User talk:Paris 16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Orlybus[edit]

Hi, why do you erase my name ©Guillaume A ? I send a ticket Otrs. Could you put yours off ? Thanks, Guillanst.

Merci...[edit]

...pour tes ajouts de catégories etc. sur mes photos de Paris : j'essaie de ne rien oublier mais tu parviens toujours à améliorer les choses. Donc grand merci pour cela ! Face-smile.svg.

--Aga (d) 06:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Paris LOpenTour, France April 2011.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris LOpenTour, France April 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Disneyland Park 08, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Disneyland Park 08, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Disneyland Park 09, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Disneyland Park 09, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Paco rabanne ad in paris.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paco rabanne ad in paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Renaming Flickr images[edit]

Hi, when you rename a Flickr file, could you please retain the photo ID on the file name? The PID is unique on Flickr and keeping it in the filename assists greatly when checking for non-identical duplicates. This is more important that the account name, as on Flickr account names can be changed many times, but the PID (and user ID, known as the NSID) remain unique and fixed. Thanks -- (talk) 18:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 18:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Tour Saint-Jacques BLS.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tour Saint-Jacques BLS.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tour Saint-Jacques BLS.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Galerie Vivienne, 12 March 2015.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Galerie Vivienne, 12 March 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galerie Vivienne, 12 March 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Disneyland Park 07, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Disneyland Park 07, Paris 22 August 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stifle (talk) 12:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

75px|center|
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/L’Afficheur, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/L’Afficheur has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Impasse Saint-Denis, Paris 3 July 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Impasse Saint-Denis, Paris 3 July 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Édouard Manet, The Rue Mosnier with Flags, 1878.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Édouard Manet, The Rue Mosnier with Flags, 1878.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Édouard Manet, The Rue Mosnier with Flags, 1878.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Le Pont Royal et le Pavillon de Flore, 1814 - BnF.jpg[edit]

Hi Paris 16, I'm curious. Did you derive this file from File:Paris-PontRoyal-PavillonDeFlore-1814.jpg? --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, with a little restauration.--Paris 16 (talk) 05:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
It looks very nice. It's always a good idea to mention the intermediate source. I'll add some notes to the file page, if that's OK with you. --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
OK, thank Robert.Allen!--Paris 16 (talk) 05:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Please edit, if I got anything wrong. Thanks for making this adjusted version and uploading it to a different page. In my opinion, it's always good to keep Gallica's original image on a separate page. --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I've been manually changing the pages that link to the original to your new version. Do you know if there is a tool for doing this? --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I changed as many as I could. --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

No, I don't known. Sometime, I did it manually too.--Paris 16 (talk) 06:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Entrance to old Louvre courtyard, Paris July 2014.jpg[edit]

Hi Paris 16, This should be a featured picture. Would you be willing to nominate it? I don't know how. (Perhaps it was uploaded too long ago? I don't know the rules.) --Robert.Allen (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Paris 16/Recent uploads[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Paris 16/Recent uploads, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 2000 files per gallery, while your gallery had 2989 images.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC))

Renaming Paris[edit]

Hello! Concerning this renaming, while the name you devised is more informative than the original, it goes probably against COM:FR; I added the text of new filename also as a description. Either way, your apt identification of the exact location of this photo is to be thanked. -- Tuválkin 12:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Ancien pont Saint-Michel[edit]

Bonjour,

Puis-je suggéré cette version : File:Auguste-Hippolyte Collard, Ancien pont Saint-Michel, 1857 edit.jpg ? J'ai en partie désaturé le jaune, et augmenté le contraste. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Auguste-Hippolyte Collard, Ancien pont Saint-Michel, 1857 edit.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Auguste-Hippolyte Collard, Ancien pont Saint-Michel, 1857 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Old and new Pont Saint-Michel has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Eiffel Tower old staircase, Paris 14 Nov 2008.jpg[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | മലയാളം | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Eiffel Tower old staircase, Paris 14 Nov 2008.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Agence Rol, L’éclipse, gare Saint-Lazare, 1921.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Agence Rol, L’éclipse, gare Saint-Lazare, 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agence Rol, L’éclipse, gare Saint-Lazare, 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Feu d'artifice du 14 juillet 2009 sur le site de la Tour Eiffel à Paris vu de la Tour Montparnasse.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feu d'artifice du 14 juillet 2009 sur le site de la Tour Eiffel à Paris vu de la Tour Montparnasse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Austriantraveler (talk) 10:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Russavia?[edit]

On 2015-09-03T18:41:00‎, you uploaded File:Église Saint-Leu-Saint-Gilles, Paris 26 May 2012.jpg and tagged it upon upload with Category:Files uploaded by Russavia. That’s not only untrue, as it was uploaded by you, not by User:Russavia, but more so as this is a user who was banned from all WMF wikis in a hugely polemic case. There’s no good explanation for this, but just don’t do it again. -- Tuválkin 00:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Impasse Delaunay, 1 November 2013.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Impasse Delaunay, 1 November 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Photographie sportive, Jules Beau - Files:Btv ... dans Category:Files of Paris with bad file names[edit]

Je retire les File:Btv..... de la Category:Files of Paris with bad file names. Ils font partie d'une série de carnets comme celui-ci et devraient rester dans le bon ordre, me semble-t-il. Cdlt, --Bohème (talk) 19:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

OK, merci Bohème!--Paris 16 (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Une faveur, s'il te plaît[edit]

Charles Fichot, Vue générale de Paris prise du rond-point.jpg

Bonjour Paris 16, est-ce que tu peux s'il te plaît ajouter ici ces petits carrés jaunes dont j'ignore même le nom sur les bâtiments suivants: 1.) en haut à gauche "Category:Église Saint-Vincent-de-Paul de Paris", 2.) entre le Palais de l'Industrie et la Seine: "Rotonde des Panoramas des Champs-Elysées (Hittorff)", 3.) en bordure de la Seine derrière le panorama: "Galerie annexe des machines de l'Exposition Universelle de 1855". C'est la seule image disponible sur commons de la Rotonde des Panoramas de Hittorff qui est souvent confondu avec celle devenu Théâtre du Rond-Point. Et elle permet de cerner la date d'exécution de cette très belle litho à quelques année près. Merci. --Bohème (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

C'est bien maintenant? Mais pourquoi tu ne le fais pas?--Paris 16 (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup, c'est parfait. Parce que je suis absolument nul en la matière. Bonne journée, --Bohème (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Catégorisation des anciennes rues de Paris (avant 1860) par arrondissement[edit]

Bonjour,

Je m'étais intérrogé au moment de catégoriser File:RueBéthizy-1793-1795.png et je pense que ta catégorisation n'est pas bonne : la rue de Béthizy était située dans dans l'actuel 1er arrondissement (et non l'actuel 4e arrondissement) mais elle a disparu avant le redécoupage des arrondisments de Paris et était, au moment de sa disparition dans le l'ancien 4e arrondissment (et non le nouveau). À noter que l'ancien 4e arrondissement a été créé en 1795 (d'après l'article Wikipédia) et que c'est très juste puisque le plan que j'ai établi s'appuie sur un plan créé entre 1793 et 1795.

O.Taris (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Salut O.Taris! C'est ma faute. Je l'ai corrigé. Désolé!--Paris 16 (talk) 11:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

File:FIAC hors les murs, Jardin des plantes 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FIAC hors les murs, Jardin des plantes 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.2.101.173 21:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Aile Henri IV (Louvre)[edit]

Paris 16 sandbox 17.svg

What source do you cite for this wing name? This wing is usually referred to as the Lemercier Wing or in French the Aile Lemercier. Or at least, I think this is what you intend. --Robert.Allen (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Not much, but there are some source for "Aile Henri IV" [1], [2]. Aile Henri IV is not Aile Lemercier. You can see here.--Paris 16 (talk) 03:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
With your first link you have confused "Alle- magne" in the first column with "Henri IV" in the second column. Henri IV did not really add to the present-day Sully wing, he added the Grande Galerie, Pavillon de Flore, and to the Tuileries Palace (in particular the dome, later replaced by Le Vau). --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
You created a very detailed map with lots of names, but I find it rather confusing, it is much too detailed and there is too much information on it. Also, what is your source for the naming of the parts of the west wing of the Sully Wing? You've split the wing into 4 subsidiary wings besides the 3 pavilions. I'm unfamiliar with this procedure. In the books I have read, the Lemercier and Lescot wings both have east and west facades. --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
I found a link which explains this name. It is an alternative name for the Aile Lemercier (see this snippet view on Google Books). The staircase north of the Pavillon de l'Horloge has also been called the escalier Henri IV, but Alexandre Gady, who wrote the 2005 monograph Jacques Lemercier, writes that this name is improper (p. 376 [it was built under Louis XIII, not Henri IV]). The same also undoubtedly applies to calling the wing after Henri IV. --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
@Robert.Allen: I found this link and we can say the Aile Henri II is not the Aile Lescot (page 3). So maybe "Aile Henri IV" is not an alternative name for the Aile Lemercier as you said.--Paris 16 (talk) 17:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Paris 16, This is a very interesting link with lots of great information on the chiffres. I think you may [not] be correct:

  • The first example on page 3 "Henri II (Cour Carrée, aile Pierre Lescot et aile Henri II)" shows a chiffre for Henri II, a wide H surmounted with a crown. This is definitely found on the east facade of the Lescot wing (see here and here). "Aile Henri II" may refer to the western-most part of the wing on the south side of the Cour Carrée, but our pictures of that facade are not detailed enough to determine whether this chiffre is found there or not. Maybe someone can go over there and look for them.
  • The second example "Henri II (Cour Carrée, aile Henri II)" shows a different, more complex H, but with corbels, fr:Corbeau (architecture), above it. There are certainly corbels on the south facade, as well on the Lescot facade, at the top of the second level. Chiffres are seen in Androuet du Cerceau's engraving of the second level of the Lescot facade (under the corbels, centered over the window pediments; see here). I don't see any sign of it on the west facade of the aile Lescot, which many refer to as the aile Henri II (see here).
  • The third example "Charles IX (Cour Carrée, aile Charles IX", with K overlapped with reversed K, may also be found on the south facade somewhere, probably further east.

Hopefully someone (you?) can go photograph these chiffres and tell us exactly where they are. Then we will understand where these wings are. --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

  • According to Berty (1868, see this plan) the aile Lescot was constructed under Henri II, the first 5 bays of the south wing (counting west to east, starting with the bay with the first door in the current day facade) were built under Charles IX, and the next 3 under either Henri III or Henri IV. All of these bays are west of the current-day Pavillon des Arts. According Bates Lowry's thesis, the major sculptural decoration of this part of the south wing took place from 1556 to 1562. This would mean the earliest was under Henri II, and later under Charles IX. The last 3 bays (west of the current-day Pavillon des Arts) may have been even later (at least according to Berty), so maybe some of these bays were decorated under Henri IV. [The ninth bay (with the door) may have been added added by Louis Le Vau c. 1659 or later, when the medieval Tour de la Chapelle was torn down to make way for the extension of the south wing.] --Robert.Allen (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Lowry, Bates (1956). Palais du Louvre, 1528-1624: The Development of a Sixteenth-Century Architectural Complex (thesis/dissertation). University of Chicago. OCLC 214308093. ProQuest

--Robert.Allen (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

  • By the way, Catherine Grodecki published an article titled "Les marchés de construction pour l'aile Henri II du Louvre (1546 - 1558)" (OCLC 888346197). These are the contracts for the construction of the Lescot wing. --Robert.Allen (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Paris 16:, After going over this article in detail and looking back at some other sources, I have concluded that the caption "Henri II (Cour Carrée, aile Pierre Lescot et aile Henri II)" is inexact writing. It doesn't mean these are different wings. They should have written something like "Henri II (Cour Carrée, aile Pierre Lescot, aussi appelé aile Henri II)". If you send me a message via Wikipedia e-mail, I will be happy to send you a scan of a figure and caption from Yvan Christ's book on the Louvre, which will help to clarify this issue. (Because the photo was taken after 1923, I can't put it on the internet, but limited sharing of a copy between two individuals for research purposes is permitted.) Best, Robert
Hi Robert.Allen! I don't known how to send an email via Wikipedia. But maybe you can do it, because my Commons account is "Enable email from other users". I really want to stop this question and modify my Louvre plans.--Paris 16 (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
@Paris 16:, When I send you an e-mail via Wikipedia (using the link in the left-hand side bar labelled "Email this user"), you will receive an e-mail with my personal e-mail as the "From:" address, but I can't include an attachment. If you then send me an e-mail address, I can send the photo directly to that address in a message with an attachment. (If you have spam filtering enabled, my first e-mail may end up there, so be sure to check for it. I will send it now.) Best, Robert
@Paris 16:, OK I sent a quick scan of the whole page. It is 1.6 MB, hopefully not too big for e-mail. --Robert.Allen (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank Robert.Allen! I will modify my Louvre plans. --Paris 16 (talk) 19:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I am very happy this helped! Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Subsidiary wing names[edit]

I think a lot of these minor wing names you are adding are just going to confuse people. If you want to change, for example, Category:Sully Wing (Louvre) to Category:Aile Sully (Louvre), that would be less confusing. I still favor using the English form, since these are in Category:Wings of the Palais du Louvre, not "Ailes du Palais du Louvre". I have no objection to use Aile for the minor wings, which was already used here. (I haven't gone around changing all these things.) You asked me about the use of the English "Wing" in the category name. I explained why I used it. If you disagree, you can always make your case.

If you look at the Louvre website, in particular the Atlas database (make sure you are searching by room), you will find that present-day Palace is divided into three main wings Richelieu, Sully, and Denon. This greatly simplifies things. All these other minor wings belong to one these. I did split out the Grande Galerie and the Rohan wing as separate wings, since I suspect a lot of people will find this better. That is something we could discuss before making a lot of changes. I started adding these categories in order to organize the artwork room categories by wing. That was my starting point. Then I quickly saw the categories were useful for organizing a lot of other categories by wing, and particularly for creating categories for differentiating and organizing pictures of facades. --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Here's another source I used. Check this web page. Scroll to the bottom. You can download pdf files in multiple languages. Naturally I used the English version. On the second page of the pdf, you can see that the three main wings of the palace are listed: Richelieu, Sully, and Denon. Everything is organized under these three names. --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
I saw the plans (English and French) on the web page of the Louvre Museum many times. But that is a simple plan for the visitors. For organizing the pictures on Commons, we need a plan with more details. I want to change only the categories like Category:Sully Wing (Louvre), not Category:Wings of the Palais du Louvre. And you use Rohan Wing for all the north west part of the Louvre, maybe it is wrong.--Paris 16 (talk) 14:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Main wings of the Louvre
Obviously the Louvre is complicated and naming is not always consistent in different sources. The northwest wing is called the Aile Napoléon or Aile Nord in Yvan Christ's 1949 book on the Louvre, which I also used. Andrew Ayers' book calls the stretch between the Pavillon de Marsan and the Pavillon de Rohan (built by Percier & Fontaine) the Rivoli wing. Maybe I got confused when I tried to find the modern name, but I see the Musée des Arts décoratifs website states it is located in the Marsan and Rohan wings. I don't advocate getting rid of wings Richelieu, Sully, and Denon. Too many guide books and publications by the Louvre use these designations. Maybe it is better to rename Category:Wings of the Palais du Louvre to Category:Primary wings of the Palais du Louvre and put there just three categories: Aile Richelieu (Louvre), Aile Sully (Louvre), and Aile Denon (Louvre) and add a simple map showing what each includes and English text explaining that these are the primary sections of the palace and that Aile means wing in French. Then the naming of all wings will be consistent on Commons. Also, maybe we should move Grande Galerie to category Aile Denon (Louvre); and Aile Rohan to category Aile Richelieu. I think most people who add pictures to Commons will find this less confusing. Very few will know the names of the subsidiary wings. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
This guide states that the Rohan wing houses three museums: Musée de la Mode et du Textile, Musée des Arts Décoratifs, and Musée de la Publicité. If you know where these are, then you know where the Rohan wing is. Here is another, which says the Musé des Arts décoratifs is in the Pavillon de Marsan and the Rohan wing. --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
I agree with you. We should create 2 categories: Primary wings of the Palais du Louvre and Minor wings of the Palais du Louvre. Both this categories are subcategories of Wings of the Palais du Louvre.--Paris 16 (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Aile Sud (Cour Carrée)[edit]

If we're going to use aile for wing, we may as well use all French. An alternative might be Category:Aile Sud de la Cour Carrée (Louvre) to be more consistent with other Louvre category names. --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Facade categories[edit]

Maybe, for example, Category:West facade of the Sully Wing (Louvre) could be renamed to West facade of the Aile Sully (Louvre). This category could be for pictures that include more than just a paviion or one minor wing. If we have a lot of pictures primarily of a particular pavilion or a detail of the pavilion then put it in a category for the pavilion. If we have a lot that focus on the facade of one minor wing, create a category for the facade of the minor wing, such as "East facade of the Aile Lescot" or "Cour Carrée facade of the Aile Lescot". But, if a picture includes more, then put it in a more general category like West facade of the Cour Carrée. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

For facade categories, I think we should use the names of the minor wings. It will more accurate.--Paris 16 (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The use of a wing name for a facade is common shorthand (see métonymie) but inaccurate. Most minor wings and pavilions have two facades, and to be accurate the facade needs to be specified. So for instance, an image that shows most of the east facade of the Cour Carrée would have to be in three categories, possibly named: Category:West facade of the Aile Est septentrionale (Louvre), Category:West facade of the Pavillon Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois (Louvre), and Category:West facade of the Aile Est méridionale (Louvre), all just to replace Category:East facade of the Cour Carrée (Louvre). And why do you call the latter inaccurate. It is used in several books (for examples, see here). Then think about the south wing: it also has two minor wings and a central pavilion, so for instance, we would have Category:North facade of the Aile Sud orientale de la Cour Carrée (Louvre), Category:North facade of the Pavillon des Arts (Louvre), and Category:North facade of the Aile Sud occidentale de la Cour Carrée (Louvre). Or are you proposing to rename these minor wings on their south facades? To use different wing names for the opposite facades of the same wing (like you do for the east side of the Cour Napoléon on your map) is in my view both inaccurate and misleading. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Gertrude Stein sitting on a sofa in her Paris studio - Library of Congress.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gertrude Stein sitting on a sofa in her Paris studio - Library of Congress.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alinea (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Gertrude Stein sitting on a sofa in her Paris studio - Library of Congress.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gertrude Stein sitting on a sofa in her Paris studio - Library of Congress.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alinea (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Rue Nicolas-Flamel (Paris)[edit]

Hello, could you please explain why Rue Nicolas-Flamel would be the correct spelling?! Neither on the street signs, nor on paris.fr there are any hints at that! Regards, XanonymusX (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am not sure but you can read this article. This is the form for the name of all street articles in French Wikipedia.--Paris 16 (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, I didn’t know this! Sorry for the inconvenience, then. Very interesting rules, we have quite similar ones in German, actually (and also there the street signs mostly disobey to the rules). Regards, XanonymusX (talk) 22:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Maquette du chateau du Louvre (est).jpg[edit]

Au secours ! J'ai fait une remarque à un utilisateur. A savoir que pour désigner le chateau du Louvre de Philippe Auguste, il valait mieux utiliser Chateau du Louvre ou Louvre castle, plutot que Medieval Louvre qui désigne l'exposition de ce qu'on a trouvé des restes de murailles et de tours. Je crois qu'il l'a mal pris et il m'a collé une demande de suppression sur cette photo pour une obscure règle de copyright aux US (obscure pour moi au moins). Si on veut suivre cette règle, il faudrait supprimer toutes les photos de modèles et maquettes qui n'ont pas de rôle utilitaire. Pourrais-tu mettre un avis de conserver. Merci d'avance.
PS : je regarde tes plans du Louvre dans la semaine. Ca tombe bien, j'y vais demain lundi pour préparer la visite de ma petite fille. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Marsan vs Rohan wings[edit]

Hi Paris 16, I've tried to fix some of the errors I made, when I confused these names, so when you have time you might want to check out the cats of the pictures in Category:Aile de Marsan (Louvre). I still have a question though: do we know for sure that the north facade of this part of the Louvre is considered to be the north facade of the Marsan wing rather the north facade of the Rohan wing? I've been thinking perhaps only the southern row of rooms are considered to be the Marsan wing, and the northern rooms might be considered part of the Rohan wing? Do you know? Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

@Robert.Allen: I think you are right. The northwest part (bigger) is the Aile de Marsan and the southeast part (smaller) is the Aile de Rohan. The facades mean nothing.--Paris 16 (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


File:Le salon de lecture Jacques Kerchache (musée du Quai Branly).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le salon de lecture Jacques Kerchache (musée du Quai Branly).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Manahene (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Balloons in Paris[edit]

Bonjour Paris16, il y a de bonnes raisons de laisser certains ballons dans la Category:Balloons. Celui-là est un ballon à gaz et non pas une montgolfière à air chaud. Ils ne sont pas toujours facile à distinguer, alors de grâce, laisse les où ils sont. Je ferai le tri ultérieurement. Merci, --Bohème (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

P.S.: Si tu penses que c'est nécessaire, ouvre une cat pour les ballons baudruche 'parisiens'. Mais à vrai dire je trouve de toute façon parfaitement inutile et superflu une category:objects in Paris. Faudrait-il à l'avenir cliquer autour du monde et passer dans les coins les plus reculés pour dénicher simplement la photo d'un ballon? Et encore, la plupart du temps l'objet convoité est à peine visible. C'est une abérration, non? --Bohème (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Je mets les ballons baudruche dans Cat:toy balloons et cat:toys in Paris. Ça te convient?
D'accord, Bohème! Merci!--Paris 16 (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Tiens, un petit cadeau[edit]

Le Géant de Nadar. Une vrai chambre d'hôtel volante, c'est pas formidable? --Bohème (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

LOL. Nadar, il est fou et futurique!--Paris 16 (talk) 07:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Another figure[edit]

Greetings Paris 16, I e-mailed you another figure from Yvan Christ's book. Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 09:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Deux touristes, Paris juillet 2014.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deux touristes, Paris juillet 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (165).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (165).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 01:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (103).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (103).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 01:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (105).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (105).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (108).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (108).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 02:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Peace for Paris.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peace for Paris.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

92.75.77.4 10:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Peace for Paris.svg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peace for Paris.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.194.218.189 11:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Pray for Paris.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pray for Paris.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


File tagging File:Peace for Paris.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Peace for Paris.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Peace for Paris.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Finnusertop (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (153).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (153).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Peace for Paris.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peace for Paris.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Finnusertop (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (102).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (102).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (107).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (107).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (142).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (142).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (110).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (110).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (163).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (163).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (180).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (180).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (203).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (203).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (209).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (209).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Rue Croulebarbe (Paris 12).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rue Croulebarbe (Paris 12).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Chocolate Jaguar, the Maison Georges Larnicol chocolate shop on St. Germain, Paris 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chocolate Jaguar, the Maison Georges Larnicol chocolate shop on St. Germain, Paris 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Plan louvre1.svg à modifier ou à supprimer?[edit]

Salut Paris 16, je confie ce plan à tes bons soins. Il est très bien à l'exception près qu'il nous indique les Tuileries à la place des Jardins du Carrousel. Ce serait dommage de le supprimer. Peut-être pourrait-il être modifié. Le créateur n'est apparemment plus actif. Je te laisse décider ce qu'il convient de faire. Bonne journée, --Bohème (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

P.S.: Supprimer n'est définitivement pas la solution: ce plan est abondamment utilisé. Je comprends par comparaison: par "Tuileries" on a voulu désigner l'emplacement du palais des Tuileries, mais c'est un peu confus. Peut-être les deux (jardins du carrousel + Palais des Tuileries) pourraient être indiquées? --Bohème (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
C'est bon maintenant? Mais je pense que mes plans sont mieux.--Paris 16 (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Très bien, merci beaucoup. C'est vrai, les tiens sont mieux. Celui-là est particulièrement beau. Juste pour info: à l'est le Jardin des Tuileries est délimité par l'Avenue du Général-Lemonnier complètement méconnue. Sa partie centrale passe en tunnel entre les deux jardins. Elle n'a pas de maisons, par conséquent pas de numéro non plus, mais elle a pourtant une importance 'stratégique' majeure parce que c'est dans son tunnel que se trouve le seul accès de véhicules aux espaces librement accessibles du sous-sol du Louvre (parking cars de tourisme et voitures, espace de livraison du centre commercial Carrousel du Louvre, espace de transit pour tout ce qui entre et sort des musées, etc. [3]). --Bohème (talk) 13:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Salut! Je vais créer un autre plan des Tuileries.--Paris 16 (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Sculptures by Aristide Maillol in the Jardins du Carrousel[edit]

Je m'aperçois aussi que commons déménage les statues de Maillol dans le Jardin des Tuileries. Il n'y en a à ma connaissance aucune. Elles sont toutes dans les Jardins du Carrousel. Bonne journée. --Bohème (talk) 13:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Je veux le faire depuis longtemps. Est-ce que tu sais le nom de statue "Unknown" dans ce catégorie?--Paris 16 (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
C'est l'Île-de-France de la série des baigneuses. Celle du Square Georges-Cain n'a pas besoin de catégorie, elle a disparue. --Bohème (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
P.S. Celles des Jardins du Carrousel sont toutes des statues de fonderie, non pas des sculptures (taille directe). Commons aime bien ignorer la différence. Il n'y a même pas de catégorie adéquate. Je viens d'ouvrir une Category:Metal statues in France. Bonne journée! --Bohème (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC) P.S.S.: Trouvé! Elles sont noyées . --Bohème (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Merci Bohème.--Paris 16 (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Spirit II in flight over Paris. Built for the San Diego Aerospace Museum. Burned in 1978 n2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Spirit II in flight over Paris. Built for the San Diego Aerospace Museum. Burned in 1978 n2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Impasse des Peintres, Paris May 4, 2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Impasse des Peintres, Paris May 4, 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Paris Notre-Dame Vaults 01.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Paris Notre-Dame Vaults 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris Notre-Dame Vaults 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Merci...[edit]

Vu ton pseudo, je suppose que tu est passionné par la ville de Paris. Lors de ma dernière visite sur Paris, j'avais fait quelques photos. Tu en as sélectionné certaines pour les proposer en images de qualité et beaucoup ont été promues comme QI. Je viens de voir que tu as améliorer les catégories sur ces images. Encore merci pour tes contributions sur mes images. Cela fait toujours plaisir de voir quelqu'un trouvant son travail utile. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

PS. J'utilise le français, car je suppose que c'est ta langue maternelle ;). --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Salut Medium69! Le français n'est pas ma langue maternelle. C'est dommage que tu n'as pas pris beaucoup photos de Paris. Mais il y a 2 FP. Merci!--Paris 16 (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (119).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Je suis Charlie, Brussels 11 January 2015 (119).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Impasse Delaunay, 1 November 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Impasse Delaunay, 1 November 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Cedric Villani in his office 2015 n1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cedric Villani in his office 2015 n1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cedric Villani in his office 2015 n1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Photographes au Tuileries, October 2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Photographes au Tuileries, October 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 15:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Duplicates[edit]

Hi Paris. Firstly, thank you a lot for the wonderful work adjusting categories and descriptions of Alexader Baronov's files. But, I think that File:Paris 75018 Rue Caulaincourt no 24 x Rue Tourlaque 20130808.jpg lost its metadata when you restored the older version over the new one. Regards, Sturm (talk) 18:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]

Christmas Barnstar.png * * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Notre Dame, Paris 30 September 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

MANET - Música en las Tullerías (National Gallery, Londres, 1862).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:MANET - Música en las Tullerías (National Gallery, Londres, 1862).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MANET - Música en las Tullerías (National Gallery, Londres, 1862).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Rue Descartes et son arbre.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rue Descartes et son arbre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

QI de Paris par arrondissement[edit]

Bonjour et bonne année d'abord. Je suis en train d'écrire les articles sur les arrondissements parisiens pour la Wikipédia en roumain, en cherchant des illustrations je me suis dit que ce serait bien d'avoir aussi un classement des QI & co. par arrondissement. Qu'en penses-tu ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

OK, Jastrow. C'est parti!--Paris 16 (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Super, merci ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Le Miroir ?[edit]

Bonjour Paris 16, auriez vous des informations sur Le Miroir journal (?) mentionné dans la légende de cette (superbe) illustration : File:Eugène Delacroix, The Crayfish at Longchamps, 1822.jpg Merci de votre aide, --Spiessens (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Spiessens: Je ne connais rien du tout. Désolé!--Paris 16 (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:West facade of the Palais du Louvre[edit]

Hi Paris 16, I suggest this category be renamed Category:West facades of the Palais du Louvre, because these are separate facades (i.e., more than one facade, so plural). Likewise for Category:North facade of the Palais du Louvre, Category:South facade of the Palais du Louvre, and Category:East facade of the Palais du Louvre. What do you think? Best, --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Map of the Palais du Louvre - OpenStreetMap 2015.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Map of the Palais du Louvre - OpenStreetMap 2015.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lophotrochozoa (talk) 14:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 16:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 16:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Collections_of_Pinacothèque_de_Paris[edit]

Mel22 (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Collections_of_Musée_en_Herbe[edit]

Mel22 (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Plan of Louvre and Tuileries - Yvan Christ, Le Louvre et les Tuileries.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan of Louvre and Tuileries - Yvan Christ, Le Louvre et les Tuileries.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Plan of Louvre and Tuileries - Alfred Dwight Foster Hamlin, History of Architecture.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan of Louvre and Tuileries - Alfred Dwight Foster Hamlin, History of Architecture.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Plan of the Louvre - Yvan Christ, Le Louvre et les Tuileries.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan of the Louvre - Yvan Christ, Le Louvre et les Tuileries.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Fondation Cartier pour l'art contemporain, Paris 12 July 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fondation Cartier pour l'art contemporain, Paris 12 July 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Racconish ☎ 16:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued image promotion[edit]

Sphinx, Louvre 15 June 2014.jpg
An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Sphynx - Louvre A23.

Plans des escaliers du Louvre[edit]

Je sais que tu as toute une collection de plans du Louvre. Mais, que penserais-tu d'en créer un de plus pour localiser les escaliers du Louvre? A la demande de Robert.Allen, je suis allé faire des photos de l'escalier du Midi. Et j'en ai fait aussi pour l'escalier Colbert et l'escalier du ministre (! J'ai compris pourquoi Edouard Balladur n'avait pas envie de transférer le ministère des finances du Louvre vers Bercy). Tous absents de Commons. Je chargerai les photos dans qques jours. Bonnes contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 15:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Je n'ai que mes notes manuscrites sur les dépliants papier proposés par le musée. Comme il y en a encore 2 dont j'ignore les noms et qui sont absents de Commons, je te propose la chose suivante : la prochaine fois que je vais au Louvre, je les note et les photographie. Puis je t'envoie mes notes manuscrites. Qu'en penses-tu ? --Tangopaso (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour
J'ai fini de catégoriser et ajouter des photos pour tous les escaliers du Louvre (je crois n'en n'avoir pas oublié...). Que penserais tu que je charge dans Commons un scan du plan du Louvre avec mes notes manuscrites qui localisent les divers escaliers. Pour que tu puisses faire un plan des escaliers du Louvre. Ensuite, je demanderai la suppression de Commons de ce document, car je pense que le plan du Louvre n'est pas libre de droits. Qu'en penses-tu ? Ce n'est qu'une suggestion de ma part. Tu peux répondre ici avec un ping. Du genre @Tangopaso: . --Tangopaso (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 21:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 21:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:People_of_Paris_needing_categories[edit]

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Notre Dame, Paris, France. Aerial view.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Notre Dame, Paris, France. Aerial view.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 09:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Chéries-Chéris & Sébastien Lifshitz (Les Invisibles) débat dans le salle 300 (8077185217).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chéries-Chéris & Sébastien Lifshitz (Les Invisibles) débat dans le salle 300 (8077185217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Queryzo (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Embassy of Australia, Paris 13 December 2015.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Embassy of Australia, Paris 13 December 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

David Eppstein (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Historical images by Paolo Monti[edit]

Hi Paris 16, thank you for your interest in our work in bringing the photos by Paolo Monti into all Wikimedia projects. We noticed you changed the standard category Category:Historical images of France by Paolo Monti to Category:Photographs of France by Paolo Monti. Unfortunately this is not compliant to the standards we used with the other images in the Paolo Monti Archive on Commons (17.000 photos!), accordingly to the existing categories of Commons we found in any other city (we added about 100 categories "Historical images of ... by Paolo Monti", as sub-categories of the existing "Historical images of ..."). So I'm sorry, but we need to revert few of your edits on the images of Paris by Monti. I wish to propose you the alternative to move the photos into a new and more specific Category:Historical photographs of Paris by Paolo Monti. Let me know what alternative you prefer, and thanks you for your patience and collaboration. --Marcok (talk) 10:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Je comprends pas pourquoi ils chargent ces photos. La plupart ne sont pas localisées et n'ont aucun intérêt encyclopédique. Mais je charge des photos d'Italie ces temps ci et j'en ai trouvé là des aussi tartes. Et impossible d'espérer les faire supprimer vu les frilosités des admins. Et en plus, ils sont plusieurs à charger tout ça. C'est pas l'idée d'un contributeur isolé. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
En fait @Tangopaso: il s'agit, à ce jour, de la plus grande donation de photos sous license libre d'un artiste reconnu à Commons, dans le cadre du projet BEIC. C'est normal qu'ils soient plusieurs à y travailler! :) Tu trouveras tous les clichés sur Category:Photographs by Paolo Monti.
Ce que Marcok voulait savoir c'est pourquoi les images relativement anciennes (années '50,'60,'70) ne sont pas placées dans una catégorie à part, dénotée par "Historical images of ...", comme on fait sur Commons pour tous les autres pays? --Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas parce que des photos sont anciennes ou la plus grande donation de photos sous license libre d'un artiste reconnu à Commons qu'elles ont un intérêt encyclopédique. J'en ai recatégorisé certaines en Italie dans les Cinque Terre. Je persiste à dire que leur intérêt encyclopédique est nul, notamment parce que leur environnement (quelle ville ? Où dans la ville ?) est inconnu. Je ne suis pas admin de Commons (et ne souhaite pas l'être). Mais la majorité des photos de Paolo Monti devraient être à mon sens supprimées. Car dans les Cinque Terre ou à Paris, on ne sait pas où elles ont été prises. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Je doute que ce soit une raison valable pour la suppression des photos (mais un admin t'en dira plus), de plus celles-ci sont encore en cours de catégorisation. Celles que j'ai rencontré ont une catégorie très générique, qui s'affinera dans le futur; mais dire qu'elles "ne sont pas encyclopédiques" est équivalent à éliminer les quatre cinquièmes neuf dixièmes du contenu de Commons :D
En redevenant sérieux, "encyclopédique" ne veut pas dire "catégorisé", sinon tu jetterais à la poubelle tout le travail de Fae, par exemple, qui n'est pratiquement pas catégorisé au départ. Je t'invite donc, comme tu as fait et comme j'ai fait aussi, de faire le possible pour rendre ces images précieuses pour le projet (car fruit d'une longue négociation pour les obtenir) facilement joignables et utilisables en les catégorisant le mieux possible… comme j'ai fait aussi. C'est un travail crispant parfois, je le comprends, mais ça fait partie du travail dans un projet collaboratif. --Ruthven (msg) 17:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Je suis d'accord. Je catégorise patiemment, notamment aussi les images dans la category to be checked. Je ne propose pas leur suppression, car de toute façon elle ne serait pas acceptée. Mais je pense que Commons croule sous les images sans intérêt. Qu'est-ce que ça deviendra dans 10 ans ? Un fond d'images exceptionnelles avec, je suis d'accord sur la proportion, 9/10 de photos sans intérêts ou de contenu indéterminé. Je pense qu'il y aura une grosse opération de ménage.--Tangopaso (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Salle des bronzes antiques au Louvre[edit]

Bonjour,
Je t'informe que j'ai chargé dans Commons File:Salle des Terres cuites du musée Napoléon III au Louvre.jpg, comparable au File:Musée Napoléon III.jpg que tu as chargé. Parce que mon fichier a une plus grande définition que le tien (sinon, je ne me serais pas permis). Le tableau se trouve dans le nouveau centre d'interprétation du pavillon de l'Horloge. Le nom du fichier est celui du panneau d'information. Et ce panneau donne Charles Giraud comme peintre (et pas ceux que tu as indiqués). Mais je n'en sais pas plus. Amitiés. --Tangopaso (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Salut Tangopaso! Je sais rien du tout. Les deux noms que j'ai indiqués, j'ai les trouve dans le web du Louvre. Mais Charles Giraud, qui était avocat ou quelqu'un d'autre?--Paris 16 (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Non, un homonyme : fr:Sébastien Charles Giraud. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Photos Autorité des Marchés Financiers & Quai Malaquais[edit]

Bonjour et merci de votre intérêt pour mes contributions photographiques. J'avais déjà nominé la photo du siège de l'AMF il y a une semaine et donc la même photo est maintenant nominée deux fois et j'ai du m'en justifier. Pour la photo du quai Malaquais, vous avez retiré la catégorie "Pont du Carrousel" pour la catégorie "Pont Royal", mais je vous confirme qu'il s'agit bien du pont du Carrousel. Bien cordialement, Albert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albert Bergonzo (talk • contribs) 05:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Untitled (Picasso) - Sans titre (Picasso) - 1998 - Maurizio Cattelan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Untitled (Picasso) - Sans titre (Picasso) - 1998 - Maurizio Cattelan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Pourquoi vouloir supprimer des images 3D par une image 2D[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que tu avais créé des images 2D extraites d'images stéréoscopique (3D). Sur le principe, il n'y a rien contre et c'est aussi plus facile à utiliser comme illustrations. Mais pourquoi les images d'origines ont-elles été marqué pour remplacement ? C'est de la perte d'information puisque l'on passe de 3D à 2D. Comment enlever la mention fichier remplacé ? Liste des images concernées :

--AliothdeMegrez (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

De ce que j'en sais, la mention le fichier à été déplacé (superseded) est excessive. C'est plutôt il est recommandé d'aller voir l'autre fichier. Ce qui est à mon sens justifié car le fichier 2D est plus lisible. Mais le fichier originel (ici le 3D) ne sera pas supprimé. ----Tangopaso (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Boutique 38 rue Bonaparte.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, vous avez nominé la photo File:Boutique 38 rue Bonaparte.jpg dont je suis l'auteur pour promotion sur la liste des Images de Qualité. Or, du fait des nombreux problèmes rencontrés, je ne souhaite pas que mes contributions soient soumises à cette procédure de nomination. En conséquence, en dépit de sa promotion, j'ai passé le statut de la photo à "Withdrawn". Je vous remercie de bien vouloir respecter ma volonté à l'avenir.--Albert Bergonzo (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)