User talk:Orlovic

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image:Parisriots1.jpg[edit]

thanks for uploading the image. could you add information -- when and where was it taken, and why is it GFDL (did you take it yourself)? regards, dab. 83.79.177.187 17:20, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Kaiserkarl VI.jpg[edit]

Hi, the painter of this painting has not been dead for 70 years. Would you mind changing the license, please? Thuresson 07:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bf109 messerschmitt.JPG[edit]

Was there any info given about the version of this plane like Original Messerschmitt F/G-Series or postwar Avia ? --Denniss 14:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I think real Messer —Orlovic 13:56, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Template:PD-YU[edit]

Hi, may I ask you to explain the reasoning behind this template? I know for a fact that the copyright law in Serbia protects works by authors for 70 years pma and I assume that Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia have similar statutes. Do you know an online resource who knows more about Yugoslavian copyright? Thuresson 20:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Missing information[edit]

Hi, the following images lack either a copyright tag or a source who can verify that the tag is correct. Please add information as quickly as possible. Thuresson 11:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Image:Tito-biggest.jpg
  • Image:Yug-nob2.JPG
  • Image:Desant drvar.jpg
  • Image:Belgrade freed.jpg
  • Image:Hanging of serbs in Zagreb1.jpg

Image:Osama Bin Laden.jpg[edit]

Hi, may I ask your reasoning for removing the "No source" template from this photo? As far as anybody know, Osama bin Laden has never visited the US or been photographed by an FBI photographer. Do you have any reason to believe otherwise? Thuresson 05:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Faludza-hem-napad.jpg[edit]

Hi, I can't find any indication that the video [1] you took this image from has been released by RAI under a free licence. regards, High on a tree 09:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Rename account[edit]

Hi David. I noticed you created a redirect at User:David Orlovic. Do you want to change your username from Orlovic to "David Orlovic"? If so, just leave a request at Commons:Changing username.

Also, is User:David orlovic you? If so, you might want to make a redirect from that user page to your own. Cheers, User:dbenbenn 16:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

done. Thanks.--Orlovic 14:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Tito-biggest.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tito-biggest.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! 08:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Intercity slovenija.JPG[edit]

Hey, the picture you posted as the InterCity Slovenija (ICS) is actually just a regular commuter train. This is the actual ICS: [2]. edolen1


Image Tagging Image:New_iraqi_army_tank.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:New_iraqi_army_tank.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 23:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: Image:Potiorek.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Potiorek.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:Image:Potiorek.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Wiggum 23:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Arena pula inside.JPG[edit]

  • How to correct geometrical distortion? The photo wasn't manipulated and it is real. Thank you. --Orlovic 09:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • You should use an editing application like Photoshop or any other cheaper alternative (like Gimp). The process of putting vertical lines parallel to each other (which is the issue here) is quite straighforward. Let me know if you have trouble. Good work! - Alvesgaspar 10:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sunset above pula harbour.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset above pula harbour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

7122 series train (9).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7122 series train (9).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Pet_rabbit_(2).JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 22:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2132-066 locomotive (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2132-066 locomotive (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Pula_harbour_(6).JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 16:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Поз[edit]

Буржуји једни! Покушаћу. Хвала. --Pokrajac 21:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 series locomotive (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 series locomotive (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Де си[edit]

Како ти се свиђа Image:Pcela-cvet-1.JPG? Кандидовао сам је. :) Имам још доста пчеларских слика... --Pokrajac 17:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Nije mi jasno zašto se mobilni u startu diskvalifikuju iako je slika dobra. Onda ništa od daljeg nadidovanja, ali je zato valjda moguće postavljati slike na članke... --Pokrajac 18:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Soviet pocket watch.JPG[edit]

Hi,

Does the quality of the subject matter (Watch needs cleaning), and what did you mean by "file is heavily compressed"? I haven't changed anything to the photo so I don't understand. Thank you, Orlovic --161.53.48.211 09:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I do think that in this case the quality of the object matters, since dust is not relevant to the picture and affects its quality. As for the compression, try to use the best possible resolution of your camera. Most modern cameras use jpeg compression as a way to decrease the size of the files, but with inevitable quality degrading, in the form of artifacts, colour distortion, pixelation, etc. Alvesgaspar 09:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

C17 DF-SD-06-03299.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:C17 DF-SD-06-03299.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:C17 DF-SD-06-03299.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 10:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

9311 maintenance train (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9311 maintenance train (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arena pula inside.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arena pula inside.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

ItalyDefense images[edit]

Hi Orlovic, I found some images which were uploaded by you after May 23rd, 2006. Unless you can find (i.e. in archive.org) that these images had previously been released in the PD by the Ministero della Difesa, they will have to be proposed for speedy deletion, because that was the last evident date in which the content of www.difesa.it was expressely licensed as free. These images are:

I have to underline that even if some of them could probably fall in the so-called PD-Italy, that kind of PD is not recognised on Commons, so we need to find evidences that these images had been directly released in the PD by the MdD, as described in the Template:ItalyDefense, or they will have to be deleted. In case you find archived versions of the webpages which you found them in, please add links and/or details. This is specially important for drawings. Thank you for your kind cooperation. --Gianfranco 01:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Ciao, ti ho risposto da me :-) --Gianfranco 13:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Si, esattamente. Speriamo ce ne siano altre :-) --Gianfranco 13:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Io immagino che poco sia stato aggiunto dopo quella data, purtroppo non posso essere di aiuto perché ho una wikina in partenza e sono preso da quella, ma se lasci un avviso al bar, sicuramente qualcuno verrà. Speriamo che se ne salvino... :-) Ciao, buon lavoro :-) --Gianfranco 16:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to the amphiteathre[edit]

Thank you. I was waiting for that move because I really didn't see it's distortion. But it's unfortunate the quality was lost and your photo is now pixelated. I wish you upload a better image so I can change my QI photo with corrected distortion. Cheers, --Orlovic (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I've uploaded a new version. Although I only corrected the geometry, the contrast and light seem a little different. Please use it as you wish. Alvesgaspar 13:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 series locomotive (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 series locomotive (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sž series 711 train (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sž series 711 train (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ornament head, Pula archaeological museum.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ornament head, Pula archaeological museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St. George icon[edit]

  • The picture was actually scanned from a wooden souvenir, probably printed on it with some kind of wood-printer (?). Anyway, I fixed a bit it - see. If not enough, please instruct me how to avoid such errors in the future. Thanks, --Orlovic (talk) 13:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It is better now, but I really don't think the quality is good enough, sorry. With such an original, only a miracle could work! Anyway, you should scan the picture with with a resolution of 300 dpi, or more, and then try to improve the resulting image with an editing application. Alvesgaspar 15:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 036 locomotive (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 036 locomotive (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

USS Lake Erie (CG 70) missile test.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:USS Lake Erie (CG 70) missile test.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:USS Lake Erie (CG 70) missile test.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 20:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spike band.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spike band.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

7122 series train (12).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7122 series train (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Lebanon_bombed_commercial_centre.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand

FP Promotion[edit]

Firefighting exercise.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Firefighting exercise.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Firefighting exercise.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 08:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Tyne Cot Cross[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for your feedback on Image:Tyne Cot Cross 3633.jpg‎.

Before: before

After: after

I've rotated it, cropped it and done a little bit of mucking with the levels. Your thoughts would be very welcome. Ben Aveling 11:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

You're probably right. I tried to darken the sky a little, unsurprisingly it's quite easy to select just it in GIMP. I'm not sure it's made any real difference. But I don't want to overdo it either. Given the subject matter, a 'pretty' treatment would feel disrespectful. I do want to keep the feeling of loss that the real thing imparts to me. I'll try QI and we'll see what happens. Thanks again, Ben Aveling 22:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Virginia Tech[edit]

Take a look at the description - the flickr user even gives the news media website they stole it from. Take a look at the photo gallery on http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,266500,00.html ... and scroll to the right-most photo. They credit the AP. Go to http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/breaking/wb/113294 and scroll down to 12:05 a.m. They credit "Alan Kim | The Roanoke Times". This is a news media photo. --BigDT 16:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Copyright paranoia??? Good grief ... it's a news media photo. Taking news media photos and claiming they are freely licensed is the fastest way to get us into trouble. And yes, part of the flickr review process is to "Consider whether the picture on Flickr was really made by the Flickr user. Many Flickr users have no clue about copyrights, and "freely" license images of which they do not own the copyright!" I don't question that you uploaded it in good faith - but that isn't really an issue. If the flickr user has no authority to release the image, we can't use it. --BigDT 16:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

2007. urtea @ flickr[edit]

Hey David! Please don’t upload images from the flickr user „2007. urtea“, his files are copyvios. Thank you. --Polarlys 00:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Laibach.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Laibach.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 12:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Marilyn Manson Ljubljana 2007 (1).JPG[edit]

Is it Marylin Manson (person) on this photo? I want to put it into polish artice, so i wanted to know. Thanks in advance for answer. Herr Kriss 12:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

OK, i will. Thanks. Herr Kriss 12:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, i changed it. Herr Kriss 13:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


Image:Eris keck.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Eris keck.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vesta 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sž series 711 train (green 08).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sž series 711 train (green 08).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sž series 711 train (05).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sž series 711 train (05).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sž series 711 train (07).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sž series 711 train (07).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sž series 711 train (green 01).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sž series 711 train (green 01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Balbi Arch ornamental head.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balbi Arch ornamental head.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sponza[edit]

Can you help me on that what means "Sponza"? I have some picture about buildings in Dubrovnik, and I looking for names. On this photo Image:Sponza Palace, Dubrovnik, Croatia.JPG in filename there is Sponza but in descripition there is rector. I don't know that is an other building or same building with other name. Thanks for help! --Beyond silence 08:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rovinj 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rovinj 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image Tagging Image:2007 Niger soldiers.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2007 Niger soldiers.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 20:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Niger_Panhard_AML.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 20:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:F-14_over_Pula.JPEG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:2062 series locomotive (015).JPG.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2062 series locomotive (015).JPG.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 12:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 series locomotive (016).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 series locomotive (016).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Locos[edit]

Hi! Where you find the types of trains? Thanks for help --Beyond silence 13:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

ItalyDefense[edit]

Ciao, purtroppo cancellato il 29 luglio con la motivazione che leggi in fondo alla pagina. No comment... Non desidero commentare... Non saprei cosa dire... :-( --g 11:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:Novi-sad_bridge1999.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Novi-sad_bridge1999.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

88.134.232.95 23:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

T-55[edit]

Ma znam. Na ostavi nema odgovarajućeg tega tj. onaj na en.Wiki se razlikuje od ovog ovde. Po onome je upotreba dozvoljena, a po ovome ne. Neka obrisu. Ne mogu da se smaram. Pozdrav, --Marko M 22:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 series locomotive (019).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 series locomotive (019).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Template:PD-ITGov-Military-Navy[edit]

Image deletion warning Template:PD-ITGov-Military-Navy has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Platonides 12:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories[edit]

Hi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:HŽ_1061_series_locomotive_(07)_.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 14:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Image:Turkey izmit bursa quake.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Turkey izmit bursa quake.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Please note that the source website for this file only states that most of its material is PD.[3] This is not the case here, since the base map is the work of a commercial company (Magellan). A U.S. government agency cannot release material that it doesn't own. Valentinian T / C 18:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:ŽRS 441 series locomotive drawing.png[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.181.247.10 12:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:HŽ logo.gif[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HŽ logo.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HŽ 7122 series train (01).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HŽ 7122 series train (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

HI[edit]

Bok,

ma kad sam vidio poprilično oskudnu galeriju tramvaja, morao sam je nadopuniti :) Slike od onih Čeha su poprilično loše.

Mislim da imam negdje bolju sliku podserije 3 serije 1141, jednostavno ne stignem sve uploadati.

Nego ako te mogu zamoliti, vidim da se krećeš oko Pule i Rijeke, pa ako ćeš imati vremena i sreće da probaš uslikat EMV serije 6011 (mislim da je zovu litorina). Ja ću probat slikat još neke lokomotive i iz varaždinskog depoa. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 17:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HŽ 7123 series DMU (06).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HŽ 7123 series DMU (06).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pula harbour (7).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pula harbour (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Citroen AX white 1.JPG[edit]

Two things about this image:

  1. I like it
  2. I modified it and uploaded a new version in the namespace

I made the modifications and upload after having two other contributors complain about when I did this to their images.

Everyone should get to express their opinions about me doing that and you are no exception. -- carol 08:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sunset above Pula harbour.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset above Pula harbour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2132 locomotive Uljanik (6).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2132 locomotive Uljanik (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Citroen AX white 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citroen AX white 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2062 series locomotive (021).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2062 series locomotive (021).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Istarska street, Pula.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Istarska street, Pula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jadrolinija supetar ferry.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jadrolinija supetar ferry.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

En-pedia main page[edit]

Don't know if you realise, but one of your images is currently on the main page of the English Wikipedia. Just wanted to drop by to congratulate you- those kind of images are something that Wikipedia really needs, and often doesn't have. I was going to give you a barnstar, but I see that you don't use en-pedia, and I am personally unfamiliar with Commons. In any case- well done, and thanks. J Milburn 20:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Epidaurus seats.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epidaurus seats.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lions Gate detail.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lions Gate detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

List od Croatia-related categories[edit]

Hi,

Check this: User:Veliki Kategorizator/Croatia. --Veliki Kategorizator 11:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Lučke kapetanije / Capitanerie di porto[edit]

Ciao! / Bok! I started a "sandbox page" about the "Croatian Coast Guard" on Italian Wikipedia w:it:Lučke kapetanije/Sandbox, with some pictures, and links as references, but to expand it (also to English wikipedia where doesn't exist yet) I will need your help! Thank you in advance. --Nicola Romani 11:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tug boat going towards the UND Adriyatik.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tug boat going towards the UND Adriyatik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

-- beautiful image in my opinion, carol 10:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:AMISOM T-55.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

2008 Mahdi Army revolt[edit]

You should add Nasiriyah to the map of the 2008 Mahdi Army revolt. The city was taken by the militia today.


Image:Bekaa_valley_bombing,_2006.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Bekaa_valley_bombing,_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patstuart (talk) 18:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Bush[edit]

Hvala :) Takvo što se ne propušta. Moram priznat da puno impresivnije izgleda uživo nego ovak na fotkama. Nisam uspio uhvatit američke sigurnjake (valjda njihovi specijalci) sa dugim cijevima koje su virile kroz prozor SUV-ova. Kad vidiš te američke aute, onda svi oni naš najbolji policijski BMW-ovi i Mercedesi izgledaju poprilično bezvezno. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 10:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Valued images evaluation[edit]

Dear Orlovic,

This is a standard message to the 18 different users who so far have been involved in testing Valued images candidates as either a nominator, reviewer or project editor. We are interested in hearing what you think about the project and what your positive and negative experiences have been. We would be grateful if you would voice your opinion here. Thank you,

-- Slaunger 20:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Help needed with the Valued images project[edit]

As you may have seen, this project is going live for nominations on 1 June, 2008 at 0:00 UTC. Before then, there are a few things to be finished off, and any help you can give will be welcome. The latest discussion is at Commons talk:Valued images candidates#Open action items for Valued images.

When the project launches publicly on 1 June, it will need reviewers who are able to jump in quickly and provide prompt feedback. During those critical first few weeks it will be important to have a decent number of reviewers who are prepared to put in the effort to make sure the first nominations are well-reviewed, as that will set the standard for the future.

Would you help, please, with the final tasks now, and also pledge your help with some reviewing on 1 June and thereafter? --MichaelMaggs 17:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwegian 5 kr.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your help please...[edit]

You created Image:Afghanistan map civilwar01.png?

Can I ask how you determined the border between the area of the Taliban's rule and the are of the Northern Alliances's rule? I have been reading through the allegations against the Guantananmo captives. Dozens of captives faced the allegation that they served on the "front lines" near Bagram, and Kabul.

Which could mean that the Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terrorism analysts didn't have a clue about Afghanistan's geography, or didn't have a clue as to who their captives really were.

Did you base your representation of the border on press reports?

Cheers! Geo Swan 12:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

of course not, it's approximate. See here http://www.blythe.org/afghan-maps/northern-alliance.gif --Orlovic (talk) 13:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Helić[edit]

Na prvi pogled čini mi se da je to jedan Sikorsky (Primjer), jer oni imaju tako izdužene heliće. Mogu još pitati kolege malo kasnije pa ti javim --Suradnik13 14:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Prvi put krivo. Ovo je taj helić w:Agusta_A109--Suradnik13 18:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Čitao sam nešto o tome. Budem ih slikao. Sad trenutno skupljam fotke željezničke signalizacije (palo mi je napamet kad sam vidio onaj stari signal na varaždinskom kolodvoru). Pozz--Suradnik13 (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Dvorana u Poreču[edit]

Pozdrav. Jel te mogu zamoliti ako slučajno budeš prolazio kroz Poreč i pored dvorane koja se gradi za rukometno prvenstvo, da okineš par fotki. Puno hvala :) --Suradnik13 (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

OK. --Orlovic (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ivan Ljubičić Umag 2008 (1).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan Ljubičić.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Ongoing conflicts[edit]

Thanks for your work on this map. I've cataloged updates that need to be made to it at w:Talk:List of ongoing conflicts. Any help you could give would be appreciated, since you seem to have the necessary expertise. Thanks! -- Beland (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tskhinvali battles.png[edit]

Hi. Since Ossetia is technically part of Georgia (recognised as such by all countries), could you please change 'Georgia' to 'Shida Kartli' (the province that South Ossetia is part of) and place "Georgia" spanning across both sides of the "border"? Cheers, BalkanFever · ENwiki-/talk\ 02:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

as I've seen so far no news agency shows "Georgia" spanning across both sides of the de facto border [4] --Orlovic (talk) 09:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
That image at least shows the Georgian-Russian border for context. Your image seems to Georgia and South Ossetia on equal footing, as merely two countries at war. It's a bit more complicated than that. BalkanFever · ENwiki-/talk\ 11:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
hmm your proposal would make esthetical problems, I can include a note that it is a "de facto" or "unrecognised" border. --Orlovic (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
OK then, thanks :) BalkanFever · ENwiki-/talk\ 09:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Do you know what sources you used when you added the arrows?. I can see lots of sources in the Wikipedia articles and news for the blue and red arrows centering on Tskhinvali but not the rest of the blue arrows. 92.12.180.5 22:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Russian news reported that Russian forces used the "Zarskaya doroga" to enter Tskhinvali. This would suggest that the initial red arrows would pass by the Dzari village and, thus, enter Tskhinvali from the west and not from the north. Just as a headsup! 62.203.176.159 13:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for a pointer in the right direction, I'll see if I can track down a specific source for that. Am I understanding you correctly, you're saying that some of red arrows might not be in quite the right place? 92.12.185.36 16:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes. Your map suggests that Russians moved along the Didi Gupta(Gufta) - Tamarasheni (Tamares) - Tskhinvali road, whilst according to Russian media and statements by South Ossetian officials dating from when the fighting began, Russian troops used the "Zarskaya Doroga", the "Road of Zar". This is the name given by Ossetians to the Gufta (Didi Gupta) - Zar (Dzari) - Tskhinval road. Try seeing if you can find anything in english language media on that. Also, I only now noticed my wikipedia account does not exist on the commons. Harr, harr... 62.203.176.159 20:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The only think I could find in English, hope it helps (I guess it's kind of translation from Russian TV channel) [5]

Bok[edit]

Mogu pomoć. Što ti konkretno treba? --Suradnik13 (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, budem probao popraviti --Suradnik13 (talk) 13:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Vidi sad jel dobro --Suradnik13 (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hvala na Barnstaru :)
Što se tiče crnog okvira - veličina dokumenta nije se podudarala s veličnim objekta (ona podloga na kojoj crtaš, stranica). To podesiš sa Shift+Ctrl+D ---> otvoriti se Document properties (ili nađeš gore pod File) i klikneš Fit to .... ili ručno napišeš veličinu dokumenta. (sad govorim napamet jer nemam na ovom kompu instaliran inkscape). Dakle, ako je ona podloga manja od objekata, slika će ti izgledati izrezano.
Strelicu sam nacrtao. Ako sam dobro skužio, ti si nacrtao crtu i stavio da rub završava strelicom. Zato se vrh gubio.
Slova si pomicao sa razmakom (spaceom). Trebao si samo napisati bez da pišeš ovako "______Vila Brijunka", a onda ih razmiještati kao objekt.
Nadam se da sam ti malo olakšao. Nisam ni ja baš spretan još sa Inkscapeom, počeo sam malo vježbati. Nacrtao sam onu zastavu predsjednika, pokušavam još neke stvari.
U svakom slučaju imam uključen i mail u postavkama, pa mi možeš pisati i preko maila. --Suradnik13 (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Parenzana[edit]

Brz si :) Pozdrav --Suradnik13 (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Ma odlično je. Još nisam sve slike stavio, jučer smo imali malo wiki druženje u zraku :) Ako imaš volje, možeš i ostale malo srediti. Ja planiram još izrezati ove važnije zgrade i dijelove, pa ih staviti posebno.--Suradnik13 (talk) 13:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Ups, nisam ni gledao :) Samo sam ubacio slike u Commonist i pustio ga da ih uploada :) Moram još opise staviti. Hvala :) --Suradnik13 (talk) 07:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kosovo War header.jpg[edit]

Hi, i reverted your new upload, the image is very well sourced, all source images are licenced under a free licence. You unfortunately failed to provide your sources. --Martin H. (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong user, your version is the well sourced image ;) --Martin H. (talk) 02:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Ciao Orlovic,

ja sam napravio članek Uljanik na njemačkom jeziku. Možeš molim staviti neke ljepe slike na ovaj članek? Hvala ljepa!


File:Israeli flag used in protests.jpg[edit]

Hi Orlovic,
do you have any sources or any proof that File:Israeli flag used in protests.jpg has actually been used in protests, or why did you revert my request for such? --Túrelio (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

it wasn't the proper way to do so. Use tags the next time, please--Orlovic (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

pozdrav[edit]

Pozdrav iz Srbije '

Imam jednu molbu za Vas!

Video sam da ste slikali sanitetsko vozilo u Puli, ja sam kolekcionar fotografija vozila za hitnu pomoc, pa me zanima da li postoji mogucnost da poslikate i ostala vozila i vaseg grada/drzave?

Moj email je ambulancehitna@gmail.com

U nadi da ce te mi odgovoriti, srdacan pozdrav

s postovanjem Vladan Jovanovic

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Orlovic!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 22:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


Do you have a better version of File:Norhern diversity.JPG?[edit]

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | +/−


Thank you for your submission of File:Norhern diversity.JPG. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:Norhern diversity.JPG at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Gotovina posteri.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gotovina posteri.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Modzzak (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Slovenian military truck.JPG[edit]

Hello Orlovic!

Do you have more images of the slovenian land forces or other military images? If yes, it would be extremely good to have them on Commons! Please upload some more. Hope to hear and see of you! Thanx! Golr 08:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Orlovic!

I enjoyed the picture of the Croatian registered Dacia 1300! Could you tell me what year was that picture taken? Do you know the year of fabrication of the Dacia? Do you have other pics of Croatian/Yugoslav Dacias?

Regards, Fastardul [6]

(please leave e response on my Wikipedia Talk page! thank you!)

File:Afghanistan_map_civilwar01.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Afghanistan_map_civilwar01.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Antemister (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Boeing_737_of_Ryanair.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boeing_737_of_Ryanair.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf «Cabale!» 13:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Radetzky class battleship photos[edit]

Hello there! I'm Buggie111. at this page, I've run into a bit of a problem regarding several photos you uploaded. Would you mind taking a look and trying to provide the necesarry info? Thanks, Buggie111 (talk) 15:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

which ones?--Orlovic (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
The lead pic. 68.98.31.172 02:02, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

7122 series train (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7122 series train (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Georgian Otokar Cobra.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Georgian Otokar Cobra.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 02:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Columbus II in Pula (2).JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


File:Columbus II in Pula (1).JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Montenegrin AF roundel.svg.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Montenegrin AF roundel.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alkari (?), 9 August 2012, 05:56 UTC 05:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

T-55 drawing[edit]

Do you have a vector version of it? Ain92 (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Zagreb airport air base.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Zagreb airport air base.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Zagreb airport air base.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


File:Trst-zona ab.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Trst-zona ab.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Train in Slovenia 2.JPG[edit]

Hi, where have been the following two images taken: File:Train in Slovenia 2.JPG, File:Train in Slovenia 1.JPG? Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dead mosquito 1.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dead mosquito 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim Raschka (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dead mosquito 2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dead mosquito 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim Raschka (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dead mosquito 3.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dead mosquito 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Achim Raschka (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Israeli troops in sinai war.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Israeli troops in sinai war.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Littorio class battleship.png[edit]

Hello, I have a question for you. I'm using the above illustration you made in the related articles on the English Wiki, and I got a question about what source you used to make the drawing. Could you either add it to the file description page or tell me and I can add it? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tito.ogg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tito.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Radetzky.postcard.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Radetzky.postcard.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Radetzky.postcard.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)