User talk:Recitation-bot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Recitation-bot!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g001.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DNA-Analysis-Indicates-That-Asian-Elephants-Are-Native-to-Borneo-and-Are-Therefore-a-High-Priority-pbio.0000006.g001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plant-Virus-Ecology-ppat.1003304.g001.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plant-Virus-Ecology-ppat.1003304.g001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g008.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prophylactic-versus-Therapeutic-Fingolimod-Restoration-of-Presynaptic-Defects-in-Mice-Suffering-pone.0170825.g008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Getting bot up to speed[edit]

@Daniel Mietchen: Hi Daniel. Bot is locked and due to insufficient data in uploads, files are being deleted. We need to get a circuit breaker to resolve this matter. Some of the concerns raised are valid and a face needs to appear to resolve the matters. That said, I would have hoped that people could have worked with you rather than just walk around slamming doors.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks, we think the problem is fixed but did not have a chance yet to test the fix in a new environment. To follow progress, see this bug list. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I have recovered some of the deleted images/figures and added the licence and information templates. [Tonight my time I will see what I can easily resurrect. (if I remember)] I note that some of the images had metadata that could have been extractable into the information template. I feel that Commons could look to test/check the metadata for such files prior to nominating for deletion, and have put a discussion topic to admins about this. At the same time, your upload bot could also avoid some of the issues with enough data. Life is a conundrum. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
There are some here that wish to have a level of 100% purity, and would rather delete than do a little legwork to fix other's errors or omissions. I find their approach disappointing, and not in the wikimedia spirit, but that is my problem.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Thanks. The problem with the bot that day was that — as a result of an oversight during a substantial rewrite — it had split up the uploads into one part in the file namespace that was missing the metadata and another part with the metadata, which ended up in gallery space, as per bugs #62 and #63 and the potential fix. Is there anything like a test wiki for Commons? We are eying http://test.wikipedia.org/ now, and once we have a few test uploads there, I will file the bot permission. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: @Billinghurst: @Daniel Mietchen: We've had a fix ready for the issue that resulted in the block of Recitation-bot and would like to test it on test.wikipedia.org but it seems the block is global. Can you change the block to a local block so that we can test our fix and then request to be unblocked on commons? Thanks! - User:Dfko