User talk:Philafrenzy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Philafrenzy!

Contents

SEEKING PERMISSION TO USE ONE OF YOUR IMAGES[edit]

I am from Mosaic Films and we are producing a series of educational animations for BBC Learning, on the history of medicine. We are using lots of archival illustrations and photographs to bring the history to life, and were wondering if it might be at all possible if we could use the image you have of the former premises of T.J.Boulting & Sons, Riding House Street, London. As it is BBC Learning, we are unfortunately unable to attribute. I am happy to tell you more about the way this will be used if you would like to start a discussion about this. Please get in touch: auriol@mosaicfilms.com

All the best,

Auriol

  • Go right ahead.
P.S. It's best to add new messages at the bottom of the page not the top. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Category naming[edit]

Hi, it's cool that you're creating categories for UK stamps by year. What was your reason for choosing year-then-country? Categories like Category:1919 stamps seem to use two different formats, and it's never been clear to me which one should be the standard. Stan Shebs (talk) 18:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed that too, but another user had already created several by year then country and there was no facility to rename them so I decided to stay with that. Incidentally, I also created by reign but capitalised the R of reign by mistake. Do you know how to change that? Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

File:God or Anti-God propaganda stamp.jpg[edit]

What country is it from, and why should it be reasonably assumed to be out of copyright? -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

  • I can't say for sure so I suppose it will have to be deleted unless you can find a better licence. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
It's not just the country of origin, it's also that the 70 years rule generally applies as 70 years from the death of the author (not 70 years from date of publication -- and by "before Barbarossa" dating, it won't even be definitely 70 years after publication until a month and a half from now...) -- AnonMoos (talk) 17:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
OK.Philafrenzy (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Stamps of Poland[edit]

I reverted your entry about polish stamps. Unfortunately it is not correct, See Commons_talk:Stamps/Public_domain#Polish_stamps_are_copyrighted. --Jarekt (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, I was thinking about reverting it myself actually as I had just seen the earlier discussion. Is it correct, however, that the stamps are PD from 1994? Philafrenzy (talk) 00:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Every few years we go through big deletions of Polish Stamps. I think previous Deletion covered everything after 1945. I do not thing 1994 made stamps PD that law mostly retroactively removed PD status from Polish works that were PD before. --Jarekt (talk) 00:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

File:1976_North_Korea_stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1976_North_Korea_stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

File:1988_stamp_of_North_Korea.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1988_stamp_of_North_Korea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Kim_Jong-il_on_North_Korean_stamps.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kim_Jong-il_on_North_Korean_stamps.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


File:1914 Greece educational revenue stamp.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Magyar | 日本語 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:1914 Greece educational revenue stamp.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted.

Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:58, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't think this is right. The image is quite large actually. No longer available on Wikipedia anyway. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Stamp Jamaica 1870 1sh QV.jpg[edit]

While I don't own one, nor have seen one of these stamps, maybe you have, but your increased contrast looks rather overdone to me. I agree that the original sandafayre image may be a little dark I think you have gone too far. Maybe a slight increase in brightness would have been better rather than increased contrast. Of course, if you have compared it to an original I accept your new image as an improvement. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 03:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I changed it to a mid level, trouble is it's not a particularly good scan in the first place, and really you can barely see the variety anyway. I will try to put a bit more Jamaica up. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

File:1859 60c lilac stamp Uruguay.jpg uploaded new version[edit]

Hello Philafrenzy, I made a higher res scan and just uploaded an improved version of this file. Arno-nl (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Nice scan. I improved the contrast a bit. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Wow, amazing. Arno-nl (talk) 11:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:File:Estampilla de Austria 1973 000.jpg[edit]

Ok si esta estampilla esta en derecho, entiendo que debe borrarse, sin embargo entiendo que las estampillas austriacas están libres de derechos de el año 1975. También llama mi atención que si una estampilla de 1973 esta en derecho como señala quien sometió a consulta de borrado no halla visto que hay estampillas más recientes y que están bajo la misma licencia y que entonces todas deberían ser borradas. Hago referencia a la siguiente lista:

Para mayor comodidad revisar Category:Stamps of Austria by year

También seria comveniente revisar:

Sorry, I won't be able to reply unless you can post this in English? Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Treasures in Focus Stamps.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Treasures in Focus Stamps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

UserB (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

SEEKING PERMISSION TO USE ONE OF YOUR IMAGES[edit]

Dear Philafrenzy

We are visual artists and academics who are currently working on a chapter in a book entitled ‘The Photograph and the Album’ (published by MuseumsEtc http://museumsetc.com/blogs/news/7422776-forthcoming-the-photograph-and-the-album). We are also contributing to the editorship of this volume.

Our chapter is examining the role that the internet plays in acting as a 'giant photograph album'. We have taken this principle and have begun to look for images, searching – as many of us do – under our own names, curious to find out what images appear. The following image came up in relation to one of our surnames: Miller's Green Gloucester with Parliament Room and Cathedral http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Miller%27s_Green_Gloucester_with_Parliament_Room_and_Cathedral.JPG

We are interested in using the image in our chapter and want to confirm that you agree that we can do this in line with the statement that appears in Wikimedia Commons which is as follows:

“You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work Under the following conditions: attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).”

To be clear about our use of the image, it will appear as part of a sequence of images for which we will provide full captions and acknowledgement (in reference to the information which appears on the webpage provided above).

We hope you are willing to give permission and would appreciate if you would confirm this via this email - r.miller@salford.ac.uk . We would also be very grateful if you could inform us of any other parties from whom we should seek permission in reference to this image, if you are aware of any such parties.

If you are willing to give us permission please confirm the text you would like us to present in relation to the image to satisfy the condition of attribution. We would appreciate it if you could respond by Friday May 3rd.

Thank you for your consideration & please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Very best regards Rosie Miller & Jonathan Carson r.miller@salford.ac.uk

Replied by email giving permission today. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Stamp-UK 1955 Castle definitives.jpg[edit]

I always understood the Castle series were the GB high value definitives of the 1950s, so I was surprised to see this edit. Am I missing something? Can you please explain? Ww2censor (talk) 21:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

They are in category Wilding Series, which is a sub-category of the definitives, though until I read the article on Wikipedia I must admit I had never thought of them as Wildings, but I guess they are as they use the relevant Wilding portrait. Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Ok, it's curious how we perceive some things like this. BTW, were you thinking of contributing to the Signpost interview about the philately project? I did not get time yet. The one contributor has rather little to say and I am surprised that Stan has not done a piece yet either. Cheers. Ww2censor (talk) 09:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes I have been meaning to do it. I am aware of the existing contribution. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
If I get a chance I will try to contribute either today or tomorrow. BTW, I should commend you on your extensive contributions to the Philately Project on the enwiki. Ww2censor (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, and the same to you! Philafrenzy (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Stamps_of_the_United_States_1978-1980[edit]

76.254.37.226 17:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Stamps_of_the_United_States_1981-1990[edit]

76.254.37.226 17:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Argentina 1952 10p postal savings stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Argentina 1952 10p postal savings stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 00:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

File:De Administrando Imperio Dumbarton Oaks edition.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:De Administrando Imperio Dumbarton Oaks edition.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:Congo 139 1967.JPG[edit]

Hello Philafrenzy I was quite surprised when I saw your delete requests for a bunch of files of stamps I uploaded in Commons. For two reasons. First of all because those files were pictures I took of stamps. I think stamps are not under the copyright laws because they are useful objects. They are made for charging a letter or postcard, that is, for paying a postal service. They are not made for being an artistic object like a film, a book, a painting or a statue. Second reason is that I paid for those stamps... they are mine. I photographed my stamps. The artist got paid when he made his drawing for the postal service. The postal service got paid when they sold the stamps to their users. So... the copyright is already paid. This is my point of view. Best regards. Towiki60 (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

I understand your point of view and wish you were right as then I could upload all of my collection. Unfortunately it is the law that counts and in most countries postage stamps are copyright the artist or the relevant national Post Office for a long time after issue. There is more guidance here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain Philafrenzy (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Fakes Forgeries Experts No. 13.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fakes Forgeries Experts No. 13.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Randykitty (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Richard Carnac Temple 1850-1931.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Richard Carnac Temple 1850-1931.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sitush (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Richard Carnac Temple 1850-1931.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Richard Carnac Temple 1850-1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mirror image of "The Roses of Heliogabalus" by Alma-Tadema.jpg[edit]

Hi, as I changed the name in order to avoid confusion and make it clear it is a mirror image, it seems not to be a good move to upload a another version of the image like you did. How can we solve this? Lotje (talk) 12:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

It's in use so we can't leave it as it is as two pages are showing the mirror image by mistake. I have suggest a simple rename. There is no benefit in leaving a mirror image here. What is it good for? Philafrenzy (talk) 12:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Images of paintings[edit]

When you upload images of paintings, do not increase the saturation levels, or contrast, or brightness. This is an unacceptable practice. Thanks in advance. Coldcreation (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Also, make sure you post the new source for the image (if not the same), rather than leaving the former image source on the description page. Coldcreation (talk) 13:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Fritz Görnnert.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fritz Görnnert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 11:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Considerate constructors scheme.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Considerate constructors scheme.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:High Commission for Pakistan, London 02.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:High Commission for Pakistan, London 02.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

File:High Barnet Station view.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:High Barnet Station view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

File:The Golliwog news, Fay Inchfawn.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Golliwog news, Fay Inchfawn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Smuggling cigarettes inside a statue of Buddha.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Smuggling cigarettes inside a statue of Buddha.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Smuggling cigarettes inside a statue of Buddha.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

czar 19:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Smuggling cigarettes inside a statue of Buddha.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Smuggling cigarettes inside a statue of Buddha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ossulston House 01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ossulston House 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2.102.190.200 21:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ossulston House 04.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ossulston House 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2.102.190.200 21:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ossulston House 03.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ossulston House 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2.102.190.200 21:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ossulston House 03.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ossulston House 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2.102.190.200 21:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Window in memory of Jane Dearberg, All Saints' Church, Oakleigh Park 08.jpg[edit]

I was accepting this request because it is told on Commons:File renaming "Which files should be renamed?" page: #1. At the original uploader's request.[1][Unless there is a compelling reason not to, uploader requests should be honored. This is a courtesy, not an absolute, however.].
But I'm sorry I did not support your decision to decline: I missed it :( It wasn't intentional. I beg your pardon, Wieralee (talk) 11:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Edgar Battersby 1881-1917.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edgar Battersby 1881-1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.71.13.211 09:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Crouch End post office.jpg[edit]

I used to live about 10 mins walk from here back in the early 19…s. My wife and I used to push the pram up here for the weekly shopping! Do you ever add the coordinates to such images as I could not easily find 28 Topsfield Parade. None of the maps I looked at actually placed it at that address but on Tottenham Lane. Curious. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, neither my camera nor my phone include that facility. Perhaps when I replace them. That's the post office in Broadway Parade which continues as Tottenham Lane slightly further on. Topsfield Parade is the name for the row of shops rather than the street name I think. Those Victorian/Edwardian rows of shops are characteristic of that part of north London as I expect you know.
Queens Parade
Queens Parade in Muswell Hill is another one. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks; I saw Topsfield Parade as a small street backing onto Broadway Parade, but I dont' remember it in such details. I was just interested because I lived so close by. Ww2censor (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

This looks copyright[edit]

This website indicated that File:The postal services of the Gold Coast to 1901.jpg is a 2003 book, so I'm not sure it can be freely licensed. Ww2censor (talk) 18:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

The book is recent put the picture is Victorian or earlier and the text is too simple to qualify for copyright. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Yeah but when was the picture published previously or is it a painting from a gallery or museum? One should really know where it is from as it might still be in copyright. I could not find anything old online. Ww2censor (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I will add the full details from the book shortly. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Great. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
It's an 1874 print: Cape Coast Castle - Zouaves embarking for Sierra Leone. I have added the details. Artist not stated however. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

eBay items[edit]

BTW, you can use the eBay temaplate {{Ebay item}} and add the item number to File:Hildebrand Harmsworth postcard 1906.jpg that you recently uploaded; then we have an actual linked source. Ww2censor (talk) 13:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't know that one existed. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Philafrenzy, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/− lNeverCry 19:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 18:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Queensland_Telegraph_Form[edit]

I came upon this image when working on the Cardwell Bush Telegraph article. I don't know if you are able to remember back to 2011 when you uploaded the image, but you said the creator was the British Government and then licensed it as a UK public domain image. However, I don't think this can be so. The form is for a telegraph in Queensland in the 1880s. The Queensland Government was established in 1860 and post and telegraph were within their responsibilities until Federation of Australia in 1901 when post and telegraph became Australian Government responsibilities. So, I think this is a Queensland Government document (but I think still public domain under PD-Australia). Is it OK with you if I change this? Thanks Kerry Raymond (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes, no problem, I wasn't sure when such items moved from British to Australian responsibility. Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

The Were-Wolf cover image[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Were-Wolf_by_Clemence_Housman.jpg

The page history means to me (uncertainly) that you provided one image 2013-12-14 with documentation. You scanned some c. 1900 original? Do you mean that that image including top banner shows front cover of some c. 1900 book?

Later I'll write to the person who revised the documentation this January, probably. --P64 (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

It's an 1896 illustration and out of copyright. You can see it here: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13131/13131-h/13131-h.htm Philafrenzy (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Yes, the illustration is "Sweyn's Finding" from the end of the 1896 first ed. of the story as a book [1]. Is the image with yellow banner a scan of the front cover of one of the modern reprints that von-eitzen.de identifies: Reprint Edition, 2000 // Ayer Company Publishers, Inc. (or) Reprint Edition 1976 by Arno Press Inc.? (This section is my first contribution to www.Wikimedia.org; I don't know the documentation standard and don't mean to criticize, only to identify the edition where the image is used at EN.wikipedia.org, whose caption I revised this weekend. I don't see any cover image at von-eitzen.de, only the interior artwork of the 2000 reprint). --P64 (talk) 22:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
I think the source of that version was https://web.archive.org/web/20140211005258/http://thefreehold.us/?p=1828 which doesn't state which edition the cover is from. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. --P64 (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Trellick Tower & Edenham map.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Trellick Tower & Edenham map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hchc2009 (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stamps Mammals of the Caribbean.jpg[edit]

Hi Philafrenzy. I expected to see a reaction from you. Haven't you watchlisted the page? --Leyo 23:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Eastgate Shopping Centre, Gloucester[edit]

I have moved your File:Amazon locker at Eastgate Shopping Centre, Gloucester.JPG and File:Amazon locker at Eastgate Shopping Centre, Gloucester (2).JPG to this category ready for me to use future photos within this category due to me creating Eastgate Shopping Centre in my sandbox, If that is ok.D Eaketts (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Theodore Fischer auctioning Georges Braque's Stilleben (1924) in 1939 lot 14.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Theodore Fischer auctioning Georges Braque's Stilleben (1924) in 1939 lot 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rlbberlin (talk) 05:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

File:New Barnet Railway Station 10 August 2017.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New Barnet Railway Station 10 August 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 06:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:John Potter chemist.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)