User talk:Petebutt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Petebutt!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Attention![edit]

What you have done here is very close to Vandalism! Never do such things again!
What is the correct name of this aircraft. Give me detailed information on my talk page, so I will move this file. --High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Petebutt!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Greg Goebel's images[edit]

Hi. Please provide exact sources of this images - in most cases you link to something what doesn't exist (like in here: File:Avmig15 2 03.png). Second of all, please provide the author's permission for the certain free license or provide the link to his webpage where he wrote terms of use of his images. Otherwise images will be deleted. Masur (talk) 09:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

COM:OVERCAT[edit]

Hello!

Please read COM:OVERCAT - very important. You are adding Mi-8-categories spuriously to images. --High Contrast (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, obviously don't know what I am doing. Can you fix it?? and give me a precis of the problem and solution.Petebutt (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Nothing serious; you were simply adding files to Category:Mil Mi-8 parent category when they had already been sorted into subcategories. For example, File:Mil Mi-8 pitot tube Torpin Tykit.JPG is in Category:CCCP-25267 (aircraft) and File:SPARK+ Mil Mi-8.jpg is in Category:RA-24653 (aircraft). Both of these aircraft categories are subcategories of Mil Mi-8; hence it was not needed to add them to the Mil Mi-8 parent category. To keep categories at a manageable size (usually below couple of hundred files; frequently smaller) files are preferably sorted into the most specific subcategory. Your edits did not break anything, they were simply redundant. MKFI (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
...but serious enought to be mentioned. Anyway, Petebutt, happy editing. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token dd88aa0349813aeb2681824ee99b5bc7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File source is not properly indicated: File:Breda safat of fiat rs14.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Breda safat of fiat rs14.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

File:AW650 USGov.jpg[edit]

Hi Pete, Can you explain why you uploaded a low resolution image over a higher one, generally we prefer the highest resolution that we can get, if a lower resolution image is needed one can be loaded under a different name, e.g File:AW650 USGovlowres.jpg. You used the rationale "Low resolution to allow use on Wikipedia pages", the only reason I can think of where this would apply is if this was not a free image, and a lower res image was needed to comply with fair-use criteria. I can see why it might be possible that the image is not free, that the FAA used an image from someone other than a federal employee and that it is infact not PD. If you believed this to be the case then the proper thing to do would be at the very least tag the file as fact disputed.--KTo288 (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't remember that, but if I did, the intention was not to replace it but ADD a lowres version that loads easily when embedded in articles. Apologies if this has caused problems.--Petebutt (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Well I guess you know better now, but to recap if you load an image to Commons with exactly the same name, then the new image overwrites the existing one and the overwritten image is no longer available to use, if loading alternative versions of an image change the name slightly, and by alternative just reducing the resolution creates an exact dupe which are usually speedily deleted (cropping it I guess will make it even smaller). No harm done as no one else seems to have noticed it, but to reiterate we prefer to have the highest resolution possible of an image. I'll recover the file later. Thanks.--KTo288 (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Overturned Rumpler C.Ia near Beirut c1917.jpg[edit]

I know that it patently isn't a commodore or a falcon, however, it isn't patently obvious that it isn't a rumpler. Please provide some supporting information for your request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Compare strut arrangements and also the faired over lumps just behind the propeller, position of the footstep in the side of the fuselage. attachment of the landing wires to the fuselage top longerons, etc. etc. Apart from that the administrator ignored my note and didnt re-name it to AEG C.IV.--Petebutt (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:KB-29J streaking fuel out of boom.jpg[edit]

Hi, I would recommend, that you use the "duplicate" tag in such cases as the above, not a deletion request, as this is mostly for copyright violations. Also, just add the ":" in front of "File:" so only the file name is displayed and not the complete photo. You can also use the tag "rename" for files with wrong names. When files are duplicates, it is common to keep the one which was uploaded earlier. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, didn't know about the duplicate feature. I will use it in future if required, assuming I can find it!--Petebutt (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The template is just ((duplicate|File:name of the original one)). Use these brackets: "{" "}" instead of (). I am not using these brackets here - otherwise we would have the template here. Cobatfor (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Besson H-3 at Paris Salon 1919.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Besson H-3 at Paris Salon 1919.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

see the following

The Editor of Flight Global, Michael Targett, wrote the following on 13:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC) at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation/Style_guide/Layout_(Aircraft): However one thing I am happy to do from this moment on is agree the reuse on Wikipedia of any material from the actually PDFs in the archive (as long as there is a credit and link back to the original). By this I mean that any reference in the text can be used and importantly any of the images replicated in the PDFs can be used. It's not a perfect solution as there would have to be an element of screen grabbing the images and saving and formatting etc ... However the images in many cases would still enhance a large number of Wikipedia entries and, from my point of view, the images are obviously not of a high enough resolution to be reused in print by a random commercial entity.

If that doesn't constitute a licence I don't know what does.--Petebutt (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

File:De Marçay Passe-Partout Paris 1919 150120 p63.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:De Marçay Passe-Partout Paris 1919 150120 p63.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Krdbot 03:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Fiat ARF overhead view Paris 1919 080120 p41.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fiat ARF overhead view Paris 1919 080120 p41.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Krdbot 03:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:De Marçay Passe-Partout Paris 1919 150120 p63.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:De Marçay Passe-Partout Paris 1919 150120 p63.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 17:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Fiat ARF overhead view Paris 1919 080120 p41.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fiat ARF overhead view Paris 1919 080120 p41.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 17:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Häfeli DH-5 150120 p71.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Häfeli DH-5 150120 p71.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Thay are tagged as duplicates - for deletion!!--Petebutt (talk) 03:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spad S.27 110320 p296.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spad S.27 110320 p296.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Le Rhône 9Z rear - Paris 1919 050220 p148.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le Rhône 9Z rear - Paris 1919 050220 p148.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 00:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ariadacapo (talk) 11:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Spad S.27 110320 p296.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spad S.27 110320 p296.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Spad S.27 110320 p296.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 12:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Napier Cub 34 front 100221 p94.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Napier Cub 34 front 100221 p94.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Wait![edit]

Hello Petebutt,

I have to ask you to stop uploading files from the Flightglobal archive. The permission we obtained in December covers only files that were at Commons then. Further files are not covered by ticket 2016010410016319. I am sorry that we could not obtain more from Flightglobal (maybe someone wants to pull their sleeves and return to them asking for more?), but this is the way things are. Ariadacapo (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

However, you can still upload files from the Flightglobal archive if they are in the public domain in the U.S. and the source country. See Commons:Copyright tags for details. But I recommend you to still stop from uploading files from that archive without permission from Flightglobal. Thanks! Poké95 01:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Bréguet-Bugatti 32A Paris 1919 290120 p122.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bréguet-Bugatti 32A Paris 1919 290120 p122.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 19:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Napier Cub 34 front 100221 p94.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Napier Cub 34 front 100221 p94.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Petebutt, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/− lNeverCry 04:58, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cansa c.5.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cansa c.5.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

lNeverCry 06:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Cansa c.5.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cansa c.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Basvb (talk) 11:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Morane-Saulnier MoS.30, Hispano Aviación, Wibault 7[edit]

Hi, just a heads-up to say that I have made several edits to image files and categories that you have recently worked on. I have separated Hispano Aviación from Hispano-Suiza, as it is in en:wp, noting that here (generally) we also separate aircraft companies from their products as different entities. Also note how I have moved aircraft features (eg wing types) from individual images to their parent categories. In case you are not aware, you can often avoid creating red links with HotCat by ensuring you get a tick next to the OK instead of an X, also Cat-a-Lot enables you to navigate the category tree up and down before you complete the edit. No reply expected.PeterWD (talk) 11:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Strahltriebwerk Derwent.jpg[edit]

Hello Petebutt,
please tell me why you changed the name and discription of this foto, although the original uploader claims otherwise Dirk1981. According to en.WP these are different engines: one american, one british.
Yours --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 10:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Well it clearly ISN'T an Allison J33!!!!!!!--Petebutt (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Maybe it is a Nene/J42!!--Petebutt (talk) 11:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Closer inspection shows the split diffusers of the Nene. So it is a Nene or J42, but it is very difficult to tell them apart with out manuals and/or documentation.

Category:VEB 14[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:VEB 14 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Frze > talk 17:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:VEB aircraft[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:VEB aircraft has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Frze > talk 17:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Aircraft production[edit]

Hi, pleased to see your current work on this subject. I'm inclined to mass shift it all to new Category:Aircraft production, and make a rational hierarchy with manufacturers, aircraft types, factories, workers, era (eg WWII) etc. Probably not controversial, so no CFDs planned yet. Welcome your thoughts, when you have settled current exercise. Watching here.PeterWD (talk) 17:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Thought similar, taking the line of least resistance.--Petebutt (talk) 17:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Good, I'll take a look at it later. Meanwhile, please ensure each of your new subcats is linked to each aircraft type, also please fix DH.9 red link.PeterWD (talk) 17:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
DH.9 done--Petebutt (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Aquila_A.210[edit]

Achim (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Images of aircraft with bad file names[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you have started mass removals of the tag "Images of aircraft with bad file names" without any explanation.

In addition, you renamed some meaningless file names with other meaningless ones, as well without any explanation.

Therefore, I don't have any idea why you "moved File:20100626- DSC7260 (4872133670).jpg to File:20100626 DSC7260 (4872133670).jpg", just as an example.

Maybe you are not so familiar with the File naming rules and the File renaming rules. They state "To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays.", giving several examples of what is "meaningless or ambiguous". File names like "160714 A DZ829 002" fit exactly into these categories, so why did you remove the tag?

Please be so kind and either rename files tagged with "bad file names" with a correct file name (= the best solution) or stop removing the respective tag. Doing so - especially without giving any reason - might be considered as disruptive editing. Thank you very much for your understanding. Regards --Uli Elch (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

what do you think i was doing?--Petebutt (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Ahh I thought they were all tagged for the same reason - using characters that may be used as mark-up text such as and ".. thank you for pointing out my mistake, but don't just whinge at me, start changing file-names--Petebutt (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)!
I don't have to "start changing file-names" - I've done that for years, and fortunately I'm not quite the only one. But there is still more than enough work to do; you are more than welcome to start changing file-names to those which "describe what the image particularly displays." --Uli Elch (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Will continue file-moves with descriptive titles.--Petebutt (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Propeller Research Tunnel etc[edit]

Thanks for your comment. With some regret, I finally found it necessary to revert or amend a number of your edits, and I hope that it was mostly just a 'bad hair day'. I also hope that you can improve your understanding of category hierarchy per COM:CAT; eg Cooley aircraft is fine, but it must be linked to parent category Aircraft of the United States. Also, as above (MoS.30 etc), I recommend more attention to how Hotcat works, to avoid creating red links, or making new categories that are duplicates of easily found existing cats (eg Navy of Italy) that are not necessarily named in an obvious style :-) Regards, PeterWD (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

No problem, despite my occasional brain-farts i do have a low rejection rate!!--Petebutt (talk) 11:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Unidentified aircraft[edit]

Thanks for your message, although it didn't come under the correct section heading. Perhaps you misunderstand the term "unidentified" in Commons jargon - for an image, it actually means (for aircraft) that the manufacturer and type/model is unidentified within the category tree, so the image must remain in Category:Unidentified aircraft (or Category:Aircraft) until it can be placed in a more appropriate category. Also, you should never remove all categories from an image or a category, otherwise it cannot be found by users browsing the category tree as required by COM:CAT. I hope that you will re-examine the recent group, in which those with a red colour scheme all appear to be Saab 340s of Mesaba Airlines.PeterWD (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

How about putting them in the right category to start with?????????--Petebutt (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I have put a bunch of images in "Unidentified" categories over the past ~2 weeks. I'm working on categorizing media needing categories. I have no skill nor time to categorize every single picture of an aircraft/helicopter/automobile. I use the "unidentified" categories as a first step towards correct classification. Several contributors have helped me in different domains. Badzil (talk) 08:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Stop hiding away aircraft files ![edit]

You have moved dozens of aircraft files from Category:Images of aircraft without type category to Category:Aircraft registrations, effectively moving them out of reach for serious editors (just one example of all too many). Another user has correctly taken them out of that unsuitable category again so that they ended up in Category:Media needing categories again! You caused those files to be pushed through a full circle and a lot of absolutely unnecessary work for other editors. This practice may even be considered close to sabotaging the project.

Files without type category belong to the appropriate category, that is either "Aircraft" or the above mentioned original one. Stop hiding away aircraft files in unsuitable categories! --Uli Elch (talk) 09:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Exactly!! Put them there in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Concerning your unrelated answer to my edit: I'm afraid you may not have understood what I was writing. Putting files into an unrelated category (and thereby hiding them) is not the correct way of handling them. Please read again carefully and try to understand the problem. Otherwise the way you have been editing has to be considered as vandalism and treated accordingly. --Uli Elch (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lioré et Olivier LeO H-242-1 - Air France - MARIGNANE. GRAND PORT AÉRIEN.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lioré et Olivier LeO H-242-1 - Air France - MARIGNANE. GRAND PORT AÉRIEN.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 05:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

I have done all that !!--Petebutt (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Let it be[edit]

to change filenames of my photos! --Ralf Roleček 05:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Check out the naming policies!!--Petebutt (talk) 09:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Die Dateinamen sind gut. Sie enthalten Datum, Inhalt und Urheber. Dateinamen ersetzen keine Beschreibung oder Kategorien --Ralf Roleček 10:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
For future uploads you might like to follow the POLICY at Commons:File naming and Commons:File renaming.--Petebutt (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Auch bin mir die Bitte Petebutt, wenn Du schon Bilder umbenennen musst, lass bitte by-RaBoe drin, damit ich auf meiner Bo weiß das es meine Bilder sind. Falls Du Arbeit suchst, ich hätte da mal drei Kats die ich noch ab arbeiten muss. Flug Schwarzheide nach Nordholz dort ist mir mein GPS Signal ausgefallen oder auch von Flug von Rom über Düsseldorf nach Hamburg oder auch von Nordholz Hammelburg 2015 könnte ich Hilfe gebrauchen, ich meine das jetzt nicht als spott oder so, sondern bitte ehrlich um Hilfe. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 21:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Vergiß es! Man on a mission, [1] --Ralf Roleček 21:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Schon beim Anlegen dieser Kategorie ist von einem persönlichen Angriff auszugehen. Petebutt, bitte nenne mir ein Bild, welches Commons:File naming widerspricht, oder den Punkt zur Umbenennung (Commons:File renaming). Bitte stelle ein Schnelllöschantrag auf diese Seite.Du verärgerst nur viele amdere. Hystrix (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Nothing personal , just a convenient category to house them until re-named. If the category name bothers you I can re-name it.--Petebutt (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
„... just a convenient category ...“ For what? Hystrix (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
I can't help feeling that you are being way too sensitive about something that has nothing to do with you--Petebutt (talk) 00:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Lade selbst deine eigenen Bilder hoch, die kannst du dann herumschuppsen, wie du willst. --Ralf Roleček 22:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for scaring off a valued photographer. I hope you provide some original content in the future. --Magnus (talk) 07:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Boeing TX[edit]

Novarupta (talk) 09:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)