User talk:Pharos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Hi[edit]

You should delete it, it is unpossible to find out the author as it appears to be over 300 years old. - FrancisTyers 16:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Wouldn't that make it PD-old? 68.39.174.238 07:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Well it would, if there were any evidence for the age other than "it sure looks old", which there was not in this case.--Pharos 21:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:John_Gotti.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:John_Gotti.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. MECUtalk 12:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:PD-USNWR[edit]

Hi there. I see you created Template:PD-USNWR. Would you be able to advise on creating a similar template to use on the staff photographers of the New York World-Telegram and the Sun, whose photos are in the Library of Congress archives? An example is Image:Martin Luther King Jr NYWTS 4.jpg, which is currently using PD-author. I'd be interested in searching through the LoC archives and finding other ones covered by this. It is only a small amount: "A small portion of the photographs were taken by NYWT&S staff photographers, and are in the public domain per the instrument of gift.", but it could be worthwhile creating a template to cover them all. Carcharoth (Commons) 14:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

For example, 41 pics by Walter Albertin. I'm checking to see how many we have already. Carcharoth (Commons) 14:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Federico Fellini NYWTS 2.jpg, Image:Federico Fellini NYWTS.jpg, Image:Carlos Montoya NYWTS.jpg. The first three we already have. I also found 53 by Fred Palumbo. Including Image:Robert Frost NYWTS.jpg. It would be nice to have something like the USNWR template to cover all these, and I'd be happy to work my way through these lists and find articles to use them in. Carcharoth (Commons) 14:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I did a search for "New York World Telegram and the Sun Newspaper Photograph Collection no known restrictions" and there were 578 hits. Many don't have more than a thumbnail (some don't even have that), and some are, well, just documenting day-to-day life and are not terribly encyclopedic, but some have potential. Forgive me for dumping a load of link here to the staff photographer links I've found so far (from the first few pages of the search), as the original search doesn't seem amenable to saving as a link. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Carcharoth (Commons) 14:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Will try and do some more later today or tomorrow. Carcharoth (Commons) 10:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Rugova-Dole.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rugova-Dole.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 03:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Black Tom pier.jpg[edit]

Hi. The source website for Image:Black Tom pier.jpg seems to be gone now, and your upload lacks any description of what, when where is shown in the image. If you can add any information about what this photograph is of, it would be appreciated. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 18:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Group_account. giggy (:O) 01:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Template proposed for deletion[edit]

Template:PD-chem[edit]

Image deletion warning Template:PD-chem has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Physchim62 17:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

User:WTMuploader[edit]

Do you mind if I block it until the next WTM? I'm sure someone will feel uncertain otherwise... giggy (:O) 08:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Sure, not a problem. Good luck. Cheers, giggy (:O) 08:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...
Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−

Pharos, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....
EugeneZelenko 14:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:Swords-Plowshares.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Swords-Plowshares.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mangostar (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump#Commons:Wikis Take Manhattan and project scope[edit]

Hi Pharos, I just noted the uploads by WTMuploader from yesterday. I have some trouble in understanding how the entire volume of this is within the project's scope and would welcome your comments to the discussion which was opened by me at the village pump. Thanks and best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 07:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Spam[edit]

The way User:WTMuploader/gallery has been categorised, is pure unadaulterated spam. Although individual images are useful, there is no need to plaster WTM's contribution in every category that these images have been added. (sarcasm begins) Should we all sigh, be grateful and worship WTM for all the wonderful images that WTM has produced? (sarcasm ends). The fact is the vast majority of images in the WTMuploader/gallery have nothing to do with the categories they have benn added to. For example of the what looks like 500 or so image in the gallery only two images are of Franklin Wharton (and those two are near dupes), so thats less than 1/2 of one precent of the images belong tp the Franklin Wharton category, making the user category grossly mis-categorised. From my calculations, this applies to all the categories that this user gallery has been added to. (frustration begins) I would not have written this, if the user gallery had not used templates for categorisation, I was going to re-categorise this gallery for you, but was unable to do so because of the use of templates. Please fix this yourself, the only categories this gallery needs is WTM user pages and user galleries. No other contributer, or group of contributers attempts to demand the level of recognition that WTM seems to desire, how would Commons pages and categories look, if every uploader of original images was to behave as your group has done and was to add every image that they have created, and not just the pertinent ones, into every category that they have contributed to? (frustration ends). My apologies if your intentions were other than I surmised, but thats why I hate categorisation templates so much as they are a bit of a blunt instrument and behave in a way that is not always predicatable and desired. KTo288 (talk) 09:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

The intention was not to spam all of these categories at all. The gallery page was automatically generated by Commonist, and yes, it requires cleanup, because the categories are only supposed to go on the individual image pages, not on the gallery itself. I'll have to remove these shortly by adding a new parameter to the template and activating it on the gallery page, as was done with Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Gallery from last April. Please bear with me if this takes a little while to get through them all. Thanks.
Fair enough. On a related note is there any reason why Category:Categories improved by Wikipedia Takes Manhattan shouldn't be a hidden category?

Congrats[edit]

Barnstar-camera.png Photo Wrangler's Barnstar
...on what looks like was a very successful Wikis Take Manhattan!--ragesoss (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Wiki takes Manhattan project[edit]

In contrast what you might be thinking, I sympatize with your project. I encountered however a number of maintenance problems as you can see in here.

I noticed that for the new version, you have a separate file for naming and categorising, which is already a big step forward. You should keep in mind that on commons, hundreds of images are deleted daily because there is no clear user, description and/or permission field in the image file itself. We move/rename hundreds of categories per week, and I am pretty much sure that in the category names you selected, several are not compliant with commons naming rules, so will need to be moved one day or another. Moreover, we try to educate our uploaders to use a descriptive, meaningfull file name.

So I feel that we better react as to have improvements overtime, as already present in the last batch. --Foroa (talk) 18:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:WSTM_Mark_Frank_0003.jpg[edit]

Why ? I mean, they're going to be deleted anyway, so why spend time and energy in rotating them ? - Erik Baas (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Improve WTM[edit]

Hi Pharos, dont understand me wrong, i really like the idea of a scavenger hunt to get more images for articles. The only thing i dont like is the current implementation. I understand you have images scattered around and you want them on wiki as fast as possible. This is possible without all to much extra work. In the end we want each image to have to following {{information}} template

  • Description : What did we photograph? We did it for <insert your favorite hunt>
  • Source : Own work of team <the team>
  • Data : The date of the hunt
  • Author : <The team> of <insert your favorite hunt>
  • Permission : All the teams in <insert your favorite hunt> agreed to release their images under the <insert licence template>

And besides the information template you need one or more categories.

This can all be accomplished in one template you substitute at upload (or later if you want time to fix things). The way you're doing it now (lot's of templates) break several processes here at Commons (like categorization). I created a test template at User:Multichill/Scavenger hunt. It produces a page with all the information + categories andit can be substituted. It still needs some tuniing, but maybe we can use it to clean up the old scavenger hunts and use it as a basis for future hunts. Categories can be altered at User:Multichill/Scavenger hunt/category and descriptions at User:Multichill/Scavenger hunt/description. Some examples:

Multichill (talk) 20:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


Image:Suncatcher.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Suncatcher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Uploads[edit]

Could you please tell the people participating at that project that if they are unable to filter their images for usability and quality that they at least upload images in a proper way, meaning: the images should not need a rotation which obviously now needs to be done by another user. -- Cecil (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:WSTM Team Dustizeff 0107.jpg[edit]

Please havae a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:WSTM Team Dustizeff 0107.jpg if you have some free time. May you want to add some detailed or general information.
thanks --D-Kuru (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Pharos!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Media lacking a description[edit]

Hi, it's not funny and useful to my opinion if many images (for example File:0108_klzwick_DSCN0798.JPG or File:0118_klzwick_DSCN0808.JPG) of your sportive contest-project spamming the Category:Media_lacking_a_description. Please write the description. --Latzel (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Benjamin_Netanyahu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Benjamin_Netanyahu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! ¿…? 09:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Latent categorization by template[edit]

Please give your attention to Commons:Village pump#Latent categorization by template. You should take part in this discussion. --ŠJů (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español

Dear Pharos. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you

Note about images hosted by the NASA website but made by non-American space agencies[edit]

Hi Pharos, I noticed that you added a note on the Template:PD-USGov-NASA stating that "The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other non-American space agencies. These are not necessarily in the public domain.". There is a deletion request which needs more information about that note. Could you give us more informations about it ? Thank you, The RedBurn (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Reverted Image:Mars_Hubble.jpg[edit]

reverted because the new version is the same image as the old one, but upscaled (it has large pixels) - in both images, the planet itself is approximately 448 pixels wide, but in the new image the pixels are large blocks. Bewareircd (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File talk:Iraq state emblem CoA 1959-1965 Qassem.svg[edit]

Only just now noticed your comments there... AnonMoos (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine[edit]

Rod of asclepius.png

Hello, Sorry for spaming your talk page, but this is very important. On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. Also they believe that common's policy is not so clear regarding the issue. And since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A.Talk 14:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Template:Brooklyn Museum-no known restrictions[edit]

Hello,

That template's history tab provides your name as the creator of the template. You might have some answers to the questions I raised at COM:VP#Template:Brooklyn Museum-no known restrictions.

Teofilo (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Earth-Touch[edit]

Nice :-) Multichill (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Pharos. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Template:WSTMtag[edit]

Could you please see Commons:Village pump#Template:WSTMtag? Any clarification you can give there would be welcome. - Jmabel ! talk 09:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


Template:Brooklyn Museum-no known restrictions[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Template:Brooklyn Museum-no known restrictions has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

File:Hippohangingout.ogv[edit]

Can we also have the true author? The uploader also claimed authorship on (and attribution for...) the Walter Lewin videos which is corrected already. The Earth-Touch videos have the same problem, of course its not ok to reuse the files for money making as long as "Totallynuts" is attributed. But thats what the file description claims (because the uplaoder said it) and thats probably not ok with the copyright holder. --Martin H. (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

WALRUS[edit]

Hello. I am willing to participate in WALRUS. I am from Minnesota (but not Minneapolis) and I have participated in each of the Minnesota meetup events. I am planning to attend the Wicnic. Jonathunder (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Rondism.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rondism.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Avron (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

WTM context photos[edit]

Hi,
In the last days, users have nominated for deletion some of the context photos of Wikis takes Manhattan 2008. I don't know if you still have an opinion about it after three years, like then, but I thought you might want to be notified anyway, in case you wanted to say something, or not. Current deletion requests are listed on the pages for June 30 and July 1st, 2011. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

wiknic dc 2012 photos[edit]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Pharos. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Pharos. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Creating new copyright code template[edit]

Hi Pharos, I tried what you said, and created a new /en copyright code. I based it off of the Brooklyn Museum, and the Flickr ones. At each step along the way, I tried to reproduce what I found in the Flickr one, but I don't think it is working right. Here are the ones I created:

This what the code in the /en template looks like, if were displayed properly:

This image was taken from the Getty Research Institute's Open Content Program, which states the following regarding their assessment that no known copyright restrictions exist:
The Getty Research Open content images are digital surrogates of works of art that are in the Getty's collections and in the public domain, for which we hold all rights, or for which we are not aware of any rights restrictions.[13]
Note: While the Getty Research Institute cannot make an absolute statement on copyright status for legal reasons, "Open content images can be used for any purpose without first seeking permission from the Getty."[14]
More information can be found at http://www.getty.edu/about/opencontent.html

The code in the edit tab looks the same in each, as in the Flickr ones, but clearly isn't activated. Something is missing... HALP!--Theredproject (talk) 22:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:PD-US-record[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Template:PD-US-record has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Afg OCHA cropped.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Afg OCHA cropped.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jeremyb (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Discussion Template:OCHA map[edit]

Hello, hereby you are invited to join the discussion on Template talk:OCHA map. --Wickey-nl (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Maillol Pierre-Auguste Renoir.jpg[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you have made an input regarding PD-US-no notice. I would be grateful if you could advise on undeletion of the subject file. In my opinion it is fullfiling requirements to be published under the above license. Thank you in advance Vert (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Pharos at wikimania 2014 8073742.JPG[edit]

hi, here's the photo. SI represent !? Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 16:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Gingerbread cookie[edit]

Hi, Pharos, since you were the uploader from this, I was wondering why there is not article on Gingerbread cookies. Face-smile.svg. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)]]

File:Russian Civil War poster.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Russian Civil War poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Heads-up[edit]

Hi, as an active colleague on upload projects, I thought I'd drop you a personal heads-up for my request for adminship, today being the last day for views. RFA's tend to only have a small proportion of the community taking part, so it can be difficult to judge if this is representative. :-) -- (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Please fix the image "map_of_america-ribero_(1529).jpeg"[edit]

Hi, you uploaded the image "map_of_america-ribero_(1529).jpeg" and it doesn't working now. Probably it was hacked by english hackers because the Islas Malvinas cause. Thank you, bye. Augusto --181.90.170.232 22:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:The Darlinettes.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:The Darlinettes.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

czar 23:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Views of Manhattan from above[edit]

You added this category to the cats "View from High Bridge" and "Views from Fort Tyron Park", however the views from these places can be of multiple locations, not just Manhattan. From the High Bridge one can see both Manhattan and the Bronx, and from Fort Tryon Park, one can see New Jersey, Manhattan and the Bronx. Therefore each image should be labelled appropriately, and not the entire category. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Photo metadata[edit]

Hey Pharos, thanks a lot for your work on MET images! I looked at a few of those, and noticed the EXIF metadata about them is missing. Information such as date, time, camera used, etc. Do you know why and if they can be still retrieved? ~nmaia d 21:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Met category[edit]

Is there a single category for your new Met uploads? Category:Images from Metropolitan Museum of Art seemed to be the closest and it has 165 items. czar 06:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if this page is watched, so wanted to leave a link that discussion appears to be centralized here: w:en:Wikipedia:GLAM/Metropolitan Museum of Art czar 00:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for your hard work on this project! As someone who grew up down the street from the Met, watching your stream is like having old friends come to visit. Again, thank you and everyone involved with the effort!! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

File:La luna nel pozzo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:La luna nel pozzo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

czar 19:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hi Pharos. The vast majority of the files in that maintenance category were uploaded by you. Could you please have a look and fix them? --Leyo 08:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@Leyo: you might have noticed I cleaned up a lot. More to come. Multichill (talk) 12:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Oh wait, looks like user:Wieralee moved a bunch of files from Category:Metropolitan Museum of Art by department - Asian Art before I could fix them. I use these incorrectly named categories as the inbox of files to fix. Multichill (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I fixed the remaining ones. Pharos, please make sure not to refill that category. --Leyo 21:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Mass download stuff from the Met[edit]

Is this possible? MechQuester (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

@MechQuester: yes, it is. That's what we're doing to upload it to Commons! Plan is to get all the PD/CC0 images from the MET on Commons. Multichill (talk) 12:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

MET creators[edit]

I made you User:Multichill/MET missing creators. You can also move it somewhere else if you like. Beware of name variants for the same person like Creator:Pavel Svinyin and Creator:Pavel Petrovich Svinyin. Multichill (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Bug in toolset or in the human operating said toolset[edit]

Hello. The upload you performed earlier had an illegal character in one field.[15] I'm not sure if that is your fault or if it is a tool error, but I thought I would let you know, so you can fix it on your end, or pass the information along to the tool creator. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

un grand merci[edit]

pour File:Joseph-Henri Altès (1826–1895) MET DT204709.jpg et File:Mademoiselle Marie Dihau (1843–1935) MET DT267444.jpg ! il ne manque plus pour terminer la série des degas sur les musiciens de fr:L'Orchestre de l'Opéra que le fr:portrait de Désiré Dihau (fine arts museums of san francisco) ! Mandariine (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC) fr:user:mandariine

Reynolds portrait of the Countess of Galloway[edit]

Hello! I don't understand this edit. The painting has nothing to do with Paris that I can see.

Also, File:Anne Dashwood (1743–1830), Later Countess of Galloway.jpg appears to be a recently uploaded duplicate. Since you seem to be involved in uploading Met images (thanks for that!), I thought I'd mention it to you. Laura1822 (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your response! "Paris project" is misleading, IMO. Also, that particular file was uploaded by someone else, so it probably doesn't belong in the "Paris project." But when you say you are "working to reconcile . . . with older, less centralized uploading efforts," does that mean that you have a plan to fix things like this, or should I correct them ad-hoc as I find them? Should I move the file out of the Paris Project category manually, for example, or mark that duplicate file for speedy deletion? Thank you! Laura1822 (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Uploading from MET[edit]

Hi Pharos, thanks for uploading a lot of pictures from the MET. Too bad your titles and categories are not very precise...(For example in the islamic art department) --Faqscl (talk) 11:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

bad syntax[edit]

Pharos, check out this diff {{Creator:Gian Lorenzo Bernini|Pietro Bernini}} is not the correct syntax and places image in Category:Bad use of creator template - option. --Jarekt (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art to sort out[edit]

Hi Pharos, https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=910837 gives a list of files that are in category:Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (or subcategories), but not in Category:Artworks with Wikidata item or Category:Artworks with known accession number. These need to be sorted out by adding either the accession number or the wikidata identifier. While typing this message I realized https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=910848 should probably be sorted out first. These are subcategories of category:Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art that don't have a link to Wikidata. Not all can be connected, but quite a few individual painting categories can. That will probably make a lot of the unconnected works show up at User:Multichill/Same image without Wikidata/Category match. Can you help or maybe put these tasks somewhere so more people can help out? Multichill (talk) 09:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Frog Pendant MET DT2593.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Frog Pendant MET DT2593.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Duplicated images[edit]

Hi... I was deleting duplicates and found these:

It seems that the metadata is different but the image is the same. Barcex (talk) 11:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

These and these, too.   — Jeff G. ツ 12:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

I uploaded a few photos from the Met. Letting you know. MechQuester (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Empty category links[edit]

Hi Pharos, could you please evaluate and in future avoid having empty category links in your uploads. I will clean them up soon by just removing them.[16]. Thank you for your cooperation, --Arnd (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Large numbers of broken creators / categories on files[edit]

Hi. I am seeing larger numbers of files with broken use of creator: ns files where multiple authors have been called in the one implementation through April and May. I am also seeing a somewhat matching (though not verified) broken categories. I am going to stop doing maintenance and may wish to cast your eye down the list at Category:Bad use of creator template - option Thanks. I separately pinged you on a couple of items.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

After so many issues raised without any reaction from the user i would vote for escalating this. For me it is a no go when somebody does mass uploads or edits and is not willing to cooperate. --Arnd (talk) 11:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh, I hadn't looked above. Pharos has a good reputation through the wikis, so I will give benefit of doubt to Pharos about why no reaction; though would hope that they would be able to talk approach people to look to resolve this issue soon. We definitely need both a fix and a reassurance that the code issue is resolved.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't know how busy my friend is today, but expect to meet him at en:Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC this evening and mention this matter. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please have a look at Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter. The error is a superfluous pipe sign | within the content of the title paramter (between 卣 and Wine in the example):

| title = 西周 青銅提梁卣|Wine Vessel (You)

Please clean this up (should be possible by bot or AutoWikiBrowser, I think) --Anvilaquarius (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing these mistakes out, I have been responding and adjusting along the way, though not always on this talkpage. Some of the imperfections unfortunately come from the limitations of the Commons:GLAMwiki Toolset, and can only be fixed after upload. I've been working with User:Multichill, who has a bot that follows up on the uploads and does clean-up, and we can tinker with this process to take the new concerns into account.--Pharos (talk) 03:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I was out hacking in Vienna so I haven't run the clean up bot for a while. Fired up the clean up bot! Multichill (talk) 10:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Multichill, could you please again fire up the bot for cleaning up Pharos' files in category:Pages_using_Artwork_template_with_incorrect_parameter. Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 18:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Arnd I'm a very lazy bot operator, I scheduled it to run several times a day some time ago :-) Multichill (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Seal MET br.823.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Seal MET br.823.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mabalu (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely no judgement on you at all - I know this was clearly human error, and the Met's own mistake in linking it to that record, and given the massive volume of uploads, a perfectly natural oversight. Just amazing that out of tens of thousands, just one problematic file slipped through. Mabalu (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Fragment MET LC-N1658-back.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fragment MET LC-N1658-back.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Met Photos[edit]

Is there a way to mass download photos from the MET? or maybe check if the photos are already uploaded to commons?

or maybe an easy to transfer? MechQuester (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Terracotta lekanis (dish) MET DP114253.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Terracotta lekanis (dish) MET DP114253.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Also:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Ass (Esel) MET DP825339.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ass (Esel) MET DP825339.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

"Chinese languages"[edit]

Dear Pharos,

please make sure, that you don't put any files (like this) into Category:Chinese languages.

Thanks a lot.--Transifex (talk) 10:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@Pharos: Stop uploading and CLEAN THIS UP: Category:Chinese languages (cleanup needed).--Transifex (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Design for a Tomb, Rothgeisser in Nuremberg (Elevation and Ground Plan) MET DP819626.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Design for a Tomb, Rothgeisser in Nuremberg (Elevation and Ground Plan) MET DP819626.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This applies to:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Trumpeter on horseback facing right, a group of horsemen in the background, from 'Various cavalry exercises' (Diverses exercices de cavalerie) MET DP833140.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trumpeter on horseback facing right, a group of horsemen in the background, from 'Various cavalry exercises' (Diverses exercices de cavalerie) MET DP833140.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This applies to:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Struggle MET 2008 666 3 Demachy Struggle WhiteShoulder 8x scale caption.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Struggle MET 2008 666 3 Demachy Struggle WhiteShoulder 8x scale caption.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Photo-Secession (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Black square[edit]

Hello Pharos,

something went wrong with this foto File:Gold_phiale_(libation_bowl)_MET_DP118068.jpg. It just shows a black square.

--Friedel Völker (talk) 05:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Department_of_Drawings_and_Prints,_Metropolitan_Museum_of_Art[edit]

Oursana (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Met categories[edit]

Your Met photo uploads are including categories that are redirects, such as Category:Metropolitan Museum of Art by department - Islamic Art, which is a redirect to Category:Department of Islamic Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art -- and many, many others. Some of these categories contain over 10,000 files. "Drawings and prints" contains almost 40,000! RussBot will move these files to the correct categories, but it is limited to 200 files per category per day, to prevent overloading it. At that rate, emptying out the incorrect Drawings and prints category will take around nine months. You might want to look into other ways of fixing this. --R'n'B (talk) 17:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:MET 14 40 203 F sf temp.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MET 14 40 203 F sf temp.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright of a Met exhibition[edit]

Hey there,

So I was at the Met this weekend and took a bunch of pictures of the Comme des Garcons exhibition. Since you've been dealing quite a bit with issues of museums and copyright, I wonder if you know what the copyright rules would be for such pictures. I know that clothing is not itself copyrightable, but I don't know about the styling of the clothes, the forms they're on, the e.g. hair styles on the forms, the arrangement of the clothes into sets, etc. As an example, I'm talking about images like this one (which from the LA Times, i.e. not actually one I would be uploading). Thoughts? — Rhododendrites talk |  00:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project[edit]

Hello Pharos,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around, but since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Standard dates[edit]

Hi Pharos, is it possible to use the standard date format for your uploads so that i do not need to clean up them like here. Thank you for your cooperation, --Arnd (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Scenes from the Lives of Jacob and Joseph- Jacob and Laban part ways MET 29310.jpg[edit]

Hi. This file has 7 duplicates. Perhaps your GWToolset malfunctioned?   — Jeff G. ツ 02:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Also, File:Annexation of Tuscany to the French Empire, 1808 MET 30729.jpg has 6.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

File:The Four Vases MET DP830232.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:The Four Vases MET DP830232.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Finoskov (talk) 12:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images_from_Wikis_Take_Manhattan_by_Naked_Pictures_of_Bea_Arthur[edit]

Anvilaquarius (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Plan of the Socialist Offensive MET DP275720.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Plan of the Socialist Offensive MET DP275720.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Дима Г (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Samuel Cutts MET ap1979.196.1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Samuel Cutts MET ap1979.196.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sanandros (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

user of {{creator}}[edit]

Hi. I was doing some tidy up at Category:Bad use of creator template - option and see that for File:-Group of 12 Stereograph Views of Celebrities, Including Popes and Presidents- MET DP75443.jpg that your assignation was outside of the scope of the template. I am not certain what you are trying to attempt with the added parameters, so I am wondering whether you could please review what you were desiring to do. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh, I see that you have a fair range of the images where you have plugged in multiple parameters, eg. File:-Album page with ten photographs of La Comtesse mounted recto and verso- MET DP235114.jpg. If these are multiple creators, then I can manually run through the list with AWB and convert the use of the template with parameters to be multiple instances of the template with single parameters. Let me know if you need assistance resolving these, don't want to dive in where the is uncertainty about what is trying to be portrayed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Yes, these are generally meant to be multiple creators, and are drawn from the Met database. Some instances might be incorrect in our definition of what a 'creator' is, but most will be good, and converting them in this way should be a real benefit. Any thoughts, @Multichill:?--Pharos (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Please go ahead with AWB edits, and thank you for the contribution to this effort with the museum. Some of the values may be a company rather than an individual artist, but i trust you to use your best judgement.--Pharos (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: I suppose for non-individual artists there will just be an empty template, and we can remove most of them later. (There will also be missing creator templates for many individual artists too, and we can help create those.)--Pharos (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. It is a lower level task in the panopoly of maintenance, though I have progressed through numbers, and skipped those that were complex or unclear. Some I just tidied, put some page inclusion links, and left the names nude. Now I know and if when it is returned to then it can be addressed. I retroactively noticed that the use of the semi-colon for name dividers, and if we face such an import in the future, it would be useful to have your bot check for their presence, or flag as an indicator of multiple creators.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

groupings[edit]

Hello, I was wondering if there's a way to group collections of files together in these mass uploads (see File:MET 1989 363 1 c03.jpg). Including the more-descriptive information would be nice too (see [17]). Thanks. --Cold Season (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Cold Season: Yes, in most cases the title has been automatically extracted from the metadata, but sometimes in cases where an artwork has multiple titles this has failed. We're also looking into having multiple views of the same artwork (when there are at least 3 or 4), have a an artwork-specific category generated by bot.--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Portrait of Jean de la Fontaine MET DP828945.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Portrait of Jean de la Fontaine MET DP828945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

88.180.14.226 14:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Sir Charles Price (1748–1818) MET DP-13721-036.jpg[edit]

Hi, Pharos, is this a portrait of Sir Charles Price, 1st Baronet? Though date of birth on that would be 1747, I am pretty sure this is the guy :) Wince you were the uploader you might be able to confirm. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Boats at Cape May MET 227527.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Boats at Cape May MET 227527.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarekt (talk) 02:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

[[18]][edit]

Hi, Completely wrong data for the 4 images of this object. Johnbod (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)