User talk:Poeticbent

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Contents

Dołęga[edit]

Miło mi, że mam tak znakomitego, profesjonalnego recenzenta. Dziękuję za uwagę. Teraz T.D-M ma piękne oczi czornyja. Robiłem co mogłem, aby złagodzić agresywne ziarno. Żałuję, że jak kiedyś robiłem reprodukcję portretu Dołęgi-Mostowicza (własność jego siostry), to nie zachowałem sobie negatywu ani kopii. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Rozwój_terytorialny_Krakowa_(2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rozwój_terytorialny_Krakowa_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wojteq (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 3ee46132463a8395024944a480a3ac35[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

move request[edit]

I declined the move you requested of File:Wawel2.jpg. Commons:File renaming#Which files should not be renamed? (reason #3) will explain my decline. If you request the move on en.wiki, myself or another file-mover can do the move for you there. INeverCry 18:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the reply, and your link to policy. I'll try to request the move on en.wiki instead like you suggested. Poeticbent talk 18:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Poprad (Leluchów) 16.08.08 p.jpg[edit]

Hej. Nadpisałem raz jeszcze. Balans bieli był przesunięty w stronę zielonego, nie żółtego. Woda w rzece była brązowa po dość ulewnych deszczach. Pozdrawiam. Przykuta[edit] 20:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Jan Matejko - Zawieszenie dzwonu Zygmunta na wiezy katedry w roku 1521 w Krakowie.jpg[edit]

Hej,

Rewert niestety nie załatwia sprawy, ponieważ wcześniej załadowane zdjęcie kopii obrazu wykonane przez Pana Piotra Walerskiego wciąż jest publicznie widoczne. Trzeba to skasować i załadować od nowa - najlepiej pod nieco inną nazwą, bo stara historia zdjęcia ponownie się doklei. Dlatego nie usuwaj szablonu copyvio. Plik musi być albo cały usunięty, albo ew. ktoś kto ma taką możliwość powinien usunąć selektywnie dwie jego wersje stanowiące ewidentne naruszenie praw autorskich. Polimerek (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Mylisz się. Facet nie ma żadnych praw autorskich, ponieważ "podrobił" cudzy obraz. Jedynym prawnym autorem jest autor dzieła oryginalnego, czyli sam Matejko. Oryginalność dzieła jest punktem kluczowym w kategoriach prawnych... a nie machanie pędzlem po płótnie. Prawo autorskie na przykład, nie obejmuje malowania domów i ścian. Drobiazgowe kopie ręczne dzieł stworzonych przez kogoś innego są pozbawione prawa autorskiego nie tylko w Polsce. Pozdrawiam. Poeticbent talk 15:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Jest kontrowersja, jest odpowiednie miejsce do dyskusji, zapraszam. A.J. (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Kościół św. Wojciecha[edit]

Witam. Wiem, że niebo jest silnie brązowe, ale tak właśnie wygląda, kiedy robi się zdjęcie w centrum oświetlonego miasta - wtedy niebo nie jest niebieskie czy czarne, ale właśnie brązowe. Natomiast na pewno nie jest fioletowe, podobnie jak fioletowe nie są budynki ani światło lamp - a tak to wyglądało po Twojej korekcie. Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Przynajmniej jest niebanalne, a to się liczy. Poeticbent talk 21:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Krakow-Old-Town(Stare-Miasto-Planty)Royal-Route.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Krakow-Old-Town(Stare-Miasto-Planty)Royal-Route.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kpalion(talk) 19:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Domena publiczna[edit]

Witaj, zauważyłem że wgrałeś w zeszłym roku obraz należącym do Samuela Finkelsteina zmarłego w 1942. W Polsce prawa autorskie wygasają po 70 latach 1 stycznia następnego roku czyli dla artysty zmarłego w 1942 jest to 1 stycznia 2013. Proszę pamiętaj o tym na przyszłość.Plushy (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Barn Owl (History of British Birds) William Yarrell - Thomas Bewick.jpg[edit]

Dzien Dobry (sorry, that's about the limit of my Polish!). I think your idea of comparing Yarrell with Bewick via 2 images of Barn Owl a good one, article needs more images. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 00:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg Thank you, INeverCry. It's nice of you to notice my continuous efforts to excell. Poeticbent talk 21:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

The Hirtle Chart[edit]

Hello Poeticbent. Here is a good resource for determining the copyright status of an image, and which tag is the appropriate one to use for any that happen to be in the public domain: Commons:Hirtle chart. The Hirtle Chart is based on a similar chart prepared by Peter B. Hirtle of Cornell University. This chart can be used to determine whether or not an image is in the public domain in the United States. In order to be hosted on the Commons, an image must be in the public domain both in the United States and in its country of origin. I hope this chart will help you determine the correct copyright status of images in the future. Best wishes, -- Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Edward Raczynski.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edward Raczynski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Sybiracy (deportacje 1940-1941).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sybiracy (deportacje 1940-1941).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Totomka (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The Holocaust in Lithuania map[edit]

Perhaps you could make a map for the en:The Holocaust in Lithuania article? The current one is not focused well. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I know very litte about the subject, but the current map is bad. That's for sure. Poeticbent talk 07:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I think we could make a better one simply by cutting and pasting a different part from File:WW2-Holocaust-Europe.png? PS. If you reply here please ECHO me. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotr. Problem is that the map of Holocaust in Lithuania is virtually empty, giving the impression that very little actually happened. Nothing could be further from the truth. Please take a look at the map of the Jewish communities targetted by the Final Solution across Lithuania. And a similar map, part of the Atlas of the Holocaust in Lithuania online. Poeticbent talk 10:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Map of General Government[edit]

Hi,

Just to let you know I have reverted your change of my admin map of the General Government. The original map is valid as it stands as it represents post 1941 so your total replacement of it is not appropriate. Your change should either be a derivative work or if you wish I will create another map of the area pre-Barbarossa. I am in the process of re-doing all my maps of German occupied europe so I can do a new map as part of this work. Please let me know what you would like. XrysD (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer. I've done it myself. Your original map is insufficient for my projects, sorry. Poeticbent talk 16:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, no problem! Please add the link to your derived work to keep track of all versions. Thanks, XrysD (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

WLE Austria Logo (no text).svg

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Radegast[edit]

Hi. Stacja Radegast to pomnik. leży sobie w kategorii pomnika Category:Łódź Stacja Radegast (która jest w kategorii dot. getta – Category:Łódź Ghetto). Na tym zdjęciu nie ma getta, to są czasy współczesne, więc nie powinno leżeć w kategorii łódź ghetto. pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 08:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Cześć, jestem innego zdania niż ty. W kategorii Łódź ghetto są inne współczesne zdjęcia, ale związek stacji z gettem jest tak silny że musi być ona uwzględniona w tzw. parent category chociaż raz dla orientacji. Pojecie pomnika jest zbyt wieloznaczne. Pozdrawiam, Poeticbent talk 17:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Współczesne jest jedno (budynek w którym kiedyś było kipo). I mocno korci mnie jego usunięcie – to zdjęcie nie pokazuje getta. (A nie usuwam, bo nie mam pomysłu do jakiej z gettowych podkategorii przenieść.) Owszem, temat łódzkiego getta wymaga pokazania współczesnych jego śladów. Ale tu mówimy o kategoriach, a nie o artykułach. W artykule o getcie jak najbardziej – pomnik-stacja, murale, pole gettowe – współczesne zdjęcia będą na miejscu – i będą opisane. A w kategoriach trzymajmy się nazw poszczególnych kategorii. Zerknij w przykłady na stronie Commons:Galleries – porównanie galerii z kategoriami. Zresztą, co to za orientacja, skoro ginie, bo każdy uploadujący nazywa pliki wedle uznania... czytelnik (oglądacz) nie znajdzie obrazka. (A dodatkowo – wolałbym uniknąć dyskusję, które z dostępnych zdjęć jest lepsze dla orientacji. I jaka tu wieloznaczność? Jeśli pytasz o moje motywy, to są powyżej. Jak dostrzegasz tu coś jeszcze, to wyjaśnij mi proszę co. Dzięki z góry) pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rudolf Reder.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Reder.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

El Grafo (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки, 15 вересня – 15 жовтня 2014 / Wiki Loves Monuments, September 15 – October 15, 2014[edit]

WLM-logo-uk.svg

Вітаємо!

З 15 вересня по 15 жовтня 2014 року буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 23:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Kurjer Poznanski 1925-5-8.jpg[edit]

Hello Poeticbent,

you uploaded this file with a {{PD-Polish}} tag. As I understand it (the English, German, French and Italian versions of the tag say so at least), the PD-Polish tag is only applicable to photographs. This is obviously not a photograph, but a press cutting, so the PD-Polish tag cannot apply. Or am I missing something? Regards --Rosenzweig τ 16:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Rosenzweig. I would very much appreciate your input here. The upload is a "photograph" of a press cutting from 1925. Not a "real" photograph. Perhaps the more appropriate tag would be the PD-old. What do you think, Poeticbent talk 16:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
The thing to consider here is the text and whether it is protected or not. PD-old would mean the author is dead for at least 70 years, but it seems we don't know the author (the text looks like a simple news item that is not signed). Perhaps {{Anonymous-EU}} could work (unless Polish law has some clause that effectively prohibits it like German law), or perhaps {{PD-Ineligible}}, if one assumes that the text is only simple sentences about facts na dbloe the threshold of originality. I don't speak Polish, so I cannot tell if that is the case. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 17:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I think {{PD-Ineligible}} is most appropriate, because the content is a newsbyte; a few basic facts and relevant circumstances of the school massacre. Not a real aricle from what I can tell, and no signature either. I will change the tag now. If you want to learn more about what happened there, go to en:Wilno school massacre article. Thanks for the feedback, 19:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Poniatowa_-_KL_Lublin_Majdanek_-_WC_Toebbens_%26_Co.jpg[edit]

Hello, thank you for the picture. Could you please check the date of the picture (1944) as the people in poniatowa camp have been liquidated in Nov 1943 and the camp was than "only"? used as an trainings camp for SS. Might be somebody hit the wrong number... best regards--5glogger (talk) 18:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Trebia[edit]

Hi Poeticbent. The reason I edited the Battle of Trebia category is because it contained maps from the 218 BC battle and pictures from the 1799 battle. Since they were two different battles, I wanted to move the pictures to a new category. I also removed the Napoleonic Wars category because that conflict is generally assumed to cover 1805-1815. If you want to revert the edits, I will not stop you because it is not that important to me. BTW: Thanks for adding the 3rd day picture to the en:Battle of Trebbia (1799) article. I put it in an appropriate place in the text. Djmaschek (talk) 05:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, User:Djmaschek. Please note that the "maps" are not in the same category as our engravings, but in a subcategory of that category. The subcategory needs to be renamed into a category on its own, parallel to the Napoleonic Battle of Trebia which is more important for our own purposes. Poeticbent talk 06:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. I created a Category:Battle of Trebbia (1799) for you and requested a rename of Category:Battle of Trebia. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 15:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Djmaschek (talk) 20:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015[edit]

WLM-logo-uk.svg
Wikipedia-logo-v2-uk.svg

Вітаємо!

З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»

File:Chil Rajchman (1914-2004).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chil Rajchman (1914-2004).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Polizeibataillon 101 in Łódź[edit]

Witaj – mam prośbę, dodałeś w ubiegły roku to zdjęcie [1] – czy mógłbyś mi pomóc w znalezieniu źródła tego pliku, przepraszam za tę prośbę, ale niestety nie jestem zbyt biegły w przeszukiwaniu Internetu / Muzeum Miasta Łodzi odpowiedziało, że nie mają i nie mieli takiego zdjęcia / być może powinienem poszukać w Bundesarchiv, ale na to muszę mieć trochę więcej czasu – Serdecznie Pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Zobacz artykuł na stronie http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/einsatz/polbat101.html oparty na książce Browninga ostatnio tłumaczonej na Polski. Nie wiem co sprawdzałeś. Polska Wikipedia podaje: dla zainteresowanych dziejami Łodzi podczas II wojny światowej, Holokaustu łódzkich Żydów i Romów, są trzy oddziały Muzeum Tradycji Niepodległościowych – oddział „Radogoszcz”, w okupacyjnym więzieniu policyjnym, miejscu największej zbrodni nazistowskiej podczas przechodzenia wojsk rosyjskich przez obszar Polski (styczeń 1945), oddział „stacja Radegast”, miejsce, które spełniało tę samą rolę co warszawski Umschlagplatz, oraz „Kuźnia Romów”, pozostałość po obozie „Cyganów” z pogranicza austro-węgierskiego (tzw. Burgenland) krótko funkcjonującego na terenie łódzkiego getta, których po kilku miesiącach wywieziono do miejsca zagłady w Chełmnie nad Nerem (Kulmhof an Nehr). Pozdrawiam, Poeticbent talk 16:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Dziękuję za podanie linku – zdjęcie jest tak właśnie opisane i wskazuje Łódź jako miejsce zrobienia tej fotografii – nie zgadzam się, ale nie mogę się sprzeczać :) / inną sprawą jest źródło, napisałeś Muzeum Miasta Łodzi – to muzeum nie ma nic wspólnego z Muzeum Tradycji Niepodległościowych; to są dwie różne instytucje / MMŁ – jak napisałem wyżej – odpowiedziało, że to nie jest foto z ich zbiorów / natomiast z MTN ma związek wikipedysta AusLodz i już wcześniej sprawdzili, że to również nie jest źródło (na marginesie właśnie pracownicy tego muzeum zajmujący się m.in. II wojną w Łodzi stwierdzili, że to nie jest Łódź) / nie zmieniam opisu zdjęcia – mimo uzasadnionych wątpliwości – ale chciałbym zrobić coś innego: w polskim opisie dodać krótkie zdanie: "istnieją wątpliwości co do miejsca zrobienia zdjęcia", a ponieważ znalazłem taką stronę [2] (spójrz proszę – strona United States Holocaust Memorial Museum – i tam na dole jako źródło pliku jest podane właśnie to muzeum) proponuję zmienić na stronie pliku z "Source Muzeum Miasta Łodzi - Siedziba Główna" na "Source United States Holocaust Memorial Museum" i dodać ten link / co o tym sądzisz? – Darekm135 (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Przeczytałem casus Radom-Kraków, czyli żeby udowodnić, że to zdjęcie nie zostało wykonane w Łodzi muszę wskazać miejsce, w którym zostało wykonane, a ponieważ nie wiem tego, więc nie mogę udowodnić, że to nie jest Łódź; w porządku, niech tak będzie > to jest Łódź / ale nadal pozostaje drugi problem, na stronie pliku nie ma żadnych dowodów na to, że zdjęcie pochodzi z Muzeum Miasta Łodzi, żadnego linku lub innego potwierdzenia; są cztery linki, ale nie mają nic wspólnego z żadnym łódzki muzeum – Darekm135 (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. Zrobione. Batalion stacjonował także w Kielcach, nie tylko w Poznaniu i w Łodzi. Zauważyłem ze Wikipedysta AusLodz zmienił miejsce zdjęcia na Poznań w niemieckiej Wikipedii, ale tylko na własną rękę, bez rzeczowego dowodu, Poeticbent talk 13:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Jak dla mnie plik na Commons OK - Bardzo dziękuję – Darekm135 (talk) 13:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Hermann Erich Bauer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hermann Erich Bauer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bełchatów.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bełchatów.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bełchatów.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey[edit]

WLM-logo-uk.svg

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:JamieHerrell2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:JamieHerrell2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Rudolf Hoess[edit]

Hey, could you please restore Rudolf Hoess's mug shot on the English Wikipedia? It is a high quality headshot of him. I fail to see any valid reason for replacing it with another photograph save for the fact that the replacement is on the Commons. I don't think there are any restrictions to worry about with the mug shot. Thanks. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

File:I was kind to the Poles1.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I was kind to the Poles1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 10:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Hinrich Lohse.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hinrich Lohse.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Granica-zrywanie godła.jpg[edit]

Hi Poeticbent, I noticed a bit of an edit war going on with the File:Granica-zrywanie godła.jpg image. I'm not sure what justification there is to making this change to a picture that has been in the original format since 2008, until Tom5551 started to change it last week. The new picture is way too dark creating huge black spaces on many of the surface areas. This is painfully obvious, why anyone keeps changing it is very strange and disruptive, there really is no arguing against it. --E-960 (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Hi, User:E-960. To begin with, you should have told me what you're trying to achieve without reverting because I could have helped you by using Photoshop. Please scroll down to File history and read what it says. You uploaded a grossly inferior file consisting of only 36 KB of data, by reverting from version as of 18:05, 28 May 2016 which was ten times bigger (!), consisting of 339 KB of data (850 × 586). Here in Commons overriding inferior files with much larger files is a standard policy. Poeticbent talk 22:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes, the original image was uploaded by Jarekt back in 2008, for some reason last week another user started to tinker with it. I can definitely appreciate a better version, so if you would be able to sharpen the image it would be greatly appreciated. But, in regards to the version Tom5551 uploaded, it is too dark (the image actually looses detail) and you get a weird halo effect around the head of one of the soldiers pictured. --E-960 (talk) 07:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Rpon1793wojew.png[edit]

Cześć. Uwaga do legendy mapy - kolor zielony proponuję oznaczyć jako "powiat piltyński", a nie "Inflanty". Województwo inflanckie zostało zabrane w I/II (łączka) rozbiorze. W związku z tym podpis powiatu na mapie przestaje być potrzebny. Powiat piltyński to oczywiście wszystkie trzy zaznaczone na zielono okręgi (podpisanie tak jedynie okręgów północnych może prowadzić do nieporozumień). Pozdrawiam --Dotz Holiday (talk) 11:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2016 в Україні[edit]

WLM-logo-uk.svg

Вітаємо!

Триває міжнародний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінації: «Цивільні споруди доби Гетьманщини» та «Національний заповідник "Софія Київська"».

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки», 10:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Photo[edit]

But this is not this building. The ministries and the court share the building at 1 Chopina Street Boston9 (talk) 06:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Запрошення на церемонію нагородження переможців фотоконкурсів ВЛП та ВЛЗ 3 грудня 2016[edit]

WLE Logo UA.svg
WLM-logo-uk.svg

Доброї пори доби! Дякуємо за участь у фотоконкурсі/ах, що проходили за підтримки «Вікімедіа Україна», та запрошуємо на церемонію нагородження переможців «Вікі любить пам'ятки» та «Вікі любить Землю» 2016 року, що відбудеться 3 грудня (субота) у Національному музеї історії України (м. Київ, вул. Володимирська, 2), початок об 11:00. Подія у Facebook.

З повагою, оргкомітети конкурсів.--20:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Jan Nepomucen Bobrowicz.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jan Nepomucen Bobrowicz.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.7.145.87 12:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Do not revert deletion requests[edit]

Regarding your changes to File:Blue Policeman.jpg and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Blue_Policeman.jpg: Please do not "close" deletion requests, only administrators have the authority. If you have any comments on a running DR, please do so in the deletion request. All DRs of a specific file usually use the same sub-page, except in the case of mass-DRs. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

  • I have no idea why you decided to go around this entire issue in such an unconventional way User:Srittau. I asked you kindly in my edit summaries to please start a new deletion request if you wish to do so, and not at the already closed debate. This messes up the whole system, which is well established and commonly followed. I am a member in good standing. I'm trying to follow the policy, because I've done that before and I know that is works. Please unblock me, and thanks in advance for your patience, Poeticbent talk 17:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see the section above this one. New deletion requests are always added to the same sub-page. Reverting deletion requests is not okay, and you were warned not to do this. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
I apologize for edit warring. It was not my intention. I promise not to do it again. In my complete ignorance, I have attempted to keep an old debate closed only because the issues brought up in the second deletion proposal had absolutely positively nothing to do with the first. I did not realize that (by policy), new deletion requests are always added to the same sub-page. Now I know. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I have unblocked you! Just to clarify, I think your contributions are very valuable, and I think you are right in regarding that image. It should not be overwritten. The image is for now still protected from overwriting, but it is editable again. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Sebari! You are a gentleman and a scholar. All best to you in the New Year, Poeticbent talk 17:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Kamianets-Podilskyi August 1941 roundup.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kamianets-Podilskyi August 1941 roundup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Atomiccocktail (talk) 08:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Sambor (june 1942).jpg[edit]

I noticed, that you added on description of file:Sambor (june 1942).jpg words "Not a Blich ghetto area" and "Это не еврейское гетто" more than once. There's no need for such sentences. Nobody claims, that the photo is made in ghetto. Here's also no need to say, that the photo isn't made in America. Also you added Category:Soviet invasion of Poland of 1939. This is inappropriate, because the photo is made in 1942. Now I revert your edit. If you edit the photo once more, then you can be blocked. Taivo (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Please take it easy User:Taivo. User Frutti-mytti who uploaded File:Sambor (june 1942).jpg is not being honest, and is manipulating both you and User:Sealle (here). Frutti-mytti who created the article about the Jewish ghetto in Sambor (Гетто в Самборе) in Russian Wikipedia (back in 2015), uploaded this file at exactly the same time (9 November 2015‎) to illustrate that article. User Frutti-mytti did not mention this to Sealle, even though since November 2015 the image was used to illustrate the Jewish ghetto in Sambor in Russian. Frutti-mytti made up the description of this image. The source, here, never said that. It was important for me, to inform users who saw this file being removed from the Russian article by me, here, why I did that. The illustration was replaced with the Jewish neighbourhood in Sambor before the Soviet invasion of 1939 (the only one available). File description clarified that the reason for replacement was because it did not reflect the facts. Sambor was a city in occupied Poland before the borders were redrawn at the end of World War II. This is all I wanted to say. Poeticbent talk 20:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I understand you. This is matter of Russian Wikipedia and it must be explained there locally, not in Commons. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate your desire to help, User:Sealle, and User:Taivo. And I'm sorry for the confusion. Thank you for renaming File:Market in Sambor 1942.jpg. I realize I made a mistake. According to description in the Polish language provided at source by Zbiory NAC on-line the photograph shows the Sambor market in July 1942 (quote): "Wozy handlarzy i kupujący na placu targowym. Data wydarzenia: 1942-07." NAC does not say that that was a Jewish neighbourhood. That's true. But please look at this image at NAC which I uploaded to Commons as File:Sambor, market in Jewish Blich neighbourhood.jpg with exactly the same view in the background; the same two tall churches rising above the Sambor skyline and, the same long market-hall in the foreground. It is the same place, photographed at a greater distance. The photograph is undated, but is shows the Jewish neighbourhood of Blich in Sambor (according to source). No confusion there. Thanks again, Poeticbent talk 18:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, let it be the same place, but not the same time. The period was tumultuous, and typical Jewish place in 1938 may become Judenfrei in 1942. Is it true or not — it's not for us to judge. Sealle (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, you're correct User:Sealle. The photograph is undated and cannot be attributed to any particular year. However, I also would like to thank you for confirming that it shows the Jewish neighbourhood of Blich. Because — if this is the Jewish Blich — than it means that the File:Market in Sambor 1942.jpg was illustrating the English article about the ghetto correctly. Poeticbent talk 19:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
…if described properly. Sealle (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I will try my best. Poeticbent talk 21:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine[edit]

WLM-logo-uk.svg

Вітаємо!

Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlm@wikimediaukraine.org.ua

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Areas annexed by Nazi Germany.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Areas annexed by Nazi Germany.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pugilist (talk) 21:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)