User talk:Raso mk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Churces in Veles (city, municipality)[edit]

Hi. Category:Churches in Veles is one of the sub categories of and Category:Veles. So when we use Category:Churches in Veles, latter two categories are needless. Btw, are Category:St. George's Church (Veles) # Category:St. George's Church (Veles) in the city of Veles or in the municipality of Veles ? Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Wait a second. The church is in the city. But we have a category about a municipality to. And the Category:Churches in Veles must be renamed in Archpriest regency of Veles. Only because I figured these categories, please leave them as they are, why I need time. I will correct errors with the bot.--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 14:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Macedonia ohrid Makedonija .jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Macedonia ohrid Makedonija .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 10:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Transmitter in Ovce Pole[edit]

Hello Raso, did you have a picture from the transmitter in Ovce Pole? If so, can you upload it to Wikimedia Commons? In the picture here there is not the top of the transmitter. Greetings, --Radiohörer (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo. Nein, leider habe ich nicht. Wenn du was brauchst, schau mal hier :) --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 13:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Wohnst du in der Nähe und könntest du ein Foto machen? --Radiohörer (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Leider nicht. Bin bisschen weit weg ;) --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 23:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Macedonian 3a.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Macedonian 3a.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jespinos (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

File:Marko Krale.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marko Krale.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Redtigerxyz (talk) 10:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Frescos from St. Nicholas of Varoš 0189.JPG and others[edit]

  • 1) thats not folk art. Your use of PD-Macedonia isnt correct for many files. Folk art is for example a traditional design of clothing, a folk song, or something like that. That law protects folk art from beeing removed from the public by copyright claims. The works you uploaded are simply old works or cultural heritage, but thats not what the copyright law means.
  • 2) the only tag for uploading this photos is PD-Art
  • This means you cant upload files like File:Frescos from St. Nicholas of Varoš 0189.JPG. Why?
    • Thats a photographic work (!!!!!)
    • the photographic work is by no way folk art or cultural heritage or something of this sort. Its simply a copyrighted photo.
    • The photo is not exempted from copyright, nor is the photographer dispossessed from his intelectual property rights

Please remove all photos that show 3D-structures. --Martin H. (talk) 16:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

OK, I will remove such photos. But PD-Macedonia is macedonian version and substitute for PD-Art, or no??? Sommetimes i do not see that od the photos are 3D objects. Sorry!--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 16:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
No, see the template: For works in the public domain due to age, use PD-old templates. Thats PD-Art, in most cases here {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}}. But that can only work for 2D works, photographs of 3D works are not free since the photographer gets a copyright for making the photo. --Martin H. (talk) 04:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
OK, das ist mir alles klar, nur manchmal sehe ich nicht das auf einige Photos 3D Objekte sind. Passiert, sorry. Weil du Admin bist, kannst du mir sagen ob der Lizenz auf diese Photo in Ordnung ist? Danke --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 09:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Sprichst du fließend Deutsch? Kann ich auf Deutsch antworten? --Martin H. (talk) 17:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Sicher, kannst du!--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 17:34, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Die Lizenz für File:Freska na Sv. Kiril i Metodij od Sv. Pantelejmon Svetanski.jpg muss ebenfalls {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}} sein. Es handelt sich um ein Foto eines nicht geschützten Werks, der Fotograf erlangt kein Urheberrecht, weil er ein 2D-Werk nur in 2D wiedergibt, so wie in Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag beschrieben. Nicht richtig ist {{PD-Macedonia}}. {{PD-Macedonia}} ist keine Begründung, warum der Fotograf kein Urheberrecht erlangt. --Martin H. (talk) 01:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Korrektur: Wenn das Fresko File:Freska na Sv. Kiril i Metodij od Sv. Pantelejmon Svetanski.jpg tatsächlich erst 1913 entstanden ist, ist die Frage nach dem Tod des Urhebers zu stellen und {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}} natürlich zu korrigieren. PD-old-"100" müsste entsprechend des Todesjahres angepasst werden. PD-old-"X" kann auch nicht durch {{PD-Macedonia}} ersetzt werden, nur weil es ein religiöses Motiv ist, ist es noch lange keine Folklore sondern immer noch eine individuelle Schöpfung des Urhebers. --Martin H. (talk) 01:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Sv. Bogorodica Bolnička 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sv. Bogorodica Bolnička 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

217.60.112.117 12:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Trnica Ruina.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Trnica Ruina.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 01:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

It was upload mistake. Its OK now. --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 08:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Matka (Q4284847) und Power plants[edit]

Hallo Raso, die Kategorie [1] war schon vorhanden. Ich habe doch nur die Bilder von der Begriffsklärung verschoben. Die Freskokategorie hatte Foroa 2012 bei Matka einsortiert. Die Dorfkategorie hattest du schon 2009 angelegt [2].

Und was stört dich an Category:Power plants in the Republic of Macedonia? Findest du en:Category:Power stations in the Republic of Macedonia wegen der missverständlichen "plants" (Pflanzen) besser? Mir ist das egal, aber falls ja müsstest du wahrscheinlich eine Änderung des gesamten Kategoriebaums Category:Power plants diskutieren. Holger1959 (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Über die Fresken habe ich später gesehen. Ist OK. Nur das ist komisch. Warum?--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 00:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Die Beschreibung "TEC Negotino" habe ich aus deinem Dateinamen übernommen. Da stand vorher nur die Commonist-Info. Die Kategorie "Negotino" passt auch dazu, oder ist das an einem anderen Ort?
Die Kraftwerkskategorie habe ich fürs internationale Schema geändert, weil bestimmt 90% der Mazedonien-Kategorien "…in the Republic of Macedonia" heißen, wahrscheinlich damit es eindeutig ist. In Category:Macedonia sind momentan auch wieder Bilder drin (Mazedonien oder Griechenland, manchmal auch Bulgarien, Albanien oder so). Ähnliches Problem wie bei Category:Galicia (Ukraine oder Spanien). Wenn die Uploader nicht schreiben, wo genau sie ein Bild fotografiert haben und keine Koordinaten dabei sind, dann ist das Sortieren schwierig. Holger1959 (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Guck mal no:Negotino kraftverk (Q15448289). Holger1959 (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Das ist alles Ok, nur das mit Name ist ein Problem hier. Früher die 90% von der Kategorien waren gennant nur Mazedonien. Nach griechische Propaganda die waren geändert. Das mit Galizien kannst du nicht vergleichen. Hier reden wir über Name von ein Land. Ist nur ein Macedonia. Ich versuche nur Fair und Gleichheit bei Commons zu bringen. Wen du in Zukunft eine Kategorie siehst, das nur die Name Macedonia steht (ohne Republic), lass das bite stehen. Gruesse --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 10:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, Antwort nicht mehr bemerkt. Ok, das mit dem Ärger um den Ländernamen kann ich ein bisschen verstehen. Aber auf Commons sind die meisten Kategorien doch auf Englisch und in lateinischer Schrift, also eh nicht "Originalname". Wichtig finde ich, dass Kategorien einheitlich und eindeutig sind. Deswegen hatte ich zum Beispiel auch ca. 20 Bilder aus Category:Manastir umsortiert (jetzt {{disambig}}). Die waren fast alle aus anderen Ländern. :) Mit "in/of Macedonia" gibt es auch noch Kategorien mit Bildern aus anderen Ländern, zB. von Bergen. Das ist dann etwas verwirrend. Grüße Holger1959 (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Bobby enjoying coffee in Struga (2555493645).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bobby enjoying coffee in Struga (2555493645).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Magare & Bobby (2555503069).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Magare & Bobby (2555503069).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Skopje Kale 15 - Impression of Skopje (2934925383) (4).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Skopje Kale 15 - Impression of Skopje (2934925383) (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Vodno Macedonia 01 (3434634027) (4).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vodno Macedonia 01 (3434634027) (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Vodno Macedonia Flag 02 (3435440070) (4).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vodno Macedonia Flag 02 (3435440070) (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bitola, Macedonia (8181584639).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bitola, Macedonia (8181584639).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Mazedonien 2013 (Bitola) (8700456177).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mazedonien 2013 (Bitola) (8700456177).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Porta Makedonija[edit]

Hallo, gibt es einen Unterschied in der Bedeutung zwischen Category:Triumph gate (Skopje) und Category:Porta Makedonija? Wenn nicht, dann wäre {{category redirect}} möglich. Mir scheint Porta Makedonija als Eigenname (proper noun) besser zu sein. Holger1959 (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Nein. Ist selbe. Mache ich mit bot.--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 09:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
super, danke! Holger1959 (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Kičevski Muzej (43).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kičevski Muzej (43).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Category[edit]

Hello! I came to ask what is wrong with the Category:Georgi Zografski? I know he is considered Macedonian in Republic of Macedonia but since there is a dispute, the Macedonian transliteration is inappropriate because it will mean taking side. Since the spelling Georgi Zografski is universal why do you disagree with using it?--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Види Алиса. Значи немам намера и тука да расправам за вашите претензии. Човекот е Македонец и Македоснки сликар, кој со своја нема стапнато во Бугарија. Творел за Македонија и умрел за и во Македонија. Тука нема место за компромиси и двојни и тројни именувања, а уште помалку за бугарски транскрибирања на имиња. Многупати е дискутирано, и треба еднаш да разберете дека постајат и други луѓе на светов освен Бугари. Истото гледам и пред некој ден си ја преименувала црквата во Кожле. Како прво универзалното име е Вознесение, а не Св. Спас (така е главната категорија), а како второ името на селото (се надевам не е намерно) си го напишала на Бугарски. Ако толку се држите до бугарштината, одите и сменете и го името на Дилма Русеф, бидејќи гледам дека не е на бугарски напишано. Затоа ќе те замолам да ги оставиш тие работи како што се. Поздрав и пријатен престој на Вики ризницата.--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 11:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Well all claims on his nationality must be taken into account if they are sourced because all points of view must be reflected in the category. I have cited sources that says he is Bulgarian, his father and grand-father also, so there is obviously a dispute which you cannot ignore. The church in Kozhle is absolutely different story and I don't mind if you insist on less popular but more academic name. I have never written Kozhle in Bulgarian in the category since the language uses the cyrillic alphabet. Best regards to you too.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
See here that Georgi is universally used for transliterating this name and since there is a dispute on Georgi Zografski's nationality, we should stick to more neutral spelling.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 12:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Непознавањето на јазикот неможе да ти дава право да менуваш значење на име. Георги е едно, а Ѓорѓи (Гьоргьи) е друго. Во Македонија постојат двете имиња и тоа не е исто. И не се изговараат исто. Во Бугарија можете и Клинтон да го сметате за Бугар, но едно е реалноста, а друго желбата. Ако не разбираш, или несакаш да разбереш предлагам ова да се реши преку арбитража. --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 13:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Which language? In Bulgarian Георги is pronounced exactly Гьоргьи and corresponds completely to the pronunciation of Ѓорѓи so the transliteration should be the same. For example your president's first name Ѓорѓe in Bulgarian is Георге - ergo it is the same name.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Во Македонскиот јазик не е исто. Како прво претседателот не е Ѓорѓе, туку Ѓорге. Како второ во Македонија има имиња и Ѓорѓи и Георги, a со тоа и адекватни презимиња од типот на Георгиев/ски. Чирс--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 09:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
My point was that Georgi encompasses both spellings since Георги in Bulgarian encompasses both Ѓорѓи and Георги.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 09:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Нема никаква потреба од арбитража. Правилото е да се користи правопис според оној што важи во земјата кајшто живеело лицето, а не дали е тој разбирлив за поголем број луѓе или не. За таа цел постојат повеќејазични описи во секоја категорија. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Зовик или Градешница[edit]

Здрасти. Тука пишеш "Свети Атанас" от Зовик, но гледам тука пише "Свети Димитър" от Градешница? Некаква грешка? --Мико (talk) 07:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

да, да....видов. Имаш право. Средена е работата, уште да побарам да се премести податотеката. Фала. Позз--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 10:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

И пак аз. Бач или Брод? --Мико (talk) 14:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Дефинитивно е Бач. Грешка е во авторите на разгледницата. Се консултирав и со луѓе од Бач. Еве доказ. Позз--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 21:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
ОК. Браво, че го сменим и при нас. --Мико (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

И пак аз. Гледай тука некви много файлове, но немат категории. Ти по-добре ги познаваш категориите за църквите, защото ти си ги и правил повечето. Да ги добавиш, когато намериш време? --Мико (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Знам за нив. Тие слики се околу 6000 на број. Од натпреварот што го имавме. Тие и ми се во план. Ќе бидат средени--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 17:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Ооо - 6000. Добре, и аз че помогнем. Като видим некоя, че категоризирам. --Мико (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

btw Јас освоив прво место како најголем прикачувач на слики :) --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 20:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Хаха - браво - ай честито! :) А, ей тия [3] пишеш 15 век - ама ми се гледат да са от 19, да не и 20 век. --Мико (talk) 20:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Па преку 20 извора проверив и секаде пишува најкасно 15 век....најстариот е од 12.--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 15:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Raso mk,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


Radiovces plants[edit]

Hi Raso mk, please categorize the species of the plants in your images. Keep in mind that Commons has a project scope and that contributed images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Therefore keep it educational and let us know what plant species can be found in Radiovces! Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Raso mk,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Military Parade Marks Iran's National Army Day (8660757380).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (102).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (102).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thiotrix (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (106).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (106).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thiotrix (talk) 09:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (19).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (19).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thiotrix (talk) 09:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (29).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niz dvorot od Rašo 2013- 16 maj (29).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thiotrix (talk) 09:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)