User talk:Pline

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lien vers l'archive de la page de discussion pour la période 2007-2012


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eglise-Saint-Antoine-a-Compiegne-DSC 0265.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise-Saint-Antoine-a-Compiegne-DSC 0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ligne--T3-porte-de-Versaill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligne--T3-porte-de-Versaill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I think it's fine, although would be better if not advert on a left SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jardin-des-Tuileries-hiver-2013-DSC 0162.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardin-des-Tuileries-hiver-2013-DSC 0162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eglise de Chateauneuf DSC 0285.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise de Chateauneuf DSC 0285.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo 21:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tramway de Dijon DSC 0238.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tramway de Dijon DSC 0238.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau d'Eguilly DSC 0393.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau d'Eguilly DSC 0393.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Isn't the left side tilted? Poco a poco 21:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done I try to fix it. --Pline 19:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pont-Royal sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0408.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-Royal sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0408.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --Mattbuck 22:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Chateau d'Eguilly DSC 0396.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau d'Eguilly DSC 0396.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharpness not optimal, but ok. --Mattbuck 22:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tramway de Dijon DSC 0244.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tramway de Dijon DSC 0244.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Definitely unsharp. Sharpening may help, but may be low DOF. Mattbuck 22:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Better ? --Pline 09:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Mattbuck 19:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hopital-de-Chateaudun-rue-des-Huileries-DSC 0095.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopital-de-Chateaudun-rue-des-Huileries-DSC 0095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Le canal de Bourgogne a Vandenesse DSC 0378.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le canal de Bourgogne a Vandenesse DSC 0378.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 08:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maison-16eme-siecle-a-Chateaudun-DSC 0089.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison-16eme-siecle-a-Chateaudun-DSC 0089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 10:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Chateaudun-St-Chapelle-et-Donjon-DSC 0377.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Chateaudun-St-Chapelle-et-Donjon-DSC 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice again but perspective correction could be better there too. --Selbymay 21:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Chateaudun-DSC 0224.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Chateaudun-DSC 0224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 07:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Hôtel-du-Saillant-a-Vendome-DSC 0496.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel-du-Saillant-a-Vendome-DSC 0496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
nice view, good composition. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Château-de-Montigny-le-Gannelon-DSC 0425.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château-de-Montigny-le-Gannelon-DSC 0425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Chateaudun-DSC 0130.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Chateaudun-DSC 0130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pretty nice but the perspective correction could be better. See notes. --Selbymay 19:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 22:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC) Better. --Selbymay 21:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Parc-Ronsard-a-Vendome-DSC 0487.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc-Ronsard-a-Vendome-DSC 0487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Maison de Chateauneuf en Côte d'Or DSC 0326.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de Chateauneuf en Côte d'Or DSC 0326.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI to me. --Florstein 07:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0082.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0058.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Tuxyso 23:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pinasse-port-d-Arcachon-DSC 0195.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinasse-port-d-Arcachon-DSC 0195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0068.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0066.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Vallery-DSC 0066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 15:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hotel-Dieu-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel-Dieu-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 23:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Piste-cyclable-Traverse-de-Ponthieu-ancienne-ligne-des-Bains-de-mer-entre-Lille-et-le-Treport-vers-St-Riquier-DSC 0227.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piste-cyclable-Traverse-de-Ponthieu-ancienne-ligne-des-Bains-de-mer-entre-Lille-et-le-Treport-vers-St-Riquier-DSC 0227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 08:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Piste-cyclable-Traverse-de-Ponthieu-ancienne-ligne-des-Bains-de-mer-entre-Lille-et-le-Treport-vers-St-Riquier-DSC 0311.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piste-cyclable-Traverse-de-Ponthieu-ancienne-ligne-des-Bains-de-mer-entre-Lille-et-le-Treport-vers-St-Riquier-DSC 0311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now. --Cayambe 20:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Place-Max-Lejeune-a-Abbeville-DSC 0083.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place-Max-Lejeune-a-Abbeville-DSC 0083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Parc-et-Hotel-d'Emonville-DSC 0134.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc-et-Hotel-d'Emonville-DSC 0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 16:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Candas-dans-la-Somme-DSC 0383.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Candas-dans-la-Somme-DSC 0383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 07:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beffroi-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0283.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beffroi-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment distraction right side, but nonetheless QI --Rjcastillo 02:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Pré-vers-Abbeville-DSC 0206.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pré-vers-Abbeville-DSC 0206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
nice --Rjcastillo 02:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paysages-de-la-vallée-de-l'Authie-vers-Doullens-DSC 0350.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysages-de-la-vallée-de-l'Authie-vers-Doullens-DSC 0350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok--Lmbuga 19:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Parc-et-Hotel-d'Emonville-DSC 0146.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc-et-Hotel-d'Emonville-DSC 0146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok (perhaps the swan is a bit overexposed--Lmbuga 19:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Abbaye-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0307.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye-de-Saint-Riquier-DSC 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Qualitiy -- Arcalino 13:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Eglise-St-Gilles-a-Abbeville-DSC 0005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise-St-Gilles-a-Abbeville-DSC 0005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now. --Cayambe 07:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vignobles-autour-de-Sancerre-DSC 0149.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vignobles-autour-de-Sancerre-DSC 0149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 09:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Ancre a Cosne sur Loire DSC 0029.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancre a Cosne sur Loire DSC 0029.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 07:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

La-Loire-et-le-vieux-pont-de-la-Charité-sur-Loire-DSC 0260.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La-Loire-et-le-vieux-pont-de-la-Charité-sur-Loire-DSC 0260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment nice, but needs a small perspective correction, sorry. --Moonik 08:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 20:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Good now. --Moonik 06:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Plateau-de-l'Aubrac-pres-de-Rieutort-DSC 0751.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plateau-de-l'Aubrac-pres-de-Rieutort-DSC 0751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice. I would crop the photo removing the cow of the left, trying to get a balanced picture if posible--Lmbuga 09:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 09:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Good quality--Lmbuga 09:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice and very good composition--Lmbuga 09:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Estaing-DSC 0092-.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaing-DSC 0092-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but please correct the small cw tilt.--ArildV 10:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 14:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done I try to fix the blurred area too. --Pline 17:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment See note, blurred area. I don't know why because the rest of the image is well--Lmbuga 14:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
{{o}} Nice, but the tower and the upper part of the castle is blurred IMO--Lmbuga 21:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support its not perfect, but Im think its ok for QI.--ArildV 22:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
New review. Symbol support vote.svg Weak support I have downloaded the picture a I saw the photo with a size of 4 megapixels... and it's QI for me--Lmbuga 14:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapelle de Bastide vers Lasbros DSC 0598.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle de Bastide vers Lasbros DSC 0598.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've only seen a problem: It's a bit tilted CCW, but in my opinion the quality is very good--Lmbuga 15:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done --Pline 21:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 02:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quai-port-de-Rouen-DSC 0030.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai-port-de-Rouen-DSC 0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me--Lmbuga 16:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Manoir-de-Marbeuf-a-Sahurs-DSC 0156.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manoir-de-Marbeuf-a-Sahurs-DSC 0156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chemin-de-halage-le-long-du-Lot-pres-de--St-Cirq-Lapopie-DSC 0728-.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paquebot-MSC-Opera-au-Havre-DSC 0899.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paquebot-MSC-Opera-au-Havre-DSC 0899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 09:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Mairie-de-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0613.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie-de-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Kraft 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-de-Brotonne-DSC 0348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice--Lmbuga 16:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-de-Normandie-DSC 0743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like it, but the picture needs a perspective correction IMO (see notes)--Lmbuga 00:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 08:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Maison-dite-Logis-du-Roy-ou-de-François-Ier-à-Vatteville-la-Rue-DSC 0642.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison-dite-Logis-du-Roy-ou-de-François-Ier-à-Vatteville-la-Rue-DSC 0642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 14:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Eglise-de-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0498.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise-de-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Dust spot (see note), but clear QI for me--Lmbuga 00:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 08:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Tramway-place-de-l'Hotel-de-ville-du-Havre-DSC 0871.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tramway-place-de-l'Hotel-de-ville-du-Havre-DSC 0871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice play ground --Rolf H. 07:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Bassin-Vauban-au-Havre-DSC 0855.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bassin-Vauban-au-Havre-DSC 0855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Sémaphore-du-port-du-Havre-DSC 0897.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sémaphore-du-port-du-Havre-DSC 0897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Batiment-monastique-abbaye-St-George-de-Boscherville-DSC 0192.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batiment-monastique-abbaye-St-George-de-Boscherville-DSC 0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo 23:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Chateau-de-la-Riviere-Bourdet-DSC 0185.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-la-Riviere-Bourdet-DSC 0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. Optionally, you can apply perspective correction to fix a tilt of the left side of the building. But the tilt is small and maybe it is so in real life. Heuschrecke 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Eglise-Saint-Sauveur--a-Sahurs-DSC 0102.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise-Saint-Sauveur--a-Sahurs-DSC 0102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 11:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Pont-levant-de-Rouen-DSC 0015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-levant-de-Rouen-DSC 0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Cargo-sur-la-Seine-devant-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0375.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cargo-sur-la-Seine-devant-Caudebec-en-Caux-DSC 0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 13:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Retable-Eglise-Saiint-Thibault-Cote-d-Or-DSC 0533.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retable-Eglise-Saiint-Thibault-Cote-d-Or-DSC 0533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good enough --Poco a poco 14:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cour-de-la-Gare-de-Dijon-DSC 0689.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour-de-la-Gare-de-Dijon-DSC 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Need perspective corrections, left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 19:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 22:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support OK, much better --Christian Ferrer 05:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vèze-Eglise-St-Caprais-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0502.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vèze-Eglise-St-Caprais-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Andelat-Eglise-St-Cirgues-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0729.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andelat-Eglise-St-Cirgues-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 18:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Coltines-Eglise-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0660.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coltines-Eglise-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Coltines-Eglise-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0666.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coltines-Eglise-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The crop is a little odd in the left side, but the light, detail level and DOF is good. QI for me. --Slaunger 20:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saint-Pierre-de-Manneville-Eglise-Saint-Pierre-dpt-Seine-Maritime-DSC 0174.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pierre-de-Manneville-Eglise-Saint-Pierre-dpt-Seine-Maritime-DSC 0174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Sahurs-Manoir-de-Marbeuf---dpt-Seine-MaritimeDSC 0117.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahurs-Manoir-de-Marbeuf---dpt-Seine-MaritimeDSC 0117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Lmbuga 21:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateaudun-Immeubles-4-et-5-place-du 18 octobre de-Chateaudun-dpt-Eure-et-Loir-DSC 0038.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateaudun-Immeubles-4-et-5-place-du 18 octobre de-Chateaudun-dpt-Eure-et-Loir-DSC 0038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --Rjcastillo 02:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Semur-en-Auxois-Chateau-et-pont-Pinard-dpt-Côte-d'Or-DSC 0431.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Semur-en-Auxois-Chateau-et-pont-Pinard-dpt-Côte-d'Or-DSC 0431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and nice. --Myrabella 06:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris-10-ardt-Eglise-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul-DSC 0455.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris-10-ardt-Eglise-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul-DSC 0455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some noise, otherwise good for QI but please go back with a tripod.--ArildV 14:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Aero Engines[edit]

Moteur de l Antoinette VII Musee du Bourget P1010360.JPG Antoinette
We would like to use this image in a book. We would like to give you full credit, and to provide you with a copy of the book. Please email us at admin@aviationfilm.com, thanks. Histavfilmunit (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Aero Engines[edit]

Moteur de l Antoinette VII Musee du Bourget P1010360.JPG Antoinette
We would like to use this image in a book. We would like to give you full credit, and to provide you with a copy of the book. Please email us at admin@aviationfilm.com, thanks. Histavfilmunit (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

International Visual Theater Paris 28 August 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! International Visual Theater Paris 28 August 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI, --P e z i 21:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Pont d'Yeu à l'Île d'Yeu[edit]

Pont d'Yeu à l'Île d'Yeu.

Bonjour
La carte ici indique le pont d'Yeu dans "la sablaire" de la carte marine
Je pense que le pont d'Yeu était dans "Basse de la conche" (au Sud de la plage des Ovaires), de là le trajet du pont d’Yeu a comme plus grande profondeur: 7,5 m (marqué 75 sur la carte marine) c'est la plus faible profondeur que les autres trajets donc "la sablaire"
Ci joint lien de référence sur la carte marine avec les hauteurs d'eau en mètre (et en dixième de mètre) au-dessus des fonds marins, (les hauteurs d'eau sont en marée basse coefficient 120) et les valeurs sur un trait émergent de l'eau toujours en marée basse coef 120.
Pour info je suis sur l'article Pont d'Yeu.
Copie à User_talk:PouX
Amicalement.
--F1jmm (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

D'après la carte le pont d'Yeu semble beaucoup plus large que cela. C'est la zone de hauts fonds qui va de l'ouest de Port Joinville jusqu'à la pointe des Corbeaux et qui s'étend jusqu'au continent avec des sondes grosso modo comprises entre 7 et 10 mètres au-dessous du zéro des basses mers (il y a une nette chute des fonds de part et d'autre). J'ai recentré le libellé pour ne pas donner l'impression qu'il désigne en particulier la sablaire (ce qui n'était pas l'intention initiale mais j'avais géré à l'économie la présence de la cartouche en haut à droite). --Pline (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | polski | română | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Pline,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Rosetta philae moins sombre.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rosetta philae moins sombre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 01:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Alouette_III_JBL_Musee_du_Bourget_P1020318.JPG[edit]

Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous me dire si il est possible d'utiliser le fichier : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alouette_III_JBL_Musee_du_Bourget_P1020318.JPG

Sur une page d'un site internet non commercial ? Si oui, quelles sont les mentions à faire figurer

D'avance merci, --Jeanba² (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Translating the blocking policy[edit]

Hi, I noticed you previously edited Commons:Blocking policy and was wondering if you can help with updating it. If you can, please go to [1]. If you are looking for the previous translation, please see [2]. Thank you for your help. whym (talk) 03:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Pline (talk) 12:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Regarding [3], were you aware that it's used a sort key? If you want the page sorted into the "B" section in a category like Category:Commons policies/fr, you'll need to set it to "Blocage" (or anything similar). whym (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
The translation page has misled me... corrected. --Pline (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sur le versant sud de la route menant au-col-de-la-Croix-Morand-dpt-Puy-de-Dome-DSC 1820.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sur le versant sud de la route menant au-col-de-la-Croix-Morand-dpt-Puy-de-Dome-DSC 1820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
ok --Cccefalon 12:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Versant route-col-de-la-Croix-Morand-dpt-Puy-de-Dome-DSC 1777.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versant route-col-de-la-Croix-Morand-dpt-Puy-de-Dome-DSC 1777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Village de Marcolès DSC 3995.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village de Marcolès DSC 3995.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Please add geo location. --XRay 07:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Porte-Martille-a-Salers-DSC 3668.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte-Martille-a-Salers-DSC 3668.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 06:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ancienne-porte-du-village-de-Léotoing-DSC 2995.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancienne-porte-du-village-de-Léotoing-DSC 2995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) Just OK, despite of slight blur --A.Savin 12:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Village de Marcolès DSC 4034.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village de Marcolès DSC 4034.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 15:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porte du village de Marcolès DSC 3977 - Copie.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du village de Marcolès DSC 3977 - Copie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI. --P e z i 19:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Village de Marcolès DSC 3992.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village de Marcolès DSC 3992.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 19:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Village-de-Paulhac-Haute-Loire-AuvergneDSC 2900.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village-de-Paulhac-Haute-Loire-AuvergneDSC 2900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Spitzer Cryogenic Telescope Assembly.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Spitzer Cryogenic Telescope Assembly.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 23:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mise-au-tombeau-église-St-Mathieu-de-Salers-DSC 3556.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mise-au-tombeau-église-St-Mathieu-de-Salers-DSC 3556.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eglise-de-Blesle-Haute-Loire-DSC 3050.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise-de-Blesle-Haute-Loire-DSC 3050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good quality but perspective correction needed; right side is leaning in. --P e z i 20:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done--Pline 10:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg SupportOK, QI now. --P e z i 15:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cote-Sauvage-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4575.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cote-Sauvage-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Port-de-La-Flotte-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4533.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port-de-La-Flotte-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Village de Marcolès DSC 4001.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village de Marcolès DSC 4001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Village de Marcolès DSC 4011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village de Marcolès DSC 4011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abbaye-des-Chateliers-ile-de-Ré-DSC 4602.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye-des-Chateliers-ile-de-Ré-DSC 4602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Tours-St-Nicolas-et-de-la-Chaine-La-Rochelle-DSC 4647.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours-St-Nicolas-et-de-la-Chaine-La-Rochelle-DSC 4647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Port-de-La-Flotte-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4536.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port-de-La-Flotte-Ile-de-Ré-DSC 4536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Musée-maritime-de-La-Rochelle-DSC 4629.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée-maritime-de-La-Rochelle-DSC 4629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Stegop 00:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris-7-ardt-Hôtel-de-Roquelaure-DSC 0014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris-7-ardt-Hôtel-de-Roquelaure-DSC 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magasin-aux-vivres-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5850.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magasin-aux-vivres-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Please add an english description. --XRay 09:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Notre-Dame-de-Lorette-Paris-DSC 6121.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-de-Lorette-Paris-DSC 6121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, nice composition.--ArildV 20:47, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-et-tour-de-la-Lanterne-DSC 6000.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-et-tour-de-la-Lanterne-DSC 6000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-et-tour-de-la-Lanterne-DSC 5991.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-et-tour-de-la-Lanterne-DSC 5991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-tour-Saint-Nicolas-et-tour-de-la-Chaine--DSC 6095.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chenal-port-de-La-Rochelle-tour-Saint-Nicolas-et-tour-de-la-Chaine--DSC 6095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Corderie-de-l'Arsenal-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5860.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corderie-de-l'Arsenal-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5906.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5928.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 19:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hermione-fregat replica -DSC 5751.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermione-fregat replica -DSC 5751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Corderie-de-l'Arsenal-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France--DSC 5863.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corderie-de-l'Arsenal-a-Rochefort,-Charente-Maritime,-France--DSC 5863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 13:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Les-carrelets-de-Saint-Palais-sur-Mer-France-DSC 5021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les-carrelets-de-Saint-Palais-sur-Mer-France-DSC 5021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : The posts are slightly leaning to the left.--Easy to fix. --JLPC 15:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
It seems to me it's the real world (main wind direction, obj 50 mm, flat horizon, some posts behind are vertical--Pline 18:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Not the posts, but the horizon is the standard for the tilt of the image, and the horizon is perfectly flat here. No tilt, nor perspective distortion. Good picture! -- MJJR 20:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5806.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frégate Hermione réplique de la frégate de 1779 en aout 2014 DSC 5806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Corderie-Royale-de-l'Arsenal-de-Rochefort, Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5828.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corderie-Royale-de-l'Arsenal-de-Rochefort, Charente-Maritime,-France-DSC 5828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentBorders are not horizontal. For this kind of building, perspective should be perfect. --Borvan53 16:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Good for QI --MB-one 12:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015[edit]

WLE Logo MA.svg
Hello,

You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia).
The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end.
A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event.
Face-smile.svg See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c)

Icon tools.svg For more details | Nuvola apps email.png Contact
Aa.png

Category:Aide_de_Commons[edit]

Category discussion warning

Aide de Commons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


197.26.200.128 18:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porte-St-Jean-a-Chateau-Thierry DSC 0011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte-St-Jean-a-Chateau-Thierry DSC 0011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peniches sur la Seine a Boulogne P1000112.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peniches sur la Seine a Boulogne P1000112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Camera Barnstar Hires.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Pour la vue de la cathédrale de Laon! Aarp65 (talk) 18:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Barrage-de-Borts-les-Orgues-sur-la-Dordogne-DSC 0233.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrage-de-Borts-les-Orgues-sur-la-Dordogne-DSC 0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Velo de randonnee DSC 0122.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velo de randonnee DSC 0122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dordogne-pres-du-pont-de-Chambon-DSC 0403.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordogne-pres-du-pont-de-Chambon-DSC 0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 15:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Natural-arch-of-Manneporte-in-Etretat-DSC0-1037.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural-arch-of-Manneporte-in-Etretat-DSC0-1037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, [edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Château-de-Janville-à-Paluel-DSC0-820.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du . Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot. Château-de-Janville-à-Paluel-DSC0-820.jpg

Trizek from FR 13:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-210.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me but a bit bright -- Spurzem 22:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-206.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 22:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ancienne-grange-a-Bassignac-le-Haut-DSC 0471.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancienne-grange-a-Bassignac-le-Haut-DSC 0471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0088.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0076.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 22:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0077.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sllightly too light for my taste but good quality, --Ermell 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0138.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --DKrieger 15:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0177.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 10:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0171.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0190.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0092.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tour-de-Saint-Thugal-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0149.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour-de-Saint-Thugal-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 08:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abbaye-Saint-Séverin-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0128.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye-Saint-Séverin-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Pline,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0093-Pont-du-moulin-Thorame-Haute.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0093-Pont-du-moulin-Thorame-Haute.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Domdomegg 21:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Strates-calcaires-au-bord-du-lac-dr-Castillon-France-DSC 0429.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strates-calcaires-au-bord-du-lac-dr-Castillon-France-DSC 0429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0846-Saint-Geniez-Alpes-de-Haute-Provence.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0846-Saint-Geniez-Alpes-de-Haute-Provence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Enceinte-de-Colmars-DSC 0208.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enceinte-de-Colmars-DSC 0208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Installations-électriques-du-barrage-de-Castillon-DSC 0478.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Installations-électriques-du-barrage-de-Castillon-DSC 0478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Voie-du-train-des-Pignes-le-long-de-l'Asse-près-de-Barrème-DSC 0998.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voie-du-train-des-Pignes-le-long-de-l'Asse-près-de-Barrème-DSC 0998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 15:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paysage-vers-Clumanc-DSC 0016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage-vers-Clumanc-DSC 0016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 16:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0829.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Christian Ferrer 20:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Lac-du-grand-Laus- Queyras-DSC 0276.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac-du-grand-Laus- Queyras-DSC 0276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
perhaps could have been a little sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Lac-du-grand-Laus-Aiguilles-Queyras-DSC 0398.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac-du-grand-Laus-Aiguilles-Queyras-DSC 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0808.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0172.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Extremely good picture! But I would appreciate a geo tag though. --W.carter 22:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0853.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Vallée-du-Guil-Queyras-DSC 0708.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée-du-Guil-Queyras-DSC 0708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice composition! Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Maison le long du-GR58-pres des-lacs-de-Malrif-et d'Abries-Queyras-DSC 0531.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison le long du-GR58-pres des-lacs-de-Malrif-et d'Abries-Queyras-DSC 0531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nicely composed, too! Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0844.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0888.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Detail site Kourou-en.svg building acronyms.[edit]

Hi, Dear Pline. Could you expand building acronyms on Detail site Kourou-en.svg, like UPG, BEAP, BIP, BSE, BIL BAF, CL, ZL, ZLV etc.? There no any description of that acronyms in Articles. --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 19:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kirill, I have added the description. --Pline (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Is the CL3 = CDL3? --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes I have to correct the svg. --Pline (talk) 06:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Rosetta probe making its final descent onto Comet 67-P 29942768641 42618c0563 o.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rosetta probe making its final descent onto Comet 67-P 29942768641 42618c0563 o.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 22:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tour Hassan a Rabat P1060435.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Hassan a Rabat P1060435.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

File:ALSEP Lunar Surface Magnetometer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ALSEP Lunar Surface Magnetometer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ALSEP RTG ALSEP.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ALSEP RTG ALSEP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ALSEP RTG Cask.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ALSEP RTG Cask.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ALSEP SIDE CCIG.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ALSEP SIDE CCIG.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ALSEP Solar Wind Spectrometer.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ALSEP Solar Wind Spectrometer.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Sofia Tacavity.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sofia Tacavity.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Pline,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:LaunchAzimuths.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:LaunchAzimuths.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Carte des fleuves de Russie[edit]

Bonjour, il y a plusieurs années vous avez fait un travail remarquable pour l'article "Liste des cours d'eau en Russie". https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carte-reseau-fluvial-Russie.png Il y a cependant plusieurs problèmes avec cette carte : d'une part cette carte oublie la région de Kaliningrad, ou passe le Niémen (qui fait la frontière avec la Lituanie) qui est assurément un fleuve important (c'est le 16è fleuve d'Europe par la longueur). Vous avez aussi oublié le Narva, qui fait la frontière avec l'Estonie et qui est plus important que le Terekt et l'Okhota qui sont sur votre carte. Sur la page de discussion de l'article j'ai signalé les autres fleuves que l'on pourrait encore ajouter, en fonction du critère choisi. Si l'on utilise le même critère que pour la carte des fleuves français qui s'arrête aux fleuves de plus de 150 m³/s de débit moyen, il y a encore 9 fleuves de plus (peut-être 10 si j'en ai loupé un). N'étant pas compétent pour l'édition d'images, je voulais savoir si vous seriez partant pourvous en occuper ? Н Француз (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Igla docking system antennas-fr.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Igla docking system antennas-fr.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Laon Cathedral[edit]

Hi Pline, I'm co-writing a book on Capetian France for students, and we'd like to use your image of Laon cathedral [4]. The publisher has asked us to contact rightsholders, hence this note - is that OK? We'd attribute the image to you of course.--Charleslincolnshire (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for asking ! You have the permission without saying.--Pline (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Hi Pline,

some of your files don't have any valid category (File:Microlock antenna site in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 293-3885bc.jpg), many more not a single specific category. Please try to avoid generic categories like Category:Jet Propulsion Laboratory – it's always possible to find or create a better fitting subcategory.

Kind regards, DCKH (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@DCKH: Removing a category without moving the image in a subcategory ? Are you a beginner ????? It 's very very very unpleasant ... --Pline (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Jsc2007e046435.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jsc2007e046435.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Funiculaire-de-la-fourviere.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Funiculaire-de-la-fourviere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remontees (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8313 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Ligne-13-invalides-portes-a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ligne-13-invalides-portes-a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ruf Willis (talk) 08:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Central Asia-fr.png[edit]

Bonjour,

Le gros lac au milieu du Kazakhstan, c'est le Balkhach, pas le Baïkal. Ælfgar (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ælfgar: Bonjour, oups ! corrigé. Merci pour le retour ! --Pline (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Versailles Immeuble-adjacent-au-5-place-Hoche dpt Yvelines DSC 0076.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles Immeuble-adjacent-au-5-place-Hoche dpt Yvelines DSC 0076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Versailles-1-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0112.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles-1-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Versailles-11-bis-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0124.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles-11-bis-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Versailles-5-place-Hoche plus immeuble adjacent-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0139.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles-5-place-Hoche plus immeuble adjacent-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Versailles-7-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0073.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles-7-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Versailles-5-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0133.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles-5-place-Hoche-dpt-Yvelines-DSC 0133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris-7-ardt---Hotel-de-Roquelaure-DSC 0016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris-7-ardt---Hotel-de-Roquelaure-DSC 0016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Bottom crop could be better, but IMHO still a QI. --C messier 20:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris-10-ardt-Eglise-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul-DSC 0456.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris-10-ardt-Eglise-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul-DSC 0456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Maquette Luna-Glob Orbiter DSC 0076.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maquette Luna-Glob Orbiter DSC 0076.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AlbertoDV (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)