User talk:Ramblersen2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ramblersen2!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Adelaide (Ordrup).jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:03, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Luxdorph coat of arms.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luxdorph coat of arms.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luxdorph coat of arms.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pbroks13 (talk) 04:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Vestergade 20 - courtyard (1914).png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Kigkurren 6-8 - Horwitz & Kattentid.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  മലയാളം  فارسی  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Kigkurren 6-8 - Horwitz & Kattentid.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

@ User:Magog the Ogre: I am affraid I have also accidently uploaded this image and this image from the same author with the same license problem. Sorry about the screw-up! (I'm currently having problems with this Flicker uploader but am trying to find someone who can help me solve the problem and will be more careful until I get it to work again).Ramblersen2 (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Flickr images[edit]

Good afternoon.

When uploading Flickr images, could you please attach the template {{Flickrreview}} so that a bot can confirm the license? Otherwise the file might be deleted if the Flickr uploader ever changes the license or removes the file.

Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Charlottenborg - Nyhavn gate.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Charlottenborg - Nyhavn gate.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Charlottenborg - Nyhavn gate.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kultorvet - Købmagergade corners.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kultorvet - Købmagergade corners.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Ytoyoda (talk) 11:43, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Filer i fuldt format[edit]

Hej Ramblersen. Tak for dine mange fine uploads. Når du henter filer fra steder som kb.dk, kunne du så overtales til at trykke på "download"-symbolet, så du får hentet filen i det bedst mulige format. For eksempel Sedivys flotte illustration fra Rågeleje. På en måde får vi alle de fine detaljer med. Venlig hilsen Ebbe --Rsteen (talk) 11:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:GM's kontorbygning, Aldersrogade.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:GM's kontorbygning, Aldersrogade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rsteen (talk) 06:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Hej Ramblersen. Bliver nødt til at teste denne blandt kollegerne, da det ikke er Paul Fischer, men Paul Erlinger, der døde i 1965. Venlig hilsen --Rsteen (talk) 08:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Nationalmuseets Klunkehjem[edit]

Bemærk at jeg har flyttet et par af dine nylige uploads til Category:Nationalmuseets Klunkehjem. --Hjart (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Mindehøjen i Søndermarken[edit]

Bemærk at der i forvejen var en kategori for Mindehøjen i Søndermarken og at jeg har redirected din version til denne. --Hjart (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Fødsels/dødsår[edit]

Bemærk at når der tilføjes infoboks til personers Commonskategorier, tilføjer den automatisk births/deaths kategorier til visningen i det omfang fødsels/dødstidspunkter er angivet på Wikidata. Derved reduceres risikoen for slåfejl. --Hjart (talk) 19:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Forfatteren Just Mathias Thiele.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Forfatteren Just Mathias Thiele.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Forfatteren Just Mathias Thiele.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bust of N. L. Høyen.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bust of N. L. Høyen.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bust of N. L. Høyen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jens Lowson by Nicolai Dajon.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Jens Lowson by Nicolai Dajon.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jens Lowson by Nicolai Dajon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Harald Conradsen - Bertel Thorvaldsen.tif[edit]

Copyright status: File:Harald Conradsen - Bertel Thorvaldsen.tif

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Harald Conradsen - Bertel Thorvaldsen.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tågerup kirke - baptismal font, Denmark.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Tågerup kirke - baptismal font, Denmark.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tågerup kirke - baptismal font, Denmark.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Horbelev Kirke, prædikestol efter konservering.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Horbelev Kirke, prædikestol efter konservering.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Horbelev Kirke, prædikestol efter konservering.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Categories at File:Kopenhagen (DK), Kastell von Kopenhagen, Kastelskirken -- 2017 -- 1758.jpg[edit]

Hello! I don't understand your comment. Categories are for collecting all files belong to the category. It's not a kind of "valued image". So it can't be a reason to remove a file from a category if there is another image of the same object. BTW: The date is at the door. Please read Commons:Categories. --XRay 💬 07:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

BTW: For your reason please use gallery pages. --XRay 💬 07:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
User:XRay: Sorry but I don't get that point. Following your argumentation, more or less all images of buildings in Copenhagen could be added to Category:Windows in Copenhagen, Category: Doors in Copenhagen, Category: Roofs in Copenhagen etc. That would of course not make sense. When there is a lot of images available of a given subject, it makes more sense only to add the ones that are most relevant (highlight the specific feature the most) to a very specific category. I have seen similar points made on other category pages but do unfortunately not remember where.Ramblersen2 (talk) 07:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
BTW There are at least a dozen images of that particular building that could be added to the same category.Ramblersen2 (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
So please add them and please follow our guidelines. --XRay 💬 08:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
I agree with Ramblersen here. It makes no sense to completely overload categories just because a very minor detail in an image could maybe fit in there. Personally I really prefer to put only the best images of that detail in the category, because otherwise the category quickly becomes unnecessarily hard to manage. If you really must, I'll recommend that you create a category similar to Category:Distant views of Rubjerg Knude Fyr, so that the better files becomes easier to find for the rest of us. --Hjart (talk) 11:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
I disagree. If a category contains too much images it's time for subcategories. If you like to create a subcategory, please do it. (But please do not remove categories just for your idea.) And for a selection of images a gallery page is a good choice. If you like to have the best of a category, please use COM:VI. If you like to change our category system, please propose your idea at COM:FORUM. Here isn't a good place for these kind of discussions. --XRay 💬 13:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Categories are meant to collect all media files relevant to the category topic. For curated collections of media files, we use gallery pages. Repeated edits against this principle are considered to be vandalism. Changes to this policy can be discussed at Commons talk:Categories, but if I were you, I wouldn't get my hopes up too high. Cheers --MB-one (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Kastelskirken - Interior[edit]

Hej Ramblersen2

Jeg undrede mig lidt over, at du oprettede Category:Interior of Kastelskirken - Interior som en underkategori til Category:Kastelskirken - Interior. Er det en fejl, eller er der en tanke med det? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Hov, jeg troede det var kategori Kastelskirken. Viser efter min mening bare hvor forvirrende det er med de bindeestreger hvor det forkerte kommer først og den totale mangel på systematik i navngivning af kategorier.Ramblersen2 (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hekla 1891.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Hekla 1891.jpg

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hekla 1891.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Peter Schannong[edit]

Mon ikke du kunne tænke dig at oversætte den danske artikel om Category:Peter Schannong og måske finde nogle af de nævnte mindetavler? --Hjart (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Hjart::Joo hvis det ikke haster alt for meget. Og så passer det endda med at hans oeuvre lige er plevet public domain (men måske er det derfor du bringer det op netop nu).Ramblersen2 (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Det haster ikke nødvendigvis så meget: Jeg brugte bare en del tid på at finde billeder og organisere billeder mm, mens en uerfaren skrev artiklen og tænkte at den bedste chance for at få nogle af de manglende mindetavler med, kunne være dig. --Hjart (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Hjart: Efter at have set lidt mere på Peter Schannong er jeg lidt bekymret for manglen på substantielle kilder. De fleste af dem som anvendes i den danske artikel er jo blotte henvisninger til hvilke mindeplader han har opsat eller hans egen publikation om samme. Det er ikke fordi jeg ikke synes han er "notable" eller gerne vil skrive en engelsk artikel om ham, men jeg er lidt bange for at den uden bedre kilder på engelsk Wikipedia risikerer at blive nomineret til "speedy deletion". Det har jeg i al fald været ude for flere gange med artikler med langt bedre kilder, hvilket jo altid er lidt træls med artikler man har brugt tid på. I øvrigt er den danske artikel da startet af en efterkommer og seneste skud i firmaet Schannong, hvilket jeg ikke skal lave noget nummer ud af (den ser jo fin ud, i al fald efter at du har været den igennem) men vel strengt taget er imod Wikipedias retningslinjer.

Ok, det lyder lidt kedeligt. Der er ikke blevet sat spørgsmål ved notabilitet eller noget på dawiki og personligt syntes jeg jo også han var interessant, så det med kilderne faldt mig ikke ind.--Hjart (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Og så en helt anden ting: Jeg har prøvet at uploade Christian Geddes kort over Københavns 12 kvarterer i høj opløsning fra denne kilde, men det vil ikke virke. Når jeg vælger "download" og "original opløsning" ser det ud som om den downloader dem men jeg kan ikke efterfølge åbne og gemme dem. Jeg tænker at problemet er noget med størrelsen. Har du noget bud på hvad problemet er og hvordan jeg løser det? De ville virkelig være nyttige i den høje opløsning, da jeg tit bruger detalher fra dem og lige nu må nøjes med screen shots.Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Det lykkedes for mig. Den fylder ca 29 MB. Hvordan foretrækker du at jeg navngiver den? --Hjart (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Hjart: Alle tiders - mange tak. Hvordan de enkelte filer navngicves synes jeg ikke er så vigtigt - det kunne fx være "Christian Geddes kvarterskort - Snarens Kvarter" eller "Snarens Kvarter (Christian Gedde)" etc. Jeg vil så foreslå foreslå at man placerer hver af dem i en kategori kaldet "Category:Christian Gedde's map of Snarens Kvarter" eller simpelthen "Snarens Kvarter (Christian Gedde)" etc, hviri jeg så tillige vil placere alle mine utallige detalher af gader og enkelte ejendomme.Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Hjart: Undskyld hvis det er at spørge dumt (og det er bestemt ikke for at være utålmodig): Men du har ikke uploaded kvarterskortene endnu, vel? Jeg kan i al fald ikke finde dem nogle steder.Ramblersen2 (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Undskyld. Jeg kom fra det. Jeg er heller ikke vant til at se på de kort, så jeg kan ikke helt afgøre hvad de enkelte filer forestiller og jeg tænker at du heller ikke har brug for alle filerne i gruppen https://kbhbilleder.dk/s%C3%B8g?q=%22Geddes%20kort%22, så kan du ikke lave en liste over dem du gerne vil have + forslag til filnavne?--Hjart (talk) 13:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Hjart: Helt i orden. Jeg laver lige en liste til dig med direkte links og navne til de enkelte kort.Ramblersen2 (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Hjart: Jeg tror nok at alle de 12 kvarterskort er der nu - de er alle sammen fra 1757. Nogle af dem er fordelt på to filer og endvidere er der så et oversigtskort og en kartouche som jeg tænker også er gode at få med. Til sidst er der så hans eleverede kort som modsat alle de andre er fra 1761. Jeg er ked af at skubbe sådan et stort b øvl over på dig - som om du ikke har rigeligt at gøre herinde i forvejen - så du skal endelig bryde det op og tage det i det tempo som passer dig. Det haster ikke.Ramblersen2 (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Jeg har forsøgt at hente flere af dem, men det ser ud til at processen afbrydes midt i download, så indtil videre har jeg kun den ene. Måske det har noget med tidspunktet at gøre. Det er "original" og ikke "stor" du ønsker?
User:Hjart: Det lyder jo meget som det jeg også er ude for. Ja som udgangspunkt var det "original" jeg var ude efter for at kunne bruge små udsnit i bedst mulig kvalitet, men hvis ikke det kan lade sig gøre må jeg jå tage dem i "stor". Tak fordi du prøvede.Ramblersen2 (talk) 12:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)