User talk:Plucas58

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Plucas58!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Plucas58!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Alexander_Beresford-Hope.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alexander_Beresford-Hope.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Burrow Hall.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bramham Biggin-Flikr.com-3319992447.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Bramham Biggin-Flikr.com-3319992447.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA) or 0 (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Manor Club, Otley-Flickr.com-6166240279.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Manor Club, Otley-Flickr.com-6166240279.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA) or 0 (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sir Joseph Savory.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sir Joseph Savory.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Theosophist (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

There are many many caricatures by Spy on Wikimedia Commons. What is so special about this one? Plucas58 (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

When we have both a scan of a caricature and a photo of a caricature, we delete the photo.--The Theosophist (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Fair enoughPlucas58 (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Tenerife Air Disaster[edit]

Hi! I see you're the original uploader of File:Tenerife Air Disaster memorial.JPG and File:Tenerife Air Disaster garden.JPG. The first time I came across one of these images (which was here), I was a bit puzzled, since I mentally linked Tenerife Air Disaster with w:en:Tenerife airport disaster. The names of the images are not wrong, but they might be confusing. Would you object if the images were renamed to, for instance, Dan-Air Flight 1008 memorial or something like that? Richard 09:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Rename them by all means but as far as Manchester is concerned the Dan-Air disaster was THE disaster. I would have preferred to using the date as a distinguishing feature rather than the flight number, but having used one of the images in the relevant articles the actual image name is less important. So I am happy to give you a free hand to rename them.Plucas58 (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll start renaming procedures for both files. Richard 14:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
PS: I'll request the names Tenerife Dan-Air Disaster memorial and Tenerife Dan-Air Disaster memorial. That eliminates the confusion and keeps Tenerife in the names. Richard 14:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like a fair solution.Plucas58 (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Both ✓ Done. Richard 08:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Hen Eglwys, Margam.jpg[edit]

Is there any reason you removed the {{Listed building Wales}} template from this image? You didn't leave any edit summary. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

The template is already in the category - If its in both the individual images are shown unnecessarily when you display the Listed buildings of Neath Port Talbot. By all means restore it if you wish.Plucas58 (talk) 20:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
That makes sense, I just wasn't sure whether it was intentional or not. I'll try not to add redundant templates in the future. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 04:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

George_Biddell_Airy_by_Spy.jpg[edit]

Hi, I see that you are the uploader of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_Biddell_Airy_by_Spy.jpg . The signature is clearly Ape, please add information why Ward would have signed as Ape as opposed to Spy, or reclassify as a caricature by Ape. Thanks, 192.118.27.253 07:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Hathershaw Hall-Flickr-274879818 ff1505a358 z.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Hathershaw Hall-Flickr-274879818 ff1505a358 z.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA) or 0 (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

cc-by-sa-2.5 on modified Geograph image[edit]

I notice that you've just uploaded File:Kinpurnie Tower-geograph-3189161.jpg and tagged it both with {{Geograph}} (which includes {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}) and {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. What is your intention in adding {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, which is not a licence offered by the original author? --bjh21 (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I had no such intention. Bit of a cock-up during the copying process. 2.0 is not an allowed option in the Upload Wizard so one is forced to use 2.5Plucas58 (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

OK, and thanks for fixing it. The Upload Wizard doesn't restrict you to the set of licences in its list: you can choose "Another reason not mentioned above" and then put the {{Geograph}} template, or {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}, or any other copyright tag in the box. --bjh21 (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Listed buildings in Liverpool[edit]

Not sure why you're downloading tiny, crappy images from Geograph when I have spent the last five years or so actually providing much better photos of listed buildings in Liverpool, most of which are also used by Historic England. See, for example, 25 Church Street, Liverpool. If there's a good reason for this, I'd love to hear it. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi- There isn't a good reason but the bad reason is that I didn't know your pictures were there. In my experience if pictures are missing from list articles it's because they are not available in Commons. If it's any consolation I was reviewing the image availability (having by now discovered them) when I got your message. I must say that your photos of the Liverpool 1 landmarks are truly amazing.Plucas58 (talk) 10:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

OK, I understand now. I was going to do 98 and 120 - 124 Duke Street today but it's a miserable and cold. Thanks for the appreciation, I've recently uploaded by 200th Valued Image and am heading for my 100th Quality Image so I must be doing something right! Again, thanks for your work on en:wp:Listed Buildings in Liverpool-L1, it badly needed sorting out. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Richard Du Cane.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

6 Laurel Road, Fairfield, Liverpool.jpg[edit]

I wouldn't trust Historic England's knowledge of postcode areas, which may have changed since the building was listed anyway. Royal Mail have Laurel Road firmly in Liverpool 7. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Clarence House, Tewkesbury-geograph-4098613.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Clarence House, Tewkesbury-geograph-4098613.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)