Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Taken with Nikon D300, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. -Kanonkas(talk) 12:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Thk's to had choose my photo. Would you like I upload a bigger size of this photo. The original size is 2592*3888 (4,9 Mo). Witch size do you want? Have a goo day. CaptainHaddock (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, would be good. If you want, you can upload the original Size..maybe a litte bit lower. Thank you. -- Pro2 (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Request Not identified. Lycaon 22:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Better now? Pro2 13:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Almost ;-). Just the scientific name and the category and I'll promote. Lycaon 13:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Fixed. Lycaon 16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hallo. Was heisst denn Dein Editsummary so it's ok beim wiederherstellen des EB Statuses des GFDL-1.2 only Schmetterlings? --Dschwen (talk) 03:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hm, ich habs ja nicht direkt wiederhergestellt. Ich habs ja auf de=2 gesetzt, also dass es mal ein exzellentes Bild war. (was ja auch stimmt, war ja mal als exzellentes Bild eingetragen) Fand ich besser, als den Hinweis ganz zu entfernen. Aber prinzipiell soll es mir egal sein, also wenns dir nicht gefällt, kannst du es auch wieder rausnehmen. :-) -- Pro2 (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
very good, shouldn't the person be removed? --Mbdortmund 23:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Das Entfernen von Personen ist verboten ;-) --Berthold Werner 06:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Comment This is already a FP, what's the point of nominating it here? Yann 21:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Comment AFAIK there is no rule, that FPs cannot be nominated as QIs --Berthold Werner 06:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
And it's featured on German Wiki, not on Commons. Btw: There is a version without the person here -- Pro2 12:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Support OK then good. Yann 10:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
FP and QI are not mutually exclusive, this is not a hierarchical system and the same goes for VI: An image can be any or each of them. Lycaon 22:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment The bytterfly looks very good to me, but to me the image might benefit of some of the blurry flowers in the foreground being cropped off. But Im no expert. --Korall 21:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Torn over this one: love the butterfly, hate the distracting and unbalancing background flower --Vladanr 09:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Support Agree about the background/foreground, but the excellent quality of the butterfly lets me forget about this; after all, this is QI and not FP. -- H005 17:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding your rename request, i want to inform you about something. Wiki guideline tells us that "If a filename in a local project conflicts with a filename at Commons, the file in the local project should be renamed. Renaming it at Commons instead would mean changing it in 500+ projects instead of just 1." Therefor, your request has been denied. All best. --WhiteWriterspeaks 18:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw you tweeked my Cardualis tristis picture. What a great result! I thought it was good enough but it didn't pass QI, but now, I'm sure it will work! Thank you again and I look foward to a new collaboration! Letartean (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Danke für deine Bearbeitung meines Fotos (Weißes_Dinner), hab erst jetzt mitbekommen, dass noch ein Vorschlag in der Fotowerkstatt gemacht wurde. Gefällt mir wirklich besser so! --Berita (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Gerne doch :-) -- pro2 05:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Comment Please add a category which location it was taken on, and consider doing it for each of your uploads. --A.Savin 18:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Done Done. --Pro2 17:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC) --A.Savin 20:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)