User talk:Raoli/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →

Double / multiple votes for POTY 2010

Just to let you know, you can vote only for one image in the final round of POTY2010. I saw you voted for more ... please remove all your votes and leave just one, otherwise none of your votes will count. Have a nice day, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Please vote again

Hello Raoli,

The image you have voted for has been removed from the list afterwards. It was only added to the list because another image has been disqualified. But committee decided not to replace the disqualified image, now. Sorry for the trouble. Sincerely not a committee-member -- RE rillke questions? 08:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Madonna Pagliara.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Madonna Pagliara.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

- Darwin Ahoy! 22:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Italiano: (missing text)
Sull'opera in questione non vi è copyright poiché l'opera d'arte in questione è risalente a qualche secolo fa quindi l'autore è morto da più di 100 anni. Riguardo allo foto:l'immagine è senza copyright poiché il libro stesso contenente l'immagine è senza copyright. Perfavore potresti rimuovere l'avviso sull'immagine? Grazie
On the work in question, there isn't copyright because the work of art in question is dating a few centuries ago, so the author has been dead for over 100 years. About the picture: the image is not copyrighted because the book itself contains the image is not copyrighted. Please could remove the warning on the image? Thank You raul (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Raoli! No, I can't remove that warning, but you can replace it with {{subst:OP}} after you have followed the OTRS procedures described above, sending an email to that address explaining why this image is not copyrighted. The issue is only with the photograph itself, not with teh sculpture, of course.--- Darwin Ahoy! 23:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Marco da Gagliano.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marco da Gagliano.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rupertsciamenna (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

La cosa è stata verificata qui. Rupertsciamenna (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
sisi lo so, grazie.--raul (talk) 13:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Lo zen garden.JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lo zen garden.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Lo_zen_garden.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lo_zen_garden.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cl_sshot_20090122_012015_(2).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cl_sshot_20090122_012015_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 13:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MPP standard.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MPP standard.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MPP standard.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 23:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Palmarini Pio Manzù.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Palmarini Pio Manzù.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:MPP Black-and-white.tiff

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MPP Black-and-white.tiff. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MPP Black-and-white.tiff]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:MPP Lectio Magistralis.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MPP Lectio Magistralis.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Franco Venanti.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Franco Venanti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:MPP standard.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:MPP standard.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Polarlys (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I restored the file. Please insure that the permission is complete (OTRS ticket), otherwise it may be deleted again. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

OTRS

Ho risposto alla mail. Buon proseguimento, --Gnumarcoo 18:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Le hai già caricate tutte (vedi la sezione sopra a questa). Rimango in attesa per eventuali concessioni da parte dei fotografi. Le fotografie potranno essere cancellate nel frattempo, non richiederne il ripristino: se sarà l'occasione lo farò io. --Gnumarcoo 19:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Quella coda (permission-commons) la guardo solo di recente, provo a dare un occhio. --Gnumarcoo 19:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

-mattbuck (Talk) 19:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Risolto. --raul (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tennessee-ernie-ford.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Fernando Gago (Real Madrid).jpg

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses File:Fernando Gago (Real Madrid).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.

Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.


Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk bokmål | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Just look at the overall quality of that flickr users uploads. Thats not a photographer but just someone who is uploading some random internet files to his flickr. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Torre Unicredit - Cesar Pelli.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Torre Unicredit - Cesar Pelli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 11:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Frattale Julia di Wikiquote.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Frattale Julia di Wikiquote.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Teofilo (talk) 00:22, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Raoli, Raoli, Raoli...

Beccato!!! :D
Visto?? Appena hai rimesso piede da qualche parte ti ho subito scovato :)))))))
Dài, torna su Wikiquote (è tornato anche Micione), sapessi Donato come sarebbe contento, e come tutti - io, Creed, Donluca e pure il "malvagio" Nemo - tireremmo un sospiro di gioia ;)
A presto! --Spinoziano (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Wenceslas Square 1968.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wenceslas Square 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikiquote

Ho risposto in Commons:Bar_italiano#Cancellazione_avviso_di_cancellazione. Ciao--Trixt (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

File:View from our room.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:View from our room.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.167.13 14:05, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

{{OTRS pending}}

When adding an {{OTRS pending}} template, consider using {{subst:OP}} instead of typing in everything manually to avoid mistakes like this. Wrong month specified and wrong syntax. It's supposed to be {{OTRS pending|year=2012|month=August|day=6}}, but if you use {{subst:OP}}, today's date will automatically be filled in. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Cancellazioni e "mezzi illegittimi"

Non mi sarei mai aspettato di leggere una cosa come questa su un nostro utente, spero che in futuro staremo tutti piú tranquilli evitando di rovinare i rapporti di it.quote con Commons, che sono sempre stati ottimi. --Nemo 14:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Io non ho dato colpe a nessuno, ho solo detto che è spiacevole leggere certe cose. --Nemo 16:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Probabilmente intende "canvassing", che sia vero o no. Come dice Adams, don't panic. --Nemo 16:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Stop

You need to stop reopening this closed discussion. The files are clearly out of scope, and you have been providing nothing but illegitimate reasons in a ridiculous effort to skew the vote. In case it isn't already deadly obvious, nobody agrees with what you're doing, so stop it, now. That said, if you reopen this discussion again, I will not hesitate to block you from editing. Sincerely, FASTILY (TALK) 19:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

san Giovanni

va bene cc-by-sa-3.0. Io stavo qui, per la cronaca... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 20:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Rosetta Barnstar Hires.png The Rosetta Barnstar
I herby award you the Rosetta-Stone-Barnstar for your efforts in i18n. Rillke(q?) 13:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
At Special:Gadgets, you can see the messages (view source links) that are used for the headings.
{{Default-tag}} is used for marking a gadget as "default" (automatically, by a template logic) and can be also translated. Best regards -- Rillke(q?) 21:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all your translation. -- Rillke(q?) 22:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Dave Baggett.jpg

Ti ripeto quello che mi ha detto Fastily: benché un'e-mail fosse stata inviata a OTRS, non è stato possibile confermare alcuni dettagli di licenza, perché sembrava che la persona che avesse dato il permesso non ne avesse l'autorità. E' stata inviata un'email di chiarimenti alla persona che aveva mandato l'autorizzazione a OTRS, ma non è mai giunta replica, quindi il file è stato considerato senza licenza valida. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 19:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Pelu02.jpg

Ti rispondo nella mia talk -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Shakira on Soundcheck.ogv

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shakira on Soundcheck.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Toto'025.jpg

L'hai visto questo? Puoi fare qualcosa? --Micione (talk) 00:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

it:Categoria:Immagini del Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana

Come da oggetto. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bafta Icon.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bafta Icon.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 ■ MMXX talk 22:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Ho solo creato una versione senza sfondo dell'altra immagine file:Bafta Award.png, che ne so che quello che l'ha caricata, ha dichiarato il falso! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


File:Ayn Rand2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ayn Rand2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cgtdk (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

wikivoyage

ciao, ho visto la tua segnalazione al bar italiano. Ho fatto due proposte (40 e 41), van bene o sono fuori tempo massimo? i voti sono quelli alla sezione "support" ? ciao grazie--Pava (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Grazie a te, non è un problema se parto svantaggiato, è più il contributo finalizzato al progetto che m'interessa, non la "vittoria", certo se avrò qualche support mi farà solo che piacere. Ciao e grazie ancora --Pava (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Foto Metro

Il divieto è per motivi di sicurezza, non di copyright. Siccome le stazioni (ferroviarie, metropolitane, etc.) vengono considerate obiettivi di possibili attentati terroristici a motivo del grande traffico di persone che ivi si trova per molte ore al giorno, allora viene proibito di fare ricognizioni fotografiche non autorizzate all'interno, non all'esterno. Di fatto è un divieto sulla carta, come puoi vedere dalle foto del metro B Piramide che presi qui e qui, oppure la foto della banchina di Sant'Agnese/Annibaliano... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

caso NO FOP e ricostruzione grafica

Di per se il lavoro non richiede molto, anzi 2 minuti nemmeno 15; il più, per un edificio dalle forme "complesse" come quello bisognerà pensarci un bel po' per creare una cosa graficamente riuscita e soprattutto non violare alcun diritto. Quindi se ci metterò del tempo sarà per quello :). Ciao ciao --Pava (talk) 09:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Oddio, mi sembra un po' esagerato, cioè non tanto il discorso ma quanto l'operazione che tu consigli di fare, aldilà che non credo vada bene, cioè nella voce che parla dell'auditorium ci vanno foto dell'auditorium, la tolgono subito la foto della villa se messa come foto principale, capisci? Poi non credo nemmeno sia quello lo scopo di Wikipedia, puoi però inserire tu nella descrizione della foto una frase tipo " le rovine della villa romana: unica cosa che si può fotografare del complesso dell'auditorium" o cose così, ma non che si vada a fare questo tipo di politica dentro l'enciclopedia, penso che non dureremo un giorno --Pava (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
ho detto qualcosa che non va? :( --Pava (talk) 17:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
si si domani la faccio verticale, anche se mi sembra che la .png si veda tutta nella voce (ho fatto una prova) --Pava (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
me l'ero dimenticata, tuttavia non ho capito come gioverebbe che fosse verticale, anche perché temo che risulti meno leggibile, adesso provo --Pava (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
così? uno ? --Pava (talk) 18:50, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
o così?? due ??? o non ho capito? --Pava (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
mi fa piacere, anche se secondo me è meno leggibile. PS: comodo lo strumento che mi hai fatto scoprire, comodo anche commonist, anche se mi sembra un po' complicato (ammetto però che gli ho dato solo un'occhiata veloce). E' corretto che richieda di essere installato nel mio pc vero? Spero di usarlo presto. Ciao grazie --Pava (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
beh.. "facciamo" ...uhm.. non coinvolgermi in cose non pertinenti con il fine dell'enciclopedia :D. Comunque, se posso permettermi di darti un consiglio, usala solo per l'infobox. Ciao a presto --Pava (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Caricamento foto da Flickr

Ciao, facendomi un po' i fatti tuoi sulla tua pagina utente di commons ho trovato quel bel strumento che carica in automatico le immagini da flickr, funziona bene ed è semplice ma ho due domande da farti:

  • 1) come faccio a caricare tutte le foto di un album? invece di caricarle una ad una? tipo queste [1]?
  • 2) foto come questa [2] posso caricarla o la pubblicità ne compromette la bontà? posso togliere la pubblicità dopo averla caricata facendo " carica nuova versione di questo file" ?? --Pava (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

ciao grazie

grazie mille :) --Pava (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
scusami ma dove lo devo "incollare" quel codice? --Pava (talk) 22:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
e dove vedo i cambiamenti? mi aggiunge degli strumenti da qualche parte? o mi aggiunge qualcosa fra le preferenze e devo andare io ad aggiungerle fra gli accessori? perdonami ma non sono molto pratico di queste cose --Pava (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Disegni schematici

Ho visto quanto stai proponendo e ho visto l'immagine usata nella voce del Pirellone... la ritengo un'iniziativa interessante e spero che possa dare dei buoni frutti anche in prospettiva semmai del Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 riuscendo a strappare qualche permesso, se non in Commons almeno con una licenza non commerciale utilizzabile in it.wiki. In realtà, per essere coerenti, si dovrebbe utilizzare una gran quantità di fosforo bianco per bruciare numerosissime categorie di edifici del XX secolo comprese molte chiese inserite da me anche se esiste una linea di pensiero che afferma che un edificio "abbastanza anonimo" non ricada necessariamente tra quelle cancellabili (come se un oscuro ingegnere edile progettista di case popolari non abbia gli stessi diritti di un architetto...). ;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Altre foto in cancellazione: Torino

Beh, le foto del museo di torino dubito venga cancellato, sia esterni che interni perché non è di architetti in NO FOP e il restauro è su un precedente edificio che ha più di 70anni. Quindi non penso proprio sia questo il caso, tantomeno le foto della 500 e della linea di montaggio interna --Pava (talk) 09:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

ad essere sincero, non penso proprio che un rivestimento interno, un allestimento o un pannello vetrato applicato su un corpo di un edificio possa essere coperto da copyright, va bene tutto, ma è un caso di restauro su edificio già esistente, non penso che la legge lo includa, comunque ho un amico architetto, glielo chiedo, ma per quel che so è da escludere. Le macchine a maggior ragione, non c'entrano nulla --Pava (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Il mio amico è in verità il mio coinquilino, gliel'ho chiesto e ha detto che l'intervento effettuato al museo dell'automobile di Torino è di tipo "conservativo" (esterni e interni) e quindi non viene toccato da tale legge. Quelle foto quindi possono restare, tuttavia possiamo informarci meglio e recuperare fonti --Pava (talk) 21:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
si ma, non che ad ogni opera di restauro viene riconosciuta proprietà intellettuale artistica, un restauro è un restauro e non mi sembra in quel caso abbia un'originalità tale da essere coperta da copyright. Un'anonima casa, anche se fatta negli anni 70 e restaurata nel 2000, non è che se la fotografo rientra in tale restrizione. Cioè qui si tratta di una legge che parla di opere d'arte applicate in vari campi, quindi opere di rilevanza artistica o comunque opere in cui si evince la personalità dell'architetto. Il problema dell'Italia è che non ha restrizioni, ma questo non vuol dire che ogni edificio è un'opera d'arte, tanto meno un restauro conservativo di quel tipo. Le automobili commons le ha sempre tenute, così come gli oggetti di design industriale (mi ricordo che ne parlarono proprio 4 anni fa) quindi su auto e arredamento non ci sono problemi. L'unica cosa sono tutti questi edifici moderni --Pava (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
ah non so, bisognerebbe che ci fosse qualcuno che se intende, io non ho tali competenze, tu le hai? dobbiamo innanzitutto informarci cosa è in FOP, cioè per esempio, il centro direzionale di napoli sei sicuro che rientri nel no fop? per me di sicuro l'ara pacis non rientra nelle cancellazioni e nemmeno l'arco olimpico di torino, troppo semplici. Il vulcano buono chi lo sa, di chi è? è registrato? boh dovremmo informarci bene su queste cose e bisogna valutare caso per caso.. siam sicuri di avere noi la parola su cosa deve rimanere e cosa no? --Pava (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
ma come, il colosseo in cancellazione? cavolo ha più di 3000 anni, è morto quello che l'ha progettato O_O poi si che conta la semplicità perché bisogna che si superi la soglia di originalità perché l'opera venga riconosciuta ad un'architetto, e non credo che quell'arco la superi (per esempio), aldilà che non è altro che la trasposizione in Italia di un ben più famoso arco statunitense --Pava (talk) 00:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Star

Ciao Grazie! Non me ne avevano mai date su commons! In Italia preferiamo non applicare nella maniera più restrittiva i limiti del FOP, sennò non avremmo neanche una foto del Colosseo! Si è sviluppata una linea morbida di cancellare le img solo in caso di effettiva minaccia o problema (autori copyrighted, ecc). --Sailko (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A cosa ti riferisci in particolare? --Sailko (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Sei sicuro che non avevi proprio altro da fare? PS: il design può stare su commons quindi ok a maniglie, sedie, lampadari e quant'altro. --Sailko (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Va bene, tieni comunque conto che non mi riferivo alle foto di interni, ma agli oggetti di design: il design è qualcosa di riproducibile e i singoli oggetti non sono eleggibili per il FOP, né per altre menate. Lo so perché una volta, per una liberia di Ettore Sottsass, ci abbiamo perso due settimane di incazzature e poi alla fine avevo ragione io, è stata tenuta. Tra l'altro per le foto di Michelucci forse varrebbe la pena provare a sentire la fondazione prima di cancellarle, sono qui a firenze, contattabilissimi. --Sailko (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Leggi qua Per commons ci possono stare, non c'è diritto d'autore in quei casi. Vale per le auto e per tutti gli oggetti "utilitari". Ne sono certo perché sennò avrei smesso da un bel pezzo di fotografare oggetti di design. --Sailko (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
per farmi cacciare la lista dovresti prima mettermi sotto tortura..--Sailko (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

No FoP, no Parti (per andare a fare le foto...)

Certo che mi interessa vedere come la cosa si evolve! Ne avevo anche accennato in tono un po' polemico a Padova in occasione di un'assemblea di WMI asserendo che comunque la responsabilità grava eventualmente sull'uploader che la rilascia a licenza libera. Certo, è un eccesso (perché se è copyviol gli admin devono rimuovere la cosa ed eventualmente sanzionare l'uploader) ma tornando in tema l'iniziativa mi sembra lodevole per cercare di scuotere l'ambiente commonaro. Fino a che vengono cancellate delle foto relative ad anonime cittadine (conosciute semmai localmente dagli italiani) non interessa più di tanto ma immagino scocci molto di più agli utenti delle wikipedia in lingua straniera trovarsi un'immagine stilizzata di un monumento che rappresenta comunque una città (Milano, essendo poverina di monumenti storici imponenti viene più identificata (oltre al Duomo (neo)gotico) dal Pirellone) quando nemmeno si ponevano il problema, insomma IMHO è un nuovo pungolo in prospettiva Wiki Loves Monuments 2013... Secondo me bisognerebbe trovare qualche utente che scriva in inglese fluente che argomenti al Village Pump la situazione anomala ed il "pericolo" che per una visione troppo restrittiva del problema (semplicemente non capito dagli admin in lingua straniera, vedi il PD-Italia tanto bistrattato) faccia cancellare decine di migliaia di immagini, con un appesantimento di lavoro sporco o rischio di down dell'accesso a Commons per il troppo operare di bot armati di sega circolare.--Threecharlie (talk) 07:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)