User talk:Peulle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Drammen tollsted[edit]

Hei! Du har lastet opp et bilde som heter Drammen tollsted til Wiki Loves Monuments. Kan du ta en titt på diskusjonssiden til bildet: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Drammen_tollsted.JPG Jeg lurer på om det er riktig bygning eller om den du har tatt bilde av også tilhører tollboden. Mvh.Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

QIC[edit]

Hi there. In Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list, oppose = decline, and support = promotion. If a nom has already been marked as promoted (declined) and you want to oppose (support), then it's to be marked as discuss. No need to support (oppose) candidacies already marked for promotion (decline). Please read the guidelines. --A.Savin 22:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! :) --Peulle (talk) 15:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

QI procedures[edit]

a few minutes before you have confirmed that you have understood that during the course of a discussion between a assessor and the nominator there is no place for overruling. And then this... Problems like a tilted horizon is not a reason at all to decline a nomination. This will be checked and changed by the nominator in short. After changing, it will be cleared by the primary assessor. Please don´t act too overambitioned. --Hubertl 15:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

  • Fair enough, but I have seen other users decline/oppose because of tilt, so it's hard to say how much is enough to decline, especially when the Guidelines say that: "Images should not be unintentionally tilted." I will therefore let my assessment stand, in accordance with these guidelines. --Peulle (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
    • We all try to be in good relation to each other - avoiding quarrels. The most important thing is not the assessing itself, it´s the learning from others. Therefore it is a good practice not to overrule and not to affront someone. After a while, almost everyone here is getting a new view onto his own pictures, but that needs some time. Thats, what QI is for. After a while - and you can see it very good with most of the participants - they don´t upload and nominate pictures without a due dilligence for each picture by themselfes. Doing it right is the same effort as doing it wrong. --Hubertl 17:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
    • A little more restraint wouldn´t be wrong at the beginning until you have learned the strings. --Milseburg (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks for your comments, I will use the "comment" feature when I'm unsure.--Peulle (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

As so often[edit]

it needs some time to get into a new task, it works fine now! Thanks for partizipating the Quality image assessing process! --Hubertl 15:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Cataratas no Parque Nacional do Iguaçu.jpg[edit]

Hello Peulle, thank you very much for reviewing this image. I tried to fix the problem using the Fix-CA plugin in Gimp, and also using the channel mixer, but when I fix the green CA in the trees, something even worst appears somewhere else... Can you please tell me if the image is fixable, and if there is any way I can do it? Thank you, --- Darwin Ahoy! 01:50, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

  • @Darwinius: Hello. :) I have made some annotations in the image so you can see the green I'm talking about. Is it fixable? I'm not sure; maybe you need a RAW version of the image.
    • Hello Peulle: Thank you very much for pointing the CAs. I fear correcting that is too much for my very limited skills and experience with graphics, so I'll withdraw that nomination (or let it go away by itself?) at least for now. Thanks again for your patience.--- Darwin Ahoy! 23:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
      • You're welcome. :)--Peulle (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Flickr2commons[edit]

Photographs were transladas by "Flickr2common" but the license remains the same, I'm changing the author, not to think that the author is another person. So far I have had no problems if I change that.--Harpagornis (talk) 18:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

  • @Harpagornis: Yes, I could see from the profiles that the photographer was the same in both Flickr and Commons, but since there are special rules against using Flickr pics in the QI guidelines, I wanted to ask the other users if they know what the rules are. :) --Peulle (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I understand perfectly, thanks --Harpagornis (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Links repariert[edit]

Hallo Peulle, ich hatte selbst schon bemerkt, dass ich beim Kopieren einer Kategorie einen Fehler gemacht hatte. Trotzdem danke für den Hinweis. Inzwischen ist der Fehler berichtigt. Schaust Du bitte noch einmal, ob Dir jetzt die Heinkel Kabine und der Porsche 912 gefallen? Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Ja, das soll ich gleich machen. --Peulle (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Mallnitz Tauerntal Tauscherböden 20160807.jpg[edit]

Dear Peulle, You have recently checked this file, which I nominated as QI candidate. You have commented it, but neither promoted nor declined. Instead, you have asked for a second opinion. However, it seems to be common practice that nobody else looks at candidates which already have been commented by other reviewers, so that my image is still not QI assessed. So please put your comments only on images where you are sure that you will promote or decline at the end. By the way, I have also nominated this image as featured picture candidate (see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mallnitz Tauerntal Tauscherböden 20160807.jpg), where I currently have 15 pros and no cons - so the quality seems to be sufficient even for FP criteria. Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Image reviewed. Indeed the comment was made a few days ago, but don't worry if the process takes a few days; the image will remain in the queue until I return a few days later. If you begin to doubt that the first reviewer will make a return and thus miss the image, please take the image to consensual review by changing the tag from "nomination" to "discuss".--Peulle (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Humour Hires.png The Barnstar of Good Humor
You really made my day with that comment! Face-grin.svg Cheers! cart-Talk 12:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

QIC question[edit]

01-21-2017 - Women's March on NYC (10715).jpg

Thanks for your comments about this image at QIC. While I don't think there's much I can do about the DoF, I took a pass at removing some of the noise from the mid/background. I've uploaded two new versions. This is the denoised version, and this one (the current default/primary) is the same as originally nominated but with some CA removed. I'd appreciate your thoughts regarding whether the denoised version is an improvement. I understand it does not satisfy all of your concerns, regardless. Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk |  03:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Also pinging Ikan Kekek given his comments on the same image. — Rhododendrites talk |  03:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
At first, I preferred the denoised version, but ultimately, I can't decide. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I prefer the denoised version. The problem with noise here is that in combination with the shallow DoF, the noise becomes very visible. Note the face on the black guy in the middle, for instance.--Peulle (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

QIC (2)[edit]

I never ever requested you to create any category. Neither "Houses in Risør", nor "Residential buildings in Risør", nor "Yellow Volvo EC140BLC excavators in Risør in February 2017 with exposure time 1/500 and F-number f/5.6" nor anything like that... I just requested on QIC that you add an adequate location category to your pictures which has most specific location, in this case it was Category:Risør, as it was the deepest available level and it is probably sufficient given its number of photos. If you want now to create categories of your town at deeper level, do it at least correct way. That is, the next deeper level would be "Buildings in Risør", but then in "Buildings in Norway by city", "Buildings in Aust-Agder", "Risør". I've deleted the allegedly "requested by A.Savin" categories, as I didn't request anything but nominating properly categorized photos according to COM:Image guidelines! Stop this nonsense finally! --A.Savin 17:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

The category "Risør" is not necessarily relevant, as it is not specific enough to the subject at hand. What is shown in the picture is not the city of Risør, but a residential building in Risør. I use the already existing categories on Commons to decide which categories to use: there was already a category called "Residential buildings in Norway by city", to which a new subcategory of "Residential buildings in Risør" could be added. This is more accurate than simply "Risør" for the reason explained above. I am reverting your changes to my files forthwith. Looking at the Guidelines, I find: "Generally files should only be in the most specific category that exists for certain topic. For example files in Category:Looking up the center of the Eiffel Tower should not also be in Category:Paris (see over-categorization below)."--Peulle (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to create Category:Residential buildings in Risør, please put it into Category:Risør. The way you do it is wrong. --A.Savin 05:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
So, here the correct way. You apparently want residential buildings category. (I didn't requested it; this is solely what you want.) OK: at first, you create Category:Buildings in Risør. This is to sort into "Buildings in Norway by city" (with the sortkey "Risor" [sic]), "Buildings in Aust-Agder", and "Risør". At second, create the category "Residential buildings in Risør". This is to be sorted into "Residential buildings in Norway by city" (with the sortkey "Risor"), and "Buildings in Risør". There is no other way and I strongly disagree with your claims that the category Risør was in any way irrelevant for some part of photos taken in Risør. Note that I have been working for >10 years with categories on Commons, very much longer than you, so I know very well what I'm doing here! Note also that I didn't request you to create all that residential builsinds etc. categories, other than you claim. As long as there are no such categories, the category Risør is the relevant location category; regardless of what is depicted - an aerial view, a street, a house or a vehicle. Should you continue the same careless way as before, we will move to COM:ANU. (Somehow I get the feeling this is exactly what you want, unfortunately.) --A.Savin 06:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
No need to lose one's temper; I don't know which parent categories should be used for each subcategory, but I'm using pre-existing parent categories to create new subcategories, so if there are erroneous parent categories, those have been created by somebody else. Having only the category "Risør" in a photo of something more specific than just a house, or adding the town name to a file that has nothing to do with the place other than having been created there, are simply not accurate enough, that has been my point. If I take a photo of my coffee table inside my house, should that file be categorized with the town name I live in? I think not. If you wish to move the discussion to COM:ANU, feel free. That way, we might get more input from other users, that is what I wanted all along.
As for the correct subcategorization, the Guideline extract above tells you that having the parent category "Risør" in an image in addition to a subcategory of "Risør" is overcategorization. So what is the best solution here? Firstly, since the meta-category "Residential buildings in Norway by city" already exists for several Norwegian cities, I see no reason why "Residential buildings in Risør" should not be a subcategory on Commons. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that this should then have several parent categories? I will attempt to set up a category tree where we end up with my suggested subcategory, at which point the parent category "Risør" will be removed from the files as overcategorization. --Peulle (talk) 08:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Mezquita del Viernes, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 07.jpg[edit]

Hi Peulle, I am not 100% sure but I think that it was a narrow street and that there were also vehicles. Believe me, I didn't have freedom to move back. Regards! Poco2 18:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Rule of thirds, this the reason for the space to the left, thanks and regards!! Ezarateesteban 21:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought about that, but thought it was mostly done for nature photography. Anyway, good image. --Peulle (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Human heart model.jpg[edit]

You have promoted this file.Is there any benefit of all this space?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Not really, no. But the high resolution makes it a QI anyway, IMO. If the uploader prefers to crop it, that would be fine too (as long as it remains above 2Mpx).--Peulle (talk) 12:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I think the space is not worth to be existing but the uploader prefers to keep this.It is acceptable that QI contains a large space?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I was of the opinion that the redundant space was not reason enough to decline it. If someone else had objected at the time and taken the image to CR, there might have been other opinions, but nobody did.--Peulle (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Problem in VI[edit]

Your image is not displayed in thumb in the contest. Outside of this point, you have to put the images at the end of the list (I corrected). You should add facade to the scope to make it perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I noticed that the image did not display correctly but was unable to fix it. Did you do anything or did it correct itself?--Peulle (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
It's a mystery. But it works, think to modify the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Done, per your suggestion. Thank you. :) --Peulle (talk) 15:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Crepidula arenata[edit]

Llez is absolutely correct. The image shows the surface structure perfectly and alteration would be as he says falsification. This is what it looks like and QI beyond question if there are no other issues. I took a look at one under a Leitz microscope. This has happened before.You really have to know these specimens. It would be very unfair to Llez to decline. His shell photos are as good as you get. See why you thought the focus was wrong. Best regards Notafly (talk) 20:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I have made a further comment in CR. --Peulle (talk) 03:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop nominating[edit]

  • «Please stop nominating». — I am sorry; I simply forgot about this nomination. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
@PereslavlFoto: OK, no worries - perhaps you should keep a list of which images you have nominated so you don't lose track. If you're unsure whether you have nominated an image before, each image files has a list of places where it has been used: "File usage on Commons". If it has been declined before, there will be an archive page there.--Peulle (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

McNamara Formula Ford[edit]

Hallo Peulle, wie ich gesehen habe, verstehst Du viel von Motorsport und Rennfahrzeugen. Unter anderem schreibst Du zu dem von mir vorgestellten Foto eines McNamara, dass es sowohl ein Formula Ford als auch ein Formula 3 sein könnte. Ein Formula 3 ist es aber mit Sicherheit nicht, wie Du auf dem Bild sehen kannst, das den Wagen von vorn zeigt. An einem Formula 3 müsste der Luftmengenbegrenzer zu erkennen sein, der für diese Fahrzeuge vorgeschrieben war. Was das Baujahr betrifft, hast Du recht, das sich die Form der Autos von Jahr zu Jahr ändern kann. Dem könnte hinzugefügt werden, dass es mitunter nicht nur jährliche Änderungen gibt, sondern möglicherweise sogar von einem Rennen zu anderen. Mit gutem Gewissen kann ich die Bauzeit auf 1969/70 eingrenzen, was Dir aber für die Beurteilung der Qualität des Fotos nicht genügt. Ich habe deshalb die Bewerbung zurückgezogen. Vielleicht sind auch die fotografische Qualität und die Bildgestaltung gemessen an den anderen von Dir bewerteten Aufnahmen so schwach, dass es besser ist, das Foto nicht weiter zur Diskussion zu stellen. Freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

  • @Spurzem: Yes, I noticed the withdrawal, but if you like, we can always ask people at CR what they think? And sorry, I forgot to mention the quality: aside from a bit of a tilt (which is easily corrected), the photo quality seems like QI to me. But yes, since Commons is basically an encyclopedia of images, I was hoping you had some more exact information about the car. These museum/exhibit cars in particular could be famous, for instance we can see in the F1 categories that many of the cars have very specific information. I do have a tip if you're interested: when photographing such museum pieces, try to get a shot of the plaques of information. Sometimes they don't have information, though. --Peulle (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Zu Deinem Vorschlag: Ich kann nicht anfangen, die Verkleidung eines Fahrzeugs abzunehmen, um das Typenschild zu suchen. ;-) Manchmal ergibt es sich zwar, dass eine Motorhaube offen ist, und dann fotografiere ich es meistens. Das Baujahr wird allerdings nicht immer genannt. Aber es ist schließlich egal, wenn ich mich auch sehr wundere, wie wichtig die exakte Angabe des Baujahrs für die Qualität des Bildes und auch für die Enzyklopädie sein soll. Ich habe beide Bilder in den Wikipedia-Artikel über McNamara eingefügt und nehme an, dass sie dort auch ohne genaues Baujahr informativ sind. Weitere User zu fragen, wie sie darüber denken, ist die Sache nicht wert. Es gibt zurzeit so viele hervorragende Bilder von Autos bei den QIC, dass es auf dieses eine nicht ankommt. Noch mal freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 21:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
OK, no problem. I like the way you did it here and here, getting the relevant info, very helpful to Commons users. Best of luck in the future. :) --Peulle (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Red user names[edit]

Surely you must have seen red user names before??? The reason that only the talk page is created is so that the rest of the old users can see that this is a newbie and perhaps take that into consideration when interacting with them. The user page has to be created by someone and that is usually the user themselves when they have begun to learn a bit more about the site and. Do not confuse creating an account with having a user page. On several WPs there is no automatic talk page creation so you can have an account and edit while still having both the user and talk page shining red. --cart-Talk 22:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but the file is the question. Looking at the "source" designation I'm still confused. Who created the file? The artist made the watercolour, but was the digital file also created by a Commons user?--Peulle (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
I see that you connected the dots now at QIC. :) According to the previous CR discussion, the artist, photographer and uploader are one and the same. She was invited to join Commons, did so and is now a user. There is also the OTRS ticket to support the issue. A lot of artists photograph their own work and since they many times have their work published in other places before uploading the work here, they also need to sign the OTRS. I think everything is in order now. Hopefully this little fixing may have gained us a new contributor. --cart-Talk 22:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Fjordparken trebro.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fjordparken trebro.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fjordparken trebro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

My first Featured Picture, yay! :) --Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


Loft 1750-60 Telemark NFM (3).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Loft 1750-60 Telemark NFM (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loft 1750-60 Telemark NFM (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotions[edit]

Vikingskipshuset november 2016.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Viking Ship Museum in Oslo..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Stavkirke Gol 1200 NFM (1).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gol stave church (rear view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Skeidi kirke 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruin of Skeidi church (viewed from south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Osebergskipet 2016.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Oseberg ship (diagonal view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Bragernes kirke Nord.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rear view of Bragernes church seen from the north side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Krøderbanen lokomotiv Type E2 nr. 1122 (3).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The type E2 locomotive of the Krøderen Line (side view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Øvre Sund Bru (sett fra Spiraltoppen).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Upper Sound" bridge seen from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (2).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Sundland business park seen from the top of the Drammen Spiral..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Gulskogen gård juli 2017.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gulskogen Manor front facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Gulskogen gård bakside skrå juli 2017 (1).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gulskogen Manor rear view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (1).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Norwegian coast guard vessel Nornen (side view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Buviksugga august 2017.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Norwegian cairn-type daymark..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Lyngør fyr august 2017 (4).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Lyngør lighthouse..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.


Quality Image Promotions[edit]

Mystras 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mystras 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


Bybrua winter 2016.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bybrua winter 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


Landfalløyabrua.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landfalløyabrua.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


Asclepion ruins 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asclepion ruins 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


Epidavros stadium.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epidavros stadium.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


Krøderbanen lokomotiv Type E2 nr. 1122 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krøderbanen lokomotiv Type E2 nr. 1122 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


Steingarden fra Sommarøy.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steingarden fra Sommarøy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


Fiskebåter fortøyd.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiskebåter fortøyd.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


Drammensbrua sett fra Kloptjernveien.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammensbrua sett fra Kloptjernveien.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


Trær i Løkkebergparken.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trær i Løkkebergparken.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


Palamidi wall (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamidi wall (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


Asclepion ruins 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asclepion ruins 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Palamidi wall (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamidi wall (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


Auens vei 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auens vei 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


Drammen Havn sett fra Holmen.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammen Havn sett fra Holmen.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


Holmen bilmottak.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmen bilmottak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


Palamidi arched doorway (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamidi arched doorway (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mystras old town ruins (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mystras old town ruins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


Ancient Sparta theatre seats.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient Sparta theatre seats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Korintkanalen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korintkanalen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mystras old town ruins (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mystras old town ruins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


Ancient Sparta theatre ruins.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient Sparta theatre ruins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


Korintkanalen (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korintkanalen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


Volvo DD22 veivals (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo DD22 veivals (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Palamidi water drain.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamidi water drain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)


Sankthansfeiring Holmennokken 2016 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankthansfeiring Holmennokken 2016 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Padlere på Drammenselva (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Padlere på Drammenselva (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Fjellheim villa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjellheim villa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


Padlere på Drammenselva (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Padlere på Drammenselva (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


12 cm felthaubits.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12 cm felthaubits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


Damkrone Nybrufossen 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damkrone Nybrufossen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Damkrone Nybrufossen 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damkrone Nybrufossen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nybrufossen fra nord.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nybrufossen fra nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nybrufossen fra sor 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nybrufossen fra sor 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


Graffiti on train in Nafplio (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti on train in Nafplio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


Graffiti on train in Nafplio (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti on train in Nafplio (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


Reklameskilt Lilleborg Luna.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt Lilleborg Luna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kiosk med reklameskilt Oslo 1800.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiosk med reklameskilt Oslo 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Graffiti on train in Nafplio (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti on train in Nafplio (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


Four House sparrows in Norway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Four House sparrows in Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Three House sparrows in Norway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three House sparrows in Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

House sparrow in Norway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House sparrow in Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Damkrone Nybrufossen 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damkrone Nybrufossen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Damkrone nord Nybrufossen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damkrone nord Nybrufossen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reklameskilt South State cigarettes.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt South State cigarettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


Reklameskilt Plaza cigarettes.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt Plaza cigarettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuneskipet (detail) 3D-scan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


Osebergskipet akter (detalj).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osebergskipet akter (detalj).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Osebergskipets styrebord (detalj).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osebergskipets styrebord (detalj).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reklameskilt Lilleborg Gronnsepe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt Lilleborg Gronnsepe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reklameskilt Nora Solo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt Nora Solo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reklameskilt Norsk Tipping.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reklameskilt Norsk Tipping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


Stabbur fra Telemark 1797.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stabbur fra Telemark 1797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


Kobberkjele.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kobberkjele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


Cappelenstua.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cappelenstua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)


Kolonialforretning Vognmannsgata 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolonialforretning Vognmannsgata 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra nord).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra nord).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra nordvest).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra nordvest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra vest).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra vest).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


Nedre Eiker bru (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker bru (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra sør).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker Kirke (fra sør).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


Nedre Eiker bru (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Eiker bru (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


Ypsilon bru november 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ypsilon bru november 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


Drammenselva fra Landfalløya 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammenselva fra Landfalløya 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


Bygninger gamle Papyrus papirfabrikk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bygninger gamle Papyrus papirfabrikk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


Landfalløyabrua november 2016 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landfalløyabrua november 2016 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grønland Drammen november 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grønland Drammen november 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


Drammenselva ved Mjøndalen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammenselva ved Mjøndalen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


Ingstad-byste.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingstad-byste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


Drammen solnedgang december 2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammen solnedgang december 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


Alterskap Kvæfjord kirke 1520 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alterskap Kvæfjord kirke 1520 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Alterskap Kvæfjord kirke 1520 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alterskap Kvæfjord kirke 1520 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


Drammensbrua sett fra Fjordparken 02.17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammensbrua sett fra Fjordparken 02.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Strandveien og Elveparken 02.17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandveien og Elveparken 02.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fjordparken trebro.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjordparken trebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Drammenselva og Aass bryggeri 02.17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammenselva og Aass bryggeri 02.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


Drammensbrua undenfra 02.17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammensbrua undenfra 02.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


Transformator i Norge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transformator i Norge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


Brunt trehus i Risør.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunt trehus i Risør.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brunt modulhus i Risør.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunt modulhus i Risør.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Volvo EC140BLC digger.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo EC140BLC digger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


Risør skjærgård Sandnesfjorden (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør skjærgård Sandnesfjorden (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


Bamble 2vk minnestøtte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamble 2vk minnestøtte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


Skeidi kirke 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


Skeidi kirke portal 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke portal 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


Skeidi kirke portal 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke portal 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke portal 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke portal 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


Skeidi kirke 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


Obelisk Bamble.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisk Bamble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


Bamble kirke 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamble kirke 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


Bur Thunehagen 1710.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bur Thunehagen 1710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Havepaviljong fra 1820.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havepaviljong fra 1820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


Mine på Drammen museum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mine på Drammen museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Johan Halvorsen statue (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Halvorsen statue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Johan Halvorsen statue (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Halvorsen statue (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


2vk minnesmerke Drammen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2vk minnesmerke Drammen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2vk minnesmerke Drammen (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2vk minnesmerke Drammen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skeidi kirke 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeidi kirke 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


Triztan Vindtorn skulptur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triztan Vindtorn skulptur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mineinskripsjon på Drammen museum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mineinskripsjon på Drammen museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


Loftsstue Mellom Rue (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loftsstue Mellom Rue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


Norsk Folkemuseum Utstillingsbygning.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norsk Folkemuseum Utstillingsbygning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skigard NFM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skigard NFM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stavkirke Gol 1200 NFM (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stavkirke Gol 1200 NFM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


Gol stavkirke tak 1200 NFM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gol stavkirke tak 1200 NFM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gol stavkirke 1200 NFM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gol stavkirke 1200 NFM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


Ventehall 1883 NFM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ventehall 1883 NFM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


Leikanger prestebolig 1752 NFM (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leikanger prestebolig 1752 NFM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


Øvre Sund Bru sett fra Ypsilon 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Øvre Sund Bru sett fra Ypsilon 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Øvre Sund Bru (sett fra Spiraltoppen).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Øvre Sund Bru (sett fra Spiraltoppen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundland (sett fra Spiraltoppen) 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmennokken sankthans 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


Ariadne DP-3 CSV.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ariadne DP-3 CSV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Drammen Bybro sett fra Spiraltoppen 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammen Bybro sett fra Spiraltoppen 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


Kran Henrik Drammen havn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kran Henrik Drammen havn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kraner Drammen havn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraner Drammen havn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


Fjellstadveien Risør 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjellstadveien Risør 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flisvika Risør 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flisvika Risør 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kajakker med seil.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajakker med seil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fjellstadveien Risør 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjellstadveien Risør 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Buviksugga Risør (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buviksugga Risør (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Buviksugga Risør (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buviksugga Risør (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


Buviksugga Risør (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buviksugga Risør (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Buvika Risør 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buvika Risør 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


Risør østfra 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør østfra 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Risør sørfra 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør sørfra 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mindalen 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mindalen 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


Sørfjorden ved Mindalen 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørfjorden ved Mindalen 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tangen og Flisvika Risør 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tangen og Flisvika Risør 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Risør østfra 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør østfra 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stake ved Buviksugga Risør.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stake ved Buviksugga Risør.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stangholmen 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stangholmen 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stangholmen fyr sørfra 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stangholmen fyr sørfra 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Risør sørfra 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør sørfra 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


Buviksugga Risør (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buviksugga Risør (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


Gulskogen gård skrå juli 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gulskogen gård skrå juli 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gulskogen gård bakside skrå juli 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gulskogen gård bakside skrå juli 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gulskogen gård bakside skrå juli 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gulskogen gård bakside skrå juli 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


Drammen Bybro juli 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drammen Bybro juli 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knoppsvane Mindalen 2017 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lyngør august 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør august 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Buviksugga august 2017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buviksugga august 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kanonjolla Øster Riisøer III.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanonjolla Øster Riisøer III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


Lyngør fyr august 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør fyr august 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lyngør fyr august 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør fyr august 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lyngør fyr august 2017 (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør fyr august 2017 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lyngør august 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør august 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


Lyngør fyr august 2017 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngør fyr august 2017 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redningsskøyter utenfor Risør august 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redningsskøyter utenfor Risør august 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redningsskøyter utenfor Risør august 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redningsskøyter utenfor Risør august 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Risør fra Risørflekken august 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør fra Risørflekken august 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnesmerke Lyngørslaget (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KV Nornen i Risør august 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)


Risør fra Risørflekken august 2017 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Risør fra Risørflekken august 2017 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (front).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (front).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (rear).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (rear).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


Frydendal kirke natt 2017 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frydendal kirke natt 2017 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)