More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.
British Rail Class 67 number 67029
Hi. First off, to the best of my knowledge, this is the only modern UK loco/MU to have its own category. Secondly, please don't pull such images out of British Rail Class 67s in English, Welsh and Scottish Railway corporate livery - liveries change, especially given EWS doesn't exist anymore it's silly to put it in there and assume that the train will be in that livery forever. In fact, this week's RAIL has a photo of it repainted into DB livery, so... -mattbuck (Talk) 22:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Same as the source : http://www.openstreetmap.org/ ...Oranjblud (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Wood versus Forest
Why do you keep moving Category:Skipton Wood (amongst others) to Category:Forests in North Yorkshire? It is not a forest, it is a wood. I have reverted your change again. --JD554 (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Relative size (woods are smaller than forests) and common sense. Skipton Wood most certainly isn't a forest. The en wiki article sums it up nicely: "Woodland is used in British woodland management to mean any smaller area covered in trees, however dense. (Forest is usually used in the British Isles only for more extensive wooded areas, again, regardless of density – and also including Royal forests, which may not be wooded at all). The term Ancient Woodland is used in British nature conservation to refer to any wooded land that has existed for a very long period (equivalent to the American term old growth forest)." --JD554 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
|Hello, Oranjblud. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
Notification about possible deletion
|Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 15:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 15:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 16:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)