User talk:Pimbrils

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Breitner the red kimoni - digitally manipulated by Jan Arkesteijn.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Breitner the red kimoni - digitally manipulated by Jan Arkesteijn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 12:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Robert Anning Bell6.jpg[edit]

Hi! I think the artist is wrong, see File:Walter T. Crane - La belle Dame Sans Merci (1865).jpg. --Micione (talk) 01:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Micione, You're right. I cant check it on the polarbear site, because the site no longer excists. I think the file may be deleted, or otherwise renemad. Greetings, --Pimbrils (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
I asked fo a rename, removed the file on the wikipages and changed the category. --Pimbrils (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. --Micione (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Lili Marberg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lili Marberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Villa Franca near Nice Carrick.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Villa Franca near Nice Carrick.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

smial 14:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Modigliani, Paul Haviland.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Modigliani, Paul Haviland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierrette13 (talk) 06:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Anonymous artist - Lot and his daughters - Louvre RF 1185 - 002.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Pimbrils, ik zag je edits en vroeg me af wie de beschrijving op aanpast op wikipedia: Anonymous (Low Countries), Formerly attributed to Lucas van Leyden. Lotje (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Formerly attributed to Lucas van Leyden. Lotje (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Dag Lotje, ik weet even niet zeker of ik je goed begrijp. Welke beschrijving bedoel je precies? Ik heb de oorsponkelijke file vervangen door een kwalitatief scherpere file in hogere resolutie omdat ik bezig ben met een lemma over het schilderij op de Nederlandse Wikipedia. Verder heb ik niks aangepast in omschrijvingen. Hartelijke groet, --Pimbrils (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Heb het trouwens terug gezet naar oude versie, was er niet tevreden over. Groet, --Pimbrils (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Gaufre biscuit.jpg nice uploads.

i would encourage you to consider commons:pattypan for multiple uploads with template:artwork, or one at a time with old uploader [1] cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

File:CameraNotes-072.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CameraNotes-072.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Photo-Secession (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Koppen 04.jpg[edit]

Hallo Pimbrils, meen je dat de file moet worden hernoemd? Lotje (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

File:RykovBucharin.JPG[edit]

Hello, can you please name the page number of this picture in the book "The Russian Century", isbn 9060749405?--Antenor81 (talk) 12:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

P. 181, added. --Pimbrils (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks.--Antenor81 (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)