User talk:Orchi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive:2005200620072008200920102011201220132014

Best wishes for 2015[edit]

Hello Orchi

Danke für Deine Grüße und die Nachricht, after a long summer! I'm still quite busy with other things, but I hope to have some time again to spend on Commons, with our beloved orchids.
All the best for 2015 !
Herzliche Grüße,
Maarten
62.195.46.158 10:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Diuris laxiflora[edit]

Hello Orchi,

Thank you very much for correcting my stupid mistake.

Gderrin (talk) 20:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

APNI[edit]

Hello my friend,
I saw your modification of {{APNI genus}}.
I will propagate it to {{APNI species}} and {{APNI family}} and {{Taxasource}}.
{{Taxasource}} does the display of sources in {{Species}}, {{Genus}}, {{Taxa}}, {{Taxoconflict}}...
Still, I have a small doubt: In all Category:Biology external link templates we display the short version:

There are very few long versions:

I like long names in links ({{IOC}}, {{ADW}}, but not as source (in {{Species}}, {{Genus}})
I have created an example: in Category:Pomaderris I have tried to replace 'GRIN' by 'Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)'. Tell me if you like "Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)" which is a bit long
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Salu Liné1, the modification was a little test. I wanted to avoid the many abbreviations for the reader. APNI and FloreBase were new links for me ;-) . I reverted my change of yesterday. O.k. GRIN is long.
Soon I have some questions for you as great specialist. Cheers. Orchi (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
It would be an honour to be you specialist ;-)
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Orchids[edit]

Hello Orchi. I understand you are trying to sort out the Orchids here on commons. Great job, most appreciated. I have two questions. First: shouldn't cultivars have the apostrophes in their category name or is there any reason to avoid them. I think Paphiopedilum Harrisianum looks like a proper name whereas with Paphiopedilum 'Harrisianum' it is clear that it is a cultivar. I know that the scientific name should be italicized, but that's unfortunately often not possible with categories. The other question was if it is common practice to delete common misspellings such as Epidendrum pseudoepidendrum? It was the name on the sign at Gothenburg botanical garden! I'll let them know about that next time I visit them (maybe tomorrow). But it is a understandable misspelling as there are many names starting with pseudo-. Therefor I thought that the common way was to redirect such misspellings in case someone else makes the same misspell. Regards Averater (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello Averater,
first thanks for your excellent pictures from the botanical garden Gothenburg.
Now your questions:
A. The spelling of cultivars is common both with and without apostrophes; the main thing is, that the epithet is not written in italics and lowercase.
(The „International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants“ says with apostroph).
My proposal here: to write the Titel without apostrpoph, because worldwide the apostrophes are not easy to write. The different notation is useful in the text. See sample here: Paphiopedilum Maudiae.
B. I deleted the misspelled category, because it was a false name according to the rules of nomenclature. (This occurs in botanical gardens also  ;-) ) You can inform the responsible persons. Sometimes there are different opinions on names ( Pescatoria or Pescatorea), but here it is a clear write error.
Greetings. Orchi (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, glad you like my photos.
I have already notified the staff of that misspelling and another possible error (where the name probably is a synonym). Since they have 1100 orchids of course some will have misspelled or outdated names. What I'm still confused of is if those misspellings should be redirects or deleted. What I thought was that they should be kept as redirect in case someone else makes the same misspelling. To be kept as a normal category is of course not an option.
Do you know of any standard here on commons concerning the use of apostrophes in category names for cultivars? I have so far used them but maybe I should stop doing that. Check for eaxample Category:Dionysia cultivars.
- Averater (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
....I think for little misspellings (like: Epidendrum pseudoepidendrum) there is the function: "Menade du: Epidendrum pseudepidendrum". Existing name errors bring confusion. Give me some time please to answer the question about the spelling of the cultivars. I ask an expert. Orchi (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


Request to license photo[edit]

Dear Orchi,

Me and my colleagues at Naturalis Biodiversity Center in The Netherlands are going to publish a scientific paper about automated slipper orchid recognition by image recognition and would like to use one of your photos in the paper. The journal we are submitting the paper to requires that the photos displayed in the paper itself be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Would you allow us to publish the following photo under the CC-BY license?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paphiopedilum_sukhakulii-Orchi_008.jpg

We will of course mention your name, Orchi, with the photo. Could you please send a reply to my email: serrano.pereira@naturalis.nl

Regards,

Serrano Pereira

--Figure002 (talk) 14:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear Serrano Pereira, gladly you can use my picture to publish. Best greetings. Orchi (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

categorised redirects[edit]

Hi, on Commons, redirects generally aren't categorised, or is there an exemption for taxonomy categories (I'm likely not aware of)?    FDMS  4    18:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello FDMS, in botany and zoology it is the only place to find these important names. Furthermore for these synonyms is the automatic construct, that you find the names in italic letters. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Best wishes[edit]

Thanks for creating and having interest in Category:Orchids of the Philippines, Sincerely--Judgefloro (talk) 12:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Judgefloro,....it's long time ago. Best wishes. Orchi (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Florissimo 2015[edit]

Bonjour, je vous remercie pour avoir catégorisé les photos de la catégorie "Florissimo 2015". Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, ich danke Ihnen für das kategorisiert Fotos der Kategorie "Florissimo 2015". Mit freundlichen Grüßen.François de Dijon (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC) (Maschinenübersetzung)

Category:Florissimo_2015

Bots[edit]


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File moves[edit]

Yet again a big thank you for fixing and keeping order among the orchids! Now mostly for finding that my photos of Dendrobium densifolium was of a Dendrobium densiflorum. I thought it was a wierd name but noted that it was a valid one and didn't check any further. So thank you for that! Now to my question regarding file moves. I do usually keep file names if it is a synonym as some synonyms changes more than once. Only for obvious typos do I request a file to be moved (as I don't have the rights myself). What are your thoughts regarding file names for synonym species? And also I did note that you didn't change the links to the moved files as others do, do you use some other tool? Best regards Averater (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Averater, first thanks for your excellent photos.
And now to your question: I think ist is correct to use accepted names or synonyms as file-names.
In categories or galleries should be used the accepted names (by KEW in orchids).
Normally should lead synonyms with "redirect" to the accepted names.
Perhaps following sample: File:Flickingeria fugax GotBot 2015 002.jpg. File name is a synonym, category and gallery use the accepted name. The link in your description leads to Dendrobium fugax.
If a file-name is not correct, I have the right, to change the name in commons (filemover).
Best greetings. Orchi (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I did note that the bot CommonsDelinker did fix those links to the moved files, it just took a few hours longer than usual.
Seems like a good practice to use accepted names or synonyms as file names. Andof course only accepted names in galleries etc.
That sample seems clever. I'll see if it is possible to make such links on all file descriptions (there are a few..). Oneproblem is that it is only among the orchids there is such good order. For example among the cactuses there is a big mess... If you have more time and want a second interest, I suggest that you give those some love :) . --Averater (talk) 08:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)