca has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Michele Tripisciano - Busto dei Vitt. Emaniele II nella Villa Amedeo di Caltanissetta 1891.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Michele Tripisciano - Busto dei Vitt. Emaniele II nella Villa Amedeo di Caltanissetta 1891.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Michele Tripisciano - Busto dei Vitt. Emaniele II nella Villa Amedeo di Caltanissetta 1891.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AA VV, Anno VII, n°12, Storia Patria Caltanissetta, 21 Settembre 2013..jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AA VV, Anno VII, n°12, Storia Patria Caltanissetta, 21 Settembre 2013..jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:AA VV, Anno VII, n°12, Storia Patria Caltanissetta, 21 Settembre 2013..jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Stone benches in Caltanissetta[edit]

Salve, pensando di fare chiarezza ho raggruppato tutti i sedili a mensoloni in marmo opera di Girolamo Ciulla, nella "categoria:Stone benches in Caltanissetta" che è a sua volta una sotto-categoria dello scultore contemporaneo Girolamo Ciulla (tra l'altro essendo vivente non è nel libero dominio). Pertanto mi sembra ridondante categorizzare ogni singolo sedile anche nella "categoria:Girolamo Ciulla". Gradirei sapere cose ne pensi.--Albertomos (talk) 15:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Michele Tripisciano[edit]

Grazie per la segnalazione, ho già provveduto a correggere la svista. Saluti--Albertomos (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Testa di Pinscher.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Testa di Pinscher.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gwestra (talk) 13:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Mother Nature Strikes Back[edit]

I'm afraid I shall have to remove File:Opuntia ficus indica on the roof 0028.tif as it was uploaded before the challenge began, which is against the rules. I hope you can take more images for future challenges. -- Colin (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)