User talk:Orgio89

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Orgio89!


I am very occasional contributor from Mongolia. Orgio89 (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Orgio89,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate/empty categories and overcategorizing[edit]

Hello Orgio89, please read about categories and about how this project is run before you edit dozens of files. Specifically:

  1. Do not create categories that are vague in scope (e.g. Category:Green energy)
  2. Check whether the category you want already exists (e.g. Category:Solar-powered aircraft exists, no need to create Category:Solar plane)
  3. Do not overcategorize (Commons:OVERCAT). Categories are not tags. If one file belongs to a category that is a sub-category of Category:Solar-powered vehicles, that is already enough.

In case you have doubts, ask around. This will save a lot of work down the line. Thanks, Ariadacapo (talk) 07:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Categories#Over-categorization and try to respect our rules. If you disagree with any of them it is better to discuss your doubts in Commons:Village pump with other users instead of enforcing your own point of view. Ankry (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion deleting the categories (Category:Solar cell, Category:Solar car, Category:Technological development, Category:Solar technology) was the right decission:
  • They were not categorized and too specific to be top-level categories
  • I see no significant differences between Category:Solar cell, Category:Solar cells; existence of both is misleading, merging leads to overcategorizing
  • Category:Solar technology is limited to only few of your images; if it includes everything reletes to solar technologies -> overcategorizing
  • Category:Technological development? no reason for this category with only these few images; shoud be disputed over obout whot it is intended to contain. But if very narrow, the name is misteading; if broad -> overcategorizing again.
Ankry (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Tree blooming in Mongolia 2014.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tree blooming in Mongolia 2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 10:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 month[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 month for the following reason: Edit warring after warning. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Why my image of Tree_blooming_in_Mongolia_2014.png is "author unknown" ? And please explain why are you deleting my categories like "Trees of Central Asia", "Trees of Mongolia" why these categories infringe policies here?"
Decline reason: "No reason to unblock given. But to make it clear: You didn't react after several warnings, just continued what you did before. Edit warring, adding meta-categories, and creating nonsense categories. Have a look at your deleted contributions. That's plenty for a block. Only one month block - you are lucky. The blocking administrator seems to believe you can learn. The block is valid. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Regarding your question about file:Tree_blooming_in_Mongolia_2014.png: The seems to be a problem with the collage you made, as stated in the deletion request: Unknown origin/authors of the photos, and "for Wikipedia usage only" remark in the description implies an invalid license
Use for Wikipedia is an unacceptable restriction on Commons. Further, the origin of the 6 photos used for the collage is not clear.
The category Trees in Central Asia should be Trees in Asia. The category Trees in Mongolia is fine, as long as it is used. We don't keep empty categories. Please read Com:Cat and Com:Overcat --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
If me making clearly botanical study image making montages is wrong then why these photos are acceptable can you explain this?! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anemone_hepatica_var._japonica_color_variation.JPG or https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asahidake_and_the_flowers_in_Ashahidake_2000-7-30.jpg. And I want to change the "Wikipedia use only message!" but blocking me to changing this is very strange. Plus in Wikicommons there are many images have private limited copyright notices like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sunflower_sky_backdrop.jpg Orgio89 (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Deeltei Mongol Naadmaar 20140713.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deeltei Mongol Naadmaar 20140713.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 19:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Naadam 2014.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Naadam 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 19:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked for 3 days
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 05:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

  • The Mongolian law can be read here You can take a picture of a city, in which modern buildings are COM:DM, etc, or pictures of buildings, sculptures, etc that are COM:PD. Otherwise pictures of modern buildings should be nominated for deletion, as I just did here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blue Sky Tower Ulan Bator.jpg. You might want to review COM:CB as well. As for categories, it looks like yours were deleted because they were empty. They weren't sabotaged. You also seem to be rererring to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tree blooming in Mongolia 2014.png. This had an unacceptable Wikipedia-only clause in it's license. See COM:L for acceptable licenses.

    Your continual attacking of Savin, seeming refusual to even review law/policy/answers, and your repeat post at COM:AN after being warned, have caused me to put in place a short block. Your behavior needs to change and you need to reviw the policies I've linked, COM:Overcat, and Mongoloin FOP laws, or you may end up being blocked indefinitely. INeverCry 05:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

File:NaadamDeel2014.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NaadamDeel2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked (Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Orgio89)
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edit warring and violation of COM:Overcat (see also last block by INeverCry). Next time you will be blocked indefinitely. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

Hi there, and welcome back to Wikimedia Commons. I am a patroller here, and hope that per your last block by Steinsplitter, you have decided to become a less disruptive contributor (with your edit warring and violations of COM:OVERCAT). Also, I hope that you stop the personal attacks against others, too. If you do not stop this behavior, like Steinsplitter said, you will end up being blocked indefinitely. DLindsley Need something? 00:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)