User talk:ProfessorX

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

de:Benutzer Diskussion:ProfessorX

Image:Marklissa(Lesna)-Talsp Juli2005.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Poland (or find more relevant one).

EugeneZelenko 9 July 2005 15:10 (UTC)

Image:OwenFalls.jpg[edit]

Fair use images are not allowed on the Commons. All images here have to be available under a free license. Please read Commons:Criteria for inclusion before uploading any more images. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of your uploads seem to be OK, but please, when you are uploading an image that is "from the English wikipedia", give a direct link to the image there. It needs to be as easy as possible for us to check the source information is correct. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I updated some of my photos today. --ProfessorX 09:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Churchill-fallspowerhouse2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Churchill-fallspowerhouse2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  eesti  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  occitan  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  shqip  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

--Oden 03:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Stava2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Stava2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  eesti  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  occitan  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  shqip  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, ProfessorX!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know that pictures should have categories (thank you!). I always try to find a suitable one. In this case I provided the category: „Hydrodynamics“, but somehow this category disappeared within the uploading procedure - and I didn't notice it. Now it has this category again!--ProfessorX (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buttress dams[edit]

Hi. This above is, without doubt, not a type of dam. Just a mere architecture style. People sometimes confuse the difference between style and type. Either way, we cannot put up wrong facts. Rehman 01:09, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you agree that a buttress dam is a dam? Or some kind of dam or some sort of dam? So it might be possible to put “buttress dams” into “Category:Dams”. --ProfessorX (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, "do you agree that a buttress dam is a dam" is a silly question, its same as asking something like "do you think a carved door is a door"; or course it is, its just carved. For now I think Category:Dams would do. Rehman 01:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your agreement.--ProfessorX (talk) 07:59, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Rehman 09:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Did you know that "type" is just another word for "sort of"?--ProfessorX (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another user changed Category:buttress dams to Dams by type in April. I think it´s OK.--ProfessorX (talk) 13:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of images of Argentine coins and bills/Supresión de imágenes de monedas y billetes argentinos[edit]

Several images of Argentine bills and coins have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you have uploaded one or more of the files. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Argentina. Thank you.

Unas imágenes de monedas y billetes argentinos han sido listadas en Commons:Solicitud de borrado para que la comunidad pueda discutir si se deberían mantener o no. Agradeceríamos si pudieras brindarnos tu opinión acerca de esto en su consulta, porque has subido uno (o más) de estos archivos. La discusión está aquí: Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of Argentina. Gracias. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dohnaische straße vs markt[edit]

Hallo professorx, ich zweifel grad an mir, bin eigentlcih vollkommen sicher, dass cih File:Relief pirna dohnaischestraße.jpg das bild in der dohnaischen staße aufgenommen zu haben, du hast koordinaten gesetzt. hast du es wirklcih da gesehen? gruß --Z thomas 17:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, es ist wirklich am Markt, geh nochmal hin! Und siehe auch dieses Bild von Norbert:
Pirna Markt-16 Hausmarke (02).jpg
, es ist dasselbe Relief.Gruß ProfessorX (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
tatsächlich :-) es ist am markt! ich war heut da --Z thomas 18:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
dann könnten wir jetzt noch überlegen, die Datei umzubenennen, weil der Name ja nun irreführend ist. Muss aber nicht sein, geht ja auch so.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ich hab sie mal verschoben. gruß --Z thomas 09:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Walsburg (Unterbecken).jpg[edit]

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Walsburg (Unterbecken).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your information. I corrected the license information yesterday. The error happened somehow during the upload procedure.--ProfessorX (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced photos[edit]

Congratulations to your photos of all the dams and reservoirs in the Ore Mountains. However, it seems to me that two of those to the Janov dam are misplaced. They show the Janov dam but appear at the Kamenicka dam. Sincerely. --HsBerlin01 (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you give me a link to the photos which you mean so that I can find them?--ProfessorX (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I mean these two photos Janov-Most013.jpg and Janov-Most022.jpg. Sincerely. --HsBerlin01 (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These two photographs show Janov dam, and they're in Category:Janov Dam. Now I found out: location parameters were wrong! I changed them already.--ProfessorX (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I meant with "misplaced" (yes, my English could be better). Sincerely --HsBerlin01 (talk) 08:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by User:Badarchiinayurzana[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you edited the file descriptions of several of this user's uploads, correctly noting that they were not the uploader's own work as he or she had claimed, but were in fact grabbed from various online sources. If you come across such cases in the future, could I please ask that you let someone know about it, either on the Administrators' noticeboard or by adding a {{Copyvio}} tag to the file description? People uploading random non-free content they found on the Internet to Commons is a huge problem for the project and its users, and the faster we can remove them, the better. Just adding a few subtle links on the file descriptions and a comment in the edit summary normally won't draw the attention of anyone who can do anything about it. Danke schön! LX (talk, contribs) 10:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice, I will do this next time.--ProfessorX (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talsperre[edit]

Hallo, meinst du es wär sinnvoll, das mit Dams und Reservoirs doch auch für Deutschland irgendwie aufzulösen? Dann könnten Kategorien wie Category:Möhne Reservoir dam, die wirklich nur das Sperrmauer-Bauwerk meinen, vielleicht noch besser einsortiert werden. Holger1959 (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Es gab vor nicht allzu langer Zeit beide Kategorien (Dams in Germany und Reservoirs in Germany), beide enthielten Talsperren und Stauseen bunt durcheinander. Dann wurden sie in einer einzigen Kategorie gemischt - das war auch konsequent, finde ich. Es gibt auch ausführliche Diskussionen in der deutschen Wikipedia zu einen ähnlichen Thema (de:Diskussion:Talsperre#Stauanlage) - aber ohne Ergebnis. Hier in Commons wäre es wohl auch schwierig, einen Konsens zu finden.--ProfessorX (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ok, das Thema scheint doch größer zu sein, dann sag ich lieber nichts mehr. Da kann man sich ja Wochen mit beschäftigen ;) Holger1959 (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ramon_Pereira[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Ramon_Pereira has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Yanguas (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File(s) appeared in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hello ProfessorX, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) Rhodes and Africa from Cairo to Cape Town.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

repaired! Thank you for your help.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File(s) appeared in Category:Language templates with no text displayed[edit]

Hello ProfessorX, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) Robert Augustus Toombs 2.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Language templates with no text displayed. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

repaired! Thank you for your help.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Monti[edit]

Grazie per le tue categorizzazioni, molto precise! Mi apprestavo a spostare alcune foto in Category:Ponte Visconteo ma ho visto che mi hai preceduto. Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I tried to help you today again, see [1]--ProfessorX (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Natural_Beauty[edit]

Category discussion warning

Natural Beauty has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Takeaway (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at the 9 (1 was added yesterday) files in that category and they were only categorised in there and nowhere else which, of course, is not supposed to be as the category doesn't actually say much about the files at all other than stating a personal view of the uploader/editor. I recategorised the files to their correct categories and the subjective category is now empty. - Takeaway (talk) 12:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
there are 6 more entries per today, look at that! (some people like that category so much)--ProfessorX (talk) 14:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Danke fürs fleißige Aufräumen![edit]

--Arnd (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist eine unendliche Arbeit, die nie endet.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn Commons:Structured data soweit ist, wird es weniger. Und da Wikimedia genau dafür gerade 3 Millionen bekommen hat, hoffe ich darauf. --Arnd (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Please avoid sloppy edits[edit]

When you are reverting a vandalism, please make sure that you are reverting all changes in order to avoid situations like this: Special:Diff/217765167/239962641. --jdx Re: 05:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I only repaired parsing errors and it's not easy to recognise vanadalism if you don't look for it.--ProfessorX (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Files are placed by the bot in Category:Pages using Information template with parsing errors due to vandalism or unskillful edits, so you have to check file's history in order to avoid such cases: Special:Diff/197685804/241572300. I have found many of them. --jdx Re: 09:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In this case it will be better I don't do these edits any more. You may do it by yourself. Bonne chance!--ProfessorX (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schade. --Arnd (talk) 04:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ewdfrd.jpg[edit]

Danke für Deine Arbeit bei der Kategorisierung von Dateien. Allerdings wird diese bei der o. g. umsonst gewesen sein, da es eine Urheberrechtsverletzungen ist. Bei „verdächtigen“ Dateien (geringe Auflösung, keine vernünftige Beschreibung usw.) führt eine Google-Bildersuche schnell zu Scott Caan und Patrick Hoelck und nicht zu Unidentified men. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 11:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Na und? Diese Information brauche ich doch nicht. Die Mittteilung war überflüssig. Ich kann mich nicht um alles kümmern.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Na dann eben nicht! Mich stört es allerdings, wenn hinterher meine Arbeit wegen vermeidbarer Gründe gelöscht wird. Wenn es bei Ihnen anders ist, ist es auch gut. Tschüss --Ras67 (talk) 20:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien entfernen[edit]

Hallo! Du hast bei File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Treppenhaus -- 2018 -- 1385.jpg eine Kategorie entfernt - Bird's-eye view. Mag sein, dass sie nicht ganz richtig ist, aber wenn du die passende kennst, wäre es nett, sie auch zu setzen. Das würde uns die Arbeit erleichtern. Ich fände es auch konstruktiv. Du doch bestimmt auch. Vielleicht habe ich jetzt die richtige gesetzt. Hoffentlich. Das ist mit Übersetzungen aus dem Englischen nicht immer einfach. --XRay talk 19:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mettmann Neandertal[edit]

Hallo, kannst du erklären, wofür die Category:Mettmann Neandertal gedacht ist? Es fehlt eine Beschreibung und auch die Bezeichnung entspricht keinem gängigen Schema. Die darin eingeordneten Bilder stecken auch in Category:Neandertal und sind damit wahrscheinlich überkategorisiert. --Sitacuisses (talk) 02:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So ist es. Die Kategorien Category:Mettmann Neandertal und Category:Neandertal waren einfach nur doppelt vorhanden. Alle Dateien können in Category:Neandertal rein und die andere gelöscht werden.--ProfessorX (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Portrait_of_Scientists_and_inventors[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Portrait_of_Scientists_and_inventors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vajont disaster[edit]

Please, can you upload here the photographies from these Italian sites about the most important protagonist about that disaster: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Thank you very much. --87.14.24.94 12:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now I understand what you want me to do. But, I cannot upload photographs from other websites that are not mine: only the photographer has the license to do that. That's a copyright issue. See Commons:Licensing for example, and other pages.

--ProfessorX (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but can you see if some of these are not in copyright, as it was done in Category:Vajont disaster, 9 october 1963 and Category:Vajont Dam before 1963? --95.252.44.109 07:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but don't know enough about this topic. Italian laws say that photographs that are "intellectual work with creative characteristics" are protected for 70 years after the author's death, whereas simple photographs are protected for a period of 20 years from creation. Maybe some of those photos are free, others aren't - I don't know. Maybe you can insert some weblinks like I did here in the German article.--ProfessorX (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DR[edit]

Please read COM:L and COM:EI, I don't think your comment is useful for discussion. (`・ω・´) (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment isn't useful either. Please leave your comments on the deletion request discussion page only. And consider that other user maybe unexperienced.--ProfessorX (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inexperience is not a reason to express one's own opinions at will, it will only disturb the formation of consensus. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Juno214-6 is unexperienced for sure. look here:Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Miriam-Vilca-Arana-Reddolac.jpg. That user needs help and care, not your ... bureaucracy.--ProfessorX (talk) 13:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know what you knowledge by helping new user. I can see that the user you cited is very unfamiliar with this project’s policies. But this is not a reason to indulge him in uploading documents that do not comply with there rules. In addition, it is not unexperienced but inexperienced. (`・ω・´) (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody may express his opinion on a discussion page at his will. That's what discussions are for. Seems to me you don't want a consensus but you want to enforce your opinion. And your English isn't best either.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Everybody may express his opinion on a discussion page at his will." This sentence is correct, but there is a premise: what you post is helpful for the discussion. For example, if you want to keep File:Mag. Miriam Vilca Arana. Auditorio.jpg, you need to read the reason for deletion, and then provide valid evidence that the reason is invalid, such as the uploader is with the lady in this photo are related. Self-photo are not a valid reason to ignore copyright issues. If Jimbo himself took a picture of himself, then the copyright holder of the photo is himself, not someone else who uploaded it to the public website without his permission. In addition, I think you have interest in [2] (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to hear that I still may take part in discussions. I would have been very sad if not.--ProfessorX (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karun3-dam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Karun3-dam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rohalamin (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]