User talk:PawełMM

Most Świętokrzyski

Na commons są grafiki Image:Most_Siekierkowski1.JPG, Most Świętochrzyski, Most Świętokrzyski.

Wszystkie tego samego autora Janusz J., podpisane "Picture taken in Siedlce, Poland, 2005 © 2005 by Janusz Jurzyk, Janusz J." Mają licencję GDFL, czy to aby nie kłóci się z tym "©" w opisie pod grafiką.

Są tożsame i przedstawiają Most Świętokrzyski w Warszawie. Czy mógłbyś to uporządkować i ewentualnie usunąć duble.

Sprawa ta była też zgłoszona w plWiki, na stronie z błędami [1].

Pozdrawiam --PawełMM 09:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

© nie kłóci się z licencją; przeczytaj samą licencję, zwracając szczególną uwagę na sekcję "jak opisywać prace". Co do skasowania, widzę, że już ktoś się tym zajął. tsca ✉ 07:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Piraeus.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Piraeus.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. le Korrigan →bla 22:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Panorama image

Thank you for the panoramized image which you created. Please remember that the template {{information}} may contain only one field "date". When two fields with identical names are used (like here), the content of the first one is ignored and not displayed. --ŠJů (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure that my note was right understood ([2]). The date of taken the original photo is a very relevant information and shouldn't be missing at the derivative work. --ŠJů (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

File:IPhone_3G_Jailbroken.jpg

File:IPhone_3G_Jailbroken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Lithograph retouched

Just wanted to say thanks for retouching that lithograph of the shells engraved on the dagurreotype. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks also for the masterful clean-up of The American Journal of Science. Looks great. MarmadukePercy (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks also for the clean-up of the Yale campus image as well. MarmadukePercy (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Once again, thanks for your help, this time with the Darwin image. MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, thank you for your work on the image of Steinkjer church. Kenneaal (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Aviva stadium under construction 2010-no watermark.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Aviva stadium under construction 2010-no watermark.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Muslim Scout.png

File:Muslim Scout.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Watermark templates

Hi! Just wanted to remind you to use {{attribution metadata from licensed image}} rather than {{Metadata from image}} for non-PD images. Thanks. —Quibik (talk) 12:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Philosopher

Hi. Can you fix just size of the image? Height must be 45px, not 65px. -- Bojan  Talk  10:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again. -- Bojan  Talk  10:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Senshitsushugi.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Lysenko_evil_eyes.jpg

File:Lysenko_evil_eyes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Alfred and Emmeline O. Stieglitz-restored.jpg

Hello again. Nice work on restoring the image. I just wanted to make sure that my original upload of this image is noted in the files. MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks for letting me know. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Masovian_voivodship_flag.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Masovian_voivodship_flag.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

• OK. File:POL województwo mazowieckie flag.svg - tu jest poprawna flaga z ustanowionymi kolorami Pantone. JDavid (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

problemy ze stronami

Witam,

wydaje mi się, że problem wynika z aktualizacji oprogramowania serwerów commons i innych wiki. Niestety nie mogę chyba tutaj dużo pomóc. Nazwa admin jest tutaj trochę myląca gdyż pod tym względem jest to w zasadzie normalny użytkownik, ktory ma tylko trochę więcej przycisków. Tutaj możesz poczytać trochę o samej aktualizacji oprogramowania. Wydaje mi się, że może pomóc usunięcie części historii i cache przeglądarki, nazwijmy to "siłowym odświerzeniem". Czy na xp pod inną przeglądarką też działa dobrze? Jeśli tak, to IMHO trzeba przeczyścić jej pamięć. Mam nadzieję, że trochę pomogłem. --sfu (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Kanchō.jpg

File:Kanchō.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– Adrignola talk 14:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Ww1VerdunMutinyc1917.JPG

File:Ww1VerdunMutinyc1917.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Goodvac (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Herb_Pierzchala.svg

File:Herb_Pierzchala.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Distorted image again

Hello. Could you help me with File:Kalakaua (PP-96-15-008).jpg? Use this version for reference.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Tamatoa

Again the derivative work. I love your version, but could you possibily just upload over the original that I've provided? I don't like having a second derivative work when the original is not so good or can serve any purpose on its own. Usually I state if I a seperate derivative work created.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 12:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, PawełMM!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

• Image:Obelisk - Tablica.jpg was uncategorized on 19 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Tablica Informacyjna.jpg was uncategorized on 19 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Tahiti Joinville

Can you combine these images File:Prince Joinville.jpg and File:Princess Joinville.jpg with these images File:Prince Teriitua Joinville.jpg and File:Princess Teriitua Joinville.jpg? If not I will understand. Thanks for the help you have given me.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Nagualdesign settled the issue and the combo image looks weird and probably should be deleted. Thanks anyway.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Iceland Krona Coins.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Iceland Krona Coins.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, PawełMM. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Prince & Princess Joinville.jpg

File:Prince & Princess Joinville.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Tehaapapa

• Could you please delete File:Tehaapapa III, late 19th century.png and File:Tehaapapa III, late 19th century.png by placing {{speedy|accidental defective upload by me}} on them? It is faster than proposing it for deletion. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Could you do the same for File:House of Kamehameha3 (restored).jpg?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Acid stained paper thanks

Thanks for doing so much work on the images. They're all very much improved, which means that a hundred and more wikipedia pages in all sorts of languages are improved. I'm very grateful. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	So, you richly deserve this for doing so many of my requests on the photo workshop page. Many many thanks. Tagishsimon (talk) 13:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

File:House of Kamehameha3 (restored).jpg

File:House of Kamehameha3 (restored).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 22:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

M0tty (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Remove watermark

Hi, first many thanks for your work on correcting the images in GraphicLab. I want to bring to your notice that also remove another watermark in this image (1) at the center of tower inside the picture. ----Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg

File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Ram Prasad Bismil2615.jpg

Thank you very much Mr Pawel! for your kind co-operation. I will be highly obliged if you please cover the corner of the top right hand side as it looks a bit odd. Regards Yours Krantmlverma (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC) Dr.'Krant'M.L.Verma ^{(talk•Email)}

File:My family picture.jpg

File:My family picture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Reagan

Looks great. Thank you!!!! Lionelt (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hassan II mosque1 (js).jpg

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Signature

Hi, PawełMM. I uploaded an improved version of a signature that you made a translucid .png file about a month ago: File:Signature of Emperor Pedro I of Brazil.jpg Could you do it again and upload it over the old file in File:Signature of Emperor Pedro I of Brazil.png? --Lecen (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

PawełMM, unfortunately the background isn't truly translucid as it can be seen in the article that the picture is being use (see here). Could you fix it? --Lecen (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Now it's almost perfect! Would you mind removing the two weird dots inside the "D" letter (of "D. Pedro")? --Lecen (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, my friend. That's what I was looking for. I'm really grateful. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

PawełMM, would you mind uploading this and this picture with their original colors, instead of black and white? --Lecen (talk) 22:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Constantine ✍ 12:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

KAVEBEAR's Requests

Could you crop and desaturate File:John Richardson, c. 1896.jpg and oval crop File:LadyJaneFranklin.jpg? --KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

For File:Clarence W. Ashford.jpg, could you crop to Clarence W. Ashford's image (with no desaturization or restoration) and save, then if you can could you restore the cover edge as a second edit, if not just desaturate and save. Thank you very much.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Passau Dom Sankt Stephan.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Passau Dom Sankt Stephan.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 09:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vue aérienne Larchant.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vue aérienne Larchant.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vue aérienne Larchant.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Bapti ✉ 14:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Keisuke Kuwata.jpg

File:Keisuke Kuwata.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Marcus Hsu  talk  12:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

przypadkowa edycja

Dzis rano ogladalem na tablecie swoje obrazki na wiki. Musialem gdzies trafic paluchem gdzie nie trzeba i odpalilem niezamierzone zgloszenie. Przepraszam za nieuwage. Julo (talk) 21:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Watermark

Some time ago, you removed a pretty extensive watermark from this image of Charles S. Morehead. I was wondering if you thought you could do anything with this image of U.S. Vice-President John C. Breckinridge. Although Commons has several images of him, this is one of only a few that shows him in his military regalia, and it is the only one of him that is in color. Acdixon (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Never mind. Someone else took care of it. Acdixon (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Grand Cordon of the Order of the Sacred Treasure.jpg

Yours sincerely, whym (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:1st Class Grand Cordon Order of the Rising Sun.jpg

Yours sincerely, whym (talk) 23:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:German concentration camp chart of prisoner markings.jpg

File:German concentration camp chart of prisoner markings.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 73.jpg

And also:

• File:Nagoya Castle Feb 2011 74.jpg

Plese provide more info about the authors of the photographs you photographed. The copyright lies with the first author. Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hassan II mosque1 (js).jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

File:RamPrasadBismil.jpg

File:RamPrasadBismil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sitush (talk) 08:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Carandiru.JPG

File:Carandiru.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Dawna Polska na starym papierze 1.jpg

File:Dawna Polska na starym papierze 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Graf Zeppelin II 1938.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:1950s decade montage.PNG

File:1950s decade montage.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Irena piela wiki2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Irena piela wiki2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Irena piela wiki2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 12:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

File:A box of Mooncakes.jpg

File:A box of Mooncakes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— SMUconlaw (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pochaev-wall.jpg

Yours sincerely, Максим Підліснюк (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Drums Crash 1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Drums Crash 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Drums Crash 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

—LX (talk, contribs) 19:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:PINCUS HAMMOND CHANG.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PINCUS HAMMOND CHANG.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PINCUS HAMMOND CHANG.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Pataki Bruno Silver.jpg

File:Pataki Bruno Silver.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

One of the pictures you used in this composition appears to be a copyvio. This is not your fault but perhaps you could consider to upload another version of this composite that uses one of the other photographs in Category:Sheldon Silver. This would allow us just to hide its current version. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2 tanga 1643 rev-2.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2 tanga 1643 rev-2.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2 tanga 1643 rev-2.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)