User talk:RJFF

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RJFF!

-- 17:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Logos of Chilean political parties (PDC and PS)[edit]

Before putting them as "copyvio" you should read their description and the Chilean copyright law. Both logos were used in the 1940s, so they are in public domain as works done as a corporation are considered to be under PD "if they were first published before September 16, 1962". In both cases (at least in the case of the File:Emblem of the Socialist Party of Chile.svg and File:Flag of the Christian Democrat Party of Chile.svg), the images were published before that threshold and are in PD (the "own work" tag refers to the particular version of this image).

I've seen you have tagged a lot of images as copyvio. Before doing that, you should consider all this. Some images are ok to be deleted but some don't pass the threshold of originality or are also under public domain. --B1mbo (talk) 01:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Usos justos[edit]

La legislación chilena me permite subir logos bajo el concepto de usos justos y yo nunca violo los derechos de autor --Danrolo (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Rafael àngel Calderón Guardia cropped.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rafael àngel Calderón Guardia cropped.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Allan Aguilar·/t/ 03:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fma12 (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Bhumibol Bridge satellite view.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bhumibol Bridge satellite view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 07:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Plakat der FPÖ - 'Schluss mit falscher Toleranz' - 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plakat der FPÖ - 'Schluss mit falscher Toleranz' - 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

   FDMS  4    01:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Chaeng Watthana Government Complex1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chaeng Watthana Government Complex1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 12:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen pagebanner.jpg[edit]

I've seen the derivate. Please do not copy all categories and assessments. The derivate isn't a valued image and it isn't a winner of Wiki Loves Monuments. I've fixed all the wrong things. Thanks. --XRay talk 18:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo @XRay:
Ich wollte dich eben ohnehin anschreiben, du bist mir zuvorgekommen. Es tut mir sehr leid, dass ich den Ausschnitt angefertigt und hochgeladen habe, ohne dich vorher zu fragen. Die Notiz, in der du dir Abwandlungen ohne vorherige Absprache verbittest, habe ich erst nach dem Hochladen gesehen. Selbstverständlich gehören die Kategorien und Auszeichnungen nicht zu dem Ausschnitt. Ich habe ihn mit dem CropTool angefertigt, das automatisch alle Kategorien der Vorlage auch zur neuen Datei hinzufügt. Das ist in diesem Fall aber völlig unpassend und muss wieder entfernt werden. Danke, dass du das für mich übernommen hast! Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du trotz der fehlenden vorherigen Absprache mit der Verwendung des Ausschnittes als "Pagebanner" für den Wikivoyage-Artikel Lüdinghausen einverstanden wärst. Ich halte die exzellente und stimmungsvolle Photographie nämlich für optimal geeignet. Wenn dir der Ausschnitt ungeschickt erscheint und du einen anderen Ausschnitt (muss allerdings im Verhältnis 7:1 sein) bevorzugst, können wir natürlich gerne darüber reden. Hoffentlich nimmst du mir meine voreilige Vorgehensweise nicht übel. Beste Grüße, --RJFF (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Die Verwendung ist natürlich möglich. Das gibt auch die Lizenz her. Ich hatte schon befürchtet, dass dass Tool so arbeitet. Ich hatte gedacht, du hättest die Anpassungen übersehen, so dass ich spontan reagiert habe. Es ist leider schon öfter vorgekommen, dass Abwandlungen unter meinem Namen hochgeladen wurden. Das ist natürlich nicht so toll, zumal dabei Bilder entstehen könnten, die nicht mehr veröffentlicht werden dürfen. Und nach meinem Geschmack sind sie auch nicht immer. Aber alles gut. --XRay talk 03:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)